Opinion
The Adamawa Judgement: Any Hope For Nigerian Democracy?
Mr. Chris Finebone – APC Chieftain.
My perspective of what happened in Adamawa in terms of the judgement that has just been delivered is that it portends some ray of hope for us as Nigerians. It was a similar judgement of the Supreme Court that brought Governor Amaechi into power.
It tells you that there is hope for democracy here. It tells you that ultimately, justice, fairness, equity must prevail over impunity and injustice with the help of the judiciary. I have heard a lot of people say that when the former Adamawa State governor, Murtala Nyako, for which Ngilari was his deputy, defected to APC that Ngilari did not defect with him, likening it to the scenario in Sokoto State where Wamako has defected to APC and Shagari his deputy has not so far, to our knowledge, defected to APC. It is now history that the former governor was impeached and all the Shananiga that happened threw up all kinds of characters and plots and all that and Fintiri manouvred his way and became governor and all that.
But what the court has done was to redirect and tell people that you must do things correctly. You must do right things, the right way and not right things the wrong way. You must also not do the wrong thing the right way and expect it to stand.
However, we shouldn’t make a fetish of this judgment. We have seen judgments like this before but our people returned to inflict all kinds of impunity on the citizens. Of course, it was a very valid, sweet judgement like the one that brought Governor Amaechi into power. But that did not stop all kinds of characters like Police Commissioner Mbu and the Presidency from plotting to commit all kinds of heinous crimes in Rivers State. So we shouldn’t make a fetish of this particular judgement. There is nothing too special about the judgement that should be instructing us about the way to go. It is just one judgement. Evil men will continue on their evil path. Yes the court judgement on Adamawa is good but we are not out of the woods yet.
Mr. Stanley Job Stanley – Journalist.
I think the judgement is in order. It’s in order because the constitution says if a governor wants to resign from office, he submits his resignation letter to the state House of Assembly, while the deputy governor submits to the governor. But in this case, the deputy governor instead of submitting to the governor, submitted to the assembly. We were told that by the time he submitted his resignation letter to the assembly, the governor was still in office, although impeached that same day. And that brings us to the thinking of some people, whether Ngilari submitted the resignation letter to the Assembly, knowing very well that that process was not the right way to follow and may be intended to turn round and go to court and see how he can obtain favourable judgement. That is the way some of us look at it, because there is no way a deputy governor will claim not to know the constitution or the right place to submit his resignation letter. The speaker too might have accepted the letter and acted on it out of ignorance. Because as of the time the letter was submitted, the governor was still in office. So if the deputy governor wanted to do the right thing, he would have gone straight to the governor to submit the letter. In law, the judgement was very correct because the Deputy Governor followed a wrong process and he capitalized on that, telling the court that he didn’t follow the right process, and the court saw that it was true and reinstated him.
I believe in future, there will be no such deliberate attempt to submit a resignation letter in a wrong place. If a deputy governor in another state tries to submit a resignation letter to the House of Assembly, he will be told to take it to the governor. These are some of the things that happen which make our democracy stronger. We have over the years learnt a lot of things through the practice of democracy. We have also discovered that our laws need to be amended in one way or the other.
Ananymous Lawyer –
As far as I am concerned, the judgement is the position of the law. The former governor, Nyako, did not receive his deputy’s resignation letter. The constitution says that such letter should be written to the governor not the state House of Assembly.
It is a landmark judgement and the way it was enforced immediately by the swearing in of Ngilari as the governor shows that democracy is evolving in Nigeria. There were many instances where court judgements were not honoured especially by those in authority so, for them to have abided by the pronouncement of the court shows we are growing up. It also serves as a big lesson to politicians who think they can twist the constitution any how they like and get away with it.
Miss Chinenye Nwangwu – Student
I think the judgment was a sound one. It is a lesson to all greedy politicians like Fintiri who think they can maneuver their ways and get whatever they want. Fintiri was simply over ambitious and I think the judge did the right thing by following the provisions of the constitution. I am also happy that tax payers’ money was not wasted on the bye-election which would have held on October 10. For once, let our leaders, politicians learn how to do the right thing at the right time.
