Connect with us

Opinion

Managing Poverty: Nigerian Style

Published

on

Scotland-Yard security instructors would always remind students who pass through them that three critical sources of social instability and changes are: explosions in human population, aspirations and knowledge. Consequently there are bound to be scrambles for survival, in the process of which divisions and inequalities among humans would surely arise. Expectedly poverty would be a common feature in every society, even though this would be in relative terms. Also, poverty goes beyond lack of money and material necessities, but includes inferiority in integrity, ability and perception.
It is quite instructive to observe the ways and styles in which the Nigerian nation manages the issue of poverty, ranging from the distribution of national and natural resources, to the management of palliative and relief aids and materials. From the handling of COVID-19 Pandemic palliative measures, to current experiences in the dispensing of succour to cushion the sad effects of removal of subsidy on petroleum, the style and strategy are the same. Humans learn from every experience and the more traumatic the experiences the more far-reaching the knowledge acquired.
With a rapidly expanding human population, coupled with faster learning arising from sad experiences, humans would aspire to rise above restricting barriers and hindrances. Explosion in human aspirations would include not only trying to cope with threats to life, but striving to rise above such threats. Money being such a good soldier, capable of being deployed in every battle, means of acquisition of money would be the lines of aspiration of an individual. Who would want to remain a beggar while others own private universities, airlines and build 5-star hotels in every state?
Those who manage crimes and security issues would suggest that revenge motives feature in many acts of social insecurity. Fear of being left in the lurch and the humiliation of being regarded as a failure, drive many people into acts of desperation, which can include crimes. Crime rate builds up and becomes more vicious and audacious when petty crimes are punished with venom and serious ones get resolved through plea bargaining. In the case of oil theft, for example, are petty bunkerers the real barons and kings? They rarely know where the oil flows!
Social services as remedial measures to balance social imbalances; emphases are not placed on maintaining the status quo, but on current social challenges arising from unavoidable changes. Factors which bring pressures on the society include the explosions in population, aspirations and knowledge. One aspect of knowledge explosion does not arise from book learning, but internet culture, of which smart phone is a symbol. Nigerian leaders would hardly believe the volume of information available to the masses, via internet resources. One of such information is hypocrisy in high places wearing masks.
Abraham Maslow’s postulations that humans are motivated by certain basic needs, were balanced by Erikson’s “Eight Ages of Man”, with desires to resolve major issues at each developmental level. Therefore, governance as a social contract, requires understanding peoples’ psychological situations and humans as bio-psycho-social creatures who aspire and learn fast. Thus, the ability to intervene in people’s lives and situations must be constructive and honest, if mass confidence must be sustained. Promises of palliatives must not create value conflicts arising from class, political or ethnic differences. Biting need counts!
Whatever the circumstances that brought about abuses in fuel subsidy project, thus resulting in the removal of such subsidy, the helpless masses should not be the major bearers of the burdens. The practice of transfer of guilt makes the shenanigans of fuel subsidy removal and the attendant palliative regime more bitter and burdensome for the masses. When the distribution of palliative measures takes the form of sharing of loots, then the principle of justice comes to question. “All human beings, because they belong to the category of being human, must be treated in the same way”, so says the principle of justice.
There is also the Concrete Principle of justice which demands that the allocation of resources by government must give priority to meeting basic human needs, with food, clothing and shelter coming first. Fairness, justice and accountability in the allocation of palliative succour count as the measure of integrity and responsibility. Basic professional principle in social services delivery as defined by McSweeny, demands “fairness” especially as it relates to the possession and/or acquisition of the resources based on some kind of valid claim to a share of these resources.
In the past administration, colossal sums of money purportedly spent on feeding of school children were seen by a large section of Nigerians as empty claims, to say the least. Similar sly claims feature in every project of social services delivery, whereby the poorest of the poor who are supposed to be the beneficiaries of such largesse, rarely had anything to show for the claims made. Any effort or clamour to probe into allegations of malfeasance would usually end up like the forensic audit of the affairs of the Niger Delta Development Commission (NDDC). Nigerians are now quite weary of any talk about probity.
With regard to the mounting opposition against the PDP Chairman in Rivers State being the head of a committee to administer subsidy removal palliative succour for Rivers State, grounds for such oppositions are quite germane. To give political or any partisan colouration to any social services delivery project, is to invite cynicism and possible obloquy to the management of such project. Nigerians are quite aware of possible abuses which political partisanship and patronage can bring about, even when no ill motive is intended in appointments of participants.
Basic social problem in poverty alleviation projects has to do largely with mindset, which translates partly into resignation and cynicism or lack of desire or ability in planning one’s life. Poverty is relative and varies with time and place and its causes can be traced to internal or personal factors, and external factors. Depressive mindset and inability in planning one’s life contribute towards poverty, but the structure of a nation’s political economy is a more devastating cause of large-scale poverty. The Nigerian style tends to perpetuate the status quo, whereby a possible means of breaking the poverty jinx is to become a desperado.
Ranging from joining the groups of ballot box snatchers, to engagement in numerous sharp practices involved in the distribution of relief materials and the sharing of loots, many Nigerians became rich and powerful through these and similar malfeasance. As population increases rapidly, and as scrambles for available resources become fiercer, aspirations of individuals rise higher, with knowledge towards making a headway in life advancing rapidly. Thus wealth grows, but men and integrity decay. What are the roles of the Ministry of Humanitarian Affairs and Poverty Alleviation?

