Features
Hope, Fears As New Electricity Tariff Begins
If the proposal made by the National Electricity Regulatory Commission (NERC) to the Federal Government is anything to go by, electricity consumers in Nigeria will be governed by a new tariff regime, beginning from today, June 1.
Already, President Goodluck Jonathan had given his tacit support to the new regime, which according to the Rivers State Director of National Orientation Agency (NOA), Chief Andy Nweye, is intended to attract foreign investors with the much needed funds to bring the desired funding into the electricity sector. In this way, President Jonathan’s power transformation agenda will be achieved in due course.
At a meeting in Abuja with electricity generation companies on May 12, the Minister of Power, Professor Barth Nnaji had told the nation that the new electricity tariff would commence on June 1. He, however, assured that the new tariff tagged “Multi-Year Tariff Order” (MYTO) would not affect the low income earners and would attract more investment into the power sector.
MYTO, according to NOA, is the method of calculating electricity tariffs for producers, transporters and consumers in Nigeria, and an adjustment in tariff that has been in practice since July 1, 2008. The new tariff regime, according to a document prepared by NOA and NERC, is predicated on the need to ensure adequate and stable power supply, and guarantee efficient customer service delivery in Nigeria, encourage private sector participation in electricity generation and distribution, create job opportunities for Nigerians, reduce unnecessary power consumption and wastage and provide more pre-payment metres and discourage estimated billing.
Under the new tariff regime, different classes of consumers would pay different rates applicable to their classes for their electricity supply. Consumers are classified into 14 groups namely Residential (R1, R2, R3, R4), Commercial (C1, C2, C3), Industrial (D1, D2, D3), Special (A1, A2, A3) and Street Lighting (S1).
Consumers who use their premises exclusively as a residence, houses, flat or multi-storeyed house fall under residential class, while consumers who use their premises for any purpose other than exclusively as a residence or as a factory for manufacturing goods are classified under commercial.
Industrial customers are people who use their premises for manufacturing goods including welding and iron-mongery, while customers such as agriculture and agro-allied industries, water boards, religious houses, government and teaching hospitals, government research institutes and educational establishment are grouped under special class.
But feelers from a one-day roundtable organized by the NOA in Port Harcourt on Monday indicate that many stakeholders, especially electricity consumers and civil society groups are still skeptical about the government’s sincerity of purpose in the implementation of the new tariff regime. They do not share the optimism of NOA that if implemented, the country would be on the part to a stable power supply, thereby bidding farewell to the era of generator dependence.
Speaking on behalf of the Centre for Advocacy Initiative, a non-governmental organisation based in Port Harcourt, Barrister (Mrs) Gladys Chibuzor dismissed the new tariff regime as unworkable since there was no baseline survey to determine its workability and possible impact on the power situation in Nigeria before it was introduced.
Sharing similar sentiments, a lecturer in the Department of Political Science, Ignatius Ajuru University of Education, Chief Christian Akani said the new tariff regime was another form of neocolonialism from the capitalist nations. He called on the federal government to tread cautiously so as not to plunge the ordinary Nigerian into a deeper economic agony in order to satisfy the exploitative desires of the powerful capitalist countries.
“This is another Karawusa which means talkshore that may be of no effect since government appears determined to implement the programme.
Other speakers who expressed reservations about the new power policy direction include, the Director of Community Rights Initiative, Dr Lucky Eleminya Anyakwe. Dr Anyakwe picked holes with the timing of the programme, saying “It is only few days to the June 1, 2012 take –off time . How much time is there to collate feedback and channel it to the authorities?”.
On Tuesday, last week, the House of Representatives had summoned the Minister of Power, Professor Barth Nnaji and chairman of NERC, Dr Sam Amadi over the new electricity tariff. The summon was sequel to a motion moved by Hon Yakubu Balogun (ACN. Lagos) which was unanimously adopted by the House. Hon Balogun had argued that the increase in electricity tariff would bring untold hardship on consumers in the country in spite of irregular power supply.
