Connect with us

Opinion

The Church And Nigeria’s Problem

Published

16 years ago

on

At an Apostolic Summit held in Lagos in November 2009, participants expressed disdain at the level of crises bedeviling all sectors of Nigeria.

They were particularly sad that Nigeria, which will mark 50 years of its independence this October, is wobbling after squandering opportunities that would have made it one of the most developed nations in the world.

Above all, participants were sad that the Church, which should seek solutions to the myriad of problems facing the nation, was itself part of the rot.

The quest for a solution to identified problems at that summit gave birth to the Christian Consultative Forum (CCF) led by Pastor Ayo Oritsejafor.

According to Oritsejafor, the forum is focused on ridding Nigeria of incessant violence, injustice, ineptitude, abuse of office by leaders, corruption and irresponsibility in the corridors of power.

The forum is also out to stop Christians’ indifference toward proffering lasting solutions to the nation’s problems.

The Pastor said that the church must lead the quest for a better Nigeria. He noted that major reformations recorded in other shores came about because God raised voices that “passionately, artfully and powerfully communicated the truth.

“We hope that the Forum will mobilise credible Christians to reverse this trend by making meaningful contributions socially, politically and financially.

“We also hope that this ideal can be achieved on the platform of the CCF, whose objective is to transform Nigeria into a progressive developed nation through the Church,” Oritsejafor stressed.

Quoting the Scriptures, he referred to Christians as “the Church of the living God, the pillar and the ground of truth”.

While noting that Christians were called the “salt of the earth and the light of the world” in the scriptures, he said that such was a reference to their commission to be solution providers to human problems.

 “Christians must be awakened and their hearts stirred up to act concerning issues on ground. It is imperative that it be done now.

“We believe the time is right for Christians to take a bold step towards solving problems in the nation’s affairs. There is the need for Christians to act now; not tomorrow; not later, but now,” he said.

Like Oritsejafor, many Christians have noted that the 50th year is usually celebrated in the scriptures as the year of jubilee, freedom, correction, restoration and a new beginning.

Pastor Adamu Buba of the ECWA Church, Nyanya-Abuja, said “this is Nigeria’s 50th year after independence and it is usually a year of jubilee and new beginnings. Today, I urge all Christians to act.’’

Adamu challenged Christians to actively participate in the efforts toward regenerating the nation and urged Christian experts and professionals to lend their strong voices to the issues.

He also urged Christians in “the media to broadcast and preach true Christian ethics and practices until blindness to what is right ceases to plague the society”.

But as the clergy continue to seek the righteous path toward ridding Nigeria of its problems, many are wondering if the Church has a voice strong enough to bring about any positive change in Nigeria.

Can the Christian body spearhead Nigeria’s transformation and should good Christian men and women continue to keep silent while injustice, degradation and rottenness pervade the nation?

According to Oritsejafor, these are issues at the centre of the agenda of the CCF as it seeks answers to the sad situation of a nation blessed with huge resources but suffocating under corruption-induced poverty.

Nigeria’s former high commissioner to the UK, Dr. Christopher Kolade, said the only way toward a regenerated Nigeria was to revive family values and boost parental and communal responsibility.

He stressed the need for discipline as norm in daily life and a reliable system for ensuring consistently good performance.

Kolade described Nigeria as a land God created and endowed with human, natural, mineral and climatic resources of copious quantity and eminent quality, with great opportunities for success.

“Our major problems now is that the country is bedeviled by seven prominent maladies which include confusion of priorities, self interest above national interest, and a disdain for truth and justice.

“There is also the abuse of authority and privileges of office, very weak concept of accountability, focus on politics rather than governance, selection and promotion by patronage rather than performance, and the lack of stakeholder empowerment.”

He advised Nigerians to sink energy into building, rather than fighting, while mistakes and failures should be turned into opportunities for learning.

Kolade said, however, that the problem of the Church was that it saw itself as a social institution and acting like others.

 “The Church, which as a spiritual fellowship of Christians, should focus on its divine mandate, drawing inspiration and strength from God, rather than from its environment.”

