Connect with us

Features

Oil Revenue And Northern Governors’ Agitation

Published

on

The debate on issues of 13 per cent derivation from oil revenue, security challenge posed by incessant bombing by Boko Haram on innocent citizens of Nigeria and the Northern Governors’ agitation for more revenue to be allocated to them is on. Commenting on this issue, Salihu Rufai Alkali had written that;“Since the discovery and exploration of oil in commercial quantities began in Nigeria in the late 1950s, there has been gradual shift from other revenue earning activities like agriculture and mining to this mono product, and today the socio-economic survival of Nigeria has been almost totally dependent on its oil. The consequence of this situation is that it has generated a lot of debates on who benefited more from the revenue derived from oil, especially in the face of Nigeria’s composition of the six geo-political zones. Part of the debate is that the oil industry was built with revenue from other parts of the country, beyond the oil bearing states, but the people in the oil producing areas will immediately counter it with their argument that it is their region that was fetching huge foreign revenue to the country from palm oil, timber, rubber and exportation of other economic crops, before the first oil rig was drilled at Oloibiri in present Bayelsa State in 1953.”

“The agitation, which late Isaac Adaka Boro led some decades back, followed by the struggles of late Ken Saro-Wiwa and lately, the long fighting period between government forces and militant groups in the Niger-Delta region in the last decade, is a fallout of the dissatisfaction of the people of the region over the perceived mismanagement of the oil revenue by allocation of large sums of it to other regions of the country, while the birth land of the oil, continues to wallow in abject poverty. Today, however, just a few years after peace was brokered between the federal government and the Niger-Delta people, Nigeria seems to be returning to the path of progress, there are fresh outbursts emerging on the issue of derivation again. This time, the worry is about the demand by the governors of the Northern states of Nigeria, for their state allocations to be increased. Pundits, especially from southern Nigeria, primarily from the Niger-Delta region, see such demand as outrageous and that the Northern governors have no reason whatsoever to demand for more money. “It is incontrovertible that the states in Northern Nigeria share of troubles too. A vast majority of its people are poor, uneducated and unemployed. Most areas of Northern Nigeria are caught in the deep mud of afflictions, environmental challenges and health problems. A consideration of these facts would prompt anybody to  agree that the Northern governors may be right to have asked for an increment in their allocation. But the issue is not about demanding for more money, it is about utilizing it. The question that has remained unanswered by those agitating for the disbursement of more funds and those demanding that it should not be given is, what happened to all the money previously allocated to all the states in Nigeria, regardless of whether they are oil producing states or not? Experience has shown that a large chunk of the revenue from the federation account is re-directed to private coffers, as soon as they are released at the end of every month after the meeting of the Federation Account Allocation Committee, FAAC. It is a shame to observe that in a country as rich as Nigeria, a great number of its citizens, whether from the North or the South, continue to live below a dollar per day and sleep on empty stomach, while those who are charged with the mandate of alleviating the suffering of the masses continue to grow robust at their expense. Indeed it is mind burgling when the amounts our public office holders are reported to have looted from public treasury are mentioned, either by the EFCC or international financial institutions where the monies are kept in foreign banks. Our public officers steal not just what they require to live in obscene affluence, but more than what their children, grandchildren and great grandchildren will require to live all their lives in luxury without doing a day’s job.”

“As always, the problem with Nigeria is not about allocating funds, it is about corruption, the cankerworm that has gained a pride of place as a cliché in our country. The rate at which corruption is pervading our country has caused people to believe that no matter how little or how much the amount of money disbursed to any part of the country for development purposes are, it will still finds its way to private pockets. The reality is that the deplorable state of roads, schools, health centres and other social amenities around the country, whether in the South-South, South West, South East or in the three geo-political zones in the North is a consequence of the selfish and greedy impulses of the same leaders who continue to argue for and against the allocation of whatever revenue acquired from our national resources, to any part of the country. Nigerian oil, whose value is determined by the vagaries of international market, will eventually dry up one day. Governors with foresight ought to be exploring other areas of improving their internally generated revenue to supplement what comes from the federation account. Total reliance on oil revenue has serious security implications for obvious reasons, and the earlier state governors seek for alternative means of generating income, the better for the people of their states. Luckily, every state in the country is endowed with several mineral resources that can be exploited to raise additional revenue for the states. Some proactive governors are already looking inwards and we expect their colleagues to take a cue from them, rather than dissipating energy and scarce resources on a near futile campaign for review of revenue allocation.”

