Editorial
Making The LG System Work
Repeated calls for the scrapping of the local government system in Nigeria is beginning to wear some worrisome legitimacy; and the earlier the issue was properly understood and addressed, the better for all.
Apart from the fact that in a democracy, the voice of the people need to be taken seriously, the calibre of persons and organisations calling for the scrapping of the local government system can no longer be ignored. But it should also be understood that this call simply amounts to throwing away the baby with the bath water.
It is true that local government councils in Nigeria have failed to meet expectations of the people. Many of them have constituted themselves into serious drain pipes and avoidable minus on the concept of democracy and devolution of powers. But this is hardly the fault of the rural people who are supposed to benefit from the system.
Indeed, the failure of the local government system is well known to the authorities and no one has done anything about it. Even when some top political office holders were openly accused of benefiting from the “robbery” at the councils, nothing has changed.
With the exception of a few councils in the country, the local government authorities collect allocations every month and have nothing to show for such monthly allocations, either in form of infrastructures or human development. In addition to the fact that many of the local government chairmen divert a bulk of the resources of the councils to spurious ventures, the real demand of being in office, which is to give the people at the grassroot a sense of belonging, is not attended to.
Yet, the local governments councils are the closest government to the people. In addition to providing leadership and development, councils should be the birth place for responsible and representative leadership. And if democracy must take root in our country, the people at that level must participate in governance.
The local government system must be made to work in Nigeria because all over the world, the gains of devolution of powers cannot be overemphasised. Besides, the achievement of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) depends greatly on the functionality of local government areas, whose closeness to the population must be taken advantage of.
In Rivers State, the need to keep the local governments alive and viable is now being realised under the present administration. The state under the leadership of Rt. Hon. Chibuike Rotimi Amaechi has taken over the payment of primary school teachers that used to take the larger percentage of the council’s allocations. The state government has also gone ahead to build model schools and remove pupils from dilapidated buildings and tree-shade classrooms.
While we commend Governor Amaechi for this great gesture that has literally restored life to primary education in Rivers State, not much would change across the country if other state governments fail to take a queue or evolve ways of reducing the financial burden on their local government councils. Perhaps, the councils would also need to step up their internally generated revenue profile.
Meanwhile, the development of the political culture at the local government level must be encouraged. Allegations of chairmen and councillors being imposed on the people across the country is regrettable. Indeed, the manipulation of elections that work against the choice of the people should end.
Also critical is the need to give free hands to councillors to work. Paying a group of people every month, and heavily too, for doing nothing is against the law. That the councillors cannot exercise checks and balances at the local government level, let alone impeach the chairman can only make the system sterile.
Since only the State House of Assembly is empowered by the constitution to sack an erring local government chairman, it will not be difficult to imagine where the allegiance of the chairman would be. By effects, the local people who are supposed to be the real beneficiaries of the local government system stand little or nothing to gain. This, we believe, does not reflect true democracy.
While we insist that the local government councils should not be scrapped, we think the relevant laws in this country should be reviewed to encourage devolution of more power in the country, especially at the local level.
Editorial
2027: Beyond IGP’s Billboards Protection Order
As Nigeria moves toward the 2027 general elections and campaign activities intensify, violence against opposition politicians has become an issue that can no longer be overlooked. What should be a season of competing ideas is increasingly turning into a test of intimidation, and early signs suggest that those challenging the ruling establishment are the primary targets.
It was, therefore, welcome news when the Inspector-General of Police, Olatunji Disu, warned politicians, political thugs and others against destroying, defacing or removing campaign posters, banners and billboards. In a statement issued in Abuja by the Force Public Relations Officer, CSP Ani Iniedu, the police condemned such acts as political intolerance, directed Commissioners of Police in all 36 States and the Federal Capital Territory to take preventive measures, and warned that sponsors would also face prosecution. The police rightly described such vandalism as a criminal act that undermines parties’ and candidates’ freedom to canvass for votes.
But billboards are replaceable; human lives are not. While applauding the IGP’s stance, we urge him to extend the same stern warning and enforcement zeal to thugs who assault opposition members during campaigns. A police force that punishes the tearing of a poster but ignores the breaking of a skull will have its priorities questioned. Allowing such attacks to continue could erode the foundations of our democracy.
Consider the African Democratic Congress (ADC) presidential campaign flag-off in Sokoto State on November 4, 2026. The party alleged that the State Government denied it access to public facilities, sealed its campaign venue and pressured hotels to reject its delegates, forcing it to hold the rally at its secretariat. The Sokoto authorities, however, denied instructing hotels to turn guests away. More seriously, two suspected ADC supporters were reportedly shot along the Sokoto–Wurno Road while travelling to the venue, allegedly by operatives of the Sokoto State Community Guards.
