Connect with us

Opinion

Addressing Nigeria’s Security Challenges

Published

5 years ago

on

In Shakespeare’s Two Gentlemen of Verona, we hear that: “By penitence the Eternal’s Wrath’s appeared”. So wisely is everything arranged in the scheme of things that no imbalance can be caused without an attendant restitution or penalty visiting the source of such imbalance.
The security situation and spate of bloodshed in Nigeria have become disturbingly embarrassing that they should be addressed with realism rather than subterfuge and blusters. Specifically, there is no way that the enigma can be addressed realistically without looking at possible causal factors. For a few honest Nigerians who knew what happened in the last six months of 1966, there is a need to speak out.
Much acts of brutality, bestiality and vengeful bloodshed took place in Northern Nigeria, ostensibly as a reaction to the military coup of January 15, 1966, which was wrongly interpreted as an affront to the Northerners. Hardly would anyone doubt the fact that the dying declarations of people killed agonizingly in cold blood can have toxic effects if after many years no penitence is shown. Rather, public lynching was a celebrated festival, wielding weapons of blood.
Specifically, December 15, 1966, a woman in labour was dragged out from a hiding place and a baby ripped out from her womb before she was lynched in a most inhuman manner. Her last cry of agony or an invocation was that the generations of those participating in the deed and those turning away from her plea, would have no peace. She added more frightful imprecations as she died.
The snag of the public lynching of that period was that security personnel passing by or called upon to intervene looked the other way and did nothing to help those they were meant to protect. It is now 54 years since the ominous curse of a woman lynched during labour. There were quite several such acts of bestiality, taking place in several towns and communities across Northern Nigeria. Nobody should ask for video coverage!
The snag was that several months before the obviously organized and coordinated public lynching and mayhem, there were security reports and alert which no authority acted upon. There were even statements by several persons instigating the lynching mob and also saying that: “this would serve your people as a lesson”. There is symbolism in 54 as a period of time, i.e. between December 1966 and now – long enough of a time for penitence, to turn aside wrath of vengeance.
One 84-year old Kabuga of Rwanda was arrested in France 2020, over war crime, in that he used his enormous wealth and influence to instigate genocide in Rwanda. In Nigeria, there were several wealthy and influential people who used their wealth and positions to spread the falsehood that the January 15, 1966 military coup was a “domination project”. Even some foreigners in Nigeria participated in that calumny.
Fifty four years should be a long time enough to let bye-gone be bye-gone, but since everyone puts on the air of innocence, with no penitence on the part of those who promoted the lynching festivals, it is needful to recall the imprecations of 1966.
While some naïve or ill-disposed commentators placed emphases on the Nigeria Civil War and the rebellion of Biafra, little or nothing is said about the counter coup of July 1966, which was an attempt to get even and punish “those who sought to dominate”. Everything was wrong in the way that Nigeria was managed prior to 1966, which accounted for the intervention of the military, or a section thereof. But that intervention project was given misleading interpretations. Politics at work!
Those who had something to hide and saw opportunities for some sectional agenda, saw to it that the lynching festival of the last six months of 1966, was not subject to any public inquiries. What is vital here is the curse placed on the lynching mob by a woman in labour who was murdered in a most agonizing manner. Children born at and after the ominous curse would surely be adults now, 50 years and above. The baby, ripped out of the woman’s womb would also have become a parent now.
It is quite possible that the spate of senseless murders and brigandage attributed to “bandits” in Northern Nigeria, can be a part of the curse laid upon that zone by those killed in cold blood in 1966. Whether the rampaging hoodlums are in partnership with Boko Haram brigands does not matter. Rather, what is vital here is the fact that there is a similar state of helplessness, non-challance on the part of security agencies and secrecy, as there were during the 1966 era of public lynching. Moreover, is it not possible that the unstoppable hoodlums have some sponsors? Old game!
Let it be said clearly and for the benefit of those who may not know the truth, that no one gets away with any act of injustice in which ever form it may take. Individually and collectively, those who participate in any act of injustice get the penalty, if after some period of grace the imbalance is not atoned for through penitence and a total change for the better. It is necessary to add that individuals and groups can, through attitude of recalcitrance and a vengeful disposition, make themselves to become channels of flow of destructive radiations.
Obviously there are many destructive radiations floating in space and capable of infecting minds that are open for them to flow into. This mechanism accounts for such horrible deeds that take place on earth, especially acts of bestiality by a madding crowd. Bitter, vengeful, ignorant and idle minds become easy prey for the infiltration of destructive radiations that hover around zones which offer them access. With the availability of arms, sponsors, and narcotic substances, weak and bitter minds become means of security challenges in society.
Origins of “destructive radiations” mentioned here include curses and invocations pronounced by persons who had suffered unjust and bestial acts from “hoodlums”. Thus, there is strong psychic power in human words uttered in a state of deep trauma. It is needful that leaders in the zones where acts of criminality and bestiality reign should meet and seek to avert a deterioration of security situations. Those who murder sleep hardly sleep anymore!
Dr. Amirize is a retired lecturer from the Rivers State University, Port Harcourt.