In agreement with Salihu Rufai Alkali’s view: “The time for affirmative action has come. The governors of the northern states of Nigeria must realise that it is no longer wise to continue to swim in wealth acquired from the oil revenue, while their people continue to suffer. They should, therefore, try to use whatever revenue is disbursed to them, plus those generated within their states, to develop their domain, rather than continue to request for more money that they may end up not using for the good of the impoverished people of their states, who in the first instance elected them into office to manage their resources. The governors must provide their social responsibility to the people by ensuring that state commissioners and other government officials who fail in their duty by misusing public funds, are made to bear the full weight of the law. There must be transparency in government in all levels. There is a saying that anyone who is faithful in little will also be faithful in much. Perhaps by taking the suggestion raised above into consideration and applying it, the governors of the northern states may be able to salvage the misinformed image which people in other regions of the country have of them and prove that they too are contributors to the continuous existence of the national entity called Nigerian in their own way, and equally prove that they deserve the right to demand for allocation of more funds for the development of their states.”

I want allied the Christian Community position in South South Zone with the positions of the Speakers of South South Zone as well as that of the Governors of South South Zone that: “the introduction of ‘fiscal federalism’ and not the review of the revenue sharing formula as argued by the coalition of northern leaders would make states develop in accordance with its capability.” Re-echoing the Communiqué of the Governors of South South Zone, he said:  “On the issue of revenue allocation, the meeting endorsed the decision of the South-South governors at their meeting in Calabar, March 13, 2012, as well as the agreement reached by the Speakers of the South-South states Houses of Assembly at their meeting on March 29, 2012, which, inter alia, regretted the attempt to link the increasing insecurity in parts of northern Nigeria to the revenue sharing formula and indeed the unfortunate and misplaced calls for a review. “The issue to be addressed is the introduction of fiscal federalism, “the communiqué added.

On the non-exploitation of other mineral resources in different parts of the country, the governors said the introduction of fiscal federalism and resources control will encourage each state of the federation to control its resources and develop in accordance with its capability.

They urged the country and the states to focus on agriculture which would allow all states to contribute significantly to the national pursue rather than the current over-dependence on oil from the South-South region.”

To be continued.

 

Lewis Akpogena

Continue Reading

Features

Before It Becomes A Norm 

Published

on

The reported selection of 16 female students of Government Comprehensive High School, Taabaa, in Khana Local Government Area, for alleged forced virginity testing is disturbing. According to the State Ministry of Education, individuals claiming to represent a traditional institution allegedly visited the school on September 17, 2026, under the guise of offering scholarships and exercise books before selecting the students for the exercise.

The incident reportedly provoked objections and a peaceful protest. I commend the ministry for investigating the allegation. The inquiry must establish the facts and ensure that anyone culpable faces appropriate consequences. Educational assistance must never become a means of exposing children to coercion, humiliation or invasive practices.

Traditional institutions have important cultural roles, but no tradition should violate children’s rights and dignity. Virginity testing lacks reliable scientific basis and can cause psychological distress, shame and stigmatisation.  The students’ privacy and welfare must be protected, with counselling provided where necessary.

The ministry should also prohibit unauthorised examinations in schools and require authorities to verify scholarship offers and other initiatives involving pupils. Schools must remain safe places where children learn without fear of abuse. I urge the government to conclude the investigation and strengthen preventive measures before this disturbing practice becomes a norm.

Fiona Kogbara

Aba Road, PH.

 

As Governance Takes A Back Seat

Across the country, politicians appear increasingly preoccupied with the 2027 general election, while governance takes a back seat. Political officeholders and aspirants are attending gatherings, touring communities and canvassing support as they position themselves for elective offices. Although political ambition is legitimate, it must not overshadow the responsibility to serve citizens.

