Editorial
Averting Nigerian Pilgrims Death
The House of Representatives’ Committee on Foreign Affairs last week queried the management of the National Hajj Commission over the death of 44 Nigerians during this year’s Hajj. We think that even the death of one Nigerian in an unlikely situation should worry us, but to lose 44 is too much.
While demanding a full report on the circumstances of the death, the committee also noted that the high level of deaths recorded was not just worrisome but attributable to the alleged dirty and unhygienic condition that Nigerian pilgrims, especially the women, were subjected to during the exercise.
The lawmakers therefore directed the commission to forward the report as soon as possible and that the report should include particular reference to where the Nigerian pilgrims encountered difficulties that resulted in the unprecedented number of death.
This is even as it congratulated the hajj commission for its success at the last Hajj, especially over the handling of the issue of male guardian in which a sizeable number of Nigerian female pilgrims were returned to the country for lack of a mahram (a male guide).
Apart from allegations of unhygienic conditions of places they were quartered, authorities of the pilgrims’ board are supposed to ascertain some facts about intending pilgrims so that those with terminal ailments, unsatisfactory health records, over-age travelers among others were not allowed to travel.
The Tide commends the House of Representatives for instigating an inquest into a tragedy that has become recurrent, but has continued to be regarded as normal. Unfortunately, the attitude of many Nigerians over the years towards the death of Nigerian pilgrims is rather sad.
No investigation has ever been carried out after such deaths nor have relatives of the diseased taken up the matter with the authorities. Yet, the same cannot be said to be the case with pilgrims from other nations. We think everything is wrong for Nigeria to behave like nothing happened when her citizens die.
The suspicion after the recent tragedy is that strict conditions were usually not enforced by officials. This has resulted in a situation where many people travel to Mecca every year for businesses other than for religious purpose and many of the travelers hardly pass the required medical certification before being allowed to embark on the journey.
Other factors that should be queried for the high death toll during the 2012 pilgrimage to Mecca include: change in weather condition, the stampede during the stoning of the devil and the belief by some faithfuls that it is a mark of honour to end one’s life at the holy land.
The point needs to be emphasised that the sponsorship of Nigerians to Mecca and Jerusalem is designed to assist citizens achieve spiritual rebirth; become better citizens and acquire a wider world view that would promote their spiritual aspiration and mutual co-existence in Nigeria.
Over the years, it has become increasingly clear that most of those who partook in the spiritual journey never imbibed those ennobling values. This is why some people are asking if the money often expended on religious pilgrimages by Nigeria and its component states is not a waste.
This is not to say that the government should not be concerned about the safety of her citizens who travel outside the country on private economic or spiritual pursuits; Government’s concern should indeed stop at using relevant agencies to ensure the safety of its citizens.
A situation where some State Governments with debilitating economic and social challenges record as their major achievement in a year, the sponsorship of pilgrims to the holy lands makes the whole idea a joke.
The House of Representatives probe should serve as the beginning of a critical look at the whole idea of pilgrims’ sponsorship in Nigeria. The way Nigerians embark on emotional trips to do things that cannot support socio-economic growth in the country should worry this corrective regime. The needed changes must take place for the expected progress to take place.
Editorial
Champions At Last: Well Done, Flamingos
Editorial
Kula Tragedy, Needless Loss Of Lives
Editorial
INEC’s Threat Alert Deserves Urgent Attention
The Independent National Electoral Commission’s (INEC) disclosure of an alleged plot to target its ad hoc personnel ahead of the 2027 general elections demand urgent national attention. The reported arrest of suspects, with intelligence support from the Department of State Services (DSS), is encouraging, but must not breed complacency. Any attack on electoral workers threatens not only human lives but also Nigerians’ constitutional right to choose their leaders through credible elections. The alleged conspiracy must be thoroughly investigated, its sponsors identified and all those found culpable prosecuted.
Particularly troubling is the reported targeting of National Youth Service Corps (NYSC) members, who play a vital role in Nigeria’s electoral process. Many serve far from home and undertake sensitive assignments at polling units and other electoral locations. As civilians, they should not be exposed to intimidation, abduction or violence without adequate protection. If election workers are vulnerable, the safety of other officials, observers and voters cannot be guaranteed.
Nigeria’s electoral history offers painful lessons. Human Rights Watch reported in Nigeria’s Post-Election Violence, published in May 2011, that more than 800 people died in the violence following the 2011 general elections. NYSC members serving as electoral officials were among the victims. This tragedy underscores the deadly consequences of political tension, incitement and disputed outcomes. Nigeria must act on the latest warning before another preventable disaster occurs.
