Politics
Rivers Police And Challenges Of 2011 Polls
Elections are a civil process of enabling citizens to exercise their democratic rights, and participate in public affairs, by either offering themselves for election or electing their chosen representatives into various organs of government. The right of citizens to participate in public affairs has been internationally recognised and enshrined in such statutes as:
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the International Convention on Civil & Political Rights and the African Charter on Human and People’s Rights.
Participation in public affairs by every citizen is facilitated by a guarantee of other rights which promote and protect the democratic rights of citizens to participate in politics and elections. These rights are enshrined in chapter IV of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (1999) as Fundamental Human Rights. These rights are:
5.38 – Right of Thought, Conscience and Religion
5.39 – Right to Freedom of Expression and Press
5.40 – Right to Freedom of Assembly and Association
5.41 – Right to Freedom of Movement
5.42 – Right to Freedom against discrimination
Periodic election are one of the central ideas of democracy through which citizens chose their representatives in government. It avails citizens alternate chances between different and competing political party policies and programme, on one hand, and the opportunity to hold officials so elected accountable for the exercise of their duties and responsibilities,
The police play a critical role in the outcome of every national elections. Whether elections are free, fair, and credible, and those elected reflects the free wil1 of the electorate, depends, to an extent, on the security agencies. particularly the Police, who are expected to provide and guarantee security for voters, electoral officials and materials, and to enable a neutral political environrnent, devoid of coercion, intimidation and violence. This responsibility has strong interplay with respective roles of other stakeholders in the conduct of elections in the country, viz:
The aggregate performance of these bodies and security agencies make for the success or otherwise of every political elections in the country.
2. Background / Overview
2,1, Trend / Views on Politics in Nigeria:
Politics as practiced in the country has been averred as the “Only viable industry” in Nigeria which guarantees and deliver three scarce commodities:
wealth, power and fame, to few lucky ones. Hence the mad quest to acquire and retain these big three dividends of public office at all effective levels. This has made elections and all political contests in the country fiercer where winners take all and losers hardly conceding defeat.
Associated with these is the inordinate desperation and ready perchance to employ the poor and unemployed for thuggery and political violence.
2.2. Features of Political Election in Nigeria:
Prof. Tekena N. Tamuno, in his paper “Historical Antecedents of Political Violence in Nigeria” in Strategies for Cubing Election-Related Political Violence in Nigeria’s North-West Zone (Al1ahi’ru M, Jega et’al 2003) captured what he considered as the main features of Nigeria’s electoral history since independence. Some of these features are the following:
Era of boycotts, bonfire and threatened secession during and after the 1964 federal Election and the 1965 Western Nigeria Election.
The 122/3 (two-third of 19) controversy during the 1979 Presidential Election and its political consequence nationwide,
The upheavals during the 1983 Federal Elections .
The “Old Breed” versus “New Breed”. fiasco in the 1992 Elections.
The “June 12” (1993) Presidential Election nullification crisis,
The “Power-Shift” crisis in the 1999 Presidential Election.
The Judicial nullifications, ordered re-run, vacation 1 substitution of tenure of political office holders in 2003/2007 Elections.
Ever increasing pressure on Police logistics and capacity for effective security coverage of hotly-contested elections.
Generally the twin factors of rigging and political violence associated with history, with very strong potential for recurrence in future elections.
3.0. Police and Securitv During Elections:
The Nigeria Police owes its legal existence to Section 214 (1) of the 1999 Constitubon which states:
“There shall be a Police Force for Nigeria which shall be styled the Nigeria Police Force and, subject to the provision of this Section; no other Police Force shall be established in the Federation or any part thereof”:
The statutory duties and functions of the Nigeria Police Force are clearly defined under Section 4 of the Police Act CAP 359, Laws of the Federation of Nigeria 1990. These duties are listed as:-
(i). The protection of life and property; (ii). The prevention and detection of crime;
(iii). The apprehension of offenders; (iv). The preservation of law and order and
(v) The enforcement of all laws and regulations with which they are directly charged, as well as performance of such military duties within and without Nigeria as may be required of them.
However several other enactments provide for the role of the Police in an election, i.e Public Order Act and the Electoral Act. Section 59 (1) of the Elecctora1 Act Cap. 105 L.F.N. 1990 assigns the Presiding Office with the
Power and autority ‘to regulate all conducts at polling stations.
If a person misconducts himself at a polling station or fails to obey any lawful order of the presiding officer, the presiding officer,may order the removal from the polling station of the person so misconducting himself, or failing to obey lawful order; and such person may be arrested ‘without warrant and may be removed accordingly”.
In this context, the arrest of offenders at such venues must necessarily be authorised by the Presiding Officer.
