Connect with us

Opinion

Still On Youth Unemployment In Nigeria (1)

Published

on

Youth unemployment in Nigeria has become one of
the most serious socio-economic problems confronting the country. The magnitude of this problem can be appreciated if an accurate data on the number of jobless young people roaming the streets of Nigerian cities, towns and villages is available. Unfortunately, accurate statistics on youth unemployment are lacking. Nevertheless, estimates by the International Labour Organisation (ILO 1999) in Sub-Saharan Africa show that unemployment affects between 15-20 per cent of the work force, and out of these estimates, young people comprise 40 to 75 percent of the total number of the unemployed.
Unemployment has affected youths in Nigeria from a broad spectrum of socio-economic groups. Both the well and less educated are affected, but more especially those with low income backgrounds and limited education. Given the lack of employment opportunities and consequently uncertain future, young Nigerians are forced to engage in unorthodox sources of livelihood  while others engage in casual work which highlights the causes of youth unemployment problem and the effectiveness of the response. It also surveys the future of Nigerian youth.
An indepth analysis of the jurisdiction of unemployment in Nigeria will reveal with crystal clarity that unemployment is a multi dimensional phenomenon that has successfully defied precise solution by successive governments. A brief insight into the historical fact will support this assertion.
According to the Central Bank of Nigeria, unemployment rate rose from 4.3 per cent in 1970 to 6.4 per cent in 1980. The increase noted in the 1980 statistics was attributed to the depression in the Nigerian economy of the late 1970s. Between this period and 1986, the rate of unemployment fluctuated around 6.0 per cent. The implementation of the Structural Adjustment Programme (SAP) in 1986, led to a decline in unemployment rate from 7.1 per cent in 1987 to as low as 1.8 per cent in 1995. Between 1986 and 2000, it fluctuated between 3.4 per cent and 4.7 per cent.
Current information from the CIA World reveal that unemployment rate in 2003 stood at 28 per cent while a great decline was noticed in 2006 (2.9 per cent). From 2008 to this present day, the country has enjoyed a relatively stable rate of 4.9 per cent. Different facts from the National Bureau of Statistics reveal that during 2000 and 2008, the unemployment rate fluctuated between 13 per cent and 14 per cent. As at 2009, the national rate of unemployment stood at 19-17 per cent. These statistics may, however, not be definite as stakeholders have continuously reiterated that the practical reality of unemployment is higher than what statistics suggest.
Without deliberately under estimating the influence of other factors, the principal causes of unemployment are legion. Bad leadership encapsulates  quite a sufficient parameter, ranging from corruption and its endemic effects, have no doubt greatly impacted positively the rate of unemployment. Many government functionaries in purporting to carry out their duties divert huge sums of money to their personal accounts; some inflate the true naira value of contracts in order to conveniently secure their own share of the national cake. In essence, resources which should be deployed towards the creation of more job opportunities for the mass unemployed are mismanaged and embezzled.
Lack of visionary leadership is also a convenient cause. The perfect example is the Nigerian experience in the agricultural sector. No sane man would doubt the innate ability of the sector to provide mass employment opportunities for the teeming Nigerian populace.
Unfortunately, and in most pathetic manner, Nigeria has in recent times not had true leaders who would bring this vision home to the people by translating it into practical reality. All they do is paper work which at the end has little or no practical utility. Successive governments in Nigeria have failed to successfully ultilise the enormous potentials wasting away in the agricultural sector.
Another fallout from the problem of bad leadership is the failure of successive governments in Nigeria to find a lasting solution to the problem of erratic power supply. The percentage of budget spending  allocated for that purpose in successive years now seem unquantifiable with little or no improvement. Any attempt at showing the huge funds pumped yearly into the resuscitation of that area of the Nigerian economy will reveal that it is totally infra dig for a country like ours to be this deep down the fathomless pit of darkness. Without sounding cynical, perhaps a few of these governments have performed fairly. The consequences of the erratic power supply include the comatose state of the manufacturing sub-sector. Hundreds of factories that hitherto provided employment to graduates and artisans alike have folded up (Kudos must, however, be given to the recent efforts of the present government at bailing out the textile industry, amongst others). The few surviving ones are at the mercy of generating sets (and fuel) and the resultant high cost of production.
Masi is of the Linguistics and Communications Department of the University of Port Harcourt, Choba.

