Opinion
FG’s Amnesty: Hopes And Uncertainty
Okere Chimezie
From June, 2009 to date, the media have been awash with an array of opinions and views concerning the Federal Government’s amnesty offer to Niger Delta militants. What exactly it means, its importance, success and perhaps failures.
This period is a period of grace and pardon to insurgents who repent from their actions and surrender arms to the Federal Government within the stipulated time, say two months, within which such persons would have nothing against them in relation to their past activities.
The deadline for Federal Government’s amnesty offer ended 12 midnight Sunday, 4 October, 2009. After that date, fanatics maintain that it would remain business as usual. Maybe the more readily determined to combat crime by federal government, the more offensive the insurgence.
Between the duo, the ordinary man is locked opinion wise to discern who actually pardons who. This is evident in Federal Government amnesty offer to militant.
In view of the foregoing, it is not wrong to say that as much as parents have the responsibility to pardon their children whenever they err, so do children have the audacity to forgive their erring parents. As humans, we are bound to err, but it takes divinity to forgive.
But then, are these militants naturally cantankerous? No I say with all conviction. As history reveals that Niger Deltans, especially the Ijaws are naturally endowed with means of survival rather than being offensive to others.
Evidently, the armed struggle to fight and live by the present Niger Delta agitators, may not be unconnected to the prophecy of one of the earliest agitators of Niger Delta, Isaac Adaka Boro. In his posthumously published book The Twelve-Day Revolution, Isaac Boro held that the need to have a Niger Delta State created out of what we had then presents a logical case owing to the peoples’ distinct history.
He then furthers his demand for the creation of Niger Delta in view of the peoples’ viability. In what would have been an act of militancy, by today’s definition, he declared that “if Nigerian government refuses to do something to drastically improve the lot of the people, certainly a point of no return would be reached; them evil is a foot.”
As Isaac Boro was not the only voice as at his time, there were others who approached the issue in a more ‘gentlemanly’ manner like T.N. Paul Birabi, Melford Okilo, Chief Harold Dappa-Biriye and other champions of Niger Delta freedom?
Ironically, the reason behind government’s outrageous refusal to the demands of Niger Delta people more than half a century ago was Ipso facto, that we then had an economy that was a little bit diversified. If not for oil, other sectors could serve. With the advent of mono-economy now in place, no oil, no economy, no revenue, and no allocation. What a sorry state!
In the crisis rocking Nigeria’s only deltaic region, the role of the seven-sister ol companies – who claim to have come to develop Nigeria, but must on condition write the agreement for landlords to sign – are left out in the whole matrix.
According to Civil Liberty Organisation (CLO), Shell for instance, is particularly mentioned. In petition number 1467, Movement for the Survival of Ogoni People (MOSOP), at the Port Harcourt sitting of the Pout Panel, adduced evidence that Shell set Ogonis against one another and instigated the government to crush Ogoni resistance to Shell’s method of doing business.
Though Shell denied the allegations, but admitted it bought 107 berretta pistols for use by Police assigned to guard its property against criminal action 23 years ago.
In February 2000, 27 communities in Bayelsa alone accused Shell of fueling crisis among them.
In the meantime, militancy, kidnapping and other social vices are not the best option to resolving the crisis or have demands heeded to. Neither would militarizing Niger Delta hold water. The demand for 100 per cent resource control as a condition to seize-fire is good, but not the summon bonum, as enjoying what we have alone, and become obsessed will not best define us a distinct people.
Nevertheless, ammon avis is for the majority tribes to accept the realities of the nation’s diversities and operate true federalism, by seeing that at least 50 per cent derivation formula is approved.
If true, the statement credited to Dr. Atuboyedia Ibianeme, the INC President by the media that Federal Government amnesty was a display of executive arrogance, which means there is a war of wit between the government and militants concerning amnesty. The I should not be seen as unpatriotic fellow if imminent failure of amnesty programme is extrapolated.
But then, as the people keep faith in God to see an end of the crisis one day, militants and Federal troops should have the axiom that, where two elephants fight, it’s the grass that bears the brunt. He who fights and runs must certainly come back to fight.
In the words of John F. Kennedy, “If a man refuses to put an end to violence, violence will put an end to man”.
Chimezie is of the Dept. of Mass Comm, RSUST PH.