But Professor Nnaji and Dr Amadi had, at different occasions, dismissed the fear that the new electricity tariff regime would amount to increase in electricity tariff for consumers. They argue that the ordinary Nigerian would benefit more from the new tariff regime.
Elucidating further on the new tariff regime, the state Director of NOA, Chief Nweye explained that tariff review was not tariff increase “because in the tariff order, the urban poor and the rural dwellers called R1 would pay less in one or two areas”. He added that the R1 consumers tagged “lifeline class” would enjoy the special benefit of not paying fixed charge for their electricity.
“For instance, they will pay N4 per kilowatt per hour instead of N7, and will no longer pay metre maintenance charge”, he said.
Meanwhile, the R2 customers who belong to the middle class and who constitute the overwhelming majority of consumers, according to Chief Nweye, would pay between N11 and N12 per kilowatt instead of the average cost of about N24, while the R3 consumers who are the rich would notice a substantial increase in tariff but not up to the 88 percent that was widely reported by the media.
Corroborating this view, the NERC boss, Dr Amadi had, in his defence of the new tariff regime, stated that “customers do not have to pay to purchase a meter because this cost has been included in their tariff. They only have to pay a minimal fee for the connection which is approved by NERC”.
The NOA boss, while defending the NERC’s position on the new tariff regime, said the objective of the new tariff was to attain cost reflective pricing that would ensure private sector investment in the generation, distribution and transmission of electricity in the country.
Stating that 50 private independent power projects have been licensed to produce 20,000 megawatts of power in the near future, Chief Nweye expressed fear that if these plants were not cost-effective, the ultimate investors might not invest as expected.
Nweye noted that for many years, Nigerians were not paying cost reflective tariff that could recover cost and bring incentives to re-invest in the network. This, according to him, was largely responsible for the poor state of power supply in the country.
He argued that government could no longer rely on the past mindset of every national good as free and that electricity is not a typical public good that is free, but a product that is produced at a cost and therefore needed to be properly priced in order to provide incentives for more investment.
The State NOA Director stated that “with stable power supply, businesses would thrive and our economy will flourish. Small and medium scale enterprises will once again have the electricity they need to keep their businesses running. Hairdressers, vulcanisers, barbers and other small scale entrepreneurs will no longer have to depend on generators, while bigger commercial and industrial ventures will considerably reduce their cost of doing business, leading to a general reduction in the cost of goods and services”.
Meanwhile, NERC is putting some measures in place to protect the rights of consumers and prevent over-billing. These measures, according to NOA boss, include establishment of Customer Complaint Units (CCU) in all distribution companies, as well as NERC Forum offices in all distribution offices nationwide.
The new tariff regime and the measures proposed to actualise it, are in no less mouth-watering; but given the failure of past governments to keep their promises to the people, especially in the area of power supply for more than two decades, many Nigerians still find it difficult to believe that Jonathan’s government would not be a chip of the old bloc.
But the Acting General Manager, Customer Service, Power Holding Company of Nigeria (PHCN), Mr Sebastian P. Koka allayed such fears. Giving a breakdown of the financial implications of meeting the expectations of Nigerians in the area of power supply at the roundtable on Monday, Mr Koka admitted though that previous governments had failed to satisfy the yearnings of Nigerians because they were not honest and humble enough to tell Nigerians the truth, he expressed confidence in the ability of Jonathan’s government.
“I must tell you that President Goodluck Jonathan has been honest enough to let everyone know that government is neither a good manager of businesses nor would it be able to afford the financial needs of the sector alone.
“Even if government invests in the construction of the power infrastructure, there has to be a programme to ensure regular maintenance of such infrastructure”, he said.
With the take-off of the new tariff, today, expectations are high that the era of generator dependence for power supply is gone. But how the new regime would not impose a deeper agony on the ordinary Nigerian remains the greatest fear the Jonathan administration will have to allay in the peoples’ minds.