Another important cause of unemployment in Nigeria is the inefficiency and ineffectiveness of the Nigerian educational system to produce graduate possessing all- round abilities. Majority of graduates in Nigeria have not developed their own skill. All they have are the certificates – nothing more. In plain language, most of these graduates are half-baked and ill-prepared for the challenges facing the nation. They have nothing substantial to add-nly to maintain the status quo. Educational institutions have failed alarmingly to produce graudates that are designed to meet the needs (not just vacancies in terms of job opportunities) of the Nigerian economy. Most of them never desire to be independent or self-employed  or at least create an item of value. Their dreams are mostly about getting juicy jobs with Shell, Total etc. Dearth of skill acquisition and ultilisation in the present crop of graduates is perhaps occasioned by a deficient curriculum. This has sometimes resulted in companies reserving vacancies for Nigerians with overseas qualifications.
Sometimes, the absence of sufficient imformation creates the status of being unemployed for some Nigerians. Admittedly, this would not always be so in the face of the numerous applications received in almost all advertised vacancies. Recession in the economy is another cause of unemployment. Recession leads to many companies winding up, restructuring, streamlining and consequently, disengaging workers.
The high rate of unemployment in Nigeria has negative social and economic implications on so many aspects of the life of an average Nigerian. First and foremost is the fact that unemployment leads to unnecessary waste of resources and less productivity. Brain drain and loss of purchasing power are also important effects of the high rate of unemployment in Nigeria. The Nigerian economy is losing some of the best brains available to other countries. Graduates with good and outstanding skills, after walking the streets looking for jobs, take on the journey for greener pastures abroad many of our youths now take to riding commercial motorcycles while others make do with street hawking to keep body and soul together. The economic cost of unemployment are not limited to be above. Unemployment leads to a gap between the actual Gross National Product (GNP) and the potential Gross National Product. This is known as the GNP gap – indicating a vast waste of resources and an inability to maximize the utility of both human and natural resources.
The social costs of unemployment in Nigeria include increased cyclical poverty. Personal hardships, decay of unused skills, depression, increase in self – desertification leading to an increase in crime rate as well as increase in the number of broken marriage.
A sad development occasioned by the rate of unemployment in Nigeria is the now common swindling of these poor job seekers. Private firms in purporting to help these poor job seekers to secure employment collect different sums of money from these applicants (such as application fee, registration fee, blue chip fee, amongst others). Most of these firms are only concerned about the money; at the end of the whole exercise, most of the applicants are still without a job. Even the public sector is not absolved from this ‘profitable’ venture. The not-too-long—ago recruitment exercise by the National Drug Law Enforcement Agency (NDLEA) reportedly raked in about 750million Naira for the Agency. The NDLEA recruitment was fraught with incomplete information (for instance, there was no information on the requirement of presentation of NYSC discharge certificate as a condition precedent to sitting for the test), which led to a waste of resources by a large percentage of these job seekers. The National Social Insurance Trust Fund is also recruiting, collecting at last a thousand Naira (1,000.00) for each applicant.
The way forward for Nigeria to successfully tackle the high rate of unemployment rests first on the shoulders of our leaders. Nigerian leaders must show more than enough commitment to the creation of jobs and most especially the creation and sustenance of an economic environment that fosters self-development and self actualization. Nigerian leaders must revisit the resuscitation of the manufacturing sector and ensure that it is exhumed from the grave where it currently lies. A Total solution to the problem of erratic power supply would be of utmost importance in this regard.
The faster government moves in that direction, the better as we  have seen the concomitant effect of youth unemployment manifest itself in various forms across the country. Kidnapping armed robbery and even militancy in the Niger Delta  and to some extent, the Boko Haram menace could be identified as some of the negative outcome of unemployment.
The utilized potentials in the agricultural sector must be made use of to create the desired job opportunities for the teeming unemployed Nigerians will experience a new breath of life. The educational system also needs restructuring. The various curricula in our schools should include skill acquisition course, entrepreneurship and self development programmes, deliberate efforts need to be made towards ensuring that a new enterprise culture  is entrenched in the minds of our graduates and artisans alike. This will reduce the present craze for white collar jobs and reduce unemployment in Nigeria. It is then that Nigeria will be on the road to economic success.

Mabel Masi

Continue Reading

Opinion

One Attack Too Many 

Published

on

Quote: “Ogoniland does not need leaders competing over who can destroy another’s platform; it needs leaders competing over who can create more opportunities, empower youths and build a better future.”