Nigerians face deteriorating roads, rising healthcare costs, unaffordable medicines and dangerous fake products. Unemployment, insecurity, rising living costs and inadequate public services further worsen household difficulties. Instead of sustained efforts to address these problems, citizens increasingly witness political manoeuvring. Public office exists to serve the people, not merely to secure another term or pursue higher positions.

Those seeking re-election must demonstrate what they have achieved. Their records, rather than rallies and campaign promises, should determine whether they deserve another mandate. Governance must continue regardless of approaching elections.  Federal, state and local governments must prioritise essential services, infrastructure, effective regulation and improved living conditions.

Political parties and aspirants must remember that Nigerians need solutions, not endless campaigns. As 2027 approaches, leaders must balance political ambitions with public responsibilities. Citizens should not suffer while elected officials concentrate on securing their political future. Measurable achievements and responsive governance must speak louder than campaign promises.

Salma Ibrahim

Rumuokoro, PH.

 

Ebola In Abuja?

Reports of a possible Ebola outbreak in Abuja demand urgent attention. Given the disease’s seriousness, the Federal Government and relevant health authorities must establish the facts and inform the public promptly. Although unverified reports can cause panic, dismissing a potentially serious health concern without investigation could have grave consequences.

The Federal Ministry of Health and Social Welfare, the Nigeria Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (NCDC), and FCT health authorities should investigate and communicate their findings transparently. If no case is confirmed, the public deserves credible reassurance. If suspected or confirmed cases exist, appropriate measures must be taken immediately to prevent transmission.

Ebola requires early detection, effective surveillance, infection prevention and prompt medical attention. Health facilities must be prepared, and healthcare workers equipped to handle suspected cases safely. Public enlightenment is equally essential. Nigerians need accurate information about transmission and appropriate steps to take if exposure is suspected.

The media must verify reports before publication to prevent misinformation and unnecessary fear.I urge the authorities to investigate these reports thoroughly and respond decisively to any confirmed threat. Protecting public health demands transparency, vigilance and timely action. Nigerians deserve reliable information and confidence that authorities are prepared to protect lives.

Tonia Iweka

Ogbor Hill, Aba

Continue Reading

Features

Empowering The Girl Child,Building A Future Where Every Girl Can Thrive ?