Boye Salau and Desmond Osueke
Features
Before It Becomes A Norm
The reported selection of 16
The incident reportedly
Traditional institutions have
The ministry should also
Fiona Kogbara
Aba Road, PH.
As Governance Takes A Back
Across the country,
Nigerians face deteriorating
Those seeking re-election
Political parties and
Salma Ibrahim
Rumuokoro, PH.
Ebola In Abuja?
Reports of a possible Ebola
The Federal Ministry of
Ebola requires early
The media must verify reports
Tonia Iweka
Ogbor Hill, Aba
Features
Empowering The Girl Child,Building A Future Where Every Girl Can Thrive ?
Every girl deserves the opportunity to learn, the freedom to dream, the right to live without fear and the chance to determine the course of her own future.
Yet, for millions of girls around the world, these opportunities remain difficult to access. Some struggle to obtain quality education, while others face discrimination, early marriage, gender-based violence and social expectations that limit their ambitions. For many, the challenge begins in childhood, when decisions about their lives are made without giving their voices the attention they deserve.
October 11, observed annually as the International Day of the Girl Child, provides an opportunity to reflect on these challenges and renew the commitment to protecting girls’ rights and empowering them to reach their full potential.
The day also raises an important question: how can societies talk about a better future for girls while some of them continue to face barriers to education, safety, equality and opportunity?
For Nigeria, where girls are growing up in communities with different social, economic and cultural circumstances, the occasion offers an opportunity to examine the progress made, recognise the challenges that remain and consider the responsibilities of families, communities and government in securing a better future for every girl.
From Recognition to Action
The International Day of the Girl Child was established by the United Nations and first observed on October 11, 2012. It was created to recognise the rights of girls and draw attention to the particular challenges they face across the world.
Its significance extends beyond a yearly celebration. It highlights the need for societies to address the inequalities that prevent girls from enjoying the same opportunities, protection and dignity as their male counterparts.
Girls have the right to education, healthcare, safety, participation and equal treatment. They also have the right to express their opinions, develop their abilities and make decisions about their futures in accordance with their age and evolving capacities.
These rights are not privileges to be granted only when families can afford them or when communities consider them convenient. They are part of the wider commitment to protecting the dignity and development of every child.
The observance also recognises that girls are not simply beneficiaries of development programmes. They are potential scientists, teachers, journalists, entrepreneurs, doctors, engineers, public servants and community leaders whose contributions can shape the future of their societies.
When girls are given the opportunity to develop their abilities, the benefits extend beyond individual achievement to families, communities and the wider economy.
The Nigerian Girl Child
In Nigeria, the experiences of girls differ considerably depending on their family circumstances, location, access to education and the opportunities available within their communities.
Some girls attend well-equipped schools, participate in extracurricular activities and receive support to pursue their ambitions. Others face difficulties that threaten their ability to complete their education or develop their full potential.
Poverty remains a significant concern for families struggling to meet basic needs. In some households, girls may be expected to undertake extensive domestic responsibilities, care for younger siblings or contribute to family income at the expense of their education.
For girls in rural and underserved communities, the distance to school, inadequate facilities, limited access to learning materials and other practical barriers may make education difficult to sustain.
Insecurity can create additional risks, particularly where families fear sending their children to school or where displacement interrupts their education.
These challenges do not affect every Nigerian girl in the same way. However, they demonstrate why protecting the rights of girls requires more than general statements about equality. It requires practical action that addresses the circumstances preventing them from accessing opportunities.
A girl who cannot attend school because her family cannot afford the necessary expenses needs support that makes education accessible. A girl exposed to abuse needs protection and access to appropriate services. A girl whose ambitions are dismissed simply because of her gender needs an environment that recognises her abilities.
The responsibility is to ensure that the circumstances of a girl’s birth do not determine the limits of her future.