The latest attack by Chief Gani Topba on the President of KAGOTE and Chief Executive Officer of Giolee Global Resources Ltd, Chief Lesi Maol, appears to have opened another troubling chapter in the politics of leadership and influence in Ogoniland. While disagreements are inevitable, the frequency and manner of attacks directed at individuals or organisations contributing to Ogoni development should concern every stakeholder. The concluded extraordinary meeting of Ogoni stakeholders in Bori was convened to deliberate on challenges confronting the people, including insecurity, farmers-herders clashes, youth disunity, education and development. It also considered harmonising the numerous youth organisations operating across Ogoniland under a strong and representative umbrella capable of giving Ogoni youths a more coordinated voice. One would have expected such an initiative to attract constructive contributions, especially from those with reservations about it.

Instead, the gathering and its organisers have come under criticism, raising a fundamental question: what exactly is wrong with Ogoni stakeholders coming together to discuss problems affecting their people? If there are legitimate concerns about the meeting, its organisers or resolutions, such concerns should be supported by facts and subjected to constructive engagement rather than personalised attacks. Leadership is demonstrated through service, sacrifice, participation and results. If Chief Gani Topba believes the stakeholders’ meeting was unnecessary or lacked legitimacy, nothing prevents him from convening another meeting and demonstrating that he can attract traditional rulers, professionals, academics, clergy and youths. Different approaches to development should therefore be allowed to compete on their merits.

The proposal for a unified youth platform should equally not be presented as an attempt to silence Ogoni youths. Rather, it should be examined against the reality of numerous organisations claiming to represent different segments of Ogoni youths. Too many competing organisations can create confusion, weaken collective bargaining power and make it difficult for genuine concerns affecting young people to receive coordinated attention. A credible umbrella body, if properly constituted and broadly accepted, could strengthen the voice of Ogoni youths and provide an organised platform for employment, education, skills acquisition, security and governance. Ogoniland has experienced enough institutional fragmentation. Its history contains painful lessons about divisions that allow personal interests, leadership struggles and competing platforms to overshadow collective objectives. The present generation should learn that destroying institutions one does not control damages society.

The question should be: who benefits when Ogoni youths remain divided and every attempt at unity is interpreted as rivalry? Against this background, KAGOTE deserves objective scrutiny rather than blanket condemnation. Any organisation with influence must be accountable, but accountability is different from a campaign aimed at delegitimising initiatives associated with its leadership. Chief Lesi Maol’s activities through KAGOTE and Giolee Global Resources Ltd have attracted attention in areas including skills development, education, youth empowerment and community support. Such interventions should be assessed on their impact and encouraged where they serve the public good. Those who believe Chief Maol is not doing enough should not stop at criticism. They should show Ogoni what they can do better. Where are the alternative skills programmes? Where are the educational interventions? Where are the youth empowerment schemes? Where are the community development initiatives?

It is easy to criticise someone who is building; it is harder to mobilise resources and sustain programmes that benefit ordinary people. This is not to suggest that Chief Maol or KAGOTE should be immune from criticism. No leader or institution should be beyond scrutiny, and legitimate questions about accountability must be welcomed. But responsible criticism should be based on facts, evidence and alternative ideas. Personal attacks and attempts to destroy initiatives simply because their leadership is not controlled by particular interests cannot provide the solutions Ogoniland needs. What is unfolding is bigger than one meeting, one statement or even two individuals. It reflects a broader contest over influence and leadership. If anyone believes KAGOTE is taking Ogoni in the wrong direction, the response is to present a better direction. If anyone believes Lesi Maol is not doing enough, the answer is to demonstrate what more can be done. Ogoni does not need leaders competing over who can destroy another’s platform; it needs leaders competing over who can create opportunities, improve education, promote security, empower youths and contribute to development.

The people are looking beyond rhetoric. They are examining records, observing programmes and measuring results. No individual owns the permanent right to speak for Ogoni or determine which organisation must survive or collapse. Ogoni must replace the politics of personal control with a culture of ideas, service, accountability and measurable achievement. Differences should produce better alternatives, not destruction. Every Ogoni leader and stakeholder should ask whether his actions are strengthening the region or deepening divisions. Ogoni needs people who can build bridges, institutions, opportunities and hope. Those who genuinely love Ogoni should support what is good, correct what is wrong and offer better alternatives. The future of Ogoni will not be secured by destroying its builders, but by encouraging more people to build.

onest people can reach different conclusions based on different experiences and information. Public debate should therefore remain respectful, evidence-based and open to correction. Truth is strengthened by honest examination, not insults, suspicion or personal attacks. The phrase “Truth has no agenda” carries a powerful message. Truth does not belong to any political party, ethnic group, religion or ideology. It cannot be permanently owned or manipulated by those in power. Governments change, institutions rise and fall, and public opinion shifts, but truth remains indifferent to popularity.The real test of character comes when speaking honestly threatens influence, privilege or personal advantage. It is easy to defend justice when there is nothing to lose. It is far more difficult when the truth may cost us something. That is when conscience must rise above convenience.