 To be able to lead Nigeria’s quest for regeneration, Kolade said the Church must continue to emphasise competence, faithfulness, probity, transparency, commitment, courage, ethical values, good behaviour and accountability.

“Above all, the Church must lead by example,” he said.

But Mr Gbenga Badejo, a Christian leader, noted that the Church was contributing to the rot because its leaders have continued to exhibit a lot of arrogance.

He wanted the Church to champion new things in the realm of its commission and operation which the society should follow.

Mr Mike Igini, the Director of the Lagos-based Centre for Leadership Values and Policy, on his part, said it was sad that Nigeria’s leaders have made the country a “litter-bin of missed opportunities of what the nation should have been”.

He was also angry that the Church was being sycophantic and blessing the political leaders who stole the people’s mandate to enter into government.

Dr Gamaliel Onosode, former chairman of Cadbury Nigeria plc, was disappointed at steps to make the Church look like a political entity.

“I don’t think the Church should be called into politics. It should only teach, preach and heal, both spiritually and physically,” he said.

He noted that Jesus was clear about His Kingdom’s mission when he said that his kingdom was not of the earth, adding that Christ never cared whether the Jews were under the Roman government or another set of rulers.

“The business of Christians is to be the light of a dark world,” he said and regretted that Churches today no longer punish straying members.

“That has encouraged bad behaviour,” he said and implored the Church to ensure a monitoring system that would know what its members do outside the Church environment and to discipline erring ones.

“I have never heard of any comment from the pulpit on the banking sector upheaval,” he lamented.

Like Onosode, many Christians are of the view that the Church in Nigeria must restore right values, re-instate high standards and respect orderliness, if the nation is to forge ahead.

Iheaka is a staff of NAN.

 