Opinion
Nigeria’s ‘Charge And Bail’ Syndrome And Justice
With the eventual release of 67 under-aged minors detained for involvement in #EndBadGovernance protests in August, the dust of the entire episode appears to have settled without lessons to improve our justice system’s administration. Between July 31 and August 11, 2024, #EndBadGovernance protests rocked through most states across Nigeria. The protests boiled more in the Northern states where the media carried scenes of arsonists burning down and looting public and private establishments. The protests took threatening dimensions when authorities alleged sighting foreign mercenaries amidst protesters who were raising Russian flags and calling on Russia to intervene in Nigeria’s internal affairs. The police subsequently swooped on protesters, encycling among them about 67 minors. Those caught were taken to the federal capital territory, Abuja, and dumped in detention cells.
Protests having been successfully quelled, Nigerians returned to their daily life hustles, while the minors with their adult suspects languished outside public consciousness. It took the coincidental sojourn in police custody, of one Martins Otse aka VeryDarkMan, for public awareness to be redrawn to a forgotten episode. VeryDarkMan had himself got entangled in police nets for posing in police attires allegedly without authorisation, hence his arrest and detention. But VeryDarkMan’s predicaments turned out to be the very channel through which the incarceration of vulnerable kids by state actors, caught the attention of a curious social media activist. As typical of VDM, sooner had he got freed than he released tales that exposed the ugly conditions of kids he met while in police custody. By then the kids had languished for no less than 90 days without arraignments. Most of them having been ferried from as far as Kano, and away from family supports, had starved immensely with pitiable signs of deteriorating health.
In the face of the exposé, police authority swinged into a flurry of actions that within hours, saw all protest detainees arraigned before a court wherein they were committed to prison on stringent bail conditions. Apparently, VDM’s exposé helped the police suddenly crack difficult nuts and untie knots they could not achieve for over 90 days. And quite surprisingly, lingering investigations got concluded within hours while charge sheets got ready for the courts. Was the police in a hurry to extricate itself from an already ugly situation? Even for treasonable offences, the delay in prosecution and the silent manner in which the suspects were incarcerated speak volumes about the inhumane nature of our law enforcement systems, and highlights the nature of maltreatments many other suspects have had to undergo contrary to the primordial principles laid down for the protection of human rights and dignity, even in custody.
That kids protesting against hunger were rounded up and set to languish in hunger for three months, should be deplorable enough to engender empathy. Yet notwithstanding the pitiable conditions in which the fragile kids appeared in court, the presiding judge ruled that, “The defendants are granted bail in the sum of N10 million each, with two sureties in like sum. One of them must be a Level 15 civil servant, and the other a parent of the defendant.” Such indifference smacks of our justice system’s high-handedness and its deposition to using a sledge hammer to punish an errant fly. Whereas, government should lead in the protection of the most vulnerable in society against any form of physical and emotional trauma, ours has become wanting in that regard. It was therefore no great surprise when public outbursts greeted both the exposure of the incarceration and the eventual terms in which the kids were sent to prison.
Many civil society organisations, human rights activists, former presidential candidates, and many others, expressed anger on discovering the inhumane treatment, prompting the Attorney-General of the Federation (AGF) to immediately take over the case files. But with a presidential intervention that finally ordered all charges dropped and all detainees released, it appears to be another closed cycle. However, some Nigerians are calling for sanctions against the Inspector-General of Police, the trial judge and the AGF for allowing such incarcerations against under-aged persons, while others complain that our justice system’s ‘charge and bail’ syndrome does not allow full dissecting of public issues to beneficial conclusions. Some question that, even as Nigeria Police Force Public Relations Officer, Muyiwa Adejobi, insists that children above the age of seven can be charged to court, does Nigeria’s Child Rights Act stipulate that offending kids should be remanded among hardened adult criminals, rather than with trusted guardians?
Does the raising of foreign flags even during protests constitute treason? And for how long should suspects be in police cells before arraignments? On the flip side, the raising of Russian flags might genuinely be worrisome considering the spate of military expeditions across Nigeria’s neighbours in the Sahel, where with alleged Russian backings, military juntas have over-thrown governments and severed Western alliances in favour of Russia. Allowing unbiased investigations into the motives behind the alleged call on Russia to intervene in Nigeria’s internal affairs coupled with the raising of flags during the protests, should have revealed any broader implications. This becomes more pertinent in the face of on-going rumours about coup plots. If our law and justice establishments had been more forthright, all suspects should have been profiled within the stipulations of legal frameworks that ensure humane handling, and the protection of our national integrity.