Education: Opening the Door to Opportunity
Education remains one of the most important ways to empower the girl child.
Through education, girls acquire knowledge, develop critical thinking skills and gain a better understanding of their rights and responsibilities. Schooling can also expand their employment opportunities and help them make informed decisions about their lives.
An educated girl is better positioned to understand the choices available to her, participate in community life and contribute to social and economic development.
However, access to education alone is not enough. Girls must also be able to learn in safe environments, receive quality instruction and complete their education without discrimination or unnecessary barriers.
Parents and guardians have an important role in ensuring that girls are encouraged to attend school and are given the support needed to continue learning.
Schools, in turn, must provide environments where girls are protected from harassment, bullying and discrimination. Teachers can help by treating students fairly, encouraging participation and challenging assumptions that certain subjects or careers are suitable only for boys.
Government also has a responsibility to strengthen educational infrastructure, improve learning conditions and address the financial and social barriers that keep children out of school.
The goal should not simply be to enrol more girls in classrooms. It should be to ensure that every girl has a genuine opportunity to learn, complete her education and use the knowledge she acquires to build a meaningful future.
When Tradition Becomes a Barrier
Culture and tradition are important parts of community identity. They preserve history, strengthen relationships and provide a sense of belonging.
However, certain practices and social expectations can restrict girls’ rights and opportunities when they place greater value on gender than on individual ability and well-being.
In some communities, girls may be discouraged from pursuing higher education because marriage and domestic responsibilities are considered more important. Others may face pressure to abandon their ambitions or accept decisions made without their participation.
Child marriage remains another serious concern in Nigeria. When a girl is married before adulthood, her education, health, safety and personal development may be placed at risk.
Such situations highlight the importance of protecting children while encouraging communities to examine practices that undermine their rights.
Empowering girls does not require rejecting every cultural tradition. It requires preserving what strengthens communities while addressing practices that expose children to harm or deny them opportunities.
Community leaders, parents, educators and religious institutions can contribute by promoting the value of girls’ education, supporting their development and speaking against harmful practices.
A community’s strength should not be measured by how effectively it restricts the ambitions of its girls, but by how well it protects its children and prepares them for the future.
Protecting Girls from Violence and Abuse
A discussion about empowering girls cannot be complete without addressing their right to safety.
Girls may face different forms of abuse, including sexual violence, physical punishment, exploitation, bullying, harassment and harmful treatment within homes, schools and communities.
Some incidents remain unreported because victims fear blame, retaliation or public humiliation. Others may lack access to trusted adults or services capable of helping them.
The consequences can be serious, affecting a girl’s physical health, emotional well-being, education and ability to trust others.
Protecting girls requires adults and institutions to take reports of abuse seriously and respond in ways that prioritise the child’s safety and dignity.
Parents and guardians should encourage open communication so that girls feel able to report situations that make them uncomfortable or unsafe. Schools need clear procedures for reporting and responding to abuse, while relevant authorities must ensure that children can access appropriate protection and support.
Girls should also receive age-appropriate information about personal safety, boundaries and where to seek help.
Importantly, the responsibility for preventing abuse belongs to those who commit it and to the institutions responsible for protection. Girls must never be blamed for violence or exploitation directed against them.
A society that celebrates the girl child must also be prepared to defend her rights when those rights are threatened.
Health, Confidence and the Freedom to Dream
Empowerment also means ensuring that girls can grow up healthy, confident and informed about their bodies and well-being.
Access to healthcare, adequate nutrition, clean water, sanitation and accurate health information is essential to their development.
For adolescent girls, menstrual health is particularly important. Where sanitary products, private toilets or reliable information are unavailable, menstruation can create practical difficulties that affect attendance at school and participation in daily activities.
Families, schools and relevant institutions can help by providing accurate information, challenging harmful misconceptions and ensuring that girls have access to appropriate facilities and support.
