Politics
Politics Of Nigeria’s Unity
The issue of unity in Nigeria’s diversity over the years has been given various interpretations. In fact, recent developments in the country have proved that most frequently, the term “unity in diversity” is only remembered when the need arises for the one to take undue advantage of the other.
A good example is the esoterically contradictory interpretations of former Head of State, Gen. Mohammadu Buhari (rtd), of what Nigeria’s multilingual enclave should be, deducible from his declarations as Commander in Chief of the country, and his recent frustrating outbursts.
As a Head of State (from the eve of 1984 to August 1985), like others before and after him, he had preached unity in diversity to the highest heaven. But following his failures at the April 2011 polls, he now deems it fit to throw Nigeria’s unity to the dogs, going as far as threatening bloodbath to a nation he should rightly assist to steer towards the right path as an elder statesman.
It is in this light that the recent stance by former Heads of State, Gen. Olusegun Obasanjo and Gen. Ibrahim Babangida becomes commendable, in spite of their contributions in inadvertently planting the seed that has germinated thus far during their tenures.
Though arch-enemies, they suddenly realised what is expected of them as elder statesmen, and came up with a joint statement denouncing the present in- security in the country. In their statement, they noted thus:
“Unfolding events in our dear motherland, Nigeria, over the last few years are threatening to unravel the nearly a century old labour of our founding fathers and subsequent generations in building a strong, united, peaceful nation that can accommodate and cater for the needs and aspirations of our diverse communities.
“Internecine crises are raging across the land unabated with damaging consequences on the social, political and economic life of the nation. And in the process untold hardships are being visited on all citizens in one form or another on a daily basis.
“The lost of innocent lives being experienced by the day across the nation is simply unbearable. Currently, the nation is gripped by a regime of fear and uncertainty that virtually all citizens have difficulties going about their normal day-to- day lives without great anxiety and trepidation. This cannot be allowed to continue.
“A deeply worrying trend that is emerging from this terrible situation is that a pervasive cynicism is beginning to set in, so much so that millions of true Nigerian patriots are starting to question the platform upon which the unity of this country rests. This is simply untenable.
“The people of this country must not allow whatever sense of frustration, fear and despair we are experiencing now to supersede our hopes for a collective destiny which lies in our continued existence as a Nation. For us, and we believe for millions of other Nigerians, the continued unity of this nation is not only priceless but non-negotiable.
“We, therefore, urge all governments in the country, starting with all the 774 local councils to comprehensively engage their communities at the various levels including: elders, youth organisation, trade union and associations, women bodies, the clergy and other community stakeholders.
“We also call on the Federal and states governments not only to encourage these grassroots engagements for peace and beneficial coexistence, but should work out the framework to sustain the engagement. In all these efforts, it is important to emphasise that our diversity is a course for celebration not a cause for lamentations.
“Finally, we need to reiterate that no meaningful development can ever occur in an atmosphere of violence and hatred. History has shown that any society that is built on the structures of violence and intolerance cannot prosper.
“We need to appreciate that, God in His infinite mercy, has blessed our country with abundant resources and talents, but we need peace and harmony to harness them not just for our own wellbeing but also that of our children and grandchildren. We owe this future generations of Nigerians this much.
“On our part, we are ready to do whatever is possible to promote the quest for peace and harmony. And are ready to join hands with all patriots to sustain and further enhance the unity and progress of this country.”
orrying trend that is emerging from this terrible situation is that a pervasive cynicism is beginning to set in, so much so that millions of true Nigerian patriots are starting to question the platform upon which the unity of this country rests. This is simply untenable”.
Presenting an address titled “Nigeria’s unity and regional groups: Influence and impact of Northern Governors Forum”, at the Royal Institute of International Affairs, Chatham House, London, last month, chairman of the Northern States Governor’s Forum (NSGF), Dr. Mu’azu Babangida Aliyu harped further on Nigeria’s unity, with emphasis on efforts made by the NSGF for the sake of Nigeria’s unity in diversity.
The well articulate address, which was compartmentalised into Protocol, Fuel Subsidy, Religion/Regulation, Peer Review Mechanism, Economy, Mobilising Socio-Cultural Groups and Traditional Institutions for National Unity, Overcoming Socio-Political Challenges, Security, Violence and Islam, Nigeria: A Historical Reflection, Regional and National Unity, Lessons, The Niger State Example, and Conclusion, touched on virtually all aspects of the Nigerian society, but for the apparent politics of unity.