Mr. Ajubo Isaac – Politician
With this judgement, one can say there is hope for Nigerian democracy because the purported resignation of Bala James Ngilari, the then deputy governor to Murtala Nyako was wrong. The resignation letter as acclaimed should have been submitted to the then governor not to the state House of Assembly.
To me, the judgement has once again proved that judiciary is the hope of the common man. When his boss was impeached, constitutionally, Ngilari should have been sworn in as the governor. But his right was denied him and instead the Speaker of the House of Assembly, Fintiri, was made the acting governor. Ngilari eventually took the matter to court which after due assessment and investigations ruled that Ngilari be sworn in as the governor since the said resignation letter didn’t pass through the constitutional procedure. No party, persons, legal practitioners can fault the
judgement, knowing it has merits. And it is a big lesson for all.
Mr. Moses Abam – Public Servant.
The judgement pronounced in favour of the former Deputy Governor of Adamawa State, Bala James Ngilari could be said to have been preplanned. From the onset, the former governor, Murtala Nyako defected from PDP to APC but Ngilari did not. So, the PDP must have used the speaker of the state House of Assembly and other members to mastermind the impeachment of the governor.
Why did almost every PDP member accept the court ruling? It is simply because the PDP saw the over ambition and anxiety of Speaker, Fintiri, to be the governor of the state which PDP did not want and that Ngilari is a real party (PDP) loyalist. Does this judgement hold any hope for Nigerian democracy? I doubt.
Opinion
Nigeria’s ‘Charge And Bail’ Syndrome And Justice
With the eventual release of 67 under-aged minors detained for involvement in #EndBadGovernance protests in August, the dust of the entire episode appears to have settled without lessons to improve our justice system’s administration. Between July 31 and August 11, 2024, #EndBadGovernance protests rocked through most states across Nigeria. The protests boiled more in the Northern states where the media carried scenes of arsonists burning down and looting public and private establishments. The protests took threatening dimensions when authorities alleged sighting foreign mercenaries amidst protesters who were raising Russian flags and calling on Russia to intervene in Nigeria’s internal affairs. The police subsequently swooped on protesters, encycling among them about 67 minors. Those caught were taken to the federal capital territory, Abuja, and dumped in detention cells.
Protests having been successfully quelled, Nigerians returned to their daily life hustles, while the minors with their adult suspects languished outside public consciousness. It took the coincidental sojourn in police custody, of one Martins Otse aka VeryDarkMan, for public awareness to be redrawn to a forgotten episode. VeryDarkMan had himself got entangled in police nets for posing in police attires allegedly without authorisation, hence his arrest and detention. But VeryDarkMan’s predicaments turned out to be the very channel through which the incarceration of vulnerable kids by state actors, caught the attention of a curious social media activist. As typical of VDM, sooner had he got freed than he released tales that exposed the ugly conditions of kids he met while in police custody. By then the kids had languished for no less than 90 days without arraignments. Most of them having been ferried from as far as Kano, and away from family supports, had starved immensely with pitiable signs of deteriorating health.
In the face of the exposé, police authority swinged into a flurry of actions that within hours, saw all protest detainees arraigned before a court wherein they were committed to prison on stringent bail conditions. Apparently, VDM’s exposé helped the police suddenly crack difficult nuts and untie knots they could not achieve for over 90 days. And quite surprisingly, lingering investigations got concluded within hours while charge sheets got ready for the courts. Was the police in a hurry to extricate itself from an already ugly situation? Even for treasonable offences, the delay in prosecution and the silent manner in which the suspects were incarcerated speak volumes about the inhumane nature of our law enforcement systems, and highlights the nature of maltreatments many other suspects have had to undergo contrary to the primordial principles laid down for the protection of human rights and dignity, even in custody.
