Editorial
Banks, Workers’ Salaries And Hidden Charges
The activities of some commercial banks
in Nigeria, especially with regard to
charges on workers’ salaries and deductions on soft loans, have become rather unacceptable. In some cases, it has led to illegal reduction of salaries through double taxation.
While public servants are still contesting the prevailing taxation of their salaries, the banks further deplete the miserable pay packet by deducting value added tax and a list of other charges that serve only to raise the blood pressure of the average worker.
Consequently, a greater percentage of public servants have gone back to the banks to obtain soft loans just to meet up. With loans called “Sharp-Sharp”, “No Wahala loan” among others, are accompanied by high interest rate and another regime of deductions that give the impression that nobody monitors the banks.
While the banks apply different sharp practices in a bid to meet their usually bogus annual revenue projections, the victims (their customers) count their losses and come to the painful conclusion that banking is detrimental to their interest.
Banks, at will, deduct account management fees, Cost of Transaction (COT) and Value-Added Tax (VAT) on COT, among other charges at rates solely determined by them and sometimes do this more than once in a month.
Public servants appear to be the worst hit as they often obtain soft loans to enable them pay house rents, school fees, purchase vehicle, or meet other domestic obligations like burials only to realise that they had unwittingly cut a deal with the ‘devil’.
With the progressive drop in the salaries of government workers lately, the many phantom charges by banks have made the average worker even more desperate and disillusioned. This cannot continue to define the fate of the people even if the labour unions fail to respond to the groaning of the workers.
Also disturbing is the purported drop in the nation’s inflation rate to eight per cent and the report that the economy is improving without a corresponding impact on the living condition of the average citizen. It is sad to notice that the banks still charge more than 20 per cent interest on soft loans even as they pay less than two per cent interest on deposits.
Whereas the banks lure civil servants with the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN’s) approved prime lending rate of 18 per cent, they have been discovered to base their monthly interest deductions on a 23.9 per cent maximum lending rate.
Again, the CBN recently directed banks to stop the N100 per transaction charge on customers for the use of Automated Teller Machines (ATMs), some customers still allege receiving notifications on ATM charges, sometimes even when there were no such purported transactions; some banks now call it ATM maintenance fee.
Some banks now take advantage of the fact that many account holders hardly study the details of their monthly bank statements, or even bother to question the legitimacy of strange deductions. Even those who dare to ask often get frustrated after several calls or visits to the banks without convincing explanations.
The Tide believes that it is high time government took up the matter with the banks to ensure that salaries are not reduced in ways that leave the worker underpaid. In fact, the workers’ union ought to take the first interest in this matter and check the impunity of the banks.
We think that this also calls for more inclusive and robust housing/vehicle loans for public servants, especially as their living standards have been seriously altered by the unexpected deductions in their salaries.
The CBN should do more than merely encouraging short-changed bank customers to channel their complaints to its Consumer Protection Department. In fact, it should act in concert with the National Deposit Insurance Corporation (NDIC), Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the National Assembly Committees on Banking and Finance to bring to an end this fraudulent banking system that discounts the interest of the customer.
Editorial
2027: Beyond IGP’s Billboards Protection Order
As Nigeria moves toward the 2027 general elections and campaign activities intensify, violence against opposition politicians has become an issue that can no longer be overlooked. What should be a season of competing ideas is increasingly turning into a test of intimidation, and early signs suggest that those challenging the ruling establishment are the primary targets.
It was, therefore, welcome news when the Inspector-General of Police, Olatunji Disu, warned politicians, political thugs and others against destroying, defacing or removing campaign posters, banners and billboards. In a statement issued in Abuja by the Force Public Relations Officer, CSP Ani Iniedu, the police condemned such acts as political intolerance, directed Commissioners of Police in all 36 States and the Federal Capital Territory to take preventive measures, and warned that sponsors would also face prosecution. The police rightly described such vandalism as a criminal act that undermines parties’ and candidates’ freedom to canvass for votes.
But billboards are replaceable; human lives are not. While applauding the IGP’s stance, we urge him to extend the same stern warning and enforcement zeal to thugs who assault opposition members during campaigns. A police force that punishes the tearing of a poster but ignores the breaking of a skull will have its priorities questioned. Allowing such attacks to continue could erode the foundations of our democracy.
Consider the African Democratic Congress (ADC) presidential campaign flag-off in Sokoto State on November 4, 2026. The party alleged that the State Government denied it access to public facilities, sealed its campaign venue and pressured hotels to reject its delegates, forcing it to hold the rally at its secretariat. The Sokoto authorities, however, denied instructing hotels to turn guests away. More seriously, two suspected ADC supporters were reportedly shot along the Sokoto–Wurno Road while travelling to the venue, allegedly by operatives of the Sokoto State Community Guards.