Whatever the truth of these competing accounts, a shooting demands more than press statements. It requires a transparent, independent investigation and prosecution where warranted. Sokoto was not an isolated incident. The following day in Birnin Kebbi, the ADC presidential campaign convoy was reportedly attacked by armed gangs. Amnesty International said vehicles were vandalised, people assaulted with cutlasses and roads blocked, while the party’s Kebbi governorship candidate, Abubakar Malami, alleged that media equipment was destroyed and tear gas deployed. His convoy had suffered a similar attack in the city in September 2025.
The Nigeria Democratic Congress (NDC) has suffered similar attacks. On November 4, hoodlums stoned the motorcade of its presidential candidate, Peter Obi, and running mate, Rabiu Musa Kwankwaso, at Watt Market roundabout in Calabar, Cross River State. Police reported arresting a 27-year-old suspect, Victor Edet, although it remains unclear whether he has been arraigned. The State Government has denied suggestions that ruling-party supporters were responsible. Worse, in Asaba, Delta State, one person was killed and five injured when suspected thugs attacked an NDC rally. A death at a political rally is no longer a warning; it is a damning indictment of the prevailing political climate.
Even critics of the establishment who are not frontrunners have not been spared. Omoyele Sowore, presidential candidate of the African Action Congress (AAC), was attacked by suspected thugs at a restaurant in Ado-Ekiti on October 30. He alleged that the assailants were linked to the Ekiti State Government House and that the Department of State Services leaked his location. Both the State Government and the security service denied involvement, while the police reported a minor injury and a discreet investigation. These conflicting accounts make an independent, publicly reported inquiry indispensable.
What deepens the concern is the Federal Government’s apparent silence. We are unaware of any specific, forceful condemnation of these assaults, even as All Progressives Congress (APC) rallies appear to proceed nationwide without incident. Such silence can easily be misconstrued as complicity, regardless of intent.
According to the Centre for Democracy and Development, 109 election-related deaths were recorded in the build-up to the 2023 polls. The Kimpact Development Initiative separately documented 238 incidents and 24 deaths during the general elections. Beyond Nigeria, Kenya’s 2007–08 post-election violence claimed more than 1,000 lives, according to the Waki Commission. Ghana, by contrast, enacted the Vigilantism and Related Offences Act in 2019 to curb party vigilante groups, a model worth studying.
The remedies are neither exotic nor expensive. The IGP should extend his directive to cover assaults on individuals and disruptions of rallies, while establishing a dedicated investigative unit to probe the Sokoto shooting and the attacks in Kebbi, Calabar, Asaba and Ado-Ekiti. It should publish the status of each case within a fixed period. Suspects must be prosecuted and their sponsors, regardless of party or position, brought to justice. State-backed security outfits, including the Community Guards, should be audited and barred from partisan duties.
The Federal Government must speak and act unequivocally. President Tinubu should specifically condemn attacks on opposition candidates and direct all security agencies to guarantee equal protection for every party. Governors must ensure equal access to public facilities for registered parties. The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), which has warned of fines and imprisonment under the Electoral Act 2026 for inflammatory campaign conduct, should enforce the Code of Conduct for Political Parties. Working with the Inter-Agency Consultative Committee on Election Security, it should publish a joint security plan covering campaigns, polling, and collation. Parties must discipline their supporters, courts expedite electoral-violence trials, and civil society and the media maintain a public record of incidents and their outcomes.
The credibility of the 2027 elections is at stake. An election is credible only when every contender can campaign, travel, assemble and speak freely, without fear. Without a free opposition, there can be no meaningful democracy. Nigeria is not a one-party State, and law enforcement agencies must demonstrate their neutrality through action, not communiqués. The campaign atmosphere is too tense to be left to chance. Billboards deserve protection, certainly, but citizens deserve it far more.
Editorial
Champions At Last: Well Done, Flamingos
Editorial
Kula Tragedy, Needless Loss Of Lives
-
News2 days ago
RSG Reaffirms Commitment To STEM Education, Technological Advancement
-
Business2 days ago
‘NUJ, NPA’s Partnership Would Boost Port Producrivity, Economic Growth’
-
News2 days agoIGP Warns Police Officers Against Partisanship …Directs Regular Engagement With Journalists
-
Business2 days ago
Fire Threat Interrupts Asaba Air Peace Flight
-
News2 days agoCustoms To Deploy AI, Scanners Against Snuggling
-
Business2 days ago
Fish Production Deficit, A Major Investment Opportunity – Minister
-
Business2 days ago
NCDMB, NLNG Unveil $9m For Professorial Endowment Research Chairs In Six Varsities
-
Politics2 days ago2027: INEC Begins Deployment Of Non-Sensitive Materials