Specifically, Dr. Mu’azu, who is also the Governor of Niger State, noted under “Protocol” that “the Northern States Governor’s Forum does not believe in the break-up of Nigeria. Hence, the unity of Nigeria is sacrosanct in spite of the current (security) challenges”. Yet he gives undue credit to the NSGF for obeying Nigeria’s constitution at critical moment of the nation’s democracy.
“For instance, we initiated and supported the adoption of the ‘doctrine of necessity’ by the National Assembly and Nigerians in confirming the then Vice President as the Acting President to resolve the exploitation of the prolonged illness and absence from office of the then President, Umaru Musa Yaradua despite Section 144 subsection 1(b) and subsection 2 of the Nigerian Constitution.
“The Constitution provides that when the President is incapacitated, administrative power to act be transmitted to the Vice President to avoid vacuum in leadership.
“The problem of formal transmission came to the fore when members of the National Assembly demanded for the letter by the ailing president before legitimising the acting capacity of the then Vice President. To date there is no certainty about what happened to the letter and whether or not it was written.
“In honouring the Constitution, the forum supported the making of Dr Goodluck Ebele Jonathan, Acting President that was subsequently endorsed by the Nigerian Governors Forum (NGF) at the national level in spite the antagonism originating from the South-south region.
“Notwithstanding such antics, he was confirmed by the National Assembly and sworn-in as Acting President paving the way for peaceful transition on the death of President Umaru Musa Yaradua on May 5th, 2010 and President Goodluck Ebele Jonathan, GCFR sworn-in on May 6, 2010 as substantive President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria”
The NSGF, as represented by Dr. Mu’azu also seeks to be noted as having done the extraordinary for standing against the zoning of the presidency by the ruling People’s Democratic Party (PDP), contrary to the 1999 constitution which states in section 131 that “A person shall be qualified for election to the office of the President if- (a) he is a citizen of Nigeria by birth; (b) has attained the age of 40 years; (c) he is a member of a political party and is sponsored by that political party; and (d) he has been educated up to at least school certificate level or its equivalent”.
It might therefore be pertinent to state that, acting according to the constitution in this context can only be seen as an extraordinary feat when it is already viewed as an abnormality.
But Mu’azu also showed his knowledge and acknowledgement of Nigeria’s peculiar socio-political challenges when he said “We have our peculiar problems and challenges; a fundamental one being leadership deficit. There is a gap of committed leadership that understands the nuances of governance and that which is conscious of the sensibilities of the political environment.
“Leadership deficit has over the years exposed Nigeria to high-level of corruption, bad governance, political instability and a cyclical legitimacy crisis. Consequently, national development has been slow and the political environment uncertain.
“Indeed, surmounting the challenges of today World requires a leadership with moral compass – character, vision, integrity and courage to take difficult decisions to enhance socio-economic development, irrespective of whose interest is at stake”.
This, among others, implies that the Boko Haram sect, which is currently the cause of the insecurity pervading the country, particularly the north, should be openly denounced by such respected traditional rulers like Sadauna of Sokoto, the father of Islam in Nigeria, and former Heads of States from the north. Incidentally, that region has a majority among former Heads of States in the country .
Politics
Senate Defends Passage Of State Police Bill
The Senate has defended the passage of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (Alteration) (State Police) Bill, 2026, saying the proposed creation of state police is driven by national consensus and the country’s security needs rather than political considerations.
The Red Chamber passed the bill last Wednesday after more than two-thirds of senators voted in support.
In a statement issued yesterday by the Directorate of Media and Public Affairs, Office of the Senate Leader, Senator Opeyemi Bamidele described the bill as “a child of necessity and not of political expediency as well as a product of national consensus and not of cynicism.”
The senate leader said the proposal to establish state police was a matter of urgent public importance that could not be delayed because of political interests, given the country’s security challenges.
He explained that the proposal did not originate recently but emerged from memoranda submitted to the Senate Ad-hoc Committee on the Review of the 1999 Constitution.
According to him, the proposal underwent extensive consultations and rigorous scrutiny because of its sensitive nature.
Bamidele said the National Assembly consulted widely with the Executive, the Nigeria Governors’ Forum, the Conference of Speakers of State Legislatures of Nigeria, the leadership of the Nigeria Police and other stakeholders before passing the bill.
He added that during the public hearings conducted across the six geopolitical zones in July 2025, participants overwhelmingly supported the creation of state police.
“At each level of our consultation, nearly all stakeholders embraced the State Police Bill in the light of stark realities we are facing today,” he said.
The Senate leader noted that recommendations from the Nigeria Police contributed to the bill, particularly on accountability and oversight mechanisms aimed at preventing abuse of state police by political actors.