Related Topics:
Continue Reading

Opinion

Agony In  Ivory Tower 

Published

6 days ago

on

March 9, 2026

By

Quote: A university that tolerates missing scripts, result manipulation and ‘sorting’ is not merely failing students—it is quietly destroying the moral foundation of education itself.”
The sad cases of missing scripts, compulsory Sorting, inputting of wrong results and other obnoxious practices in some public universities, leave much to be desired. One cannot imagine how a student will be compelled to suffer consequences of the flagrant negligence of a Head of Department, a lecturer, Department staff or an ICT staff.Many academic and non academic staff in several public universities seem to be performing far below standard, thus unproductive to the university system. The unacceptable cases of sorting, missing scripts, missing results, inputting of wrong grades to students, should not be mentioned in a university, not even in any academic community. This is because people who are employed to work in various positions should have cognate work experience and unquestionable competence. They should not be seen as  certificate welding illiterates but people who have been proven to be worthy in learning and character, diligent and competent to carry out assigned responsibilities with minimal or no supervision.
The university as a citadel of learning should boast of men of integrity, people  who are repositories of applied knowledge and competence to drive the much desired holistic development in a nation that functions on quality teaching and learning. A situation where a student having gone through the crucibles of learning and written a prescribed semester examination or class-based evaluation test, is told that his or her script is missing or that he or she did not participate in that academic exercise, or must sort to pass, is an unpardonable error and a height of callousness. In fact some lecturers and staff of Departments are using the seeming systemic defect (which is their architecture) as an opportunity to extort  students. Sometimes it is discovered much to students chagrin that the supposed missing script was later discovered when a ransom was paid.
Since a lecturer, or Head of Department has in their disposal both Yam and the knife and determines who takes what (if they wish to give without strings), students have no alternative but to submit to their importunate demands in order to graduate at record time.Such practices should be unheard of in an institution that should be a vanguard of moral and ethical values and conduct. What people learn in school constitute their behavioural patterns in the society. Where the school as an agency of socialisation cannot drive positive change first in its immediate environment, then the objective of education as a bedrock for the development of society, is inevitably compromised and counter-productive. The German Reformer, Dr. Martins Luther was quoted as saying, “I advise parents not to put their wards or children in any school where the Bible is not being used as a rule of life because such institutions will unnecessarily be corrupt”.
 Gleaning from Luther’s sentiment one can deduce that the lack of respect and regard for values as well as the absence of the fear of God is the greatest undoing of most public schools. Another major challenge is that lack of Information, Communication and Technology literacy or compliance on the part of some lecturers and heads of department, may have informed the decision to give students’ scripts to secretaries to compile and input students results thereby making the secretaries the determinants of students’ fate. It is not saying a new thing that some of the secretaries in the process of compiling results have inputted wrong results, omitted names or down graded some students or given unmerited grades to others.Society today is ICT-driven and ICT-literacy enhances efficiency, speed and a reasonable degree of accuracy if the person behind the computer is level headed, articulate, competent, alive to responsibilities and is aware that negligence on his or her part is not only tantamount to a disservice to the university but to the students who may not graduate at record time because of his or her (computer operator’s) gross ineptitude or carelessness.
The ICT era makes the carrying of hard copy of results obsolete as lecturers through the  Heads of Department  can log on to the central server of the Exams and Records (if any) or ICT unit and input students’ results directly. By so doing the incessant cases where result on spread sheet is different from the one published online, more often than not, caused by abject negligence, will be avoided. The process will also end the intermediary services of some staff in the universities’ Information, Communication and Technology Department which has become a money spinner-a lucrative source of income to many of them. In fact some ICT staff reserved the power to award grades to students depending on students’ degree of compliance to terms and conditions. They can dubiously make or unmake a student. The university community should be considered too lofty to have careless, negligent, immoral  and academic or professionally deficient people as academic or non-academic staff.
The Governing  Councils and Senates of universities should be proactive in addressing the menace of missing Script,  inputting of wrong results and sorting.  This is  necessary to end the slogan “Education is scam” so the system can produce quality students who are truly found worthy in learning and in character by operators who exemplify diligence, moral and ethical values. The much-needed reform must begin within the institutions themselves, because the future of any society is shaped in its classrooms.
By: Igbiki Benibo
Continue Reading