That kids protesting against hunger were rounded up and set to languish in hunger for three months, should be deplorable enough to engender empathy. Yet notwithstanding the pitiable conditions in which the fragile kids appeared in court, the presiding judge ruled that, “The defendants are granted bail in the sum of N10 million each, with two sureties in like sum. One of them must be a Level 15 civil servant, and the other a parent of the defendant.” Such indifference smacks of our justice system’s high-handedness and its deposition to using a sledge hammer to punish an errant fly. Whereas, government should lead in the protection of the most vulnerable in society against any form of physical and emotional trauma, ours has become wanting in that regard. It was therefore no great surprise when public outbursts greeted both the exposure of the incarceration and the eventual terms in which the kids were sent to prison.
Many civil society organisations, human rights activists, former presidential candidates, and many others, expressed anger on discovering the inhumane treatment, prompting the Attorney-General of the Federation (AGF) to immediately take over the case files. But with a presidential intervention that finally ordered all charges dropped and all detainees released, it appears to be another closed cycle. However, some Nigerians are calling for sanctions against the Inspector-General of Police, the trial judge and the AGF for allowing such incarcerations against under-aged persons, while others complain that our justice system’s ‘charge and bail’ syndrome does not allow full dissecting of public issues to beneficial conclusions. Some question that, even as Nigeria Police Force Public Relations Officer, Muyiwa Adejobi, insists that children above the age of seven can be charged to court, does Nigeria’s Child Rights Act stipulate that offending kids should be remanded among hardened adult criminals, rather than with trusted guardians?
Does the raising of foreign flags even during protests constitute treason? And for how long should suspects be in police cells before arraignments? On the flip side, the raising of Russian flags might genuinely be worrisome considering the spate of military expeditions across Nigeria’s neighbours in the Sahel, where with alleged Russian backings, military juntas have over-thrown governments and severed Western alliances in favour of Russia. Allowing unbiased investigations into the motives behind the alleged call on Russia to intervene in Nigeria’s internal affairs coupled with the raising of flags during the protests, should have revealed any broader implications. This becomes more pertinent in the face of on-going rumours about coup plots. If our law and justice establishments had been more forthright, all suspects should have been profiled within the stipulations of legal frameworks that ensure humane handling, and the protection of our national integrity.
The outcomes of diligent prosecutions should also have availed Nigerians who supported the protests solely for the genuine purpose of ensuring good governance, the opportunity of knowing if truly the protest was hijacked, how and by whom. In Nigeria, hundreds of arrests go on daily but end up without insightful closures, in a common phenomenon referred locally, as ‘charge and bail.’ Some cases stall due to the frivolity of their origins, and some due to bribery, sheer frustration or politics. While submitting that the trauma of the incarcerated kids should not be swept under the carpets without some consolations, there is need for sanctions against their incarcerators. However, President Tinubu’s order that discharged in one swing, both adult suspects and the maltreated kids, whether out of political calculations having achieved an aim of silencing a protest, or to enable justice, has just repeated an over-beaten cycle – our penchant for ‘charge and bail.
Joseph Nwankwor
Opinion
Judicial Manipulation: Threat To Democracy
The judiciary in Nigeria is one of the three arms of the Federal Government. It is represented by the courts, including the Supreme Court, Court of Appeal, Federal High Court, High Court of States and FCT, Sharia Court of Appeal of States and FCT, Customary Court of Appeal of States, and other courts authorised by law. The judiciary is responsible for interpreting the law and upholding the rule of law. The strenght and muscle of the judiciary at upholding the rule of law, is predicated on its independence of existence and function from other arms of government. Thus, the independence of the judiciary is guaranteed by the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, to ensure that judicial officers are free from outside pressure or influence as is visible in some political interferences in the exercise of their judicial functions.
This makes the judiciary an essential institution in any democratic political setting. But can the judiciary ever be said to be absolutely independent when the appointment and dismissal of its key officers for example judges, solely rest on the executives and the security of tenure and remuneration of the former, are strictly determined by the latter?