By: Bright Amirize
Dr Amirize is a retired lecturer from the Rivers State University, Port Harcourt.

Continue Reading

Opinion

Agony In  Ivory Tower 

Published

on

Quote: A university that tolerates missing scripts, result manipulation and ‘sorting’ is not merely failing students—it is quietly destroying the moral foundation of education itself.”
The sad cases of missing scripts, compulsory Sorting, inputting of wrong results and other obnoxious practices in some public universities, leave much to be desired. One cannot imagine how a student will be compelled to suffer consequences of the flagrant negligence of a Head of Department, a lecturer, Department staff or an ICT staff.Many academic and non academic staff in several public universities seem to be performing far below standard, thus unproductive to the university system. The unacceptable cases of sorting, missing scripts, missing results, inputting of wrong grades to students, should not be mentioned in a university, not even in any academic community. This is because people who are employed to work in various positions should have cognate work experience and unquestionable competence. They should not be seen as  certificate welding illiterates but people who have been proven to be worthy in learning and character, diligent and competent to carry out assigned responsibilities with minimal or no supervision.
The university as a citadel of learning should boast of men of integrity, people  who are repositories of applied knowledge and competence to drive the much desired holistic development in a nation that functions on quality teaching and learning. A situation where a student having gone through the crucibles of learning and written a prescribed semester examination or class-based evaluation test, is told that his or her script is missing or that he or she did not participate in that academic exercise, or must sort to pass, is an unpardonable error and a height of callousness. In fact some lecturers and staff of Departments are using the seeming systemic defect (which is their architecture) as an opportunity to extort  students. Sometimes it is discovered much to students chagrin that the supposed missing script was later discovered when a ransom was paid.
Since a lecturer, or Head of Department has in their disposal both Yam and the knife and determines who takes what (if they wish to give without strings), students have no alternative but to submit to their importunate demands in order to graduate at record time.Such practices should be unheard of in an institution that should be a vanguard of moral and ethical values and conduct. What people learn in school constitute their behavioural patterns in the society. Where the school as an agency of socialisation cannot drive positive change first in its immediate environment, then the objective of education as a bedrock for the development of society, is inevitably compromised and counter-productive. The German Reformer, Dr. Martins Luther was quoted as saying, “I advise parents not to put their wards or children in any school where the Bible is not being used as a rule of life because such institutions will unnecessarily be corrupt”.
 Gleaning from Luther’s sentiment one can deduce that the lack of respect and regard for values as well as the absence of the fear of God is the greatest undoing of most public schools. Another major challenge is that lack of Information, Communication and Technology literacy or compliance on the part of some lecturers and heads of department, may have informed the decision to give students’ scripts to secretaries to compile and input students results thereby making the secretaries the determinants of students’ fate. It is not saying a new thing that some of the secretaries in the process of compiling results have inputted wrong results, omitted names or down graded some students or given unmerited grades to others.Society today is ICT-driven and ICT-literacy enhances efficiency, speed and a reasonable degree of accuracy if the person behind the computer is level headed, articulate, competent, alive to responsibilities and is aware that negligence on his or her part is not only tantamount to a disservice to the university but to the students who may not graduate at record time because of his or her (computer operator’s) gross ineptitude or carelessness.
The ICT era makes the carrying of hard copy of results obsolete as lecturers through the  Heads of Department  can log on to the central server of the Exams and Records (if any) or ICT unit and input students’ results directly. By so doing the incessant cases where result on spread sheet is different from the one published online, more often than not, caused by abject negligence, will be avoided. The process will also end the intermediary services of some staff in the universities’ Information, Communication and Technology Department which has become a money spinner-a lucrative source of income to many of them. In fact some ICT staff reserved the power to award grades to students depending on students’ degree of compliance to terms and conditions. They can dubiously make or unmake a student. The university community should be considered too lofty to have careless, negligent, immoral  and academic or professionally deficient people as academic or non-academic staff.
The Governing  Councils and Senates of universities should be proactive in addressing the menace of missing Script,  inputting of wrong results and sorting.  This is  necessary to end the slogan “Education is scam” so the system can produce quality students who are truly found worthy in learning and in character by operators who exemplify diligence, moral and ethical values. The much-needed reform must begin within the institutions themselves, because the future of any society is shaped in its classrooms.
By: Igbiki Benibo
Continue Reading