According to him, the police’s support for the proposal underscores its national significance in tackling insecurity at the state and local levels.
Bamidele also said the bill received broad bipartisan backing in both chambers of the National Assembly.
“Even though the APC is the majority, there are members of opposition parties — PDP, ADC, NDC and Labour Party — that exercised their discretion in favour of the Bill, mainly in the national interest and not on parochial basis.
“In the Senate, for instance, 84 out of 109 members voted clause by clause in support of the Bill. This accounted for 77.06 per cent approval at the Senate alone,” he said.
He argued that national security should transcend political affiliations, saying political actors in other countries often set aside partisan interests to support initiatives that strengthen security.
Bamidele called on opposition parties to contribute constructive ideas that would promote peace and stability, adding that they have a responsibility to offer alternatives that would strengthen the country.
“Even when they disagree on some grounds, they are under obligations to provide credible and useful ideas that can make our nation better and greater. Unfortunately, they have not passed this critical test of opposition democracy,” he said.
News
Probe N6.3bn Constituency Funds Or Face Legal Action, SERAP Tells Akpabio, Abbas
The Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP) has called on Senate President, Godswill Akpabio, and Speaker of the House of Representatives, Tajudeen Abbas, to refer allegations of the diversion or non-accounting of over ?6.3 billion in constituency project funds to anti-corruption agencies for investigation and possible prosecution.
The group also urged the National Assembly leadership to ensure that anyone found culpable is prosecuted where sufficient admissible evidence exists, while all diverted or unaccounted public funds are recovered and paid into the treasury.
In a letter dated June 27, 2026, and signed by its Deputy Director, Kolawole Oluwadare, SERAP said the allegations were contained in the Auditor-General of the Federation’s 2022 Annual Report, published on September 9, 2025.
The organisation disclosed this in a statement signed and released by Oluwadare, yesterday.
SERAP also asked Akpabio and Abbas to disclose the identities of contractors and companies, including their shareholders and beneficial owners, that allegedly received constituency project funds but failed to execute the projects.
It gave the National Assembly seven days to act on its recommendations, warning that it would institute legal proceedings should the legislature fail to respond.
“We would be grateful if the recommended measures are taken within seven days of the receipt and/or publication of this letter. If we have not heard from you by then, SERAP shall take all appropriate legal actions to compel you and the National Assembly to comply with our request in the public interest,” the letter stated.
It said, “The allegations involve several federal ministries, departments and agencies, including the Environmental Health Registration Council of Nigeria (EHORECON); the Federal College of Animal Health and Production Technology, Volm; the Federal Polytechnic, Udana; the National Agency for the Prohibition of Trafficking in Persons (NAPTIP); and the National Institute of Legislative and Democratic Studies (NILDS).
“The Auditor-General identified numerous cases of payments into private bank accounts, contracts awarded without due process, payments for contracts not executed or services not rendered, undocumented expenditures, inflated contracts, procurement irregularities and failures to account for public funds, recommending in each case that the funds be recovered and remitted to the treasury.
“According to the 2022 audited report, contained in pages 367 to 396, the Environmental Health Registration Council of Nigeria (EHORECON or Council) Abuja paid over ‘N22 million [N22,944,565.16] into the private account of some members of staff of the Council from the Constituency Projects Fund Account.
“There ‘was no evidence of the utilization of the funds and no explanations on the purpose for the payment of such amount into the individual accounts.”
SERAP added, “The Council (EHORECON) also in 2021 ‘awarded suspicious consultancy contracts of over N12 million [N12,030,818.29] for the development of Modern Abattoirs in Kebbi State and the supervision of 7 projects in Kebbi, Jigawa, and Headquarters Abuja.
“The money was to ‘produce bills of quantity, architectural design, structural design, mechanical design, and electrical designs for the contracts and supervision.’ But ‘the ‘items could not be found.’”
Altogether, SERAP said the Auditor-General’s 2022 report alleged EHORECON paid more than ?1.8 billion in constituency project funds through questionable transactions.
For the Federal College of Animal Health and Production Technology, Vom, SERAP said the institution “in 2022 reportedly ‘paid over N279 million [N279,700,500.00] to 3 contractors to empower and train youths in selected vocational areas in Borgu and Kontagora, Niger State, train women and youths in entrepreneurship in Niger East Senatorial District and to train youths and women in agro production and self-reliance in Barki Ladi/Riyom Federal Constituency, Plateau State.
“But the money was paid to the contractors without any document.’”
Other irregularities involving the college include another ?279.7 million in mobilisation fees allegedly paid without documentation, and more than ?629.4 million paid to unqualified contractors for various constituency projects without evidence of due process, contract advertisements or details of the contractors.
