The alarming surge in the sexual exploitation and over exposure of children and preteens to explicit content is a crisis that cannot be ignored. The case of a preteen moimmoin seller, nicknamed ‘Apeke’ and widely referred to as “Oriyomi Hamzat’s wife,” exemplifies the disturbing trend and serves as a clarion call for action.
Through the powerful medium of Kokoro Alate, a popular radio programme anchored by Oriyomi Hamzat on Agidigbo FM, numerous cases of child sexual abuse, exploitation, and moral decay have been brought to public attention.
Hamzat’s programme has highlighted heartbreaking stories such as fathers sexually abusing their daughters and siblings engaging in inappropriate relationships—grim realities that underscore the depth of the crisis.
One particularly troubling episode involved Apeke, a preteen moimmoin seller, whose viral videos revealed not only her inappropriate use of sexually suggestive language and songs but also the alarming reaction from the public. Instead of eliciting collective concern and condemnation, her actions triggered widespread amusement, with many adults viewing her performance as mere entertainment.
In her song, Apeke referred to herself as the “wife” of Oriyomi Hamzat and other imaginary lovers, singing lyrics laced with innuendos, including inviting Hamzat to rest on her ‘fragile chest.’ She even questioned a man about the balance in his bank account, showcasing a precociousness far beyond her years.
These are clear indicators of a child who has likely been exposed to inappropriate content or worse, possibly experienced exploitation.
While Hamzat commendably promised to sponsor her education and give her a better future, this incident raises broader questions about the systemic failures that leave children like Apeke vulnerable. It is common knowledge that children who hawk goods on the streets are at significant risk of sexual abuse, exploitation, and loss of innocence.
This situation demands a multifaceted and urgent response. The government, particularly,  the Ministry of Women Affairs, and the Ministry of Youth, must collaborate with individuals like Oriyomi Hamzat to rescue vulnerable children, rehabilitate those who have been abused, and address the root causes of this crisis.
Proactive education and counselling must be prioritised by engaging experts in early childhood education and teenage counselling. These professionals can design programmes that educate children, parents, and communities on the dangers of sexual exploitation and foster safe, nurturing environments.
There is also an urgent need to regulate children’s exposure to explicit content on social media and other platforms. The government and media organisations should launch awareness campaigns to address the psychological damage caused by overexposure to such content.
Parents play a critical role here and must take responsibility for monitoring their children’s use of and exposure to social media to safeguard their innocence and well-being.
Support systems for victims are essential. Many children have endured trauma and require counselling, medical care, and reintegration into society. The establishment of safe spaces and robust support networks will help these children recover and rebuild their lives.
Finally, law enforcement agencies must act decisively to prosecute individuals who exploit children, whether they are guardians, relatives, or strangers. Strengthening community vigilance and the legal framework is vital to preventing abuse and ensuring justice for victims.
The case of Apeke is not just about one child; it is a reflection of a society at a crossroads. Will we allow our children’s innocence to be eroded further, or will we stand together to protect them? This is the time for bold, decisive action.
As John Adams aptly stated, “It is more important that innocence be protected than it is that guilt be punished.”
Let us ensure that no child is left unprotected or unheard. The future depends on what we do today.
Ladigbolu, a teen counsellor and early childhood educator, wrote from Lagos.

