Business
Petroleum Industry Governance Bill 2017 (As Passed By The Senate)
The Nigeria Petroleum Industry Legislation Explanatory Memorandum for Governance & Institutional Reforms
Background and Introduction
This executive summary note narrates the principles and intent of the 2015 Petroleum Industry Legislation being prepared by the Technical Committee for submission to the National Assembly.
The Technical Committee mandates include:
a. Review the Oil and Gas Policy approved in 2007, for appropriateness;
b. Review all available materials and information of the past reforms the Petroleum Industry Bill (PIB) 2008, 2012 and in addition to the PIB version passed by the House of Representatives in May 2015;
c. Consult and engage as necessary;
d. Debrief relevant authorities as frequently as needed to ensure alignment and adequate guidance; and
e. Redraft, present and commence submission of the PIB 2015, ensuring alignment with the Policy.
It was expedient to go back and review the circumstances that led to the inability to establish an acceptable document and to enact the intended Petroleum Industry Bill in the past, which suffered a multiplicity of assaults from various players/stakeholders
To arrive at the present proposition for the Petroleum Industry legislation-2015, this committee has employed thorough review of past documents, made comparative review of similar and competitive jurisdictions, and ensured international best practices in content and in style.
1.1 Role of Petroleum to National Growth and Development
Oil and gas have been, and will remain for years to come, Nigeria’s most important non-renewable energy source, currently contributing over 90% of country’s foreign exchange earnings and about 80% of recurrent and capital expenditure. The industry is therefore critical to the economic and social development of Nigeria.
While the government’s vision and aspiration continue to target diversification of the economy, the petroleum sector remains the primary source of revenues to make that happen as well as sustain the country for the foreseeable future.
Nigeria currently produces about 2 million barrels of light, sweet quality crude oil per day, still the largest in Sub-Saharan Africa. It has proven oil plus condensate reserves of about 37 billion barrels. Both current oil production and reserves are far short of growth levels envisaged in the Vision 20:2020.
Similarly, Nigeria produces approximately 8 bcf of gas daily of which some 50% goes for export while 13% (mainly associated gas) is flared. Natural gas reserves are substantial at about 183 trillion cubic feet (TCF), representing 3 percent of the world’s total. Incidentally, gas is also not sufficiently addressed in the existing petroleum industry legislation.
History of Petroleum Sector Regulation
The history of petroleum legislations may be classified into three periods:-
a) Pre- colonial, under the British Colony, giving authority to the “Crown” for issuance of licences and taxation under the Minerals Ordinance Act of 1914;
b) Post Independence Nigeria, (1960-1971), whereby only taxes were paid by companies involved in petroleum operations; and,
c) Since joining the Organisation of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) in 1971, that created the enabling environment for greater involvement by the Government, taking equity in petroleum assets and in operations, and as a prelude, ushered authority from 1969 of the Minister to create an Inspectorate Unit in the then Ministry of Mines & Power, as well as promulgate rules and regulations for the sector.
This authority was upped by the 1977 legislation creating a commercial entity, the Nigerian National Corporation (NNPC), alongside with the Department of Inspectorate, renamed, the Department of Petroleum Resources (DPR), under the office of the Minister in 1991.
Since then, petroleum sector realised several ad-hoc legislations mostly on need basis without necessarily checking alignment with existing ones.
As at today, our nation is in energy crisis. There has been a sustained imbalance between domestic Supply and Demand, not arising from lack of endowed energy resources but from inability to manage our resources efficiently. We still import today over 90% of needed petroleum products (petrol and chemicals), flare substantial gas produced, have damaged our eco-systems and polluted our communities and cannot supply adequate electricity to homes and industry. This situation has undermined our citizens’ standard of living, life expectancy, our national energy security and has resulted to other unforeseen fall-outs like: labour unrest; fuel queues; high cost of delivery of products; high cost of delivery of overall services in the total economy; and a share waste of unquantifiable productivity.
The Existing joint ventures (JVs) and PSCs fiscal policies, require review with respect to “windfall profits” to private companies based on incentives that have distorted normal market economics as well as need harmonisation because they are dispersed along the nature or type of product, company or project specific. In doing so, the indigenous “Sole Risk”/ independent players, should command attention under the nations priority policy that ensures indigenous capacity expansion in the petroleum value chain in Nigeria.