Opinion

Strength of Emotional Equality

Published

6 days ago

on

March 9, 2026

By

Quote: “Love thrives not when one gives more, but when both give fully — not in competition, not in performance, but in partnership.”
In every healthy relationship, there exists an invisible balance. It is not measured in grand gestures, expensive gifts, or public displays of affection. It is measured in something quieter and far more significant: emotional equality. When couples stand on equal emotional grounds, love becomes less of a negotiation and more of a partnership. Emotional equality does not mean both individuals express love in identical ways. It does not require matching personalities or mirroring temperaments. Rather, it speaks to balance — a shared willingness to invest, to communicate, to be vulnerable, and to grow. It is the difference between two people walking side by side and one person constantly trying to catch up.
 In many relationships, imbalance begins subtly. One partner initiates most conversations. One apologizes more frequently. One carries the emotional labor — remembering important dates, managing conflicts, sensing tension, and attempting reconciliation. Over time, this uneven distribution of emotional effort breeds exhaustion. The partner who gives more begins to feel unseen. The one who gives less may grow comfortable in emotional passivity. Love, in such a space, starts to tilt — slowly at first, then significantly. Resentment can creep in quietly, disguising itself as patience. Silence may replace honest dialogue. What once felt effortless begins to feel heavy.
When couples stand on equal emotional grounds, responsibility is shared. Both people are accountable for the health of the relationship. If conflict arises, neither hides behind silence nor dominates through control. Instead, they engage. They listen. They speak honestly without weaponizing words. Equality creates safety — and safety strengthens intimacy. It allows both individuals to express needs without fear of ridicule or rejection. One of the most overlooked aspects of emotional equality is vulnerability. True connection requires courage. It demands that both partners risk being misunderstood. But when vulnerability is one-sided, it becomes exposure rather than intimacy. If one person consistently opens up while the other remains guarded, trust cannot fully deepen.
Equality ensures that emotional risks are mutual. Where one shares fears, the other shares too. Where one admits weakness, the other responds with openness rather than judgment. In such a space, authenticity flourishes. Another crucial element is validation. In emotionally balanced relationships, both partners feel heard. Their concerns are not dismissed as “overreactions.” Their feelings are not minimized or compared. When couples operate on equal emotional ground, they acknowledge each other’s experiences as legitimate. They may not always agree, but they always respect. Validation does not mean surrendering one’s viewpoint; it means recognizing that another’s emotional reality matters.
Equality also protects individuality. Contrary to popular belief, healthy love does not erase personal identity — it enhances it. When both partners are emotionally secure, they do not feel threatened by each other’s independence. Personal ambitions are encouraged, not resented. Friendships are respected, not restricted. Growth is celebrated, not feared. Standing on equal emotional grounds means neither person shrinks to accommodate the other. Instead, both expand, knowing the relationship is strong enough to hold their evolution. Power dynamics often expose emotional inequality. When one partner controls communication — appearing and disappearing unpredictably, withholding affection, or using silence as leverage — imbalance emerges.
 Emotional dominance weakens intimacy. It creates anxiety instead of assurance. But when couples share emotional power, there is consistency. There is clarity. There is no need to decode affection because it is offered freely and intentionally. It is important to understand that equality does not imply perfection. Couples will still disagree. They will face stress, miscommunication, and moments of frustration. However, when emotional footing is equal, conflict does not threaten the foundation. Instead, it becomes an opportunity for understanding. Both partners approach challenges as teammates rather than opponents. They choose resolution over ego and repair over pride.
Time often reveals whether emotional equality truly exists. In the early stages of love, intensity can disguise imbalance. Enthusiasm feels mutual. Effort appears equal. But as routine settles in and novelty fades, the structure of the relationship becomes clearer. Who still initiates? Who still invests? Who still shows up consistently? Sustainable love requires sustained balance. It is built not merely on attraction, but on deliberate reciprocity. Standing on equal emotional grounds requires intentionality. It demands honest conversations about needs and expectations. It requires both partners to examine their habits — whether they withdraw during tension, avoid accountability, or rely on the other to carry the emotional weight. Emotional maturity is not about avoiding conflict; it is about handling it responsibly and returning, again and again, to shared ground.
Perhaps the greatest benefit of emotional equality is peace. There is no constant anxiety about where one stands. No guessing games about commitment. No fear that affection may suddenly disappear. Instead, there is stability. There is reassurance. There is mutual effort. In a world where relationships often blur the lines between attention and commitment, equality offers clarity. It reminds us that love should not feel like competition or performance. It should feel like partnership. When couples stand on equal emotional grounds, they build something resilient. They build trust that does not fracture easily. They build respect that does not depend on mood. They build a connection rooted not only in passion but in balance. And in that balance, love finds its strength — not in who gives more, but in how both give fully.
By: Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
Continue Reading