Emotional well-being also deserves attention. Girls who experience discrimination, bullying, abuse or constant pressure to meet unrealistic expectations may struggle with confidence and self-worth.
Encouragement from parents, teachers and trusted adults can help them recognise their abilities and develop the confidence to pursue their goals.
A girl should not have to choose between being accepted by society and believing in her own potential.
She should be able to explore her interests, develop her talents and imagine a future that reflects her abilities, values and ambitions.
The Role of Parents, Schools and Government
Empowering the girl child is a shared responsibility.
Parents and guardians are often the first people who shape a girl’s understanding of her worth and potential. Their encouragement can influence whether she feels confident enough to pursue education, express her views and aspire to leadership.
Providing equal encouragement to girls and boys, sharing household responsibilities fairly and listening to girls’ concerns are practical ways families can promote equality at home.
Schools must ensure that girls have equal opportunities to learn, participate in activities and develop leadership skills. Teachers should challenge gender stereotypes and encourage girls to explore subjects and careers based on their interests and abilities.
Government institutions also have a responsibility to protect children’s rights through effective laws, policies, educational support and accessible protection services. Laws must be implemented, and families should be able to seek help when a child’s safety or rights are threatened.
Communities, civil society organisations and the media can support these efforts by educating the public, drawing attention to harmful practices and highlighting positive examples of girls overcoming barriers.
The media, in particular, can help change public attitudes by portraying girls as active participants in development rather than limiting their stories to vulnerability and suffering.
Together, these efforts can create an environment in which girls are protected, heard and given the opportunity to contribute meaningfully to society.
Beyond October 11
The International Day of the Girl Child is an important reminder, but the protection and empowerment of girls cannot be achieved through a single day’s activities.
It requires sustained action in homes, schools, workplaces, communities and public institutions.
It means ensuring that a girl from a low-income family has access to education, that a girl living in a rural community is not forgotten in development planning, and that a girl who reports abuse receives appropriate protection rather than blame.
It also means listening to girls when decisions affect their lives and including their perspectives in discussions about education, healthcare, safety and development.
The measure of progress is not simply the number of speeches delivered or campaigns organised. It is whether girls are safer, better educated, healthier and more able to make meaningful choices about their futures.
Every girl deserves the opportunity to grow without violence, learn without discrimination and pursue her ambitions without being limited by harmful expectations.
A Future Where Every Girl Can Thrive
The future of any society is closely connected to the opportunities available to its children.
When girls are educated, protected and encouraged to develop their abilities, they are better positioned to contribute to their families, communities and the wider society. When their rights are neglected, the consequences can extend far beyond the individual child.
As the world marks October 11, the message to Nigeria and the international community is clear: empowering girls begins with recognising their rights and continues through the practical steps taken to protect them.
It begins with a parent who encourages a daughter to remain in school, a teacher who recognises her potential, a community that rejects harmful practices and institutions that respond seriously when her rights are violated.
It also requires a willingness to question beliefs and practices that deny girls the freedom to learn, grow and participate in society.
A girl’s future should not be determined by poverty, discrimination or the assumption that her ambitions matter less than those of a boy.
Every girl deserves the chance to discover what she can become.
On this International Day of the Girl Child, the call is not merely to celebrate girls, but to protect their rights, invest in their education, listen to their voices and create a society where every girl has the freedom and opportunity to thrive.
Because empowering a girl is not simply about changing her life today. It is about helping to build a future in which her dignity is respected, her potential is recognised and her rights are protected every day.
Davies Christian Nelson & Dominic Emediong Emmanuel
Dr Davies is the Director of Publications, Rivers State Ministry of Information and Communications.
Features
Beyond Tradition As Stakeholders Seek Collaboration To End FGM In Rivers
For generations, Female Genital Mutilation(FGM) has remained one of the most deeply entrenched harmful traditional practices affecting women and girls across many societies.Sustained largely by cultural beliefs, misconceptions and long-standing norms, the practice has continued despite increasing global awareness of its severe health, psychological and human rights consequences.