Society must therefore cultivate a culture where integrity is valued more than comfort and accountability is welcomed rather than feared. Leaders should learn to accept criticism without hostility, while citizens should express disagreement responsibly. Progress becomes difficult when honest questions are treated as acts of disloyalty. Ultimately, every society must choose the future it desires. A nation built on silence cannot sustain justice, while a community where comfort consistently outweighs conscience risks making injustice ordinary. But people committed to truth, even when inconvenient, lay the foundation for stronger institutions, trustworthy leadership and lasting progress. The call is not to condemn those who succeed or to glorify perpetual criticism. It is to remember that privilege should never silence principle, influence should never replace integrity, and personal gain should never outweigh the public good. Truth has no hidden agenda. It seeks neither applause nor favour. It simply asks to be spoken, defended and lived. When truth is silenced by comfort, everyone eventually pays the price.

By:  King Onunwor
Continue Reading

Opinion

When Comfort Silences The Truth  

Published

on

Quote: “Privilege should never silence principle, influence should never replace integrity, and personal gain should never outweigh the public good.”

There is an old saying that truth does not fear investigation. Genuine truth neither depends on applause nor seeks permission to exist. It remains constant whether celebrated or rejected, defended or ignored. Yet, in today’s society, truth often competes with comfort, convenience, loyalty and personal interest. This raises an important question: Can a person remain objective after beginning to benefit from the very system he once criticised? Throughout history, reform movements have been driven by courageous individuals willing to challenge injustice despite personal risks. Their commitment to truth sometimes cost them popularity, comfort, freedom and even their lives. History has also recorded instances where influential voices became quieter after receiving appointments, promotions, contracts, political favours or other advantages.

While motivations cannot always be known, such patterns remind us that personal benefit can sometimes influence public conviction. Human beings naturally seek security, stability and opportunities for themselves and their families. There is nothing wrong with success or advancement. The concern arises when personal comfort replaces public responsibility, or privilege becomes a reason to ignore problems affecting others. One of the greatest dangers facing society is not only corruption or poor governance but the normalisation of silence. Systems rarely collapse overnight. They deteriorate gradually when people who know better decide that speaking the truth is no longer worth the personal cost. Every society therefore depends on citizens willing to ask difficult questions, demand accountability and defend justice, regardless of who benefits or feels uncomfortable.

A person who benefits from a broken system may become less inclined to challenge it. This is not true of everyone, and individuals should not be judged without evidence. Many principled people continue to advocate reform while working within imperfect institutions. Nevertheless, personal interests can sometimes soften criticism, dilute conviction or redirect attention from uncomfortable realities.Perhaps the greatest threat to truth is not open opposition but quiet compromise. Censorship is easy to recognise; silence purchased through convenience is harder to detect. When people gradually stop asking questions, demanding transparency or defending principles they once considered important, society should ask whether something has changed. Perspectives may genuinely evolve with new information, but incentives can also influence what people say—or choose not to say.

This is why citizens should not place blind trust in personalities. Ideas, principles and actions should be examined independently. Loyalty to individuals must never exceed loyalty to truth. Political affiliation, professional status, financial success or social influence should not exempt anyone from accountability. A healthy democracy depends on independent thinking, not unquestioning allegiance.The responsibility to speak truth does not belong only to journalists, activists, judges, religious leaders or opposition politicians. It belongs to every citizen. The teacher who refuses to manipulate facts, the public servant who rejects corruption, the business owner who acts with integrity, the parent who teaches honesty and the young person who chooses principle over popularity all contribute to a more just society. However, defending truth also requires humility.

We must not assume that everyone who disagrees with us has been compromised.