Remi Ladigbolu

The world emptied at the Vatican City, Rome, Italy last week for the burial of late Pope Francis, the head of the Catholic Church worldwide who died on April 21. Foreign delegates from 164 countries attended the funeral. Among them were the President of the Nigeria’s Senate, Godswill Akpabio, the Minister of State for Foreign Affairs, Bianca Ojukwu, the Catholic Bishop of Sokoto Diocese, Hassan Kuka and other politicians, who were there on behalf of President Bola Tinubu and the entire nation.
Right from the day the Pontiff passed on, through the days preceding his burial, till the day his corpse was laid to rest and uptill now, a lot has been spoken about his great leadership qualities which stood him out among many other leaders in the world.
Some say that in a world increasingly defined by power struggles, materialism, and political division, Pope Francis stood as a rare symbol of humility and selflessness. Since his election in 2013, he redefined what it meant to lead not just a church, but a global moral community. More than just a spiritual figure, Pope Francis was a powerful voice for the voiceless, championing compassion, justice, and mercy.
Others say that from the very beginning of his papacy, Jorge Mario Bergoglio—Pope Francis—made clear that he intended to chart a different course. Choosing to live in the modest Vatican guesthouse rather than the opulent Apostolic Palace, he signaled that his papacy would not be about grandeur. He traded the red papal shoes for simple black ones, and when he was introduced to the world, he asked the crowd to pray for him before offering his own blessing. These symbolic acts spoke volumes about the kind of leader he aspired to be.
Perhaps, the most talked about quality of the cherished leader was his humility. In him, humility was not theoretical but practical. He repeatedly called for a “poor Church for the poor,” aligning the Catholic Church more closely with the needs of the marginalized. Whether washing the feet of prisoners on Holy Thursday or visiting refugee camps, Pope Francis embodied a theology that demands solidarity with the suffering.
Equally mentioned was his selflessness in the face of complex global challenges. He did not shy away from controversial topics—climate change, economic inequality, migration, and even internal Church reform. His encyclical Laudato Si’ challenged both political and economic leaders to treat the planet with reverence, not exploitation. He advocated for inclusive dialogue, calling on governments to welcome migrants as fellow human beings, not burdens.
The passing of Pope Francis indeed marked the end of an era defined by humility, moral clarity, and an unwavering commitment to justice.
nd the question for Nigerian leaders both those present at his funeral and those that couldn’t be there, both political, religious and traditional leaders and indeed all Nigerians is, what lessons can the country learn from the life of the Pontiff? How can we embrace his lifestyle to transform our national fabric?
Pope Francis showed the world that true leadership is rooted in service, not in pomp or power. He declined the luxuries of the papal palace and chose to live among the people. Our leaders, notorious for their obsession with opulence and entitlement, must learn that leadership is not about status symbols—convoys, sirens, and security details—but about responding to the needs of the people with empathy and action.
In a country where public officials often equate success with extravagance, the lifestyle of Pope Francis should teach us that simplicity does not diminish influence. He wore modest clothing, drove a humble car, and redirected attention away from himself and toward the marginalized. Even at death, his coffin was made of simple wood. If our leaders, contractors, heads of institutions and others can practice such simplicity, certainly more resources will be available for education, health, and infrastructure. Nigerians will stop dying of hunger because there will be enough money to invest in farming and other agricultural activities.
Pope Francis was a champion of the poor, migrants, and the forgotten. He spoke boldly against exclusion, even within the Church. As a matter of fact, many Catholics, particularly the divorced and the civilly remarried who could not receive communion, started receiving communion. A close childhood friend of mine belongs to this group. After her first marriage crashed, she remarried but could no longer receive communion until Pope Francis’s Amoris Laettia (The Joy of Love) document of April 8, 2016, began to reshape in our local parishes.
Ours is a deeply divided nation—ethnically, religiously, and politically. Our leaders must rise above sectional interests to promote inclusion, heal old wounds, and govern with the common good in mind. The practice of one law for one tribe or a particular section of the country and other for others should be jettisoned.
Expectedly, Pope Francis’s papacy was not without challenges. Scandals within the Church, resistance from conservative factions, and geopolitical tensions tested his resolve. Some critics even said that his positions were too progressive, even disruptive. Yet even in the face of criticism, he maintains a posture of listening, forgiveness, and dialogue. He did not back down from calling out injustice, environmental degradation, or corruption.
Nigerian leaders should stop prioritizing personal survival over national progress. Currently there is a defection wave going on in the country. Political leaders are dumping the political parties under which they were elected by the people to join other political parties. How do their actions benefit the people that elected them? Some Nigerians for tribal reasons and political profiteering will choose to keep mum in the face of injustice against their fellow citizens. Just as Pope Francis, speaking and acting against injustice—no matter the cost—should be the standard, not the exception if Nigeria must move forward as a united entity.
Another striking attribute of Pope Francis was his ability to listen, dialogue and foster peace. He was a bridge-builder. He engaged atheists, Muslims, and people of all cultures in meaningful dialogue all geared towards peace in the world. In a country as diverse as Nigeria, listening to opposing views and working toward peaceful coexistence should be second nature to our leaders, not an afterthought.
Nigeria will be a better, more progressive country if both the leaders and the led realize that everybody cannot be on the same side of a bargain. Dissenting voices must always be there. Diverse opinions must exist. The ability to tolerate these views and accommodate the opponents is one of the great qualities of a good leader. That, too, is a form of humility—not weakness, but the strength to lead with openness and grace.
Francis never forgot that he was accountable not just to the Church, but to God and humanity. Nigerian leaders, especially those who publicly profess faith, must internalize the idea that leadership is a sacred trust. Governance should reflect conscience and character, not just calculation and convenience.
Pope Francis’s message was simple yet radical: to be truly great, one must serve. In this, he channeled not only the spirit of St. Francis of Assisi, whose name he bore, but also the core teachings of the Gospel. He brought the Catholic Church closer to the people—not by changing doctrine, but by changing tone. His humility was not performative; it was deeply woven into his actions, his words, and his witness.
In honoring the legacy of Pope Francis, Nigerians—leaders and citizens alike—must embrace a new kind of leadership: one marked by humility, sacrifice, and service to others. His life reminds us that change doesn’t begin with policies alone; it begins with character.
Adieu Humble Holy Father

