Opinion

·We Dared, Creditably!

Published

3 years ago

June 12, 2023

As Special Assistant to Secretary to the Government (SASG) of ·We Dared, Creditably!Rivers State in the early 1980s, I was one of the foot soldiers of Governor Melford Okilo in his bid for the ticket of National Party of Nigeria (NPN) towards the 1987 presidential race. In the North-South zoning arrangement of NPN, the presidency was billed for the south following the anticipated completion of eight years by Alhaji Shehu Shagari. It was speculated that Shagari would favour Okilo who worked harmoniously with him under the Prime Minister of Nigeria during the First Republic, Alhaji Tafawa Balewa. In a survivalist strategy, NPN Rivers State prepared National Vice Chairman South, Chief Ranami Abah, as the alternate wannabe in the presidential bid, which was christened “Project RR”. Conveniently, RR provided an effective decoy: it created the impression of having to do with Rt Honourable Rossbury R. “RR” Briggs, the Speaker of Rivers State House of Assembly while it actually meant Ribadu Road, which was the seat of power in Lagos. Sadly, that dream was aborted by the military coup of December 30, 1983, which birthed the Buhari/Idiagbon military regime.
Informed by the above experience and consistent study of the Nigerian political firmament and the mindset of the politicians over the years, I advised my friend, Governor Peter Odili, not to vie for the presidency in 2007. I based that opinion on the conviction that, given the prevailing primordial sentiments and geopolitical realities of Nigeria, it would be highly objectionable and therefore improbable for the North to support another southerner to occupy Aso Rock at the heels of Obasanjo’s eight years. Assertively, I added that even the position of Vice President (VP) would be highly unlikely for him due to the fact that, given the vested interest of Europe and America in the oil and gas of Niger Delta vis-a-vis the volatility of the region, the West would be favourably disposed to a VP that speaks the language of the militants. I also referred to the statement by Governor DSP Alamieyeseigha of Bayelsa State thus: “the VP position is for a blue-blooded Niger Deltan”, pointing out that the inference of “blue blooded Niger Deltan” is Ijaw.
Furthering on the unsolicited advice, I opined that he should run for Senate and angle for Senate Presidency or take ambassadorial appointment and cool off overseas for sometime. Unfortunately, that well-meant advice was construed as not supporting the presidential bid of my friend. Eventually, my heart bled profusely and, in my characteristic softness, I shed tears as I watched the scene at Eagle Square on television during PDP primaries on Saturday, December 16, 2006. I prayed fervently that God should give Peter the strength to deal with the unnerving and highly emotional situation. Thank God, the “rock” essence of the name, Peter, manifested and he survived the ordeal. Commenting on that episode, former Senate President, Ken Nnamani, offered that “all serious contenders vying for the PDP ticket were hounded out of the way or convinced to withdraw…Peter Odili was the most prepared of the lot”. Writing in Vanguard Newspaper on December 19, 2006, columnist Pini Jason “wonder[ed] if, in all honesty, President Obasanjo and his cronies would describe what transpired at Eagle Square [that day] as a credible convention and primary election”.
The columnist furthered that “the national convention, which produced Umar Yar’Adua as the presidential flag bearer, would go down in history as the most disgraceful charade of all times”. PM News held that 24 hours to the National Convention, Governors Donald Duke of Cross River State and Ahmed Makarfi of Kaduna State withdrew from the race on the instructions of Obasanjo. These moves were informed by the awareness that the convention may just be a mere formality. The party leadership had conceded the post to Governor Umar Yar’Adua of Katsina State whose elder brother, General Shehu Yar’Adua was Obasanjo’s deputy during the military dispensation of 1976–1979. Till date, political pundits and social critics maintain that if the primaries had been conducted fair and square, Peter Odili would have conveniently clinched the coveted crown. Alluding to the treachery in politics, a man of God in Port Harcourt, referred to PDP as Papa Deceive Pikin. Now, you can say anything about Peter Odili but you cannot accuse him of not having the guts to try. He dared, creditably.
During the 2023 presidential primaries of PDP and All Progressives Congress (APC), two sons of Rivers State were simmering hot in pursuit of the tickets; Governor Nyesom Ezenwo Wike in PDP and Rt Honourable Chibuike Rotimi Amaechi in APC. By happenstance, if both Wike and Amaechi had clenched the tickets of PDP and APC, respectively, it would have been “Head, we win; tail, we win” for Rivers State baring a political revolution at the polls. Rivers State would have been at the centerstage of global attention. The point being made here is that both sons of River State dared, creditably. Yes, they lost but the truth remains that it was Rivers State that lost, not Nyesom Ezenwo Wike and Chibuike RotimiAmaechi. It is said that the greatest failure is failure to try. Therefore, you can accuse Peter Odili, Nyesom Wike and Chibuike Amaechi of whatever suits your fancy but you can not accuse them of failure to try. Try, they did and they acquitted themselves creditably. If PDP had provided a level playing field on December 16, 2006, Odili would have coasted home with the ticket.
If Wike’s political associate and friend had not succumbed to primordial sentiments of religion and ethnicity, he might have shared northern votes with Atiku thereby giving Wike the needed edge to clench the PDP ticket. Like Odili and Wike, Amaechi put in so much in his bid. Having built a University of Transportation in Daura, taken a traditional title from there and vigorously attempted to rationalise the irrationality of constructing a railroad to a foreign land while no two states or cities in the Niger Delta are connected by rail, Amaechi seemed the anointed one. In my congenital optimism, I would say that these three worthy sons of the Niger Delta have taken turns laying a formidable foundation from which Niger Deltans, especially Rivers State politicians, can draw psychological and political steam and lessons towards eventually breaking the glass ceiling of presidency. The point remains that we did not fail to try; we dared and stayed focused till the end. We may not have taken the trophy but we were the hottest contenders in the three cases. Our ascendency to the exalted office of President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria will not be an accident.
A censorious reading of the literature of Judeo-Christian theology informs that God (whoever or whatever He, She, They or It may be) regretted some actions; this means acknowledging mistakes. Therefore, who is man not to make mistakes? To His Excellencies Peter Odili, Nyesom Wike and Chibuike Amaechi, I salute your courage for making that weighty political statement for and on behalf of us all from Rivers State. They can take the presidency from us but they cannot take away the spirit to try and the fact that we dared and that we acquitted ourselves creditably in the process. We hold tenaciously to the fact that in daring, we spoke eloquently and volubly of our indisputable stake-holding in the Nigerian enterprise.