From the foregoing, it is apparent that, outside the polling stations, the Police Act, Public Order Act, Electoral Act and other relevant enactments govern and guide the exercise of authority by Police Officers whereas the Electoral Act govern conducts at polling stations. The import of this is that, the Presiding Officer, guided by the Electoral Act, decides when an electoral offence is committed and when a consequent arrest is to be made. Implicitly the exercise or discretion for which the Police is known is on hold with respect to electoral offences at the polling station.
Generally, the primary role of the Police in elections is to protect the integrity of the electoral processes and security of the participants, through:
a). Safeguarding the security of the live and property of citizens during campaigns and voting, so that citizens will not feel unsafe on account of holding, associating with or expressing a political opinion;
b) Ensuring the safety of electoral officers before during and after elections:
c) Providing security for candidates during campaigns and elections:
d). Ensuring and preserving a free, safe and lawful atmosphere for campaigning by all parties and candidates without discrimination:
e). Maintaining peaceful conditions, law; and order around the polling and counting centres.
f). providing security for electoral officials at voting and counting centres and
g). Ensuring the security of election materials at voting and counting centres and during their transportation thereto. It is the duty of the Police to ensure that election materials are not stolen, hi jacked, destroyed or fraudulently altered by any person.
3.2 Police Code of Conduct in Election Duty
Police Regulation 325 provides the attributes every Police officer is expected to possess and exhibit (including the times of elections – 2011 inclusive). These attributes are:
a. Efficiency and thoroughness through meticulous attention to details in the performance of his duties.
b.Courtesy, forbearance and helpfulness in his dealings with members of the public.
c.Tact, patience and tolerance, and the control of his temper in trying situations;
d. Integrity, in refusing to allow religious. racial; political. or personal
feelings,. or other considerations to influence him in the execution of his duties
e. Impartiality in the avoidance of feelings of vindictiveness., or the showing of vindictiveness towards offenders.
f. Strict truthfulness in his handling of investigations. and in the giving of evidence.
Most specifically, the Police Service Commission (PSC) has published guidelines on the conduct of the Police on Electoral duty. These guidelines re-emphasis the important responsibility of the Police in ensuring that peaceful condition prevail at polling and counting centres during elections, and that citizens exercise their responsibility/functions without coercion, intimidation, violence or manipulation. The guidelines are as follows:
1. A prompt response by a Police Officer to any given situation will often be necessary to prevent a minor incident from becoming a major problem. A minor disagreement during election campaign or voting may also degenerate to violence or other disruption if effective and early intervention is not made by the officer. Therefore, the Police Officer should always be alerted in noticing and preventing the deterioration of incidents that could lead to disruption of voting and associated electoral processes.
ii. The Police Officer on election duty needs to be approachable and accessible to the voters who might need his or her assistance. Election duty gives the NPF an invaluable opportunity to contribute towards a peaceful transition from one civilian government to another. By performing this function creditably, the men and women of the NPF also improve the image of the organisation and its relationship with Nigerians.
III. The Police Officer must be professional in his or her demeanour and personal appearance. Polling officials, the public arid election monitors and observers form, opinions about the Police on the basis or the officer’s actions,.appearance and comportment.
iv. Every Police Officer on election duty must avoid fraternilizing with anv political party or candidate or party or polling agent, in any way that could be interpreted as being capable of compromising their impartiality. Police personnel must be equally fair, courteous and, if necessary, firm to all persons within their vicinity of deployment without concern for the party to which they belong, their political or other opinions, religion, ethnic group, place of origin, gender, wealth or other status., Any evidence or indication that a Police Officer on electoral duty showed bias towards one political party or another in any form has the potential to undermine the integrity of the elections and will be investigated by PSC, with discipl- inary action appropriately taken.
Abba is Commissioner of Police, Rivers State Command.
Suleiman Abba
Politics
Atiku Names Kenneth Okonkwo As Spokesperson
Mr Okonkwo made the announcement on his X (formerly Twitter) account on yesterday, expressing gratitude for what he called Alhaji Abubakar’s show of faith in him.
“I give God all the glory for being appointed by His Excellency Atiku Abubakar as his spokesperson. I thank His Excellency for the immense confidence reposed in me,” Mr Okonkwo said.
The politician credited Alhaji Abubakar with championing dialogue over conflict within party ranks.
He noted that the former vice president favours conversation and compromise when party associates raise genuine worries, rather than dismissing their concerns.
“Rather than take offence at associates for expressing genuine reservations about any action taken, His Excellency always opts for dialogue and compromise that engender solutions to problems,” Mr Okonkwo stated.
According to him, recent talks with Alhaji Abubakar and other ADC leaders tackled worries about South-East political representation within the limits of the Electoral Act, 2026, and the current political climate. He said the discussions produced guarantees for the region’s interests despite existing constraints.