Ijendu Iheaka

Related Topics:
Continue Reading

Opinion

Monthly Environmental Sanitation Imperative 

Published

1 week ago

on

May 18, 2026

By

Quote: “A clean environment is not a government gift; it is a civic duty that protects our health, preserves our cities, and reflects our national character.”
For many Nigerians who grew up in the 1980s, 1990s, and early 2000s, the last Saturday of every month followed a familiar pattern. Roads were deserted, markets closed, and residents swept compounds, cleared gutters, cut overgrown weeds, and disposed off refuse. The monthly environmental sanitation exercise became a national ritual that promoted cleanliness, discipline, and civic responsibility. As an environment correspondent about two decades ago, I joined officials of the Rivers State Ministry of Environment on sanitation monitoring tours across Port Harcourt and surrounding communities. Although enforcement officers were sometimes accused of excesses, the exercise succeeded in creating public awareness about the importance of keeping our surroundings clean. Over time, however, the practice faded away in many states.
In its absence, indiscriminate dumping of refuse, blocked drainages and environmental neglect became increasingly common. Today, heaps of waste line roads, markets and motor parks, while gutters clogged with plastics contribute to perennial flooding. Given the mounting environmental challenges facing Nigerian cities, there is no better time to revive environmental sanitation. Its return is no longer a matter of nostalgia; it is a practical necessity for public health, environmental safety, and sustainable development. Poor sanitation remains a major cause of disease. Stagnant water and uncollected waste create breeding grounds for mosquitoes, flies and rodents, increasing the risk of malaria, cholera, typhoid and other infections. Floodwaters contaminated by refuse also expose communities to serious health hazards.
Rapid urbanisation has worsened the situation. Cities such as Lagos, Port Harcourt and Abuja are expanding faster than their waste management systems can cope. As populations grow, so does the volume of waste generated daily. Monthly sanitation exercises can help rebuild environmental consciousness. Beyond cleaning streets, they remind citizens that environmental cleanliness is a shared responsibility. They also offer an opportunity to educate children and young people about hygiene, public health and community participation. Critics argue that the old sanitation policy restricted movement and was sometimes abused by security personnel. Those concerns were valid, but they do not invalidate the concept itself. Rather than abandon it, governments should reform the programme to make it more humane, participatory and transparent.
That is why the recent decision by the Lagos State Government to reintroduce monthly sanitation deserves commendation. Even if participation is largely voluntary, the move sends a strong signal that environmental responsibility must be taken seriously. Other states should emulate this initiative. In Rivers State, the Rivers State Waste Management Agency has intensified efforts to improve waste collection and restore Port Harcourt’s reputation as the Garden City. Reintroducing monthly sanitation would complement these efforts and deepen public involvement. At the federal level, policies such as the Digital Waste Marketplace, the Plastic Waste Policy and the National Waste Management Network are commendable. However, environmental sanitation remains one of the most direct and visible ways to mobilise citizens toward cleaner communities.
The exercise, however, must be supported by efficient waste management infrastructure. Citizens cannot be expected to maintain clean surroundings if there are inadequate waste bins, irregular refuse collection, and limited recycling facilities. Governments at all levels should invest in modern waste management systems, properly fund sanitation agencies, and promote recycling programmes. Waste sorting should become standard practice to reduce the volume of refuse ending up in landfills and drainage channels. Countries such as Singapore, Sweden and South Korea have demonstrated that waste can become a valuable economic resource. Recycling industries in these countries create jobs while protecting the environment. Nigeria can adopt similar strategies and turn waste into wealth.
Environmental laws must also be enforced consistently. Regulations against illegal dumping exist in many states but are rarely implemented. Offenders should face penalties, but enforcement must be fair and free from extortion. Urban planning is another critical factor. Poor drainage systems, overcrowding and inadequate sewage infrastructure worsen sanitation problems. Governments must prioritise road construction, drainage maintenance and orderly urban development. Markets deserve particular attention. They generate enormous quantities of waste every day, yet many lack organised disposal systems. Local councils and market associations should work together to establish effective waste collection arrangements in commercial centres. Religious institutions, schools, traditional rulers and civil society groups also have important roles to play.
Environmental responsibility should be taught and reinforced as a social value. Community leaders can help change attitudes by consistently promoting cleaner habits. This issue is even more urgent in an era of climate change. Flooding, erosion and extreme weather events are already threatening many Nigerian communities. Poor waste disposal worsens these challenges by blocking waterways and reducing urban resilience. A clean environment also offers economic benefits. Well-maintained cities attract investors, tourists and businesses. Reduced disease outbreaks lower healthcare costs and improve productivity among workers and students. More importantly, cleanliness reflects national values. A nation that allows public spaces to deteriorate projects an image of disorder and neglect. Nigerians deserve cleaner streets, healthier neighbourhoods and safer communities.
Reviving environmental sanitation will not solve all environmental problems overnight, but it can serve as a powerful starting point. Combined with effective waste management, public education and stronger infrastructure, it can restore environmental consciousness across the country. Ultimately, environmental cleanliness is a shared responsibility. Government must provide leadership, infrastructure and enforcement, while citizens must demonstrate discipline and civic commitment. From disposing of household waste properly to keeping drains free of obstruction, every Nigerian has a role to play. If Nigeria is serious about protecting public health, reducing flooding and building livable cities, the return of monthly environmental sanitation is a step whose time has come.
By: Calista Ezeaku
Continue Reading

Opinion

God’s Intentionality in Ecological System

Published

1 week ago

on

May 18, 2026

By

Quote:”Every component of creation is interdependent, demonstrating that God designed nature as a balanced system in which each part contributes to the wellbeing of the whole”.
 