SERAP further alleged that the Auditor-General’s report identified multiple financial irregularities involving the Federal Polytechnic, Ukana, Akwa Ibom State, including over ?407 million allegedly paid as mobilisation fees without supporting documents, more than ?399 million paid to unqualified contractors, contracts allegedly inflated by over ?192 million, over ?279 million paid for projects not fully executed, ?50 million allegedly paid for an unexecuted borehole project, and more than ?83 million disbursed without the required documentation or approvals.
It also alleged that NAPTIP reportedly irregularly awarded contracts worth over ?21.8 million, paid more than ?176.8 million for logistics and consultancy services without supporting documents, and disbursed over ?89.6 million and ?4.4 million for projects that were allegedly not executed.
The report also alleged that NILDS failed to submit audited financial statements for 2012 to 2022, did not remit over ?15 million in stamp duties, and spent ?1.6 million without authorisation from the Office of the Accountant-General of the Federation.
SERAP said the report recommended the recovery of the affected funds and their remittance to the treasury.
It argued that corruption in constituency projects disproportionately affects poor and vulnerable Nigerians by diverting resources meant for public services and development.
It added that the National Assembly, in exercising its oversight responsibilities, should demonstrate leadership by ensuring accountability in the management of constituency project funds.
The organisation further argued that the allegations, if established, would amount to breaches of the Constitution, the Fiscal Responsibility Act 2007 and the Public Procurement Act 2007, which require transparency, accountability and due process in the management of public resources.
Politics
Parties’ Deregistration: How Justice Lifu Overruled Appeal Court Justices
Justice Peter Lifu of the Federal High Court in Abuja on Monday brushed aside the order of the Court of Appeal in Abuja which ordered him to stay proceedings in a suit that sought deregistration of the African Democratic Party (ADC), Accord Party and three others.
The Court of Appeal in a unanimous decision of a panel of three Justices had on May 22, 2026 directed the Federal High Court Judge not to proceed with the suit until an appeal pending before them and filed by Accord Party is resolved.
In a Certified True Copy Enrol Order of the Superior Court, Justices Mohammed Danjuma, Adebukola Banjoko and Oyejoju Oyewumi asked the lower Court Judge to stay proceedings until all issues on the appeal filed by the Accord Party were resolved
Governor Ademola Adeleke of Osun State had, through the Accord Party, applied to justice Lifu to join him as a defendant in the deregistration legal battle instituted by a group of former legislators.
The contention of the Osun State governor was that he had a stake in the Accord Party, being the platform he was seeking re-election in the August 15 gubernatorial poll in the state.
In his ruling, Justice Lifu on April 27 ruled against the Osun State governor, rejecting his request to be joined in the suit to defend his own position and interest.
Not satisfied with the Federal High Court decision, the Osun State governor, through his lawyer, Musibau Adetunbi (SAN), moved to the Court of Appeal in Abuja where he challenged the Justice Lifu decision to refuse to allow him join the suit.
After listening to the argument canvassed, especially that he has interest to protect as Accord Party gubernatorial candidate for Osun State governorship election, the three Justices of the Court of Appeal, unanimously directed Justice Lifu to allow them look into the grievances of the governor.
In specific terms, the Court of Appeal Justices directed Justice Lifu not to proceed further with the matter and fixed October 27 to determine the interlocutory appeal of the appellant.
However, when the certified enroll order and notice of appeal were served on Justice Peter Lifu by Mr Adetunbi (SAN), the judge rejected it on the ground that it was a ploy to arrest his judgment in the matter.
Although the judge had adjourned his judgment delivery in the matter indefinitely, he finally made a dramatic turn around on Monday and proceeded to deliver the judgment that has now proscribed the five political parties.
-
Rivers4 days ago
Rivers Police Uncovers Firearm Concealed In Loaf Of Bread
-
Niger Delta3 days agoPro-Chancellor Hands Over Okey Onuchuku Peace, Conflict Institute Building
-
Sports4 days ago
Six Nigerians To Play For NBA Teams
-
Business4 days agoIPMAN Raises Concern Over Delay In Chinese Refinery Deal …Predicts Lower Fuel Prices Through Competition
-
News4 days agoFubara Reaffirms Commitment To Blue Economy, Private Sector Growth …Calls For Protection Of Marine Resources
-
Politics4 days agoSenate Defends Passage Of State Police Bill
-
Business4 days ago
Navy Hands Over Five Suspected Stowaways to NIS
-
Business4 days ago
Gas Economy: Decade of Gas, Pi-CNG/ EV Deepen Media Engagement