Mr Okonkwo also acknowledged the work of Dr. Kashim Imam; former ADC National Chairman, Ralphs Nwosu; Ekene Onwuka, Alhaji Abubakar’s Senior Special Assistant on Special Duties, in preparing the party for next year’s elections. He thanked his loved ones and supporters for their support and prayers.
“I still covet your prayers for wisdom, courage, provision and protection needed to carry out this challenging responsibility, which will usher in a glorious and great Nigeria,” he added.
The appointment arrives weeks after Mr Okonkwo publicly attacked the ADC’s pick for running mate in 2027. He’d warned that choosing a vice-presidential candidate from the South-South would worsen what he sees as political neglect of the South-East, a region without a president or vice president since 1999.
Despite Mr Okonkwo’s objections, the ADC later announced former Rivers State Governor and ex-Minister of Transportation, Mr Rotimi Amaechi, as Alhaji Abubakar’s running mate following the ex-vice president’s clinching of the party’s presidential nomination.
Politics
Senate Defends Passage Of State Police Bill
The Senate has defended the passage of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (Alteration) (State Police) Bill, 2026, saying the proposed creation of state police is driven by national consensus and the country’s security needs rather than political considerations.
The Red Chamber passed the bill last Wednesday after more than two-thirds of senators voted in support.
In a statement issued yesterday by the Directorate of Media and Public Affairs, Office of the Senate Leader, Senator Opeyemi Bamidele described the bill as “a child of necessity and not of political expediency as well as a product of national consensus and not of cynicism.”
The senate leader said the proposal to establish state police was a matter of urgent public importance that could not be delayed because of political interests, given the country’s security challenges.
He explained that the proposal did not originate recently but emerged from memoranda submitted to the Senate Ad-hoc Committee on the Review of the 1999 Constitution.
According to him, the proposal underwent extensive consultations and rigorous scrutiny because of its sensitive nature.
Bamidele said the National Assembly consulted widely with the Executive, the Nigeria Governors’ Forum, the Conference of Speakers of State Legislatures of Nigeria, the leadership of the Nigeria Police and other stakeholders before passing the bill.
He added that during the public hearings conducted across the six geopolitical zones in July 2025, participants overwhelmingly supported the creation of state police.
“At each level of our consultation, nearly all stakeholders embraced the State Police Bill in the light of stark realities we are facing today,” he said.
The Senate leader noted that recommendations from the Nigeria Police contributed to the bill, particularly on accountability and oversight mechanisms aimed at preventing abuse of state police by political actors.
According to him, the police’s support for the proposal underscores its national significance in tackling insecurity at the state and local levels.
Bamidele also said the bill received broad bipartisan backing in both chambers of the National Assembly.
“Even though the APC is the majority, there are members of opposition parties — PDP, ADC, NDC and Labour Party — that exercised their discretion in favour of the Bill, mainly in the national interest and not on parochial basis.
“In the Senate, for instance, 84 out of 109 members voted clause by clause in support of the Bill. This accounted for 77.06 per cent approval at the Senate alone,” he said.
He argued that national security should transcend political affiliations, saying political actors in other countries often set aside partisan interests to support initiatives that strengthen security.
Bamidele called on opposition parties to contribute constructive ideas that would promote peace and stability, adding that they have a responsibility to offer alternatives that would strengthen the country.
“Even when they disagree on some grounds, they are under obligations to provide credible and useful ideas that can make our nation better and greater. Unfortunately, they have not passed this critical test of opposition democracy,” he said.
News
Probe N6.3bn Constituency Funds Or Face Legal Action, SERAP Tells Akpabio, Abbas
The Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP) has called on Senate President, Godswill Akpabio, and Speaker of the House of Representatives, Tajudeen Abbas, to refer allegations of the diversion or non-accounting of over ?6.3 billion in constituency project funds to anti-corruption agencies for investigation and possible prosecution.
The group also urged the National Assembly leadership to ensure that anyone found culpable is prosecuted where sufficient admissible evidence exists, while all diverted or unaccounted public funds are recovered and paid into the treasury.
In a letter dated June 27, 2026, and signed by its Deputy Director, Kolawole Oluwadare, SERAP said the allegations were contained in the Auditor-General of the Federation’s 2022 Annual Report, published on September 9, 2025.
The organisation disclosed this in a statement signed and released by Oluwadare, yesterday.
SERAP also asked Akpabio and Abbas to disclose the identities of contractors and companies, including their shareholders and beneficial owners, that allegedly received constituency project funds but failed to execute the projects.
It gave the National Assembly seven days to act on its recommendations, warning that it would institute legal proceedings should the legislature fail to respond.
“We would be grateful if the recommended measures are taken within seven days of the receipt and/or publication of this letter. If we have not heard from you by then, SERAP shall take all appropriate legal actions to compel you and the National Assembly to comply with our request in the public interest,” the letter stated.