Whatever the truth of these competing accounts, a shooting demands more than press statements. It requires a transparent, independent investigation and prosecution where warranted. Sokoto was not an isolated incident. The following day in Birnin Kebbi, the ADC presidential campaign convoy was reportedly attacked by armed gangs. Amnesty International said vehicles were vandalised, people assaulted with cutlasses and roads blocked, while the party’s Kebbi governorship candidate, Abubakar Malami, alleged that media equipment was destroyed and tear gas deployed. His convoy had suffered a similar attack in the city in September 2025.
The Nigeria Democratic Congress (NDC) has suffered similar attacks. On November 4, hoodlums stoned the motorcade of its presidential candidate, Peter Obi, and running mate, Rabiu Musa Kwankwaso, at Watt Market roundabout in Calabar, Cross River State. Police reported arresting a 27-year-old suspect, Victor Edet, although it remains unclear whether he has been arraigned. The State Government has denied suggestions that ruling-party supporters were responsible. Worse, in Asaba, Delta State, one person was killed and five injured when suspected thugs attacked an NDC rally. A death at a political rally is no longer a warning; it is a damning indictment of the prevailing political climate.
Even critics of the establishment who are not frontrunners have not been spared. Omoyele Sowore, presidential candidate of the African Action Congress (AAC), was attacked by suspected thugs at a restaurant in Ado-Ekiti on October 30. He alleged that the assailants were linked to the Ekiti State Government House and that the Department of State Services leaked his location. Both the State Government and the security service denied involvement, while the police reported a minor injury and a discreet investigation. These conflicting accounts make an independent, publicly reported inquiry indispensable.
What deepens the concern is the Federal Government’s apparent silence. We are unaware of any specific, forceful condemnation of these assaults, even as All Progressives Congress (APC) rallies appear to proceed nationwide without incident. Such silence can easily be misconstrued as complicity, regardless of intent.
According to the Centre for Democracy and Development, 109 election-related deaths were recorded in the build-up to the 2023 polls. The Kimpact Development Initiative separately documented 238 incidents and 24 deaths during the general elections. Beyond Nigeria, Kenya’s 2007–08 post-election violence claimed more than 1,000 lives, according to the Waki Commission. Ghana, by contrast, enacted the Vigilantism and Related Offences Act in 2019 to curb party vigilante groups, a model worth studying.
The remedies are neither exotic nor expensive. The IGP should extend his directive to cover assaults on individuals and disruptions of rallies, while establishing a dedicated investigative unit to probe the Sokoto shooting and the attacks in Kebbi, Calabar, Asaba and Ado-Ekiti. It should publish the status of each case within a fixed period. Suspects must be prosecuted and their sponsors, regardless of party or position, brought to justice. State-backed security outfits, including the Community Guards, should be audited and barred from partisan duties.
The Federal Government must speak and act unequivocally. President Tinubu should specifically condemn attacks on opposition candidates and direct all security agencies to guarantee equal protection for every party. Governors must ensure equal access to public facilities for registered parties. The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), which has warned of fines and imprisonment under the Electoral Act 2026 for inflammatory campaign conduct, should enforce the Code of Conduct for Political Parties. Working with the Inter-Agency Consultative Committee on Election Security, it should publish a joint security plan covering campaigns, polling, and collation. Parties must discipline their supporters, courts expedite electoral-violence trials, and civil society and the media maintain a public record of incidents and their outcomes.
The credibility of the 2027 elections is at stake. An election is credible only when every contender can campaign, travel, assemble and speak freely, without fear. Without a free opposition, there can be no meaningful democracy. Nigeria is not a one-party State, and law enforcement agencies must demonstrate their neutrality through action, not communiqués. The campaign atmosphere is too tense to be left to chance. Billboards deserve protection, certainly, but citizens deserve it far more.
Editorial
Champions At Last: Well Done, Flamingos
Editorial
Kula Tragedy, Needless Loss Of Lives
-
News2 days ago
RSG Reaffirms Commitment To STEM Education, Technological Advancement
-
Business2 days ago
‘NUJ, NPA’s Partnership Would Boost Port Producrivity, Economic Growth’
-
News2 days agoIGP Warns Police Officers Against Partisanship …Directs Regular Engagement With Journalists
-
Business2 days ago
Fire Threat Interrupts Asaba Air Peace Flight
-
News2 days agoCustoms To Deploy AI, Scanners Against Snuggling
-
Business2 days ago
Fish Production Deficit, A Major Investment Opportunity – Minister
-
Business2 days ago
NCDMB, NLNG Unveil $9m For Professorial Endowment Research Chairs In Six Varsities
-
Politics2 days ago2027: INEC Begins Deployment Of Non-Sensitive Materials