Published

on

Every girl deserves the opportunity to learn, the freedom to dream, the right to live without fear and the chance to determine the course of her own future.
Yet, for millions of girls around the world, these opportunities remain difficult to access. Some struggle to obtain quality education, while others face discrimination, early marriage, gender-based violence and social expectations that limit their ambitions. For many, the challenge begins in childhood, when decisions about their lives are made without giving their voices the attention they deserve.
October 11, observed annually as the International Day of the Girl Child, provides an opportunity to reflect on these challenges and renew the commitment to protecting girls’ rights and empowering them to reach their full potential.
The day also raises an important question: how can societies talk about a better future for girls while some of them continue to face barriers to education, safety, equality and opportunity?
For Nigeria, where girls are growing up in communities with different social, economic and cultural circumstances, the occasion offers an opportunity to examine the progress made, recognise the challenges that remain and consider the responsibilities of families, communities and government in securing a better future for every girl.
From Recognition to Action
The International Day of the Girl Child was established by the United Nations and first observed on October 11, 2012. It was created to recognise the rights of girls and draw attention to the particular challenges they face across the world.
Its significance extends beyond a yearly celebration. It highlights the need for societies to address the inequalities that prevent girls from enjoying the same opportunities, protection and dignity as their male counterparts.
Girls have the right to education, healthcare, safety, participation and equal treatment. They also have the right to express their opinions, develop their abilities and make decisions about their futures in accordance with their age and evolving capacities.
These rights are not privileges to be granted only when families can afford them or when communities consider them convenient. They are part of the wider commitment to protecting the dignity and development of every child.
The observance also recognises that girls are not simply beneficiaries of development programmes. They are potential scientists, teachers, journalists, entrepreneurs, doctors, engineers, public servants and community leaders whose contributions can shape the future of their societies.
When girls are given the opportunity to develop their abilities, the benefits extend beyond individual achievement to families, communities and the wider economy.
The Nigerian Girl Child
In Nigeria, the experiences of girls differ considerably depending on their family circumstances, location, access to education and the opportunities available within their communities.
Some girls attend well-equipped schools, participate in extracurricular activities and receive support to pursue their ambitions. Others face difficulties that threaten their ability to complete their education or develop their full potential.
Poverty remains a significant concern for families struggling to meet basic needs. In some households, girls may be expected to undertake extensive domestic responsibilities, care for younger siblings or contribute to family income at the expense of their education.
For girls in rural and underserved communities, the distance to school, inadequate facilities, limited access to learning materials and other practical barriers may make education difficult to sustain.
Insecurity can create additional risks, particularly where families fear sending their children to school or where displacement interrupts their education.
These challenges do not affect every Nigerian girl in the same way. However, they demonstrate why protecting the rights of girls requires more than general statements about equality. It requires practical action that addresses the circumstances preventing them from accessing opportunities.
A girl who cannot attend school because her family cannot afford the necessary expenses needs support that makes education accessible. A girl exposed to abuse needs protection and access to appropriate services. A girl whose ambitions are dismissed simply because of her gender needs an environment that recognises her abilities.
The responsibility is to ensure that the circumstances of a girl’s birth do not determine the limits of her future.
Education: Opening the Door to Opportunity
Education remains one of the most important ways to empower the girl child.
Through education, girls acquire knowledge, develop critical thinking skills and gain a better understanding of their rights and responsibilities. Schooling can also expand their employment opportunities and help them make informed decisions about their lives.
An educated girl is better positioned to understand the choices available to her, participate in community life and contribute to social and economic development.
However, access to education alone is not enough. Girls must also be able to learn in safe environments, receive quality instruction and complete their education without discrimination or unnecessary barriers.
Parents and guardians have an important role in ensuring that girls are encouraged to attend school and are given the support needed to continue learning.
Schools, in turn, must provide environments where girls are protected from harassment, bullying and discrimination. Teachers can help by treating students fairly, encouraging participation and challenging assumptions that certain subjects or careers are suitable only for boys.
Government also has a responsibility to strengthen educational infrastructure, improve learning conditions and address the financial and social barriers that keep children out of school.
The goal should not simply be to enrol more girls in classrooms. It should be to ensure that every girl has a genuine opportunity to learn, complete her education and use the knowledge she acquires to build a meaningful future.
When Tradition Becomes a Barrier
Culture and tradition are important parts of community identity. They preserve history, strengthen relationships and provide a sense of belonging.
However, certain practices and social expectations can restrict girls’ rights and opportunities when they place greater value on gender than on individual ability and well-being.
In some communities, girls may be discouraged from pursuing higher education because marriage and domestic responsibilities are considered more important. Others may face pressure to abandon their ambitions or accept decisions made without their participation.
Child marriage remains another serious concern in Nigeria. When a girl is married before adulthood, her education, health, safety and personal development may be placed at risk.
Such situations highlight the importance of protecting children while encouraging communities to examine practices that undermine their rights.
Empowering girls does not require rejecting every cultural tradition. It requires preserving what strengthens communities while addressing practices that expose children to harm or deny them opportunities.
Community leaders, parents, educators and religious institutions can contribute by promoting the value of girls’ education, supporting their development and speaking against harmful practices.