In Nigeria, however, growing public awareness, stronger legal frameworks and coordinated interventions by government institutions and development partners are gradually changing the narrative.Although significant progress has been recorded, experts insist that achieving the complete eradication of female genital mutilation requires more than legislation. It demands sustained collaboration, continuous public enlightenment, community ownership and the willingness to challenge harmful practices that have endured across generations.
To this end, stakeholders in Rivers State have renewed calls for stronger collaboration, sustained public enlightenment and community ownership in the fight against Female Genital Mutilation (FGM), warning that the harmful practice cannot be completely eradicated through legislation alone.
The call was made during the Third Quarter State Technical Committee Meeting on the Elimination of Female Genital Mutilation in Rivers State, organised by the Rivers State Ministry of Health with support from the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) and other development partners.
The meeting brought together representatives of the Ministries of Health, Social Welfare and Rehabilitation, Information and Communications, civil society organisations, child protection advocates, development partners and other stakeholders committed to protecting women and girls from harmful traditional practices.
The engagement provided an opportunity for participants to review progress recorded in the state, examine persistent challenges and develop practical strategies for accelerating the elimination of FGM through stronger partnerships, coordinated interventions and evidence-based advocacy.
A major focus of the meeting was the need to broaden public understanding of what constitutes FGM. Participants noted that the practice extends beyond the commonly recognised cutting or removal of parts of the female genitalia and includes other harmful procedures that can cause lasting physical and psychological damage.
Setting the tone for the technical discussions, the Reproductive Health Coordinator, Rivers State Ministry of Health, Dr. Ebere Smith, described FGM as both a reproductive health concern and a social injustice that violates the bodily integrity, dignity and wellbeing of women and girls.
According to her, although FGM has historically been sustained by cultural beliefs and traditions in many communities, medical evidence has established that the practice exposes women and girls to avoidable health complications and psychological trauma.
“It is an injustice to the female anatomy. It is not just a reproductive injustice; it is also a social one. It affects a woman’s emotional well-being, childbirth, marriage and overall quality of life,” Dr. Smith said.
She explained that FGM can involve the use of unsterilised razor blades, knives, scissors and needles, while drawing attention to less recognised practices, including the repeated pressing of a baby girl’s genital area with hot water, which she identified as a form of Type IV FGM.
Dr. Smith noted that survivors could suffer excessive bleeding, infections, chronic pain, complications during childbirth, sexual dysfunction and emotional trauma, among other long-term health consequences.
She therefore stressed the importance of providing families and communities with accurate information to dispel misconceptions that have allowed harmful practices to persist across generations.
“Having the right information at the right time for the right people is essential,” she said, emphasising the roles of healthcare workers, parents, caregivers, traditional institutions, educators, journalists and community leaders in preventing FGM.
Speaking on progress made in Rivers State, the UNICEF Desk Officer in the Rivers State Ministry of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation, Dr. Victor Iseberetonma, expressed optimism over the impact of sustained advocacy and community sensitisation.
He disclosed that sensitisation structures established in about 60 communities were conducting house-to-house campaigns, church outreaches and market engagements aimed at educating residents on the dangers of FGM.
Iseberetonma also noted that an increasing number of traditional rulers and community leaders were demonstrating commitment to ending the practice within their domains.
He described the willingness of some monarchs to formally abolish FGM in their communities as an important milestone, stressing, however, that the ultimate objective remained the complete eradication of the practice across Rivers State.
In his technical presentation, UNICEF Facilitator, Mr. Uchenna Unah, cited findings from the 2024 Nigeria Demographic and Health Survey (NDHS), which showed that the prevalence of FGM among women aged 15–49 had declined from 20 per cent in 2018 to 14 per cent in 2024.
Despite the decline, Unah said FGM remained a significant public health and human rights concern, noting that 85 per cent of girls and women who underwent the practice experienced it before the age of five.