Opinion

NDDC: Time To Illuminate Homes 

Published

2 weeks ago

on

March 2, 2026

By

Quote:“Twenty-five years on, the Niger Delta cannot celebrate illuminated streets while families sit in darkness. Development must begin inside the home — where children study, businesses grow, and lives are built — before it glows on the roadside.”
The Niger Delta Development Commission (NDDC) was established in 2000 with a clear and urgent mandate: to facilitate the rapid, even, and sustainable development of Nigeria’s oil-producing Niger Delta region. The creation of the Commission followed decades of agitation over environmental degradation, infrastructural neglect, and socio-economic marginalization in the region. Its core mandate included the development of roads, bridges, electricity, water supply, health facilities, education, housing, environmental remediation, and economic empowerment initiatives. At inception, expectations were high that the Commission would transform the Niger Delta into a model of regional development. Over the years, the NDDC has indeed implemented numerous projects across the nine Niger Delta states. Roads have been constructed and rehabilitated in several communities, easing transportation challenges.
Schools have been renovated, and new classroom blocks have been provided in underserved areas. Health centres have been built or upgraded, improving access to primary healthcare services. The Commission has also awarded scholarships to students, including foreign postgraduate scholarships, empowering thousands of youths academically.Skills acquisition and youth empowerment programmes have helped many young people gain vocational competencies.Through various interventions, the NDDC has contributed to job creation and local economic stimulation.Solar-powered street lighting projects have been widely implemented in urban and semi-urban communities. These streetlights have improved visibility at night and contributed to enhanced security in some areas. Markets, highways, and public spaces illuminated by solar lights have experienced extended business hours.
For these efforts, the Commission deserves acknowledgment and commendation. However, development must always align with foundational mandates and pressing grassroots realities. A growing concern among residents is that while streets are illuminated, many homes remain in darkness. Rural electrification and household power access remain inconsistent and inadequate across large parts of the region. In riverine and remote communities, families still rely on generators, kerosene lamps, or complete darkness after sunset. The irony of brightly lit streets juxtaposed with powerless homes cannot be ignored. Electricity at the household level directly impacts education, health, and small-scale enterprise. Students cannot effectively study at night without reliable indoor lighting.Families cannot preserve food or power essential appliances without stable electricity.
Micro and small businesses struggle to grow without dependable energy access. While street lighting enhances public aesthetics and security, it does not substitute for domestic electrification. The proverb “charity begins at home” is especially relevant in this context. True community development must first empower households before beautifying public spaces. The Commission’s original mandate emphasizes integrated and sustainable development, not isolated infrastructural gestures. Balanced development requires that energy interventions prioritize homes alongside streets. Solar technology presents a unique opportunity for decentralized household electrification in off-grid communities. Extending solar solutions to individual homes would have a transformative social impact. Home-based solar systems could power lights, fans, small appliances, and communication devices.
Such interventions would reduce poverty, improve living standards, and stimulate grassroots productivity. By broadening its energy focus, the Commission would better reflect the spirit of its founding legislation. This is not a call to abandon street lighting projects, which have their merits. Rather, it is an appeal for balance, inclusivity, and alignment with core developmental objectives. Strategic planning should ensure that rural electrification and household access form a central pillar of ongoing interventions. Community engagement and needs assessments can help determine priority areas for household solar deployment. Twenty-five years after its establishment, the NDDC stands at a reflective moment in its institutional journey. The people of the Niger Delta say: thank you for the efforts so far—but not very much—because true appreciation will come when development begins at home and radiates outward, not merely when streets shine while houses remain in darkness.
By: King Onunwor
Continue Reading

Trending