By: Jason Osai

Osai, is a Professor of Development Studies Rivers State University, Port Harcourt.

Opinion

Poor Federal Roads: The Oshiomhole’s Outburst

Published

20 hours ago

August 3, 2026

The Tide

Quote:”Although the Federal Ministry of Works is responsible for road construction and rehabilitation while the Federal Roads Maintenance Agency (FERMA) oversees maintenance, road maintenance has consistently taken a back seat”

The recent outburst by the lawmaker representing Edo North Senatorial District, Senator Adams Oshiomhole, over the deplorable condition of federal roads in Edo and Delta states has once again drawn national attention to one of Nigeria’s most persistent infrastructure challenges. During Senate plenary last Wednesday, Oshiomhole criticized the Minister of Works, David Umahi, accusing the Federal Ministry of Works of neglecting major federal highways in Edo and Delta while prioritizing new road projects. According to him, the government should focus on rehabilitating existing roads that have become impassable before embarking on new construction. He identified the Benin-Warri, Benin-Asaba, Benin-Auchi and Auchi-Okene highways as strategic economic corridors that have deteriorated to alarming levels, making travel difficult for commuters and motorists while increasing the cost of transporting goods and services.

The senator also alleged that road projects affecting Edo and Delta states were repeatedly omitted from budgetary provisions and that some interventions were only undertaken following directives from President Bola Tinubu. Ironically, the Federal Government has consistently reiterated its commitment to reconstructing and rehabilitating federal roads across the country. The Minister of Works has repeatedly assured Nigerians that the government is deploying reinforced concrete technology to build more durable highways capable of withstanding the country’s climatic conditions. Despite these assurances, vast sections of federal road across the country remain in deplorable condition. The consequences are enormous. Federal highways serve as the backbone of the nation’s economy, carrying more than 90 per cent of passengers and freight.