From the very first chapter of Scripture, the Bible presents a profound truth: creation was not accidental, random, or without meaning. The universe emerged from the deliberate counsel of an all-wise God who fashioned every aspect of life with purpose and precision. The heavens were stretched out by His command, the earth was carefully positioned, the seas were bounded, and every living creature was assigned a distinct role within a perfectly coordinated ecological system. When God surveyed His completed work, He pronounced it “very good,” affirming that creation was whole, harmonious, and exactly as He intended. The natural world remains a visible testimony to God’s intentionality. The sun provides warmth and energy at the right intensity to sustain life. The moon governs tides and seasons. Trees absorb carbon dioxide and release oxygen.
Rivers irrigate the land and quench thirst. Bees and butterflies pollinate crops. Birds disperse seeds. Animals maintain biodiversity. Every component of creation is interdependent, demonstrating that God designed nature as a balanced system in which each part contributes to the wellbeing of the whole. Nothing was made without significance, and nothing was left to chance. Among all created beings, humanity occupies a unique and privileged position. Unlike plants and animals, man was created in the image and likeness of God. This divine imprint endowed human beings with intelligence, moral consciousness, creativity, and the capacity for relationship with their maker. It also established mankind as the steward of creation. God granted humanity dominion over the earth, not as a license for reckless exploitation, but as a sacred trust to cultivate, protect, and preserve the world He had declared good.
Dominion, in God’s original intention, was to be exercised with wisdom, compassion, and responsibility. Human beings were meant to care for the land, use natural resources judiciously, and ensure that all forms of life flourished in accordance with divine order. The earth was to be managed as a trust from God, not plundered for selfish gain. Unfortunately, this divine mandate has been grossly misunderstood and widely abused. It is deeply regrettable that man has deviated so drastically from God’s original intention. Instead of stewardship, humanity has too often embraced greed. Instead of preservation, there has been exploitation. Instead of gratitude to the Creator, there has been reckless consumption and abuse of the environment. Across the world, forests are felled indiscriminately, rivers are contaminated, and fertile lands are stripped of their productivity.
 Species disappear as habitats are destroyed. Air pollution threatens public health, and climate change disrupts weather patterns and livelihoods. What God created as a life-supporting ecosystem is increasingly treated as a disposable commodity. In Nigeria, the consequences are especially painful. Oil spills in the Niger Delta have devastated farmlands, poisoned rivers, and destroyed fishing communities. Poor waste management clogs drains and contributes to flooding. Erosion eats away homes and roads. Illegal mining and logging scar the landscape. In many cases, communities suffer while those responsible evade justice. At the root of much of this destruction is corruption. Funds earmarked for environmental protection, sanitation, and erosion control are often diverted for personal enrichment. Regulatory agencies are compromised through bribery.
 Powerful individuals and corporations place profit above human welfare. Corruption thus becomes not only a moral failure but an assault on God’s creation. This environmental abuse is also a tragic expression of man’s inhumanity to man. When water is polluted, children fall sick. When farmlands are destroyed, farmers lose their means of survival. When rivers are contaminated, fishermen are plunged into poverty. When floods and erosion displace families, communities are torn apart. The burden of environmental degradation falls most heavily on the poor and vulnerable, while future generations inherit a diminished world. Yet, despite humanity’s failures, there remains hope for restoration. God’s purpose for creation has not changed. He still calls His people to responsible stewardship and righteous living. When individuals and nations return to God’s principles, they begin to view the earth not as an object to exploit, but as a sacred trust to preserve.
Responsible stewardship means protecting natural resources, planting trees, reducing pollution, disposing of waste properly, enforcing environmental laws, rejecting corruption, and treating others with justice and compassion. It requires governments to act with integrity, businesses to operate ethically, faith communities to teach creation care, and citizens to take personal responsibility for the environment. Creation care is therefore more than an environmental concern; it is a spiritual obligation. Our treatment of the earth and of one another reflects the sincerity of our reverence for God. To exploit nature, oppress the vulnerable, and enrich ourselves through corruption is to rebel against His purpose. To protect creation and uphold justice is to honor the Creator and participate in His original design. The world God made was declared “very good.” It is our solemn duty to ensure that our actions preserve rather than destroy that goodness.
By: Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
Continue Reading

