Editorial
Return Of PDP
Nigeria’s political space was once again enlivened last week as the nation’s judiciary saved the acclaimed Africa’s largest political party, the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) from itself.
Last Wednesday precisely, the Supreme Court of Nigeria ended the 14-month leadership squabble within the PDP, giving it a new lease of life ahead of the all-important 2019 general elections.
Former Kaduna State Governor and PDP’s National Caretaker Committee Chairman, Senator Ahmed Makarfi and erstwhile Borno State Governor, Senator Ali Modu Sheriff had been locked in a protracted legal battle for the soul of the main opposition party, forcing it to lose critical elections, including governorship seats in Edo and Ondo States and legislative seats in many others.
Not only that, the PDP has been grappling with loss of high-profile membership to the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC), especially at the national level, after it suffered an embarrassing defeat in the 2015 presidential election.
But in what seems to be a reinvigorating tonic for the PDP, a five-man panel of the apex court led by the Chief Justice of Nigeria (CJN), Justice Walter Onnoghen, Wednesday removed the Ali Modu Sheriff faction of the party and affirmed the leadership of Ahmed Makarfi which was earlier sacked by the Federal Court of Appeal sitting in Port Harcourt.
Declaring Makarfi as the authentic Chairman of the PDP, the apex court, in its unanimous decision read by Justice Bode Rhodes Vivour, held that contrary to the majority verdict of the Court of Appeal sitting in Port Harcourt, the suit filed by Makarfi’s committee before the Federal High Court, Port Harcourt was not an abuse of court process.
The court also ruled that the PDP national convention held in Port Harcourt on May 21, 2016, was validly convened and in consonance with the party’s constitution; hence, Sheriff was rightly and constitutionally removed, more so, as he was incompetent to seek election as the party’s National Chairman at the convention.
The Tide agrees no less with the apex court. In affirming the universality of party supremacy in a democratic setting, the Supreme Court judgement vindicates the Makarfi-led PDP and has put the party on a recovery path.
We also agree with all lovers of democracy and good governance that the judgement would strengthen the opposition once again and save the country’s democracy from the dictatorial tendencies of the ruling party which also has its own share of internal challenges.
While we need not recall the deleterious impact of the PDP crisis on Nigeria’s democratic project, it must be stated that since the crisis started last year, there has been no virile opposition to the APC-led administration which, the PDP alleged, surreptitiously and assiduously worked to ensure that the crisis lasted. We believe, therefore, that the judgement would, in the main, indubitably serve as a check on the excesses of the ruling APC.
Even as PDP leaders and members deserve commendation for exhibiting a sense of maturity while the crisis lasted, the judges must be lauded for upholding the law, not minding whose ox is gored.
However, the PDP will have to re-invent itself by putting its house in order, and see the judgement as a no victor, no vanquished verdict, particularly, as it has brought sanity and stability to Nigeria’s political system.
While it behooves the PDP to be united, stronger and more focused after the crisis, it should strive to serve as a shadow government to the APC administration as it prepares itself for the 2019 general elections.
The victory of the Makarfi-led committee is a victory for democracy; a victory that calls for magnanimity and the imperative to soothe frayed nerves in the party. What this means is that Makarfi must hit the ground running now by initiating genuine reconciliation of the party’s factions at all levels; local, state and national.
Makarfi, rather than make utterances that would further polarise the party must extend his hand of fellowship and display some magnitude of camaraderie to the Sheriff faction in the spirit of true reconciliation and forgiveness.
On his part, Sheriff must prove himself as a true party man by burying the hatchet, allowing PDP to stablilise and avoiding inflammatory remarks, in the interest of the party and Nigeria’s democracy at large.
Editorial
Champions At Last: Well Done, Flamingos
Editorial
Kula Tragedy, Needless Loss Of Lives
Editorial
INEC’s Threat Alert Deserves Urgent Attention
The Independent National Electoral Commission’s (INEC) disclosure of an alleged plot to target its ad hoc personnel ahead of the 2027 general elections demand urgent national attention. The reported arrest of suspects, with intelligence support from the Department of State Services (DSS), is encouraging, but must not breed complacency. Any attack on electoral workers threatens not only human lives but also Nigerians’ constitutional right to choose their leaders through credible elections. The alleged conspiracy must be thoroughly investigated, its sponsors identified and all those found culpable prosecuted.
Particularly troubling is the reported targeting of National Youth Service Corps (NYSC) members, who play a vital role in Nigeria’s electoral process. Many serve far from home and undertake sensitive assignments at polling units and other electoral locations. As civilians, they should not be exposed to intimidation, abduction or violence without adequate protection. If election workers are vulnerable, the safety of other officials, observers and voters cannot be guaranteed.
Nigeria’s electoral history offers painful lessons. Human Rights Watch reported in Nigeria’s Post-Election Violence, published in May 2011, that more than 800 people died in the violence following the 2011 general elections. NYSC members serving as electoral officials were among the victims. This tragedy underscores the deadly consequences of political tension, incitement and disputed outcomes. Nigeria must act on the latest warning before another preventable disaster occurs.