He further highlighted encouraging changes in public attitudes, stating that 71 per cent of women and 74 per cent of men surveyed believed that FGM should not continue, while a similar majority affirmed that no religion requires the practice.
He urged stakeholders to sustain evidence-based advocacy, strengthen community engagement and intensify public enlightenment to ensure that the declining prevalence ultimately translates into the complete elimination of FGM.
Also contributing to the discussions, the State Coordinator of the Child Protection Network (CPN), Rivers State, Inyinyi Irimagha, challenged the continued use of the term “female circumcision”, describing it as medically inaccurate.
She explained that circumcision refers to the removal of the male foreskin and should not be used to describe harmful procedures carried out on the female genitalia.
Irimagha said collaboration between the Rivers State Ministry of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation, Child Protection Network, UNICEF and other partners had strengthened community advocacy through survivor groups, adolescent networks, male champions and traditional rulers.
She also highlighted the need to increase awareness of Type IV FGM, particularly practices that communities may not recognise as forms of genital mutilation.
According to her, the absence of cutting does not mean that such practices are harmless, as damage to delicate tissues and nerves can result in long-term health and reproductive complications.
Beyond the formal presentations, discussions with participants revealed that misconceptions about FGM remain widespread.
Some participants admitted that they had previously associated FGM exclusively with the physical cutting or removal of parts of the female genitalia and were surprised to learn that other harmful practices are also recognised internationally as forms of FGM.
The discussions further highlighted the influence of culture and intergenerational traditions on perceptions of women’s health. Some participants recalled practices that had been passed down for generations without sufficient consideration of their medical implications.
One cultural practice mentioned during the engagement involved placing a snail between the legs of a woman after childbirth based on the belief that its slimy nature could help control bleeding.
Participants agreed that while cultural traditions remain important to communities, practices that pose risks to human health should be subjected to scientific scrutiny and discontinued where necessary.
A resident, Sampson, described the enlightenment as an eye-opener, noting that many people had traditionally believed that applying hot water to a newborn girl’s genital area was simply a routine hygiene practice.
He said greater public awareness was needed to ensure that families did not unknowingly expose their children to harmful practices.
Another participant, DollyPur, stressed the importance of creating safe spaces for community dialogue, saying that people often continue harmful practices because “everyone else” appears to be doing the same thing.
She noted that open discussions involving parents, community leaders and other stakeholders could help communities understand the health consequences of harmful traditional practices and encourage behavioural change.
The stakeholders consequently agreed that the elimination of FGM requires sustained cooperation among government institutions, healthcare professionals, traditional rulers, religious leaders, civil society organisations, development partners, the media and communities.
They emphasised that continuous public enlightenment, accurate health information and community-led interventions remain critical to correcting misconceptions, changing attitudes and protecting the health, dignity and rights of women and girls across Rivers State.
Christian Nelson Davies & Ekemini Victor Sunday
Dr Davies is the Director of Publications, Rivers State Ministry of Information and Communications, and Ekemini, an intern
-
Politics3 days agoLG CITY BOY COORDINATOR HAILS WIKE’S SUPPORT FOR ONYESOH, TINUBU
-
Politics3 days ago
DIRI INAUGURATES APC CAMPAIGN COUNCIL, SETS MILLION VOTES TARGET FOR TINUBU
-
Politics3 days agoNDC Candidate Urges Oborevwori To Probe Asaba Political Violence
-
News3 days agoArmy Recovers X Account After Hack Attempt
-
Business3 days agoNigeria Loses N17tr Yearly To Abandoned Projects
-
Politics3 days ago
2027: Oborevwori Tasks Media On Fair, Accurate Reporting
-
Politics3 days ago
2027: AKPABIO ENVISAGES TINUBU’S VICTORY IN SOUTH SOUTH REGION
-
Politics3 days ago
Asaba Political Violence: Police Confirm One Dead, Delta Govt Urges Probe