A community’s strength should not be measured by how effectively it restricts the ambitions of its girls, but by how well it protects its children and prepares them for the future.
Protecting Girls from Violence and Abuse
A discussion about empowering girls cannot be complete without addressing their right to safety.
Girls may face different forms of abuse, including sexual violence, physical punishment, exploitation, bullying, harassment and harmful treatment within homes, schools and communities.
Some incidents remain unreported because victims fear blame, retaliation or public humiliation. Others may lack access to trusted adults or services capable of helping them.
The consequences can be serious, affecting a girl’s physical health, emotional well-being, education and ability to trust others.
Protecting girls requires adults and institutions to take reports of abuse seriously and respond in ways that prioritise the child’s safety and dignity.
Parents and guardians should encourage open communication so that girls feel able to report situations that make them uncomfortable or unsafe. Schools need clear procedures for reporting and responding to abuse, while relevant authorities must ensure that children can access appropriate protection and support.
Girls should also receive age-appropriate information about personal safety, boundaries and where to seek help.
Importantly, the responsibility for preventing abuse belongs to those who commit it and to the institutions responsible for protection. Girls must never be blamed for violence or exploitation directed against them.
A society that celebrates the girl child must also be prepared to defend her rights when those rights are threatened.
Health, Confidence and the Freedom to Dream
Empowerment also means ensuring that girls can grow up healthy, confident and informed about their bodies and well-being.
Access to healthcare, adequate nutrition, clean water, sanitation and accurate health information is essential to their development.
For adolescent girls, menstrual health is particularly important. Where sanitary products, private toilets or reliable information are unavailable, menstruation can create practical difficulties that affect attendance at school and participation in daily activities.
Families, schools and relevant institutions can help by providing accurate information, challenging harmful misconceptions and ensuring that girls have access to appropriate facilities and support.
Emotional well-being also deserves attention. Girls who experience discrimination, bullying, abuse or constant pressure to meet unrealistic expectations may struggle with confidence and self-worth.
Encouragement from parents, teachers and trusted adults can help them recognise their abilities and develop the confidence to pursue their goals.
A girl should not have to choose between being accepted by society and believing in her own potential.
She should be able to explore her interests, develop her talents and imagine a future that reflects her abilities, values and ambitions.
The Role of Parents, Schools and Government
Empowering the girl child is a shared responsibility.
Parents and guardians are often the first people who shape a girl’s understanding of her worth and potential. Their encouragement can influence whether she feels confident enough to pursue education, express her views and aspire to leadership.
Providing equal encouragement to girls and boys, sharing household responsibilities fairly and listening to girls’ concerns are practical ways families can promote equality at home.
Schools must ensure that girls have equal opportunities to learn, participate in activities and develop leadership skills. Teachers should challenge gender stereotypes and encourage girls to explore subjects and careers based on their interests and abilities.
Government institutions also have a responsibility to protect children’s rights through effective laws, policies, educational support and accessible protection services. Laws must be implemented, and families should be able to seek help when a child’s safety or rights are threatened.
Communities, civil society organisations and the media can support these efforts by educating the public, drawing attention to harmful practices and highlighting positive examples of girls overcoming barriers.
The media, in particular, can help change public attitudes by portraying girls as active participants in development rather than limiting their stories to vulnerability and suffering.
Together, these efforts can create an environment in which girls are protected, heard and given the opportunity to contribute meaningfully to society.
Beyond October 11
The International Day of the Girl Child is an important reminder, but the protection and empowerment of girls cannot be achieved through a single day’s activities.
It requires sustained action in homes, schools, workplaces, communities and public institutions.
It means ensuring that a girl from a low-income family has access to education, that a girl living in a rural community is not forgotten in development planning, and that a girl who reports abuse receives appropriate protection rather than blame.
It also means listening to girls when decisions affect their lives and including their perspectives in discussions about education, healthcare, safety and development.
The measure of progress is not simply the number of speeches delivered or campaigns organised. It is whether girls are safer, better educated, healthier and more able to make meaningful choices about their futures.
Every girl deserves the opportunity to grow without violence, learn without discrimination and pursue her ambitions without being limited by harmful expectations.
A Future Where Every Girl Can Thrive
The future of any society is closely connected to the opportunities available to its children.
When girls are educated, protected and encouraged to develop their abilities, they are better positioned to contribute to their families, communities and the wider society. When their rights are neglected, the consequences can extend far beyond the individual child.
As the world marks October 11, the message to Nigeria and the international community is clear: empowering girls begins with recognising their rights and continues through the practical steps taken to protect them.
It begins with a parent who encourages a daughter to remain in school, a teacher who recognises her potential, a community that rejects harmful practices and institutions that respond seriously when her rights are violated.
It also requires a willingness to question beliefs and practices that deny girls the freedom to learn, grow and participate in society.
A girl’s future should not be determined by poverty, discrimination or the assumption that her ambitions matter less than those of a boy.
Every girl deserves the chance to discover what she can become.
On this International Day of the Girl Child, the call is not merely to celebrate girls, but to protect their rights, invest in their education, listen to their voices and create a society where every girl has the freedom and opportunity to thrive.
Because empowering a girl is not simply about changing her life today. It is about helping to build a future in which her dignity is respected, her potential is recognised and her rights are protected every day.