The subsisting primary legislation that governed Oil & Gas in Nigeria are:
A. The Petroleum Act, which came into force on 27th November 1969 and has been amended severally. From it , there exist subsidiary legislations (Regulations), as well as other related international Treaties. Accordingly, there are approximately 70 principal Legislations and 30 Regulations that govern the petroleum sector of Nigeria.
The following regulations, amongst others are subsidiary to the Petroleum Act:
• Mineral Oils (Safety) Regulations, Statutory Instrument 1963 No. 45;
• Petroleum (Drilling and Production) Regulations, Statutory Instrument 1969 No. 69;
• Crude Oil(Transportation and Shipment) Regulations, Statutory Instrument 1984 No. 1984;
• The Oil Pipelines Act 1956;
• The Oil Terminal Dues Act 1969;
• The Associated Gas Re-injection Act 1979
• the Associated Gas Re-injection (and Flaring of Gas) Regulations 1979(as amended)
B. The Petroleum Profits Tax (PPT) Act, which came into force on 1st January 1958, and has been amended many times. Its main purpose was to provide for the assessment and imposition of a tax upon the profits of enterprises engaged in the development and production of petroleum in Nigeria.
Some of the amendments include;
• The Deep Offshore and Inland Basin Production Sharing Contracts Act 1999 No. 9 (as amended);
• Various incentives under the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) of 1986, 1991 and 2000, that were NOT enacted but put in place and implemented by the Tax authorities;
C. The separation or distinction of crude oil and natural gas fiscal structure can be said to have begun with the introduction of incentives terms under the Associated Gas Framework Agreement (AGFA) of 1991. The terms promulgated under AGFA, as a policy and in context, attempted to further differentiate between Associated Gas (AG) and Non-Associated Gas (NAG). The existing legislations and fiscal incentives pertaining to gas are those of:
• The Nigerian Liquefied Natural Gas Act No 39, 1990;
• The Finance (Miscellaneous Taxation Provisions) Act No. 18, 1998 (Amendment to Petroleum Profits Tax Act);
• The Finance (Miscellaneous Taxation Provisions) Act No. 19, 1998 (Amendment to the Petroleum Profits Tax Act)
3. The Nigeria Petroleum Industry Reforms
Recognizing the positive contribution of the oil and gas industry to the Nigerian economy, the real and potential losses due to successive mismanagement of the sector, the Federal Government of Nigeria (FGN) launched a process of broad sector reform which commenced in the year 2000.
The reform was meant to put in place an updated Nigeria Oil and Gas Policy as well as a legislative framework (Petroleum Industry Act) to enhance delivery of the sector objectives with emphasis on complete overhaul of the Nigeria petroleum industry, reforming the operational mechanisms for the upstream, downstream and natural gas sectors, redefinition of the roles and responsibilities of key institutions, enhancement of performance, accountability and transparency, (Governance), licensing and acreage management, bringing operations in line with international standards and, not least, improve on tax codes for both oil and gas.
Although the issues involved are complex, their resolution can be expected to have significant implications for investment flows, industry activity, and government revenues.
The overriding objective of the National Oil and Gas policy was “to maximise the net economic benefit to the nation from oil and gas resources and to enhance the social and economic development of the people while meeting the nation’s needs for fuels at a competitive cost, accomplishing all in an environmentally acceptable manner”.
Maximisation of the net economic benefit would include additions through appropriate fiscal regimes, sustained profitability of the sector, delivery of growth commercial activities, active local content policy and the development of improved direct linkages between the oil sector and the other sectors of the Nigerian economy.
4. The Nigeria Petroleum Industry Bill (PIB)
The Nigeria Petroleum Industry Bill (PIB), has been around in one form or the other since 2008 when it was first introduced. During the 7th National Assembly, additional efforts were made to pass the 2012 version of the PIB but it unfortunately was unsuccessful, similar to attempts at prior parliamentary sessions.
Continuous stalling and delay in passage to law has hampered investments, keeping the country’s future in limbo and denying Nigeria the unique opportunity as oil and gas leader in Sub Sahara Africa.