Opinion

Strength of Emotional Equality

Published

on

Quote: “Love thrives not when one gives more, but when both give fully — not in competition, not in performance, but in partnership.”
In every healthy relationship, there exists an invisible balance. It is not measured in grand gestures, expensive gifts, or public displays of affection. It is measured in something quieter and far more significant: emotional equality. When couples stand on equal emotional grounds, love becomes less of a negotiation and more of a partnership. Emotional equality does not mean both individuals express love in identical ways. It does not require matching personalities or mirroring temperaments. Rather, it speaks to balance — a shared willingness to invest, to communicate, to be vulnerable, and to grow. It is the difference between two people walking side by side and one person constantly trying to catch up.
 In many relationships, imbalance begins subtly. One partner initiates most conversations. One apologizes more frequently. One carries the emotional labor — remembering important dates, managing conflicts, sensing tension, and attempting reconciliation. Over time, this uneven distribution of emotional effort breeds exhaustion. The partner who gives more begins to feel unseen. The one who gives less may grow comfortable in emotional passivity. Love, in such a space, starts to tilt — slowly at first, then significantly. Resentment can creep in quietly, disguising itself as patience. Silence may replace honest dialogue. What once felt effortless begins to feel heavy.
When couples stand on equal emotional grounds, responsibility is shared. Both people are accountable for the health of the relationship. If conflict arises, neither hides behind silence nor dominates through control. Instead, they engage. They listen. They speak honestly without weaponizing words. Equality creates safety — and safety strengthens intimacy. It allows both individuals to express needs without fear of ridicule or rejection. One of the most overlooked aspects of emotional equality is vulnerability. True connection requires courage. It demands that both partners risk being misunderstood. But when vulnerability is one-sided, it becomes exposure rather than intimacy. If one person consistently opens up while the other remains guarded, trust cannot fully deepen.
Equality ensures that emotional risks are mutual. Where one shares fears, the other shares too. Where one admits weakness, the other responds with openness rather than judgment. In such a space, authenticity flourishes. Another crucial element is validation. In emotionally balanced relationships, both partners feel heard. Their concerns are not dismissed as “overreactions.” Their feelings are not minimized or compared. When couples operate on equal emotional ground, they acknowledge each other’s experiences as legitimate. They may not always agree, but they always respect. Validation does not mean surrendering one’s viewpoint; it means recognizing that another’s emotional reality matters.
Equality also protects individuality. Contrary to popular belief, healthy love does not erase personal identity — it enhances it. When both partners are emotionally secure, they do not feel threatened by each other’s independence. Personal ambitions are encouraged, not resented. Friendships are respected, not restricted. Growth is celebrated, not feared. Standing on equal emotional grounds means neither person shrinks to accommodate the other. Instead, both expand, knowing the relationship is strong enough to hold their evolution. Power dynamics often expose emotional inequality. When one partner controls communication — appearing and disappearing unpredictably, withholding affection, or using silence as leverage — imbalance emerges.
 Emotional dominance weakens intimacy. It creates anxiety instead of assurance. But when couples share emotional power, there is consistency. There is clarity. There is no need to decode affection because it is offered freely and intentionally. It is important to understand that equality does not imply perfection. Couples will still disagree. They will face stress, miscommunication, and moments of frustration. However, when emotional footing is equal, conflict does not threaten the foundation. Instead, it becomes an opportunity for understanding. Both partners approach challenges as teammates rather than opponents. They choose resolution over ego and repair over pride.
Time often reveals whether emotional equality truly exists. In the early stages of love, intensity can disguise imbalance. Enthusiasm feels mutual. Effort appears equal. But as routine settles in and novelty fades, the structure of the relationship becomes clearer. Who still initiates? Who still invests? Who still shows up consistently? Sustainable love requires sustained balance. It is built not merely on attraction, but on deliberate reciprocity. Standing on equal emotional grounds requires intentionality. It demands honest conversations about needs and expectations. It requires both partners to examine their habits — whether they withdraw during tension, avoid accountability, or rely on the other to carry the emotional weight. Emotional maturity is not about avoiding conflict; it is about handling it responsibly and returning, again and again, to shared ground.
Perhaps the greatest benefit of emotional equality is peace. There is no constant anxiety about where one stands. No guessing games about commitment. No fear that affection may suddenly disappear. Instead, there is stability. There is reassurance. There is mutual effort. In a world where relationships often blur the lines between attention and commitment, equality offers clarity. It reminds us that love should not feel like competition or performance. It should feel like partnership. When couples stand on equal emotional grounds, they build something resilient. They build trust that does not fracture easily. They build respect that does not depend on mood. They build a connection rooted not only in passion but in balance. And in that balance, love finds its strength — not in who gives more, but in how both give fully.
By: Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
Continue Reading