Davies Christian Nelson & Dominic Emediong Emmanuel

Dr Davies is the Director of Publications, Rivers State Ministry of Information and Communications.

Continue Reading

Features

Beyond Tradition As Stakeholders Seek Collaboration To End FGM In Rivers

Published

on

For generations, Female Genital Mutilation(FGM) has remained one of the most deeply entrenched harmful traditional practices affecting women and girls across many societies.Sustained largely by cultural beliefs, misconceptions and long-standing norms, the practice has continued despite increasing global awareness of its severe health, psychological and human rights consequences.
In Nigeria, however, growing public awareness, stronger legal frameworks and coordinated interventions by government institutions and development partners are gradually changing the narrative.Although significant progress has been recorded, experts insist that achieving the complete eradication of female genital mutilation requires more than legislation. It demands sustained collaboration, continuous public enlightenment, community ownership and the willingness to challenge harmful practices that have endured across generations.
To this end, stakeholders in Rivers State have renewed calls for stronger collaboration, sustained public enlightenment and community ownership in the fight against Female Genital Mutilation (FGM), warning that the harmful practice cannot be completely eradicated through legislation alone.
The call was made during the Third Quarter State Technical Committee Meeting on the Elimination of Female Genital Mutilation in Rivers State, organised by the Rivers State Ministry of Health with support from the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) and other development partners.
The meeting brought together representatives of the Ministries of Health, Social Welfare and Rehabilitation, Information and Communications, civil society organisations, child protection advocates, development partners and other stakeholders committed to protecting women and girls from harmful traditional practices.
The engagement provided an opportunity for participants to review progress recorded in the state, examine persistent challenges and develop practical strategies for accelerating the elimination of FGM through stronger partnerships, coordinated interventions and evidence-based advocacy.
A major focus of the meeting was the need to broaden public understanding of what constitutes FGM. Participants noted that the practice extends beyond the commonly recognised cutting or removal of parts of the female genitalia and includes other harmful procedures that can cause lasting physical and psychological damage.
Setting the tone for the technical discussions, the Reproductive Health Coordinator, Rivers State Ministry of Health, Dr. Ebere Smith, described FGM as both a reproductive health concern and a social injustice that violates the bodily integrity, dignity and wellbeing of women and girls.
According to her, although FGM has historically been sustained by cultural beliefs and traditions in many communities, medical evidence has established that the practice exposes women and girls to avoidable health complications and psychological trauma.
“It is an injustice to the female anatomy. It is not just a reproductive injustice; it is also a social one. It affects a woman’s emotional well-being, childbirth, marriage and overall quality of life,” Dr. Smith said.
She explained that FGM can involve the use of unsterilised razor blades, knives, scissors and needles, while drawing attention to less recognised practices, including the repeated pressing of a baby girl’s genital area with hot water, which she identified as a form of Type IV FGM.
Dr. Smith noted that survivors could suffer excessive bleeding, infections, chronic pain, complications during childbirth, sexual dysfunction and emotional trauma, among other long-term health consequences.
She therefore stressed the importance of providing families and communities with accurate information to dispel misconceptions that have allowed harmful practices to persist across generations.
“Having the right information at the right time for the right people is essential,” she said, emphasising the roles of healthcare workers, parents, caregivers, traditional institutions, educators, journalists and community leaders in preventing FGM.
Speaking on progress made in Rivers State, the UNICEF Desk Officer in the Rivers State Ministry of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation, Dr. Victor Iseberetonma, expressed optimism over the impact of sustained advocacy and community sensitisation.
He disclosed that sensitisation structures established in about 60 communities were conducting house-to-house campaigns, church outreaches and market engagements aimed at educating residents on the dangers of FGM.