Specifically, the main objectives remain relatively the same, spanning the spectrum of the industry to:-
1. Enhance exploration and exploitation of petroleum resources;
2. Significantly increase domestic gas supplies especially for power generation and industrial development;
3. Create a peaceful business environment that enables petroleum operations;
4. Establish a fiscal framework that is flexible, stable, progressive and competitively attractive;
5. Create a commercially viable National Oil Company;
6. Deregulate downstream petroleum business;
7. Create efficient regulatory entity;
8. Engender transparency and accountability;
9. Promote active Nigerian Content and make Nigeria the hub of the western African petroleum province, and
10. Promote and protect Health Safety and Environment.
Apart from content issues with prior versions, one of the major drawbacks to passage was the bogus packaging of the PIB as a single legal instrument.
Consequently, although this 2015 attempt contains enhanced quality work on content, the bill has been split into logical smaller pieces for submission to the 8th National Assembly, a complete departure from all prior efforts.
This way, the pieces can be expeditiously considered and passed one after the other. And where amendments are required in the future, the relevant piece can be separately considered rather than opening up the whole Act for review.
Accordingly, the following pieces of legislation will be considered for the Nigeria Petroleum Industry Bill – 2015.
1. Petroleum Industry (Governance & Institutional Reforms) Bill
2. Petroleum Industry (Upstream Petroleum Administration Reforms) Bill
3. Petroleum Industry (Downstream Petroleum Administration Reforms) Bill
4. Petroleum Industry (Fiscal Framework & Reforms) Bill
5. Petroleum Industry (Revenue Management Reforms) Bill.
A. Petroleum Industry (Governance & Institutional Reforms) Bill
A1.0 Principles & Structure
It is widely acknowledged that major reforms in the governance and institutional structure for the sector are necessary and urgent.
A major drawback of the existing framework is the lack of clarity of roles, self- regulation, conflicts and unnecessary overlaps.
For example, while the Minister is in charge of the Ministry of Petroleum Resources, and indirectly supervises the Department of Petroleum Resources (supposed to be an independent regulator), he is also the Chairman of the Board of the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC) by law.
The minister therefore operates in a quasi- executive capacity across all facets of government involvement in the industry giving ample room for sustained failures in governance and performance.
In addition, and in particular, the country is being robbed of huge revenues as a result of mismanagement of the NNPC, the intrusive control of the government in the affairs of the corporation, the confusion with the regulator as well as funding difficulties. These continue revenues are needed primarily to grow the sector as well as support the much talked about diversification of the economy.
The key objectives of the Petroleum Industry (Governance & Institutional Reforms) Bill are to:-
a) Create efficient and effective governing institutions with clear and separate roles for the petroleum industry;
b) Establish a framework for the creation of commercially oriented and profit driven petroleum entities that ensures value addition and internationalization of the petroleum industry;
c) promote transparency in the administration of the petroleum resources of Nigeria;
d) create a conducive business environment for petroleum industry operations.
In defining the new petroleum industry institutional landscape, the following principles were used to guide the overall framework:-
a) Clear delineation of government roles and responsibilities across the industry (Policy formulation, Regulatory oversight and Commercial operations);
b) Simple and lean structure, devoid of unnecessary overlaps;
c) Streamline the coordination role of the Minister;
d) Creation of a single strong industry regulator;
e) Unbundling of the existing NNPC to two Commercial entities limited by shares – the NOC, and the National Assets Management Company;
f) Ensuring strong governance, transparency and accountability in all institutions.
Based on these principles, the institutions proposed in the Petroleum Industry (Governance & Institutional Reforms) Bill are as follows:-
1) The minister, who shall be responsible for policy formulation and coordinating the affairs of the petroleum industry on behalf of the Federal Government.
2) The Petroleum Regulatory Commission, who shall be the industry regulator and watchdog, responsible for licensing, monitoring, supervision of petroleum operations, enforcing laws, regulations and standards across the value chain.
3) The National Petroleum Company, who will operate as a commercial entity, fully integrated across the value chain.
4) The National Assets Management Company, who shall ensure maximum value for the federation through prudent management of the federation’s oil and gas investments in assets where government is relieved of upfront funding obligations; eg. PSC assets.
