Editorial
Bill Gates’ Challenge
American billionaire and founder of Microsoft Corporation, Mr Bill Gates recently caused the Federal Government of Nigeria some discomfort and ignited a national discourse when he gave his verdict on the economic recovery template of the present administration.
Addressing stakeholders at the special session of the National Economic Council (NEC) meeting presided over by Vice President Yemi Osinbajo at the Presidential Villa in Abuja on Thursday, March 22, 2018, Mr Gates faulted the Economic Recovery and Growth Plan (ERGP) of the President Muhammadu Buhari-led administration, pointing out that the plan needs to be reworked if the country hopes to make progress and achieve sustainable economic growth and development.
According to the Co-chair of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the Nigerian government’s economic recovery blueprint is heavy on infrastructural development without a corresponding emphasis on human capital development, and therefore, could not be the solution to Nigeria’s economic woes.
In his words, “To anchor the economy over the long term, investment in infrastructure and competitiveness must go hand in hand with investment in the people.
“People without roads, ports and factories can’t flourish. And roads, ports and factories without skilled workers to build and manage them can’t sustain an economy”.
Mr Gates urged the Federal Government to have a rethink on the nation’s investment strategy and lamented a situation where Nigeria ranks among the worst places to give birth in the world even though it has capacity to be among Upper Middle Income status countries like Brazil, China, Mexico, etc.
The Tide salutes the courage and audacity of the American businessman for not only speaking the truth but telling it in no unambiguous terms right to the faces of the top actors and managers of the Nigerian economy.
We note that several other notable Nigerians within and outside the country had made similar observations. Personalities like the World Bank Director and former Minister of Finance, Mrs Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala, former Minister of Education, Dr Oby Ezekwesili, former Governor of the Central Bank, Mallam Sanusi Lamido Sanusi and former President Olusegun Obasanjo, among others have, at various times, drawn attention to the nation’s economic drift while the government has remained lethargic, clueless and listening to itself alone.
Even though the economy is said to be exiting recession, the manufacturing sector has gone comatose, inflation rate remains double digit, cost of living remains very high, life expectancy keeps going down, businesses are folding up, the unemployment market is swelling unabated, while millions of jobs are lost every year. Worse, our young people continue to leave the country in droves in search of opportunities even as many of them die in the Mediterranean while others are sold into slavery.
It is sad that malaria is still a major killer in Nigeria while nearly all the countries of the world wait on us to sound a global death knell on polio. But for Sierra Leone, Chad and Central African Republic, Nigeria has the worst infant and maternal mortality record in the world while we have the most number of out-of school children in the globe. Yet, stagnancy, decay and disintegration characterise our educational sector due to systemic failure.
It is, indeed, curious and worrisome that the Buhari administration has no visible economic team to fashion a workable solution to the mountain of economic challenges facing the country; rather the cabinet is made up of square pegs in round holes.
It is against this backdrop that we urge the Federal Government to wake up from its siesta and respond appropriately to Mr Gates’ challenge by reordering its priorities and setting up the right framework for Nigeria’s economic recovery, growth and development. Action in this regard must be swift, pragmatic and diligent in order to stop the agonising and excruciating experience Nigerians are going through at the moment.
Perhaps, it is worth reminding the All Progressives Congress (APC)-led Federal Government that there is greater honour and pride in uplifting the living conditions of the people than there can ever be in glory of electoral victory.
Editorial
Champions At Last: Well Done, Flamingos
Editorial
Kula Tragedy, Needless Loss Of Lives
Editorial
INEC’s Threat Alert Deserves Urgent Attention
The Independent National Electoral Commission’s (INEC) disclosure of an alleged plot to target its ad hoc personnel ahead of the 2027 general elections demand urgent national attention. The reported arrest of suspects, with intelligence support from the Department of State Services (DSS), is encouraging, but must not breed complacency. Any attack on electoral workers threatens not only human lives but also Nigerians’ constitutional right to choose their leaders through credible elections. The alleged conspiracy must be thoroughly investigated, its sponsors identified and all those found culpable prosecuted.
Particularly troubling is the reported targeting of National Youth Service Corps (NYSC) members, who play a vital role in Nigeria’s electoral process. Many serve far from home and undertake sensitive assignments at polling units and other electoral locations. As civilians, they should not be exposed to intimidation, abduction or violence without adequate protection. If election workers are vulnerable, the safety of other officials, observers and voters cannot be guaranteed.
Nigeria’s electoral history offers painful lessons. Human Rights Watch reported in Nigeria’s Post-Election Violence, published in May 2011, that more than 800 people died in the violence following the 2011 general elections. NYSC members serving as electoral officials were among the victims. This tragedy underscores the deadly consequences of political tension, incitement and disputed outcomes. Nigeria must act on the latest warning before another preventable disaster occurs.