They connect ports, airports, industrial centres, state capitals and agricultural belts, facilitating the movement of food, fuel, cement and manufactured goods. When these roads fail, the entire economy suffers. Although the Federal Ministry of Works is responsible for road construction and rehabilitation while the Federal Roads Maintenance Agency (FERMA) oversees maintenance, road maintenance has consistently taken a back seat. The result is a recurring cycle in which newly completed roads quickly deteriorate while existing ones are left to collapse. The economic consequences are severe. Bad roads increase transportation costs, contribute to food inflation, delay the movement of goods from ports to markets, increase vehicle maintenance expenses and lead to avoidable road crashes that claim countless lives every year.

To address these challenges, the Federal Government has introduced initiatives such as the Highway Development and Management Initiative (HDMI), which seeks to attract private investment into road maintenance through concessions and tolling. While the initiative holds promise, public acceptance will depend largely on visible improvements in road quality and transparent management of toll revenues. Similarly, the Road Infrastructure Tax Credit Scheme is designed to encourage companies to finance the reconstruction of strategic highways in exchange for tax credits. While the scheme has shown promise, its ability to address road infrastructure challenges equitably across the country remains to be seen. Other countries facing similar infrastructure challenges have demonstrated that sustainable road management requires a different approach.

Rwanda and Morocco, for instance, have prioritized dedicated road maintenance funds, performance-based contracts that reward quality rather than kilometers constructed, and policies that allocate a significant proportion of road budgets to maintenance instead of new construction. Nigeria can draw useful lessons from these experiences. Maintenance funding should be increased and protected because preventive maintenance is far cheaper than complete reconstruction. Public-private partnerships should be expanded with adequate safeguards, transparent tolling policies and independent monitoring. Development finance institutions should support contractors with affordable financing to minimize disruptions caused by delayed government payments. Road designs should withstand heavier rainfall and flooding, while compensation and right-of-way issues must be resolved before projects begin to avoid unnecessary delays.

FERMA should also prioritize durable, high-quality road maintenance over the shoddy repairs that have become all too common. Ultimately, Nigerians are not asking for perfect roads; they simply want roads that are safe, durable and properly maintained. While new highways are desirable, a well-maintained five-kilometer stretch is often far more valuable to road users than a much longer road that quickly falls into disrepair. The media, civil society, the National Assembly and Nigerians must continue to hold the government accountable by monitoring road projects and demanding better results. Good roads are not a privilege but a right of every citizen. With tax credit schemes, concessions and other funding mechanisms already in place, what is now required is political will, transparency and consistent implementation. However, Senator Oshiomhole’s criticism also invites legitimate public reflection.

Many Nigerians have asked what the condition of these same federal roads was during his eight-year tenure as Governor of Edo State. Several governors, including those of Rivers State at different times, undertook repairs on critical federal roads within their states and subsequently sought reimbursement from the Federal Government. It is therefore fair to ask whether similar interventions were pursued during Oshiomhole’s administration. Public officials, whether serving or former, should be judged by the same standard. Constructive criticism is essential in a democracy, but it carries greater weight when matched by a demonstrable record of action. Nigerians expect those entrusted with public office to address pressing challenges while they have the authority to do so, rather than becoming vocal critics only after leaving office

By: Calista Ezeaku

Opinion

Sacrificing Humanity for Politics?

Published

20 hours ago

August 3, 2026

The Tide

“Politics is temporary, but humanity is permanent. No politician is worth sacrificing genuine friendships, family bonds, or peaceful coexistence.””Politics is temporary, but humanity is permanent”.

Every election season leaves behind more than ballot papers and campaign posters. It often leaves broken friendships, divided families, fractured communities, and hearts filled with resentment. In the heat of political competition, many people forget a simple but profound truth: politics is temporary, but humanity is permanent. Across our communities, it has become increasingly common to see people sever lifelong relationships simply because they support different political parties or candidates. Individuals who once shared meals, celebrated milestones, and stood by each other during difficult times suddenly become strangers not because they committed any personal offence, but because they exercised their democratic right to think differently. This growing trend should concern every citizen. Politics is designed to provide leadership, shape public policy, and improve society.