These institutions constitute the key structures necessary to assure effective governance and efficiency of the petroleum industry. It is recognised however that the following agencies do exist and contribute in one way or the other to the running of the industry.
1. The Nigerian Content Development &Monitoring Board (NCDMB) whose Act came into effect in April 2011 and already undergoing some amendment, hence remain as is.
2. The Petroleum Technology Development Fund (PTDF) has responsibility for providing funds for human capacity development in the industry. A separate bill has been developed for this to institute appropriate legislative framework which was never in place.
A2.0 Institutions, Roles, Governance and Controls
In line with the proposed structure of the industry, mandates, deliverables and control mechanisms, in particular for the effective governance of the various institutions are clarified in greater detail in the Bill.
This narrative simply provides high level characteristics of each of the new institutions proposed in the Petroleum Industry (Governance & Institutional Reforms) Bill.
A2.1 The Minister
The Minister of Petroleum Resources will exercise general coordination powers and provide full diplomatic cover on all petroleum-related matters on behalf of the country.
A2.1.1 Mandates
Specifically, the Minister shall:-
a) Be responsible for the determination, formulation and monitoring of government policy for the petroleum industry in Nigeria;
b) Exercise general coordination over the affairs and operations of the petroleum industry subject to the provisions of this Act;
c) Report developments in the petroleum industry to the Federal Executive Council;
d) Advise the Government on all matters pertaining to the petroleum industry;
e) Represent Nigeria at meetings of international organisations that are primarily concerned with the petroleum industry;
f) Negotiate and execute international petroleum treaties and agreements with other sovereign countries, international organizations and other similar bodies on behalf of the government
g) Promote the strategic interest of Nigeria in the global oil and gas industry.
The Minister will be empowered to source professional support on fixed term basis as needed without drawing resources from the regulatory authority (e.g the DPR) or the National Oil Company (e.g. the NNPC) as currently is the case.
Consideration was given to creating a new institution within the ministry to cater for this but was subsequently discarded as it does not fit with the civil service framework.
A2.1.2 Funding
Funding of the office of the Minister shall be by appropriation by the National Assembly.
A2.2 The Petroleum Regulatory Commission
A single and one stop shop Petroleum Regulatory Commission is hereby proposed for the petroleum industry, consolidating such roles currently largely resident in the Department of Petroleum Resources (DPR), the Petroleum Products Pricing Regulatory Agency (PPPRA), and some environmental regulations driven by the National Oil Spill and Detection Agency (NOSDRA).
A2.2.1 Mandates
The core mandates of the Commission are as follows:-
a. Promote the healthy, safe and efficient conduct of all petroleum operations;
b. Promote the efficient, safe, effective and sustainable infrastructural development of the petroleum industry;
c. Ensure compliance with all applicable laws and regulations governing the petroleum industry;
d. Determine and ensure the implementation and maintenance of technical standards, codes and specifications applicable to the petroleum industry;
e. Subject to the provisions of this Act, execute government policies for the petroleum industry assigned to it by the minister;
f. Promote an enabling environment for investments in the petroleum industry;
g. Ensure that regulations are fair and balanced for all classes of lessees, licensees, permit holders, consumers and other stakeholders; and
h. Implement such other objectives as are consistent with the provisions of this Act.
In addition to the above and other roles detailed out in the bill, it shall:-
i. Undertake and promote the exploration of the frontier basins of Nigeria.
j. Develop exploration strategies and portfolio management for the exploration of unassigned frontier acreages in Nigeria;
k. Identify opportunities and increase information about the petroleum resources base within all frontier acreages in Nigeria;
l. Undertake studies, analyse and evaluate all unassigned frontier acreages in Nigeria.
Detailed tasks, responsibilities and deliverables are listed in the Bill.
A2.2.2 Governance & Controls
The size and powers of the commission requires effective governance and controls to assure delivery as envisaged, in addition to reducing abuse to the absolute minimum.
At the same time, there is need to ensure maximum independence of the new Nigeria Petroleum Regulatory Commission and limit political interference in particular on technical decisions.
To this end, the Commission is proposed to be governed by a 9-man board comprised of politically autonomous individuals with proven integrity, relevant competencies and experience to effectively deliver on core functions.