By: Michael  Abraham

Continue Reading

Opinion

Poor Federal Roads: The Oshiomhole’s  Outburst

Published

on

Quote:”Although the Federal Ministry of Works is responsible for road construction and rehabilitation while the Federal Roads Maintenance Agency (FERMA) oversees maintenance, road maintenance has consistently taken a back seat”

The recent outburst by the lawmaker representing Edo North Senatorial District, Senator Adams Oshiomhole, over the deplorable condition of federal roads in Edo and Delta states has once again drawn national attention to one of Nigeria’s most persistent infrastructure challenges. During Senate plenary last Wednesday, Oshiomhole criticized the Minister of Works, David Umahi, accusing the Federal Ministry of Works of neglecting major federal highways in Edo and Delta while prioritizing new road projects. According to him, the government should focus on rehabilitating existing roads that have become impassable before embarking on new construction. He identified the Benin-Warri, Benin-Asaba, Benin-Auchi and Auchi-Okene highways as strategic economic corridors that have deteriorated to alarming levels, making travel difficult for commuters and motorists while increasing the cost of transporting goods and services.

The senator also alleged that road projects affecting Edo and Delta states were repeatedly omitted from budgetary provisions and that some interventions were only undertaken following directives from President Bola Tinubu. Ironically, the Federal Government has consistently reiterated its commitment to reconstructing and rehabilitating federal roads across the country. The Minister of Works has repeatedly assured Nigerians that the government is deploying reinforced concrete technology to build more durable highways capable of withstanding the country’s climatic conditions. Despite these assurances, vast sections of federal road across the country remain in deplorable condition. The consequences are enormous. Federal highways serve as the backbone of the nation’s economy, carrying more than 90 per cent of passengers and freight.

They connect ports, airports, industrial centres, state capitals and agricultural belts, facilitating the movement of food, fuel, cement and manufactured goods. When these roads fail, the entire economy suffers. Although the Federal Ministry of Works is responsible for road construction and rehabilitation while the Federal Roads Maintenance Agency (FERMA) oversees maintenance, road maintenance has consistently taken a back seat. The result is a recurring cycle in which newly completed roads quickly deteriorate while existing ones are left to collapse. The economic consequences are severe. Bad roads increase transportation costs, contribute to food inflation, delay the movement of goods from ports to markets, increase vehicle maintenance expenses and lead to avoidable road crashes that claim countless lives every year.

To address these challenges, the Federal Government has introduced initiatives such as the Highway Development and Management Initiative (HDMI), which seeks to attract private investment into road maintenance through concessions and tolling. While the initiative holds promise, public acceptance will depend largely on visible improvements in road quality and transparent management of toll revenues. Similarly, the Road Infrastructure Tax Credit Scheme is designed to encourage companies to finance the reconstruction of strategic highways in exchange for tax credits. While the scheme has shown promise, its ability to address road infrastructure challenges equitably across the country remains to be seen. Other countries facing similar infrastructure challenges have demonstrated that sustainable road management requires a different approach.

Rwanda and Morocco, for instance, have prioritized dedicated road maintenance funds, performance-based contracts that reward quality rather than kilometers constructed, and policies that allocate a significant proportion of road budgets to maintenance instead of new construction. Nigeria can draw useful lessons from these experiences. Maintenance funding should be increased and protected because preventive maintenance is far cheaper than complete reconstruction. Public-private partnerships should be expanded with adequate safeguards, transparent tolling policies and independent monitoring. Development finance institutions should support contractors with affordable financing to minimize disruptions caused by delayed government payments. Road designs should withstand heavier rainfall and flooding, while compensation and right-of-way issues must be resolved before projects begin to avoid unnecessary delays.

FERMA should also prioritize durable, high-quality road maintenance over the shoddy repairs that have become all too common. Ultimately, Nigerians are not asking for perfect roads; they simply want roads that are safe, durable and properly maintained. While new highways are desirable, a well-maintained five-kilometer stretch is often far more valuable to road users than a much longer road that quickly falls into disrepair. The media, civil society, the National Assembly and Nigerians must continue to hold the government accountable by monitoring road projects and demanding better results. Good roads are not a privilege but a right of every citizen. With tax credit schemes, concessions and other funding mechanisms already in place, what is now required is political will, transparency and consistent implementation. However, Senator Oshiomhole’s criticism also invites legitimate public reflection. 

Many Nigerians have asked what the condition of these same federal roads was during his eight-year tenure as Governor of Edo State. Several governors, including those of Rivers State at different times, undertook repairs on critical federal roads within their states and subsequently sought reimbursement from the Federal Government. It is therefore fair to ask whether similar interventions were pursued during Oshiomhole’s administration. Public officials, whether serving or former, should be judged by the same standard. Constructive criticism is essential in a democracy, but it carries greater weight when matched by a demonstrable record of action. Nigerians expect those entrusted with public office to address pressing challenges while they have the authority to do so, rather than becoming vocal critics only after leaving office

By:  Calista Ezeaku
Continue Reading

Trending