Politics
Rivers PDP Welcomes INEC’S De-Registration Of Political Parties
The Peoples’ Democratic Party (PDP) in Rivers State has said it is pleased with the deregistration of 74 political parties by the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC).
The State PDP spokesman, Darlington Orji who stated this to The Tide in Port Harcourt said the decision would ensure that only strong parties participate in future elections.
While noting that most of the parties merely exist on the social media, Orji said the constitution is clear on the conditions to meet to become a political party.
According to him, “Some of this political parties only exist in the social media. The constitution is very clear on the conditions to meet before you can be called a political party.
“For me people should be serious in building a political party, rather than making a caricature of the whole thing.
“Take for instance what happened in the 2019 general elections in Rivers State where a political party that did not exist, didn’t even have one ward chairman in Rivers state and their candidate almost emerged as the Governor of the State.
“You see that this people are just there to cause confusion,” the State spokesman of the PDP stated.
Meanwhile, INEC has said the de-registration of 74 parties was not a punitive measure but aimed at sanitising the nation’s electoral system.
Chief Press Secretary to the INEC Chairman, Rotimi Onyekanmi, stated this while speaking to newsmen and urged anyone unhappy with the decision to seek legal redress.
“The commission did not take the decision as a punitive measure against political parties. We were just implementing section 225A of the Constitution, the fourth alteration made by the National Assembly.
“And the alteration set some criteria that political parties must now fulfil moving forward, after every four years,” the media aide explained.
During a press conference held in Owerri, the coalition called the campaign a “dangerous and shameful display” designed to distract the public from the governor’s performance in office.
The CSOs directly linked the Greater Imo Initiative (GII) —the group that made the allegations on September 4, 2025—to Governor Uzodimma, describing the group as his “mouthpiece and attack dog.”
“Every word spoken against INEC was spoken on his behalf.
“By falsely alleging that Professor Yakubu has an alliance with Dr. Amadi to compromise the 2027 elections, Uzodimma has not only maligned a man of proven integrity but also assaulted the very foundation of our democracy”, said Dr Agbo Frederick, speaking for the coalition.
The coalition described Professor Yakubu as a “beacon of electoral professionalism” and called the attempt to soil his reputation “defamatory and a national security risk.”
They also defended Dr. Amadi, a “respected development scholar,” stating that the governor’s accusations were “laughable, desperate, and dangerous.”
The CSOs see the motive behind the campaign as an attempt to “silence the dissent, intimidate the opposition, and divert attention from the governor’s abysmal record in office.”
The coalition issued four key demands to Governor Uzodimma: An immediate retraction of the false and defamatory allegations against Professor Mahmood Yakubu and Dr. Chima Amadi.
- A public apology to both men within seven days, to be published in at least three national newspapers and broadcast on major television networks.
- An end to diversionary tactics and proxy propaganda.
- A renewed focus on governance, including addressing insecurity, unemployment, and poverty in Imo State.
The CSOs warned that failure to comply would force them to “review our position with a view to seeking legal redress from Governor Uzodimma for defamation, false accusation, and reckless endangerment of lives.”
“Governor Uzodimma must be reminded that he did not find himself in the seat of power to chase shadows.
“We call on all Nigerians to reject Uzodimma’s diversionary antics as they are nothing short of desperate plots by a government terrified of accountability”, the statement concluded.
In a statement signed by its National Publicity Secretary, Mallam Bolaji Abdullahi, the ADC expressed concern that preventing the senator from resuming her legislative duties violates democratic principles and disenfranchises her constituents.
“The suspension, having been imposed by the Senate and not a court of law, has lapsed. Any further attempt to prevent her from resuming is therefore both illegal and morally indefensible,” Mallam Abdullahi said.
The party noted that denying Sen. Akpoti-Uduaghan access to the chamber silences the voice of the people who elected her, adding that the withdrawal of her salary, aides, and office access during the suspension amounted to excessive punishment.
The ADC also criticised the Clerk of the National Assembly for declining to process her resumption on grounds that the matter was before the courts, arguing that the Clerk’s role was administrative, not judicial.
“Administrative caution must not translate into complicity. When the administrative machinery becomes hostage to political interests, the institution itself is diminished,” the party stated.
Highlighting that Sen. Akpoti-Uduaghan is one of only four women in the 109-member Senate, the ADC warned that the handling of the case sends a discouraging signal about gender inclusion in Nigerian politics.
“Any action that resembles gender intimidation of the few women in the Senate would only discourage women’s participation. Nigeria cannot claim to be a democracy while excluding half of its population from key decision-making spaces,” Mallam Abdullahi added.
The ADC insisted that Sen. Akpoti-Uduaghan be allowed to resume her seat immediately, stressing that the matter was about more than one individual.
“What is at stake here is not just one Senate seat, but the integrity of our democracy itself,” the party said.
