Editorial
Nigeria And The Ebola Scare

An injunction placed at the gate of Uyo Magistrate Court in compliance with the indefinite nationwide strike in Uyo last Friday. The strike was however suspended last Saturday.
The death of a Liberian in Lagos said to
have died of Ebola virus has brought
home the fear of the scourge currently ravaging some of the Central and West African countries. It has also engaged the attention of the world and the reason is obvious, Ebola is dangerous.
Ebola is considered to be worse than HIV/AIDS not because it has no known cure or vaccine, its effect on victims is rather fast and excruciating. Infected persons face painful death in days. So far, about 720 persons are known to have died of the virus in Central, Southern and West Africa.
The Ebola virus, classified as a zonotic disease came to limelight in 1976 from forest bats along the Ebola Rivers in Zaire, now Democratic Republic of Congo. It is said to have been transmitted to chimpanzees, monkeys and a few other animals when they feed on infected animals and fruits. Men contract the virus through handling or and eating of infected animals, especially ‘bush meat’ as well as the keeping of games and pets.
Regrettably, Ebola virus has claimed many lives including healthcare providers. Only recently, a frontline medical doctor in Liberia, Samuel Brisbane died of the virus and so did another doctor in Uganda, while an American aid worker, Nancy Writebol was said to have tested positive to the virus. On Tuesday, July 20, 2014 another frontline doctor, Umar Khan reportedly died of the virus in Sierra Leone.
Infected persons exhibit symptoms ranging from diarrhea, bleeding, high temperature, haemorrhagic fever and sore throat among others. Thankfully the Federal Ministry of Health says no Nigerian has been infected with the virus, even as medical experts warn against the consumption of “bush meat”, as well as physical contact with infected persons, by way of hand-shake, sexual intercourse and exposure to wild animals and birds.
The situation has become scary that the corpse of a Nigerian flown home to Anambra State from Liberia raised fears and caused federal authorities to carry out autopsy on the corpse to reassure the people.
We think that more than any other time, Nigerians need to be very cautious as conditions that predispose the population to the virus appear to be everywhere. Nigeria’s close interaction with some countries with the virus is an issue. Also worrisome is the preponderance of slum settlements and a culture that cherishes the “bush meat” delicacy.
Though there are concerns about the spread of the virus world-wide, concerted actions are ongoing to contain and prevent it from overwhelming the population, especially, in Africa. Moreso, the World Health Organisation, WHO and the European Union have put in place facilities and strategies to combat the scourge.
The Tide commends the Lagos State Government for the prompt action following the death of the Liberian. It quickly quarantined the hospital where the Liberian died and identified 47 persons that had contact with the deceased while searching for those on the same flight with him. We also commend the elaborate plan set in motion by the Rivers State Government on the subject.
Already, Arik Air has suspended flight to countries with Ebola record and advised others to do likewise. This the Nigerian government must enforce, even as the recent ban on bringing of corpses from abroad is a move in the right direction.
While we expect citizens to report suspected cases, we believe that this is the time medical personnel and other stakeholders, especially, the mass media should synergise towards providing the needed sensitisation.
There must be effective plan for adequate surveillance on the Ebola disease as well as diagnoses and containment strategy. In as much as it is good to isolate or quarantine infected persons, the authorities must request and confirm health certifications from pet owners and importers of animals and birds into the country.
Perhaps, this is one reason health workers, who have been on strike for so long, should reconsider their stand and go back to work to help save the population.
Editorial
2027: Beyond IGP’s Billboards Protection Order
As Nigeria moves toward the 2027 general elections and campaign activities intensify, violence against opposition politicians has become an issue that can no longer be overlooked. What should be a season of competing ideas is increasingly turning into a test of intimidation, and early signs suggest that those challenging the ruling establishment are the primary targets.
It was, therefore, welcome news when the Inspector-General of Police, Olatunji Disu, warned politicians, political thugs and others against destroying, defacing or removing campaign posters, banners and billboards. In a statement issued in Abuja by the Force Public Relations Officer, CSP Ani Iniedu, the police condemned such acts as political intolerance, directed Commissioners of Police in all 36 States and the Federal Capital Territory to take preventive measures, and warned that sponsors would also face prosecution. The police rightly described such vandalism as a criminal act that undermines parties’ and candidates’ freedom to canvass for votes.
But billboards are replaceable; human lives are not. While applauding the IGP’s stance, we urge him to extend the same stern warning and enforcement zeal to thugs who assault opposition members during campaigns. A police force that punishes the tearing of a poster but ignores the breaking of a skull will have its priorities questioned. Allowing such attacks to continue could erode the foundations of our democracy.
Consider the African Democratic Congress (ADC) presidential campaign flag-off in Sokoto State on November 4, 2026. The party alleged that the State Government denied it access to public facilities, sealed its campaign venue and pressured hotels to reject its delegates, forcing it to hold the rally at its secretariat. The Sokoto authorities, however, denied instructing hotels to turn guests away. More seriously, two suspected ADC supporters were reportedly shot along the Sokoto–Wurno Road while travelling to the venue, allegedly by operatives of the Sokoto State Community Guards.