It said, “The allegations involve several federal ministries, departments and agencies, including the Environmental Health Registration Council of Nigeria (EHORECON); the Federal College of Animal Health and Production Technology, Volm; the Federal Polytechnic, Udana; the National Agency for the Prohibition of Trafficking in Persons (NAPTIP); and the National Institute of Legislative and Democratic Studies (NILDS).
“The Auditor-General identified numerous cases of payments into private bank accounts, contracts awarded without due process, payments for contracts not executed or services not rendered, undocumented expenditures, inflated contracts, procurement irregularities and failures to account for public funds, recommending in each case that the funds be recovered and remitted to the treasury.
“According to the 2022 audited report, contained in pages 367 to 396, the Environmental Health Registration Council of Nigeria (EHORECON or Council) Abuja paid over ‘N22 million [N22,944,565.16] into the private account of some members of staff of the Council from the Constituency Projects Fund Account.
“There ‘was no evidence of the utilization of the funds and no explanations on the purpose for the payment of such amount into the individual accounts.”
SERAP added, “The Council (EHORECON) also in 2021 ‘awarded suspicious consultancy contracts of over N12 million [N12,030,818.29] for the development of Modern Abattoirs in Kebbi State and the supervision of 7 projects in Kebbi, Jigawa, and Headquarters Abuja.
“The money was to ‘produce bills of quantity, architectural design, structural design, mechanical design, and electrical designs for the contracts and supervision.’ But ‘the ‘items could not be found.’”
Altogether, SERAP said the Auditor-General’s 2022 report alleged EHORECON paid more than ?1.8 billion in constituency project funds through questionable transactions.
For the Federal College of Animal Health and Production Technology, Vom, SERAP said the institution “in 2022 reportedly ‘paid over N279 million [N279,700,500.00] to 3 contractors to empower and train youths in selected vocational areas in Borgu and Kontagora, Niger State, train women and youths in entrepreneurship in Niger East Senatorial District and to train youths and women in agro production and self-reliance in Barki Ladi/Riyom Federal Constituency, Plateau State.
“But the money was paid to the contractors without any document.’”
Other irregularities involving the college include another ?279.7 million in mobilisation fees allegedly paid without documentation, and more than ?629.4 million paid to unqualified contractors for various constituency projects without evidence of due process, contract advertisements or details of the contractors.
SERAP further alleged that the Auditor-General’s report identified multiple financial irregularities involving the Federal Polytechnic, Ukana, Akwa Ibom State, including over ?407 million allegedly paid as mobilisation fees without supporting documents, more than ?399 million paid to unqualified contractors, contracts allegedly inflated by over ?192 million, over ?279 million paid for projects not fully executed, ?50 million allegedly paid for an unexecuted borehole project, and more than ?83 million disbursed without the required documentation or approvals.
It also alleged that NAPTIP reportedly irregularly awarded contracts worth over ?21.8 million, paid more than ?176.8 million for logistics and consultancy services without supporting documents, and disbursed over ?89.6 million and ?4.4 million for projects that were allegedly not executed.
The report also alleged that NILDS failed to submit audited financial statements for 2012 to 2022, did not remit over ?15 million in stamp duties, and spent ?1.6 million without authorisation from the Office of the Accountant-General of the Federation.
SERAP said the report recommended the recovery of the affected funds and their remittance to the treasury.
It argued that corruption in constituency projects disproportionately affects poor and vulnerable Nigerians by diverting resources meant for public services and development.
It added that the National Assembly, in exercising its oversight responsibilities, should demonstrate leadership by ensuring accountability in the management of constituency project funds.
The organisation further argued that the allegations, if established, would amount to breaches of the Constitution, the Fiscal Responsibility Act 2007 and the Public Procurement Act 2007, which require transparency, accountability and due process in the management of public resources.
-
News3 days ago
Rivers Court Jails Man Seven Years For Defiling Minor …Directs N5 Million Upkeep For Victim
-
News3 days ago
Alleged Coup Plot: DSS Docks Five For Hiding Sylva’s Whereabouts
-
News3 days agoFG To Replace NYSC Khaki With Adire
-
Niger Delta3 days ago
24 Nigerian Universities Make 2026 THE Rankings … 4 S’South Versitieis Pull Through
-
Women3 days ago
NAWOJ Seeks Partnership With Hotel Presidential On Summit
-
News3 days ago
BOI Unveils Maiden Impact Report, Disburses N644.9bn In 2025
-
Business3 days ago
Fidelity Bank Collaborates YEIDEP To Empower Nigerian Students
-
Niger Delta3 days ago
‘Ogbolo ’26’: Bayelsa Community Revives Heritage, Strengthens Unity