It was never intended to become a weapon for destroying relationships or creating permanent enemies. When politics begins to erode our humanity, it ceases to serve its true purpose. A democratic society thrives on diversity of thought. Every citizen possesses the constitutional right to support any political party, candidate, or ideology without fear of intimidation or hatred. Political disagreement is not a crime; rather, it is evidence that democracy is alive and functioning. The true measure of political maturity is not our ability to silence opposing voices but our willingness to respect them. Unfortunately, many people have mistaken political loyalty for personal hostility. Instead of debating ideas, they attack personalities. Instead of discussing policies, they spread insults and misinformation. Instead of building bridges, they construct walls of bitterness.

Such behaviour weakens not only our relationships but also the democratic values we claim to defend. The reality is simple: elections are temporary. Political offices have fixed tenures. Governments change. Political alliances shift. Today’s political rivals may become tomorrow’s allies, while today’s allies may become tomorrow’s opponents. History has repeatedly demonstrated that politicians who once exchanged harsh words eventually sit together at negotiation tables in pursuit of shared interests. Yet ordinary citizens often remain trapped in unnecessary hatred long after political leaders have reconciled.This reality offers an important lesson. No politician should be worth sacrificing genuine friendships, family bonds, or peaceful coexistence. Political support should never require personal hatred. We can campaign passionately for our preferred candidates while still respecting those who choose differently.

Democracy flourishes when disagreement remains civil. One of the most dangerous habits in politics is inheriting other people’s enemies. Far too often, supporters adopt the personal conflicts of political leaders as though they were their own. People who have never met begin insulting one another on social media, damaging relationships, and sometimes engaging in violence simply because influential figures disagree.Such misplaced loyalty serves no meaningful purpose. Political leaders often possess the opportunity to reconcile, negotiate, and move forward after elections. Their supporters, however, are frequently left with damaged relationships, regret, and lasting divisions within their communities. Wisdom demands that citizens distinguish between political competition and personal relationships. Rather than inheriting hostility, we should cultivate independent judgment.

Judge individuals by their character, integrity, honesty, and personal conduct not merely by the colour of the political party they support. A person’s political affiliation does not automatically define their values, competence, or humanity. Equally important is the need to elevate the quality of our political conversations. Instead of engaging in personal attacks, we should focus on issues that genuinely affect people’s lives. Discussions should revolve around education, healthcare, infrastructure, security, economic growth, employment, agriculture, and accountable governance. These are the matters that determine the future of our nation not endless exchanges of insults. Social media has further amplified political intolerance. Behind anonymous profiles and smartphone screens, many people say things they would never express in person.

Every post, comment, and shared message has the potential either to promote understanding or to deepen division. Responsible citizenship requires restraint, accuracy, and respect, especially during politically sensitive periods. Politics should inspire service, not hostility. Leadership should unite rather than divide. Citizens should be free to disagree without becoming enemies. After all, beyond our political preferences, we remain neighbours, colleagues, business partners, classmates, worshippers, and fellow citizens who share the same hopes for peace, prosperity, justice, and national development. As another political season approaches, let us remember what truly matters. Campaigns will end. Elections will pass. Winners will celebrate, and losers will regroup. But the relationships we preserve, the respect we extend, and the humanity we uphold will remain long after the campaign slogans have faded.

The greatest victory in politics is not defeating an opponent at the polls; it is preserving our values while participating in democracy. Let us choose dialogue over division, understanding over intolerance, and respect over hatred. Above all, let us never forget this timeless principle: Politics should never be more important than humanity. And perhaps the wisest political advice anyone can embrace is this: Never inherit people’s enemies. In doing so, we preserve not only our relationships but also the very spirit of democracy itself.