The outcomes of diligent prosecutions should also have availed Nigerians who supported the protests solely for the genuine purpose of ensuring good governance, the opportunity of knowing if truly the protest was hijacked, how and by whom. In Nigeria, hundreds of arrests go on daily but end up without insightful closures, in a common phenomenon referred locally, as ‘charge and bail.’ Some cases stall due to the frivolity of their origins, and some due to bribery, sheer frustration or politics. While submitting that the trauma of the incarcerated kids should not be swept under the carpets without some consolations, there is need for sanctions against their incarcerators. However, President Tinubu’s order that discharged in one swing, both adult suspects and the maltreated kids, whether out of political calculations having achieved an aim of silencing a protest, or to enable justice, has just repeated an over-beaten cycle – our penchant for ‘charge and bail.
Joseph Nwankwor
Opinion
Judicial Manipulation: Threat To Democracy
The judiciary in Nigeria is one of the three arms of the Federal Government. It is represented by the courts, including the Supreme Court, Court of Appeal, Federal High Court, High Court of States and FCT, Sharia Court of Appeal of States and FCT, Customary Court of Appeal of States, and other courts authorised by law. The judiciary is responsible for interpreting the law and upholding the rule of law. The strenght and muscle of the judiciary at upholding the rule of law, is predicated on its independence of existence and function from other arms of government. Thus, the independence of the judiciary is guaranteed by the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, to ensure that judicial officers are free from outside pressure or influence as is visible in some political interferences in the exercise of their judicial functions.
This makes the judiciary an essential institution in any democratic political setting. But can the judiciary ever be said to be absolutely independent when the appointment and dismissal of its key officers for example judges, solely rest on the executives and the security of tenure and remuneration of the former, are strictly determined by the latter?
This singular relationship has not made it easier for the judiciary to actually maintain its neutrality and dispense judgment without fear or favour. From all indications, Judicial manipulation which refers to the improper influence or control of the judicial process by individuals or groups outside of the judiciary, is becoming a growing concern across the globe, including Nigeria. This can take many forms, such as bribery, coercion, and political pressure. The consequences of it are severe and far-reaching as it not only undermines the integrity of the legal system, but also erodes public trust in the judiciary, and denies justice to individuals and communities. In Nigeria, the judiciary has faced numerous challenges in recent years, including political interference, corruption, and lack of resources. Judicial manipulation is often associated with authoritarian or dictatorial regimes, where the rule of law is not respected, and the judiciary is not independent. However, it can also occur in democratic societies, where the judiciary is subject to political pressure and other forms of influence. One of the most significant forms of judicial manipulation is the use of political pressure to influence judicial decisions. This can take many forms, including the use of political rhetoric to sway public opinion and the application of political pressure on judges to rule in a particular way.
Another form of judicial manipulation is the use of bribery and other forms of corruption to influence judicial decisions. This can include the payment of bribes to judges or other court officials, as well as the offer of other forms of inducement, such as lucrative business deals or other benefits. Judicial manipulation can also take the form of coercion, where judges are threatened or intimidated into ruling in a particular way. This can include the use of physical violence, as well as other forms of harassment or intimidation. However, it can also occur in democratic societies, where the judiciary is subject to political pressure and other forms of influence. As I read about the recent developments in Rivers State, I could not help but wonder if the judiciary is being manipulated for political gain. Former Vice President, Atiku Abubakar, has raised some serious concerns that warrant attention.
Atiku has warned the judiciary to avoid actions that could lead to unrest in Rivers State, particularly in response to the Federal High Court’s decision to suspend all financial transactions with Rivers State. He suspects that certain groups associated with the Federal Government are influencing judicial decisions behind the scenes. I share his concerns about the rationale behind Justice Joyce Abdulmalik’s order, especially since Rivers State has already appealed the prior Court of Appeal ruling regarding the legality of its 2024 budget. Atiku pointed out that the Court of Appeal’s decision deemed the Rivers State budget illegal due to its passage by an incomplete assembly, instructing Governor Siminalayi Fubara to reintroduce the budget for approval. Despite the Rivers State Government’s notice of appeal to the Supreme Court, it is insinuated that elements within Bola Tinubu’s administration are allegedly seeking a judgment that undermines the Supreme Court’s authority.