INEC deserves recognition for uncovering the alleged plot, while the DSS and other security agencies merit commendation for their reported assistance. However, arrests are only the beginning. Investigators must establish the suspects’ identities, motives, networks and intended targets, ensuring that evidence is admissible in court. The process must remain impartial and free from political interference. Credible public updates are also necessary, provided they do not compromise investigations or operational security.
The authorities must adopt a comprehensive, intelligence-led security strategy for 2027. INEC’s proposed security conference should produce practical measures developed in collaboration with the Inter-Agency Consultative Committee on Election Security (ICCES), the police, the DSS and other relevant agencies. Threat assessments should guide personnel deployment, secure transportation, emergency communications, evacuation procedures and rapid response. Protection must extend beyond polling day to the distribution of sensitive materials, collation centres and the safe return of ad hoc personnel.
Those who provide intelligence must also be protected from retaliation. Confidential reporting channels and appropriate safeguards should be established for informants and others assisting investigations. Equally, security deployments must not intimidate voters or facilitate political repression. Personnel should act professionally, impartially and proportionately, within the law. Clear mechanisms for reporting misconduct and investigating abuses are essential to maintaining public confidence.
The threat also highlights broader concerns about trust in the electoral system. The European Union Election Observation Mission’s June 2023 final report identified shortcomings in transparency and operational implementation during Nigeria’s 2023 general elections, alongside concerns about the legal framework and electoral dispute resolution. Credible elections require more than security; they depend on transparent procedures, accountable officials and consistent enforcement of electoral laws. INEC must demonstrate measurable progress in addressing previously identified weaknesses.
Voter apathy presents another challenge. INEC’s published figures indicate that approximately 25 million people voted in the 2023 presidential election, out of about 93.5 million registered voters, a turnout of roughly 26.7 per cent. Although insecurity is not the sole cause of low participation, threats against electoral personnel can heighten public anxiety and discourage voters from exercising their franchise. INEC should strengthen civic education, improve polling accessibility and communicate procedures clearly. Political parties, civil society and the media must promote peaceful participation and reject electoral intimidation.
Misinformation and manipulated digital content pose additional risks. False reports, fabricated announcements and deepfake videos can inflame tensions, impersonate officials and mislead voters. INEC should establish a well-resourced, rapid-response communication system supported by verified digital channels and timely public statements. Collaboration with credible media organisations and fact-checkers would help counter falsehoods without suppressing legitimate criticism. Clear, consistent communication is indispensable, as administrative confusion and delayed explanations often allow rumours to spread.
Electoral integrity must also begin within INEC itself. The chairman’s warning against partisanship, negligence, extortion and ethical misconduct deserves serious attention. Security measures cannot compensate for officials who abuse their positions or disregard established procedures. INEC should strengthen staff training, ensure transparent recruitment and deployment, provide secure channels for reporting misconduct and enforce disciplinary rules consistently. Allegations of bribery and political interference must be investigated regardless of rank, while ad hoc personnel should receive adequate briefing, support and prompt payment.
The legal framework also requires clarity and consistent enforcement. INEC should explain the precise provisions and applicability of Section 26 of the Electoral Act 2026, including the obligations of electoral officials and security personnel, and publish authoritative guidance on neutrality and professional conduct. Complaints by opposition parties that they have been prevented from campaigning in certain states must likewise be investigated impartially. Any established violations should attract appropriate corrective action. Electoral fairness requires not only impartial polling officials but also lawful campaigning, access to competing viewpoints and freedom from intimidation.
The alleged plot against INEC’s ad hoc personnel is a warning against complacency ahead of the 2027 general election. Governments, security agencies, INEC, political parties and civil society must work together to prevent violence, punish misconduct and protect citizens’ participation. The commission should communicate its security priorities, maintain accessible threat-reporting channels and provide periodic updates on preparedness. Nigeria’s democracy cannot be safeguarded by assurances alone; it requires demonstrable preparation, impartial law enforcement and an unwavering commitment to free, fair and credible elections.
-
Rivers3 days ago
NUJ Set To Attend UNIPORT’s 217th Inaugural Lecture
-
News3 days agoNJC Suspends Three Judges, Sanctions Eight Others
-
News6 hours agoArmy Recovers X Account After Hack Attempt
-
Politics3 days ago
Atiku Kicks-Off 2027 Campaign, Promises To Tackle Nigeria’s Challenges
-
Featured3 days agoAPC Presidential Campaign Storms PH, ‘Morrow
-
News3 days ago
FG Explains Supply Disruption As Power Generation Drops To 3,659MW
-
Metro3 days ago
Port Harcourt Prepares For 10,000 Runners As International Marathon Returns
-
News3 days agoBille Gas Leak: Coalition Tasks FG On Proactive Measures