By: Michael T. Abraham

Opinion

Making the Out-of-School Children Survey Count

Published

1 week ago

July 27, 2026

The Tide

Quote: “Reliable data may reveal the scale of Nigeria’s out-of-school crisis, but only sustained political will and practical action can ensure that every child is given the opportunity to learn, thrive and contribute to national development.”

The Minister of Education, Dr. Tunji Alausa, recently announced that the Federal Government, in partnership with the National Bureau of Statistics (NBS), will conduct a nationwide household survey to determine the actual number of out-of-school children in Nigeria. The exercise is intended to provide reliable data for evidence-based education policies and targeted interventions. Current estimates put the number of out-of-school children at between 15 million and 20 million, placing Nigeria among the countries with the highest number of children excluded from formal education. At first glance, this is a commendable initiative. One of Nigeria’s greatest developmental challenges has been the absence of accurate and reliable data. Without dependable statistics, planning becomes difficult, implementation inefficient, and evaluation of government programmes almost impossible.

The nation’s actual population also remains uncertain because of the absence of an up-to-date national census. Estimates range from below 200 million to over 250 million, making effective planning a daunting task. Sound policies on education, healthcare, housing, employment and infrastructure all depend on credible population statistics. Against this backdrop, the proposed survey deserves commendation. If government succeeds in generating reliable figures, it will be better positioned to allocate resources equitably, identify areas of greatest need and design interventions based on facts rather than assumptions. Accurate data will also make it easier to monitor progress and assess whether efforts to reduce the number of out-of-school children are achieving the desired results.

However, beyond the good intentions lie important questions. Will state governments provide the enabling environment for an objective and transparent survey? Since education is on the concurrent legislative list, the cooperation of state governments will largely determine the credibility of the exercise. Politics could easily influence the process. States with higher numbers of out-of-school children may qualify for greater intervention funds from the Federal Government and development partners. Would this tempt some states to inflate their figures? On the other hand, high numbers could portray a state government as performing poorly in the education sector. Would some governors therefore seek to understate the figures to protect their image? These concerns are legitimate because whenever statistics are tied to political interests or financial benefits, the temptation to manipulate them cannot be ignored.

Equally important are questions about the survey itself. When will it begin? How long will it last? What methodology will be adopted? Will every household be covered, including those in remote rural communities and areas plagued by insecurity? Does the government have the manpower, funding, technology and security arrangements needed for such a nationwide exercise? Nigeria has witnessed several well-intentioned national programmes that fell short because of poor planning and inadequate logistics. Many Nigerians will remember that the proposed national population census scheduled a few years ago was postponed despite extensive preparations. Funding constraints and logistical challenges contributed to its suspension. What guarantees are there that this survey will not suffer a similar fate? More importantly, what becomes of the findings after the exercise? Nigeria is not short of reports or data collection initiatives.

The recurring challenge has been the lack of political will to translate findings into concrete policies and sustained action. The survey must not become another document gathering dust on government shelves. Instead, it should serve as the basis for measurable interventions, continuous monitoring and improved educational outcomes. Beyond producing accurate figures, the survey must also uncover the reasons children remain outside the classroom. Addressing the crisis requires more than counting affected children. It demands an understanding of the social, economic and cultural factors responsible for the problem. Issues such as the Almajiri system and other practices that discourage formal education should be carefully examined while respecting cultural values and protecting every child’s right to quality education. Poverty remains a major barrier, as many parents cannot afford school-related expenses, forcing children into street trading or child labour

Insecurity has also led to the closure of schools in several communities, depriving thousands of children of learning opportunities.Government must therefore complement the survey with practical measures. Strengthening social protection for vulnerable families, improving school infrastructure, recruiting and retaining qualified teachers, enhancing security around schools and enforcing compulsory basic education are all essential. Equally important is sustained collaboration with traditional rulers, religious leaders, civil society organisations and development partners to address the root causes of school exclusion. The proposed survey presents an opportunity to replace guesswork with credible evidence. However, its true value will not be measured by the number of households visited or questionnaires completed. Its success will depend on whether the findings inspire bold policies, adequate funding and sustained action that ensure every Nigerian child, regardless of location or background, has access to quality education. Only then will the exercise move beyond statistics to become a genuine instrument for national development.