Whatever the truth of these competing accounts, a shooting demands more than press statements. It requires a transparent, independent investigation and prosecution where warranted. Sokoto was not an isolated incident. The following day in Birnin Kebbi, the ADC presidential campaign convoy was reportedly attacked by armed gangs. Amnesty International said vehicles were vandalised, people assaulted with cutlasses and roads blocked, while the party’s Kebbi governorship candidate, Abubakar Malami, alleged that media equipment was destroyed and tear gas deployed. His convoy had suffered a similar attack in the city in September 2025.
The Nigeria Democratic Congress (NDC) has suffered similar attacks. On November 4, hoodlums stoned the motorcade of its presidential candidate, Peter Obi, and running mate, Rabiu Musa Kwankwaso, at Watt Market roundabout in Calabar, Cross River State. Police reported arresting a 27-year-old suspect, Victor Edet, although it remains unclear whether he has been arraigned. The State Government has denied suggestions that ruling-party supporters were responsible. Worse, in Asaba, Delta State, one person was killed and five injured when suspected thugs attacked an NDC rally. A death at a political rally is no longer a warning; it is a damning indictment of the prevailing political climate.
Even critics of the establishment who are not frontrunners have not been spared. Omoyele Sowore, presidential candidate of the African Action Congress (AAC), was attacked by suspected thugs at a restaurant in Ado-Ekiti on October 30. He alleged that the assailants were linked to the Ekiti State Government House and that the Department of State Services leaked his location. Both the State Government and the security service denied involvement, while the police reported a minor injury and a discreet investigation. These conflicting accounts make an independent, publicly reported inquiry indispensable.
What deepens the concern is the Federal Government’s apparent silence. We are unaware of any specific, forceful condemnation of these assaults, even as All Progressives Congress (APC) rallies appear to proceed nationwide without incident. Such silence can easily be misconstrued as complicity, regardless of intent.
According to the Centre for Democracy and Development, 109 election-related deaths were recorded in the build-up to the 2023 polls. The Kimpact Development Initiative separately documented 238 incidents and 24 deaths during the general elections. Beyond Nigeria, Kenya’s 2007–08 post-election violence claimed more than 1,000 lives, according to the Waki Commission. Ghana, by contrast, enacted the Vigilantism and Related Offences Act in 2019 to curb party vigilante groups, a model worth studying.
The remedies are neither exotic nor expensive. The IGP should extend his directive to cover assaults on individuals and disruptions of rallies, while establishing a dedicated investigative unit to probe the Sokoto shooting and the attacks in Kebbi, Calabar, Asaba and Ado-Ekiti. It should publish the status of each case within a fixed period. Suspects must be prosecuted and their sponsors, regardless of party or position, brought to justice. State-backed security outfits, including the Community Guards, should be audited and barred from partisan duties.
The Federal Government must speak and act unequivocally. President Tinubu should specifically condemn attacks on opposition candidates and direct all security agencies to guarantee equal protection for every party. Governors must ensure equal access to public facilities for registered parties. The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), which has warned of fines and imprisonment under the Electoral Act 2026 for inflammatory campaign conduct, should enforce the Code of Conduct for Political Parties. Working with the Inter-Agency Consultative Committee on Election Security, it should publish a joint security plan covering campaigns, polling, and collation. Parties must discipline their supporters, courts expedite electoral-violence trials, and civil society and the media maintain a public record of incidents and their outcomes.
The credibility of the 2027 elections is at stake. An election is credible only when every contender can campaign, travel, assemble and speak freely, without fear. Without a free opposition, there can be no meaningful democracy. Nigeria is not a one-party State, and law enforcement agencies must demonstrate their neutrality through action, not communiqués. The campaign atmosphere is too tense to be left to chance. Billboards deserve protection, certainly, but citizens deserve it far more.
Editorial
Champions At Last: Well Done, Flamingos
Editorial
Kula Tragedy, Needless Loss Of Lives
-
News2 days ago
RSG Reaffirms Commitment To STEM Education, Technological Advancement
-
Business3 days ago
‘NUJ, NPA’s Partnership Would Boost Port Producrivity, Economic Growth’
-
News2 days agoIGP Warns Police Officers Against Partisanship …Directs Regular Engagement With Journalists
-
Business3 days ago
Fire Threat Interrupts Asaba Air Peace Flight
-
News2 days agoCustoms To Deploy AI, Scanners Against Snuggling
-
Business3 days ago
Fish Production Deficit, A Major Investment Opportunity – Minister
-
Politics2 days ago2027: INEC Begins Deployment Of Non-Sensitive Materials
-
Business3 days ago
NCDMB, NLNG Unveil $9m For Professorial Endowment Research Chairs In Six Varsities