Opinion

NDDC: Time To Illuminate Homes 

Published

on

Quote:“Twenty-five years on, the Niger Delta cannot celebrate illuminated streets while families sit in darkness. Development must begin inside the home — where children study, businesses grow, and lives are built — before it glows on the roadside.”
The Niger Delta Development Commission (NDDC) was established in 2000 with a clear and urgent mandate: to facilitate the rapid, even, and sustainable development of Nigeria’s oil-producing Niger Delta region. The creation of the Commission followed decades of agitation over environmental degradation, infrastructural neglect, and socio-economic marginalization in the region. Its core mandate included the development of roads, bridges, electricity, water supply, health facilities, education, housing, environmental remediation, and economic empowerment initiatives. At inception, expectations were high that the Commission would transform the Niger Delta into a model of regional development. Over the years, the NDDC has indeed implemented numerous projects across the nine Niger Delta states. Roads have been constructed and rehabilitated in several communities, easing transportation challenges.
Schools have been renovated, and new classroom blocks have been provided in underserved areas. Health centres have been built or upgraded, improving access to primary healthcare services. The Commission has also awarded scholarships to students, including foreign postgraduate scholarships, empowering thousands of youths academically.Skills acquisition and youth empowerment programmes have helped many young people gain vocational competencies.Through various interventions, the NDDC has contributed to job creation and local economic stimulation.Solar-powered street lighting projects have been widely implemented in urban and semi-urban communities. These streetlights have improved visibility at night and contributed to enhanced security in some areas. Markets, highways, and public spaces illuminated by solar lights have experienced extended business hours.
For these efforts, the Commission deserves acknowledgment and commendation. However, development must always align with foundational mandates and pressing grassroots realities. A growing concern among residents is that while streets are illuminated, many homes remain in darkness. Rural electrification and household power access remain inconsistent and inadequate across large parts of the region. In riverine and remote communities, families still rely on generators, kerosene lamps, or complete darkness after sunset. The irony of brightly lit streets juxtaposed with powerless homes cannot be ignored. Electricity at the household level directly impacts education, health, and small-scale enterprise. Students cannot effectively study at night without reliable indoor lighting.Families cannot preserve food or power essential appliances without stable electricity.
Micro and small businesses struggle to grow without dependable energy access. While street lighting enhances public aesthetics and security, it does not substitute for domestic electrification. The proverb “charity begins at home” is especially relevant in this context. True community development must first empower households before beautifying public spaces. The Commission’s original mandate emphasizes integrated and sustainable development, not isolated infrastructural gestures. Balanced development requires that energy interventions prioritize homes alongside streets. Solar technology presents a unique opportunity for decentralized household electrification in off-grid communities. Extending solar solutions to individual homes would have a transformative social impact. Home-based solar systems could power lights, fans, small appliances, and communication devices.
Such interventions would reduce poverty, improve living standards, and stimulate grassroots productivity. By broadening its energy focus, the Commission would better reflect the spirit of its founding legislation. This is not a call to abandon street lighting projects, which have their merits. Rather, it is an appeal for balance, inclusivity, and alignment with core developmental objectives. Strategic planning should ensure that rural electrification and household access form a central pillar of ongoing interventions. Community engagement and needs assessments can help determine priority areas for household solar deployment. Twenty-five years after its establishment, the NDDC stands at a reflective moment in its institutional journey. The people of the Niger Delta say: thank you for the efforts so far—but not very much—because true appreciation will come when development begins at home and radiates outward, not merely when streets shine while houses remain in darkness.
By: King Onunwor
Continue Reading

Trending