Iseberetonma also noted that an increasing number of traditional rulers and community leaders were demonstrating commitment to ending the practice within their domains.
He described the willingness of some monarchs to formally abolish FGM in their communities as an important milestone, stressing, however, that the ultimate objective remained the complete eradication of the practice across Rivers State.
In his technical presentation, UNICEF Facilitator, Mr. Uchenna Unah, cited findings from the 2024 Nigeria Demographic and Health Survey (NDHS), which showed that the prevalence of FGM among women aged 15–49 had declined from 20 per cent in 2018 to 14 per cent in 2024.
Despite the decline, Unah said FGM remained a significant public health and human rights concern, noting that 85 per cent of girls and women who underwent the practice experienced it before the age of five.
He further highlighted encouraging changes in public attitudes, stating that 71 per cent of women and 74 per cent of men surveyed believed that FGM should not continue, while a similar majority affirmed that no religion requires the practice.
He urged stakeholders to sustain evidence-based advocacy, strengthen community engagement and intensify public enlightenment to ensure that the declining prevalence ultimately translates into the complete elimination of FGM.
Also contributing to the discussions, the State Coordinator of the Child Protection Network (CPN), Rivers State, Inyinyi Irimagha, challenged the continued use of the term “female circumcision”, describing it as medically inaccurate.
She explained that circumcision refers to the removal of the male foreskin and should not be used to describe harmful procedures carried out on the female genitalia.
Irimagha said collaboration between the Rivers State Ministry of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation, Child Protection Network, UNICEF and other partners had strengthened community advocacy through survivor groups, adolescent networks, male champions and traditional rulers.
She also highlighted the need to increase awareness of Type IV FGM, particularly practices that communities may not recognise as forms of genital mutilation.
According to her, the absence of cutting does not mean that such practices are harmless, as damage to delicate tissues and nerves can result in long-term health and reproductive complications.
Beyond the formal presentations, discussions with participants revealed that misconceptions about FGM remain widespread.
Some participants admitted that they had previously associated FGM exclusively with the physical cutting or removal of parts of the female genitalia and were surprised to learn that other harmful practices are also recognised internationally as forms of FGM.
The discussions further highlighted the influence of culture and intergenerational traditions on perceptions of women’s health. Some participants recalled practices that had been passed down for generations without sufficient consideration of their medical implications.
One cultural practice mentioned during the engagement involved placing a snail between the legs of a woman after childbirth based on the belief that its slimy nature could help control bleeding.
Participants agreed that while cultural traditions remain important to communities, practices that pose risks to human health should be subjected to scientific scrutiny and discontinued where necessary.
A resident, Sampson, described the enlightenment as an eye-opener, noting that many people had traditionally believed that applying hot water to a newborn girl’s genital area was simply a routine hygiene practice.
He said greater public awareness was needed to ensure that families did not unknowingly expose their children to harmful practices.
Another participant, DollyPur, stressed the importance of creating safe spaces for community dialogue, saying that people often continue harmful practices because “everyone else” appears to be doing the same thing.
She noted that open discussions involving parents, community leaders and other stakeholders could help communities understand the health consequences of harmful traditional practices and encourage behavioural change.
The stakeholders consequently agreed that the elimination of FGM requires sustained cooperation among government institutions, healthcare professionals, traditional rulers, religious leaders, civil society organisations, development partners, the media and communities.
They emphasised that continuous public enlightenment, accurate health information and community-led interventions remain critical to correcting misconceptions, changing attitudes and protecting the health, dignity and rights of women and girls across Rivers State.

 

Christian Nelson Davies & Ekemini Victor Sunday

Dr Davies is the Director of Publications, Rivers State Ministry of Information and Communications, and Ekemini, an intern

Continue Reading

Trending