Opinion

Confronting National Development In Chinese Style

Published

2 weeks ago

on

May 13, 2026

By

Quote: “China’s rise was not a miracle. It was the result of deliberate planning, disciplined execution, and a national determination to make poverty reduction the foundation of national development.”
A short TikTok video by @ancientchinaforever recently offered a compelling summary of China’s remarkable transformation from one of the world’s poorest nations to a global economic powerhouse. In just a few minutes, it captured a lesson that developing countries like Nigeria cannot afford to ignore: meaningful development does not happen by chance. It is the product of vision, consistency, and a deliberate commitment to confronting poverty. In 1981, according to the World Bank, nearly 88 percent of China’s population lived in extreme poverty. The country was overwhelmingly rural, industrially weak, and lacking in modern infrastructure. Millions of people had limited access to quality healthcare, education, and basic social services. Yet China refused to accept poverty as its destiny. Its leaders made a strategic decision to treat poverty reduction as the starting point of national development.
 Rather than relying on slogans or isolated welfare programmes, they created a coordinated system that mobilised government institutions at every level toward one overriding goal: improving the living conditions of ordinary citizens.
This was the turning point in China’s history. Poverty alleviation became a national mission. Clear targets were established, responsibilities were assigned to provincial and local governments, and officials were evaluated based on measurable results. Data was used to identify poor households, monitor progress, and adjust strategies where necessary.In effect, China built what may be described as a national development machine.The first major reforms focused on agriculture. Through the household responsibility system, farmers were given greater control over their land and allowed to sell surplus produce after meeting government quotas.
 This policy created incentives for productivity and innovation. The results were dramatic. Agricultural output rose significantly, rural incomes increased, and millions were lifted out of poverty.With food security improving, China turned to industrialisation. The government established Special Economic Zones, most notably in Shenzhen, to attract foreign investment and promote export-driven manufacturing. What was once a small fishing community quickly transformed into one of the world’s leading industrial and technology hubs. Factories created millions of jobs, drawing workers from rural areas into expanding urban centres. China soon became the manufacturing capital of the world, producing electronics, textiles, machinery, and consumer goods for global markets.The revenue generated from industrial growth was reinvested in infrastructure and human development.
China understood that development requires more than factories. It demands modern infrastructure that connects people, goods, and markets. Massive investments were made in roads, railways, airports, seaports, electricity, and telecommunications.
Today, China’s high-speed rail system, modern cities, and efficient logistics networks stand as visible proof of decades of purposeful investment. Equally important was China’s commitment to education and healthcare.Schools were expanded, literacy improved, and vocational training equipped workers with the skills needed in a modern economy. Healthcare reforms reduced preventable diseases and protected families from being pushed deeper into poverty by medical costs.These investments ensured that economic growth translated into tangible improvements in living standards.
Another defining feature of China’s development model was policy continuity. Through successive Five-Year Plans, national priorities were clearly outlined and pursued over decades. While leaders changed, the core development agenda remained consistent. This stability encouraged investment, strengthened institutions, and allowed long-term projects to be completed. Unlike countries where each administration abandons the policies of its predecessor, China sustained a clear sense of direction.The results have been extraordinary. According to the World Bank, China has lifted more than 800 million people out of extreme poverty—the largest poverty reduction effort in human history. A broad middle class has emerged, and the country has become the world’s second-largest economy. Chinese companies such as Huawei Technologies and Alibaba Group now compete at the forefront of global innovation.
China’s journey has not been without challenges. Rapid industrialisation has contributed to environmental degradation, regional disparities, and demographic pressures. However, these challenges do not diminish the scale of its achievement. They underscore the complexity of transforming a nation of over one billion people. For Nigeria, China’s experience offers valuable lessons. First, poverty reduction must be treated as a strategic national priority rather than a campaign promise. Second, development requires long-term planning and policy continuity. Third, sustained investment in agriculture, infrastructure, education, and healthcare is essential. Fourth, institutions must be strengthened to ensure accountability and measurable outcomes. Finally, leadership must combine vision with disciplined execution. Nigeria is richly endowed with natural resources, entrepreneurial talent, and a youthful population.
What remains missing is a coherent and consistent development strategy that places national interest above politics. China’s transformation demonstrates that development is not a matter of luck. It is the outcome of clear priorities, effective institutions, and unwavering commitment. For countries still grappling with poverty and underdevelopment, China stands as compelling proof that when a nation confronts its challenges with strategic intent and collective discipline, extraordinary progress is possible.
 Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
Continue Reading

Trending