INEC deserves recognition for uncovering the alleged plot, while the DSS and other security agencies merit commendation for their reported assistance. However, arrests are only the beginning. Investigators must establish the suspects’ identities, motives, networks and intended targets, ensuring that evidence is admissible in court. The process must remain impartial and free from political interference. Credible public updates are also necessary, provided they do not compromise investigations or operational security.
The authorities must adopt a comprehensive, intelligence-led security strategy for 2027. INEC’s proposed security conference should produce practical measures developed in collaboration with the Inter-Agency Consultative Committee on Election Security (ICCES), the police, the DSS and other relevant agencies. Threat assessments should guide personnel deployment, secure transportation, emergency communications, evacuation procedures and rapid response. Protection must extend beyond polling day to the distribution of sensitive materials, collation centres and the safe return of ad hoc personnel.
Those who provide intelligence must also be protected from retaliation. Confidential reporting channels and appropriate safeguards should be established for informants and others assisting investigations. Equally, security deployments must not intimidate voters or facilitate political repression. Personnel should act professionally, impartially and proportionately, within the law. Clear mechanisms for reporting misconduct and investigating abuses are essential to maintaining public confidence.
The threat also highlights broader concerns about trust in the electoral system. The European Union Election Observation Mission’s June 2023 final report identified shortcomings in transparency and operational implementation during Nigeria’s 2023 general elections, alongside concerns about the legal framework and electoral dispute resolution. Credible elections require more than security; they depend on transparent procedures, accountable officials and consistent enforcement of electoral laws. INEC must demonstrate measurable progress in addressing previously identified weaknesses.
Voter apathy presents another challenge. INEC’s published figures indicate that approximately 25 million people voted in the 2023 presidential election, out of about 93.5 million registered voters, a turnout of roughly 26.7 per cent. Although insecurity is not the sole cause of low participation, threats against electoral personnel can heighten public anxiety and discourage voters from exercising their franchise. INEC should strengthen civic education, improve polling accessibility and communicate procedures clearly. Political parties, civil society and the media must promote peaceful participation and reject electoral intimidation.
Misinformation and manipulated digital content pose additional risks. False reports, fabricated announcements and deepfake videos can inflame tensions, impersonate officials and mislead voters. INEC should establish a well-resourced, rapid-response communication system supported by verified digital channels and timely public statements. Collaboration with credible media organisations and fact-checkers would help counter falsehoods without suppressing legitimate criticism. Clear, consistent communication is indispensable, as administrative confusion and delayed explanations often allow rumours to spread.
Electoral integrity must also begin within INEC itself. The chairman’s warning against partisanship, negligence, extortion and ethical misconduct deserves serious attention. Security measures cannot compensate for officials who abuse their positions or disregard established procedures. INEC should strengthen staff training, ensure transparent recruitment and deployment, provide secure channels for reporting misconduct and enforce disciplinary rules consistently. Allegations of bribery and political interference must be investigated regardless of rank, while ad hoc personnel should receive adequate briefing, support and prompt payment.
The legal framework also requires clarity and consistent enforcement. INEC should explain the precise provisions and applicability of Section 26 of the Electoral Act 2026, including the obligations of electoral officials and security personnel, and publish authoritative guidance on neutrality and professional conduct. Complaints by opposition parties that they have been prevented from campaigning in certain states must likewise be investigated impartially. Any established violations should attract appropriate corrective action. Electoral fairness requires not only impartial polling officials but also lawful campaigning, access to competing viewpoints and freedom from intimidation.
The alleged plot against INEC’s ad hoc personnel is a warning against complacency ahead of the 2027 general election. Governments, security agencies, INEC, political parties and civil society must work together to prevent violence, punish misconduct and protect citizens’ participation. The commission should communicate its security priorities, maintain accessible threat-reporting channels and provide periodic updates on preparedness. Nigeria’s democracy cannot be safeguarded by assurances alone; it requires demonstrable preparation, impartial law enforcement and an unwavering commitment to free, fair and credible elections.
-
Politics2 days agoLG CITY BOY COORDINATOR HAILS WIKE’S SUPPORT FOR ONYESOH, TINUBU
-
Politics2 days ago
DIRI INAUGURATES APC CAMPAIGN COUNCIL, SETS MILLION VOTES TARGET FOR TINUBU
-
Politics2 days agoNDC Candidate Urges Oborevwori To Probe Asaba Political Violence
-
News2 days agoArmy Recovers X Account After Hack Attempt
-
Rivers5 days ago
NUJ Set To Attend UNIPORT’s 217th Inaugural Lecture
-
News5 days agoNJC Suspends Three Judges, Sanctions Eight Others
-
Politics5 days ago
Atiku Kicks-Off 2027 Campaign, Promises To Tackle Nigeria’s Challenges
-
Featured5 days agoAPC Presidential Campaign Storms PH, ‘Morrow