These are:
a) A non-executive chairman;
b) One non-executive commissioner;
c) The executive vice chairman, who shall also be the accounting officer of the Commission;
d) Three executive commissioners;
e) A representative of the Ministry of Petroleum Resources who shall not be below the rank of Director;
f) A representative of the ministry of finance who shall not be below the rank of director;
g) A representative of the ministry of environment who shall not be below the rank of director;
All appointments shall be made by the president and confirmed by the senate. It is expected that the board will operate outside the 4-year electoral cycle to safeguard continuity.
The Board shall:-
a) Be responsible for the general direction and supervision of the commission;
b) Oversee the operations of the commission;
c) Provide general guidelines for the carrying out of the functions of the commission;
d) Review and approve the business, strategic and operating plans of the commission;
e) Consider and approve the budget of the commission and monitor its performance;
f) Approve the audited and management accounts of the commission and undertake consideration of the management letter from the external auditors;
g) Determine the terms and conditions of service of employees of the commission;
h) Stipulate remuneration, allowances, benefits and pensions of staff and employees of the commission in consultation with the National Salaries, Incomes and Wages Commission;
i) Structure the commission into such number of departments as it deems fit for the effective discharge of the functions of the commission; and
j) Carry out such other functions and undertake such other activities which in the opinion of the board, are necessary to ensure the efficient and effective administration of the commission in accordance with the provisions of this Act or as may be delegated to the commission by the minister.
To be contd
Business
Nigeria Loses N17tr Yearly To Abandoned Projects
The Minister of State for Industry, Trade and Investment, John Enoh said this at the 8th annual induction and conference of the Chartered Institute of Project Managers of Nigeria (CIPMN).
He explained that abandoned projects continue to lock up public funds that could have been used for infrastructure development, industrial growth, job creation and essential social services.
Represented by the ministry’s Permanent Secretary, Chris Osa Isokpunwu, he said the impact goes beyond financial losses, as incomplete projects affect communities and limit access to important public services
He cited examples of that remain unopened, schools that cannot accommodate students, roads that fail to connect communities and electricity projects that have not delivered their intended benefits.
The Registrar-General and Chief Executive Officer of CIPMN, Henry Ifeanyi Mbadiwe, also identified poor project management as a major challenge affecting development in Nigeria.
He revealed that the institute had developed a project management curriculum for Nigerian universities, which has received approval from the National Universities Commission (NUC). The programme is expected to enable universities to offer project management as a bachelor’s degree.
Mbadiwe further referenced findings by the Presidential Projects Assessment Committee, which identified 11,886 ongoing federal capital projects in 2011, with an estimated financial commitment of ?7.78 trillion.
He noted that inadequate planning, supervision, accountability and implementation were among the factors contributing to the abandonment of projects across the country.
The minister called for stronger project management structures across ministries, departments and agencies to improve planning, monitoring and evaluation.
He added that the Federal Ministry of Industry, Trade and Investment had introduced a 90-day implementation reporting cycle to strengthen transparency and monitor the progress of government programmes.
Business
Transcorp Power seeks sustained investment across Nigeria’s electricity value chain
Ikenga said the company remained committed to Nigeria’s power sector and would continue investing in its operations despite the challenging business environment.
He spoke in Lagos at the third edition of the Shell Power Conference, themed “Powering Nigeria’s Progress: Turning Ambition and Action into Sustainable Impact”.
The Transcorp Power chief said the company would sustain electricity generation, invest in its facilities and deliver value to shareholders.
“Transcorp Power is a long-term player, not a short-term player. This year has been challenging, but what is important is getting power to schools, hospitals and businesses to power progress,” he said.
Ikenga said the company’s focus on operational efficiency and investment had strengthened its contribution to Nigeria’s electricity supply.
He disclosed that since acquiring the Ughelli Power Plant in Delta State in 2013, Transcorp Power had quadrupled its available generation capacity.
He also said the company became the first privatised power generation firm to receive a post-privatisation discharge certificate after fulfilling all its privatisation obligations.
The company’s unaudited results for the nine months ended September 30, 2026, showed a profit before tax of N83.1 billion, while its profit-before-tax margin rose to 31.2 per cent from 29.6 per cent recorded in the corresponding period of 2025.