By; Calista Ezeaku

On April 21, as the clock struck 9 p.m., terror descended upon Desa, a tranquil town known officially as Ilesha Baruba, nestled in Kwara State’s Baruten Local Government. It’s just a few minutes away from my hometown.
“Masked in military fatigues, armed bandits shot sporadically at the town’s night market that was bustling with young men of different ethnicities having a good time and cold-bloodedly murdered eight innocent souls.
The terrorists began their rampage by brutally executing a Fulani man who was a member of the local vigilante. Multiple gunshots splattered his brains across the ground in a shockingly repellent spectacle of blood and tissue.
Five other Fulani people were gunned down. Tragically caught in the crossfire were also a Fon man from southern Benin Republic and a Baatonu native of the town.
What deepens the anguish is the apparent senselessness and inscrutability of it all. Eyewitness accounts said the assailants themselves were Fulani (based on the language they spoke). And they neither kidnapped nor stole.
Why did they kill fellow Fulani men? The Fon man and the Baatonu man appeared to be unintended targets. Was this just bloodthirsty nihilism? Did the Fulani men, who were integrated into the local community, betray the terrorists? Everyone is mystified.
Before April 21, though, the whole of Borgu had been gripped by paralyzing fears of the new terrorist group called Mahmuda. They had operated in Kebbi and Niger states and recently began to be seen in my part of Kwara State. In other words, they are now in all of what used to be collectively Borgu.
Borgu is a historic, multi-ethnic space, which comprises Baruten and Kaiama local governments in Kwara State, Borgu and Agwara local governments in Niger State, Bagudo and Dandi local governments in Kebbi State, and Borgou and Alibori departments (i.e., states) in Benin Republic.
It existed as a loose but powerful, storied, invincible, confederation of disparate kingdoms from the 1300s until the 1890s when Britain and France conquered and dismembered it.
Terrorists had been camped in the Kainji Lake National Park and in the part of Beninese portion Borgou that shares a boundary with Burkina Faso for more than a year. This year, they moved to Kaiama and parts of Yasikiru in Baruten LGA.
Efforts by residents to alert authorities initially brought hope when security forces raided terrorist hideouts and confiscated some of their weapons and equipment.
But rather than bringing relief, these actions incited vicious reprisals and transformed our communities into targets for heartrending sanguinary retaliation that spares no children, women, or the elderly.
The last week’s visit by Kwara State’s governor to Kaiama, intended as an assurance of protection, tragically became a catalyst for further bloodshed. Mere hours after his departure, terrorists punished the community with intensified violence and mercilessly murdered more innocent and helpless people.
Two days before the horrific events in Desa, ominous messages from the terrorists had spread across Baruten and Kaiama, imposing a curfew slated to begin at 10 p.m.
Yet even before it could be enforced, the terrorists struck unannounced, extinguished precious lives and spread dread.
This escalation leaves the people of Borgu in a state of disabling siege and fear. They have been robbed of the peace they once cherished.
My heart is broken beyond description. Borgu’s famed, time-honored tranquility now trembles beneath the weight of terror and grief.
The urgency for decisive, meaningful action to restore safety and peace has never been more critical.
Kperogi, a public affairs analyst, wrote in from Lagos.

By: Farooq Kperogi