This, according to Atiku, is unacceptable and has the potential to erode trust in our judicial system. Furthermore, legal expert Femi Falana (SAN) had warned about potential judicial manipulation, citing instances of gifts being presented to judges in Abuja. It is alarming that these warnings went unheeded, and I join Atiku in demanding answers. The judiciary must maintain its independence and impartiality to ensure justice is served.I urge the judiciary to take Atiku’s warnings seriously and ensure that their decisions are guided by the law, not political influence. The people of Rivers State deserve a fair and just resolution to this matter. However, despite these challenges, the judiciary remains a vital institution in Nigeria’s democracy, and its independence must be protected at all costs. To prevent judicial manipulation, it is essential to ensure the independence of the judiciary and the integrity of the legal system. This can include measures such as the establishment of an independent judiciary, the protection of judges from political pressure and other forms of influence, and ensuring transparency and accountability in the legal system.
Additionally, promoting a culture of respect for the rule of law and the judiciary, and educating the public about the importance of an independent judiciary and the dangers of judicial manipulation, are crucial steps in preventing judicial manipulation. The Nigerian government must take concrete steps to address the challenges facing the judiciary and ensure its independence. This includes providing adequate resources, protecting judges from political interference, and promoting transparency and accountability in the legal system. Furthermore, civil society organisations and the media have a critical role to play in promoting judicial independence and exposing instances of judicial manipulation. Judicial manipulation is a serious threat to democracy and the rule of law in Nigeria. It is essential that we take steps to prevent it and ensure that the judiciary is able to function independently and impartially. The future of Nigeria’s democracy depends on it.
Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
Opinion
Balancing Work And Life
Work-life balance is typically the amount of time you spend doing your job versus the amount of time you spend doing what is important to you outside of work, whether that is with loved ones or pursuing personal interests and hobbies. When work demands more of your time or attention, you will have less time to handle your other responsibilities or passions. Truly, many people want to achieve a greater balance between their work and their personal life, but in practice, it can be difficult to achieve, sometimes a demanding job means more money to support a family. Sometimes, a job contributes to deteriorating your mental health, which then leaves you drained in personal relationships. But work and life integration or the synergistic blending of our personal and professional responsibilities has become an increasingly popular concept. Work is simply one aspect of our lives that needs to be considered alongside other home and family lives, our community and our personal well-being, rather resembling a scale with two computing sides.
The importance of work-life balance can never be over-emphasised. Improving your work-life balance can improve your overall well-being including your physical, emotional and mental health. Studies have found out that working long hours can lead to such serious health issues as “impaired sleep, depression, heavy drinking, diabetes, impaired memory, and heart disease. Unfortunately, as these conditions arise, they can also exacerbate our work-life issues, leading to burnout and other negative repercussions. Ordinarily, the unique nature of each of our lives and our fluctuating responsibilities mean that work-life balance and work-life integration look different for everyone. It is a constant negotiation about, how and where you spend your time. In striving for greater work-life balance, you get to determine your priorities, whether they are related to your work or personal life.
Different workers or employees have different schedules to take care of their responsibilities. For instance, a stay-at- home parent who tackles work assignment while her newborn is napping. You can also look at a student who prioritises spending time with friends rather than rushing to study for an upcoming midterm exam. An employee who crafts his schedules to work specific days so that she can take care of her elderly parents. Notably, an employee has more advantages when it comes to work-life balance. One of those is increased production. When you are able to take a step back from work and recharge, it is amazing how much more productive you can be when you return to your tasks. Studies have shown that employees who have a better work-life balance are more productive, creative, and motivated.
One study found that employees who have great balance of work and personal lives are more productive by as much as 30per cent. Being able to disconnect from work and focus on other things, whether it is spending time with family, pursuing a hobby or simple relaxing, can help you come back to your work with renewed energy and focus. When you are feeling more balanced you are less likely to burnout, which can lead to a decrease in productivity and even health issues. Additionally, better work-life balance leads to improved health of a person. When you are constantly working, it can be easy to neglect your health. But maintaining a good work-life balance can have a positive impact on your physical and mental well-being. Study by the American Psychological Association reveal that people who maintain a good balance of work , as well as personal life are more likely to report good health and less likely to report poor health.