Its total assets rose to 11.7 per cent amounting to N629.5 billion, while shareholders’ funds grew 8.9 per cent to N199.8 billion. Cash and cash equivalents also rose to N10.3 billion, supported by improved collections.
On the company’s contribution to grid stability, Ikenga said Transcorp Power’s black-start capability enabled it to restart operations without relying on electricity from the national grid.
He explained that the capability allowed the company to support power restoration following grid disturbances, helping to restore electricity supply to homes, businesses and industries.
Ikenga noted that Nigeria had an installed electricity generation capacity of about 13,000 megawatts, with an estimated potential of 50 gigawatts, adding that realising the potential would require effective coordination across the entire value chain.
“Everything in the value chain has to work,” he said.
He called for stronger collaboration among federal and state governments, regulators and private-sector operators, alongside increased private investment, to build a sustainable electricity market.
Business
FG generates N33tn revenue in 10 months – Oyedele
This was contained in a statement issued on Thursday by his Senior Special Assistant on Communications and Press Secretary, Maryann Duke.
The statement said Oyedele pointed to “improved digital systems, including electronic invoicing, as a key driver behind a record of N33tn in government revenue collected between January and October 2026.”
The minister said the performance demonstrated the potential of technology to improve revenue administration, strengthen compliance and increase efficiency across government institutions.
Speaking on the theme, ‘Digital Sovereignty and Ethics: Guarding the Economy for the Next Generation,’ Oyedele warned that Nigeria risked losing substantial economic opportunities if it continued to depend heavily on foreign digital infrastructure.
Citing Nigerian Communications Commission figures, he disclosed that the country recorded more than 157 million active internet subscriptions as of May 2026.
He explained that these connections generated significant volumes of information through financial transactions, healthcare, education and taxation.
However, citing estimates from the Nigeria Data Protection Commission, Oyedele said as much as 90 per cent of the country’s data was hosted abroad.
According to him, the situation has implications for foreign exchange expenditure, employment opportunities, technological skills and Nigeria’s control over information generated by its citizens.
He compared the country’s reliance on foreign digital infrastructure with its historical dependence on imported refined petroleum products, warning against a situation where Nigerian data would be processed abroad and the resulting services sold back to domestic users.
The minister consequently advocated greater investment in local data infrastructure, technical expertise, cybersecurity and predictable regulations to enable Nigerian businesses to capture more value from the digital economy.
He clarified that digital sovereignty should not translate into technological isolation but should strengthen Nigeria’s capacity to participate competitively in international markets.
Addressing graduating students, Oyedele urged young Nigerians to become developers of technological solutions rather than remain primarily consumers of products created elsewhere.
He identified artificial intelligence as both a disruptive force and an opportunity for innovation, advising graduates to acquire relevant digital skills alongside critical thinking, creativity, sound judgement and integrity.
The minister also cautioned against irresponsible online behaviour, explaining that digital footprints increasingly influence employment prospects, commercial relationships and professional credibility.
Oyedele outlined five priorities for graduates, including continuous learning, value creation, integrity, responsible digital citizenship and active participation in national development.
“Your degree is evidence of what you have learned. Your competence will demonstrate what you can do. Your character will reveal who you truly are,” he told the graduating students.
-
Politics2 days agoLG CITY BOY COORDINATOR HAILS WIKE’S SUPPORT FOR ONYESOH, TINUBU
-
Politics2 days ago
DIRI INAUGURATES APC CAMPAIGN COUNCIL, SETS MILLION VOTES TARGET FOR TINUBU
-
Politics2 days agoNDC Candidate Urges Oborevwori To Probe Asaba Political Violence
-
News2 days agoArmy Recovers X Account After Hack Attempt
-
Business2 days agoNigeria Loses N17tr Yearly To Abandoned Projects
-
Politics2 days ago
2027: Oborevwori Tasks Media On Fair, Accurate Reporting
-
Politics2 days ago
2027: AKPABIO ENVISAGES TINUBU’S VICTORY IN SOUTH SOUTH REGION
-
Politics2 days ago
Asaba Political Violence: Police Confirm One Dead, Delta Govt Urges Probe