INEC deserves recognition for uncovering the alleged plot, while the DSS and other security agencies merit commendation for their reported assistance. However, arrests are only the beginning. Investigators must establish the suspects’ identities, motives, networks and intended targets, ensuring that evidence is admissible in court. The process must remain impartial and free from political interference. Credible public updates are also necessary, provided they do not compromise investigations or operational security.
The authorities must adopt a comprehensive, intelligence-led security strategy for 2027. INEC’s proposed security conference should produce practical measures developed in collaboration with the Inter-Agency Consultative Committee on Election Security (ICCES), the police, the DSS and other relevant agencies. Threat assessments should guide personnel deployment, secure transportation, emergency communications, evacuation procedures and rapid response. Protection must extend beyond polling day to the distribution of sensitive materials, collation centres and the safe return of ad hoc personnel.
Those who provide intelligence must also be protected from retaliation. Confidential reporting channels and appropriate safeguards should be established for informants and others assisting investigations. Equally, security deployments must not intimidate voters or facilitate political repression. Personnel should act professionally, impartially and proportionately, within the law. Clear mechanisms for reporting misconduct and investigating abuses are essential to maintaining public confidence.
The threat also highlights broader concerns about trust in the electoral system. The European Union Election Observation Mission’s June 2023 final report identified shortcomings in transparency and operational implementation during Nigeria’s 2023 general elections, alongside concerns about the legal framework and electoral dispute resolution. Credible elections require more than security; they depend on transparent procedures, accountable officials and consistent enforcement of electoral laws. INEC must demonstrate measurable progress in addressing previously identified weaknesses.
Voter apathy presents another challenge. INEC’s published figures indicate that approximately 25 million people voted in the 2023 presidential election, out of about 93.5 million registered voters, a turnout of roughly 26.7 per cent. Although insecurity is not the sole cause of low participation, threats against electoral personnel can heighten public anxiety and discourage voters from exercising their franchise. INEC should strengthen civic education, improve polling accessibility and communicate procedures clearly. Political parties, civil society and the media must promote peaceful participation and reject electoral intimidation.
Misinformation and manipulated digital content pose additional risks. False reports, fabricated announcements and deepfake videos can inflame tensions, impersonate officials and mislead voters. INEC should establish a well-resourced, rapid-response communication system supported by verified digital channels and timely public statements. Collaboration with credible media organisations and fact-checkers would help counter falsehoods without suppressing legitimate criticism. Clear, consistent communication is indispensable, as administrative confusion and delayed explanations often allow rumours to spread.
Electoral integrity must also begin within INEC itself. The chairman’s warning against partisanship, negligence, extortion and ethical misconduct deserves serious attention. Security measures cannot compensate for officials who abuse their positions or disregard established procedures. INEC should strengthen staff training, ensure transparent recruitment and deployment, provide secure channels for reporting misconduct and enforce disciplinary rules consistently. Allegations of bribery and political interference must be investigated regardless of rank, while ad hoc personnel should receive adequate briefing, support and prompt payment.
The legal framework also requires clarity and consistent enforcement. INEC should explain the precise provisions and applicability of Section 26 of the Electoral Act 2026, including the obligations of electoral officials and security personnel, and publish authoritative guidance on neutrality and professional conduct. Complaints by opposition parties that they have been prevented from campaigning in certain states must likewise be investigated impartially. Any established violations should attract appropriate corrective action. Electoral fairness requires not only impartial polling officials but also lawful campaigning, access to competing viewpoints and freedom from intimidation.
The alleged plot against INEC’s ad hoc personnel is a warning against complacency ahead of the 2027 general election. Governments, security agencies, INEC, political parties and civil society must work together to prevent violence, punish misconduct and protect citizens’ participation. The commission should communicate its security priorities, maintain accessible threat-reporting channels and provide periodic updates on preparedness. Nigeria’s democracy cannot be safeguarded by assurances alone; it requires demonstrable preparation, impartial law enforcement and an unwavering commitment to free, fair and credible elections.
-
Rivers3 days ago
NUJ Set To Attend UNIPORT’s 217th Inaugural Lecture
-
News3 days agoNJC Suspends Three Judges, Sanctions Eight Others
-
Politics3 days ago
Atiku Kicks-Off 2027 Campaign, Promises To Tackle Nigeria’s Challenges
-
Featured3 days agoAPC Presidential Campaign Storms PH, ‘Morrow
-
News3 hours agoArmy Recovers X Account After Hack Attempt
-
News3 days ago
FG Explains Supply Disruption As Power Generation Drops To 3,659MW
-
Metro3 days ago
Port Harcourt Prepares For 10,000 Runners As International Marathon Returns
-
News3 days agoBille Gas Leak: Coalition Tasks FG On Proactive Measures