When you are able to focus on other things, like exercise, healthy eating, and getting enough sleep in addition to having a better balance will reduce stress. When you are working long hours, it can be easy to neglect your relationships. But maintaining a good work-life balance will have a positive impact on your personal relationships. When you can disconnect from work, you can focus on other things, like spending time with friends and family, pursuing hobbies , and building new relationships. Furthermore, having a better balance can reduce stress which can lead to better communication and understanding in your relationship. When you are feeling good in your personal relationships, you are better able to handle the demands of your job, which in turn can lead to better performance and more job satisfaction. A good work-life balance can lead to happier and more fulfilling life overall.
If you just focus on getting things done without proper planning, it can be easy to neglect your overall career development. But if you maintain a healthy work-life balance, it can have a positive impact on your career opportunities. Employees who have a good balance of work time and personal lives are more likely to be promoted and have better job satisfaction. By disconnecting from work, you will be able to focus on other things like learning new skills, networking and exploring new career opportunities. Additionally, when you can disconnect from work, you are able to enjoy your personal life and recharge your batteries , which in turn, helps you stay engaged and motivated at work. Work-life balance also has its negative impacts on the employee. It may be difficult to meet up work demand. It is not always easy to find a balance between work and personal time, especially when you have a demanding job or tight deadline. Maintaining a good work-life balance can be difficult and it is common to feel like you are not doing enough in either area.
In fact, employees who are struggling to balance work and personal life are more likely to experience stress and burnout. When you are trying to balance work and personal life, you may find yourself feeling pulled in different directions. It can be hard to focus on when you are thinking about personal obligation and it can be hard to enjoy your personal life when you are thinking about work. Furthermore, when you are trying to find the perfect balance between work and personal life, you may feel like you are not able to give your full attention to either area. This can lead to feelings like guilt or dissatisfaction with your job or personal life. It is important to remember that finding a balance between work and personal life is a work in progress, and it will require constant adjustments and flexibility. It is also important to be realistic and set boundaries for yourself to communicate them with your personal life.
When you are focused on maintaining a good work-life balance, you may end up sacrificing financial opportunities. For instance, you may turn down a promotion or a rise because it will require more time away from your personal life. Or you may take a leave of absence from your job, which can lead to a loss of income. Employees who take time off for personal or family reasons often experience a loss of income. They also may have difficulty getting back into the work force, which can lead to long term financial consequences. Furthermore, employees who are constantly working overtime or taking on additional responsibilities may be eligible for extra pay or bonuses, but if you are trying to maintain a good balance, you may end up missing out on those opportunities. It is important to remember that balancing work and personal life is not just about time but also about financial opportunities and stability.
Finding a balance will require careful consideration of both your personal and financial goals and communicating with your employer about expectations and limitations to ensure that you are able to meet your financial needs without sacrificing your life. Prioritisation is very important. Considering which one is more important than the other. When trying to balance your work and personal life, you may find it difficult to prioritise what is important. According to a survey conducted by the American Psychological Association, 60per cent of adults said that work is a significant source of stress in their lives. This stress can be compounded when you are trying a balance competing demands on your time and attention. Remember, that finding a balance does not mean that you have to divide your time equally between work and personal life. Instead, it is about determining what is most important to you and making sure that you are allocating your time and resources accordingly.
Robinson is a student of Pan African Institute of Management and Technology, Port Harcourt.
By: Happiness Nkiruka Robinson
-
Sports4 days ago
43rd Edition Of Public Service Games Officially Opens In PH
-
Business2 days ago
Expert Wants AI Introduction In Retail Industry … Says It’ll Boost Nigeria’s Economy
-
Business2 days ago
SON To Simplify SMEs Certification Process
-
News5 days ago
PDP Govs Give NWC Feb 2025 Deadline For NEC Meeting
-
Business4 days ago
CFAO Hits Nigerian Automobile Market With New Land Cruiser Prado
-
Politics2 days ago
Ondo Guber: Court Dismisses Ajayi’s Forgery Case Against Dep Gov-elect
-
News2 days ago
NAFDAC Busts Fake Alcohol Factory In Lagos
-
Featured2 days ago
We’ll Implement Judicial Commission’s Report On Arson, Killings -Fubara …Says Such Violence Must Stop In Rivers