This singular relationship has not made it easier for the judiciary to actually maintain its neutrality and dispense judgment without fear or favour. From all indications, Judicial manipulation which refers to the improper influence or control of the judicial process by individuals or groups outside of the judiciary, is becoming a growing concern across the globe, including Nigeria. This can take many forms, such as bribery, coercion, and political pressure. The consequences of it are severe and far-reaching as it not only undermines the integrity of the legal system, but also erodes public trust in the judiciary, and denies justice to individuals and communities. In Nigeria, the judiciary has faced numerous challenges in recent years, including political interference, corruption, and lack of resources. Judicial manipulation is often associated with authoritarian or dictatorial regimes, where the rule of law is not respected, and the judiciary is not independent. However, it can also occur in democratic societies, where the judiciary is subject to political pressure and other forms of influence. One of the most significant forms of judicial manipulation is the use of political pressure to influence judicial decisions. This can take many forms, including the use of political rhetoric to sway public opinion and the application of political pressure on judges to rule in a particular way.
Another form of judicial manipulation is the use of bribery and other forms of corruption to influence judicial decisions. This can include the payment of bribes to judges or other court officials, as well as the offer of other forms of inducement, such as lucrative business deals or other benefits. Judicial manipulation can also take the form of coercion, where judges are threatened or intimidated into ruling in a particular way. This can include the use of physical violence, as well as other forms of harassment or intimidation. However, it can also occur in democratic societies, where the judiciary is subject to political pressure and other forms of influence. As I read about the recent developments in Rivers State, I could not help but wonder if the judiciary is being manipulated for political gain. Former Vice President, Atiku Abubakar, has raised some serious concerns that warrant attention.
Atiku has warned the judiciary to avoid actions that could lead to unrest in Rivers State, particularly in response to the Federal High Court’s decision to suspend all financial transactions with Rivers State. He suspects that certain groups associated with the Federal Government are influencing judicial decisions behind the scenes. I share his concerns about the rationale behind Justice Joyce Abdulmalik’s order, especially since Rivers State has already appealed the prior Court of Appeal ruling regarding the legality of its 2024 budget. Atiku pointed out that the Court of Appeal’s decision deemed the Rivers State budget illegal due to its passage by an incomplete assembly, instructing Governor Siminalayi Fubara to reintroduce the budget for approval. Despite the Rivers State Government’s notice of appeal to the Supreme Court, it is insinuated that elements within Bola Tinubu’s administration are allegedly seeking a judgment that undermines the Supreme Court’s authority.
This, according to Atiku, is unacceptable and has the potential to erode trust in our judicial system. Furthermore, legal expert Femi Falana (SAN) had warned about potential judicial manipulation, citing instances of gifts being presented to judges in Abuja. It is alarming that these warnings went unheeded, and I join Atiku in demanding answers. The judiciary must maintain its independence and impartiality to ensure justice is served.I urge the judiciary to take Atiku’s warnings seriously and ensure that their decisions are guided by the law, not political influence. The people of Rivers State deserve a fair and just resolution to this matter. However, despite these challenges, the judiciary remains a vital institution in Nigeria’s democracy, and its independence must be protected at all costs. To prevent judicial manipulation, it is essential to ensure the independence of the judiciary and the integrity of the legal system. This can include measures such as the establishment of an independent judiciary, the protection of judges from political pressure and other forms of influence, and ensuring transparency and accountability in the legal system.
Additionally, promoting a culture of respect for the rule of law and the judiciary, and educating the public about the importance of an independent judiciary and the dangers of judicial manipulation, are crucial steps in preventing judicial manipulation. The Nigerian government must take concrete steps to address the challenges facing the judiciary and ensure its independence. This includes providing adequate resources, protecting judges from political interference, and promoting transparency and accountability in the legal system. Furthermore, civil society organisations and the media have a critical role to play in promoting judicial independence and exposing instances of judicial manipulation. Judicial manipulation is a serious threat to democracy and the rule of law in Nigeria. It is essential that we take steps to prevent it and ensure that the judiciary is able to function independently and impartially. The future of Nigeria’s democracy depends on it.
Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
Opinion
Balancing Work And Life
Work-life balance is typically the amount of time you spend doing your job versus the amount of time you spend doing what is important to you outside of work, whether that is with loved ones or pursuing personal interests and hobbies. When work demands more of your time or attention, you will have less time to handle your other responsibilities or passions. Truly, many people want to achieve a greater balance between their work and their personal life, but in practice, it can be difficult to achieve, sometimes a demanding job means more money to support a family. Sometimes, a job contributes to deteriorating your mental health, which then leaves you drained in personal relationships. But work and life integration or the synergistic blending of our personal and professional responsibilities has become an increasingly popular concept. Work is simply one aspect of our lives that needs to be considered alongside other home and family lives, our community and our personal well-being, rather resembling a scale with two computing sides.
The importance of work-life balance can never be over-emphasised. Improving your work-life balance can improve your overall well-being including your physical, emotional and mental health. Studies have found out that working long hours can lead to such serious health issues as “impaired sleep, depression, heavy drinking, diabetes, impaired memory, and heart disease. Unfortunately, as these conditions arise, they can also exacerbate our work-life issues, leading to burnout and other negative repercussions. Ordinarily, the unique nature of each of our lives and our fluctuating responsibilities mean that work-life balance and work-life integration look different for everyone. It is a constant negotiation about, how and where you spend your time. In striving for greater work-life balance, you get to determine your priorities, whether they are related to your work or personal life.
Different workers or employees have different schedules to take care of their responsibilities. For instance, a stay-at- home parent who tackles work assignment while her newborn is napping. You can also look at a student who prioritises spending time with friends rather than rushing to study for an upcoming midterm exam. An employee who crafts his schedules to work specific days so that she can take care of her elderly parents. Notably, an employee has more advantages when it comes to work-life balance. One of those is increased production. When you are able to take a step back from work and recharge, it is amazing how much more productive you can be when you return to your tasks. Studies have shown that employees who have a better work-life balance are more productive, creative, and motivated.
One study found that employees who have great balance of work and personal lives are more productive by as much as 30per cent. Being able to disconnect from work and focus on other things, whether it is spending time with family, pursuing a hobby or simple relaxing, can help you come back to your work with renewed energy and focus. When you are feeling more balanced you are less likely to burnout, which can lead to a decrease in productivity and even health issues. Additionally, better work-life balance leads to improved health of a person. When you are constantly working, it can be easy to neglect your health. But maintaining a good work-life balance can have a positive impact on your physical and mental well-being. Study by the American Psychological Association reveal that people who maintain a good balance of work , as well as personal life are more likely to report good health and less likely to report poor health.
When you are able to focus on other things, like exercise, healthy eating, and getting enough sleep in addition to having a better balance will reduce stress. When you are working long hours, it can be easy to neglect your relationships. But maintaining a good work-life balance will have a positive impact on your personal relationships. When you can disconnect from work, you can focus on other things, like spending time with friends and family, pursuing hobbies , and building new relationships. Furthermore, having a better balance can reduce stress which can lead to better communication and understanding in your relationship. When you are feeling good in your personal relationships, you are better able to handle the demands of your job, which in turn can lead to better performance and more job satisfaction. A good work-life balance can lead to happier and more fulfilling life overall.
If you just focus on getting things done without proper planning, it can be easy to neglect your overall career development. But if you maintain a healthy work-life balance, it can have a positive impact on your career opportunities. Employees who have a good balance of work time and personal lives are more likely to be promoted and have better job satisfaction. By disconnecting from work, you will be able to focus on other things like learning new skills, networking and exploring new career opportunities. Additionally, when you can disconnect from work, you are able to enjoy your personal life and recharge your batteries , which in turn, helps you stay engaged and motivated at work. Work-life balance also has its negative impacts on the employee. It may be difficult to meet up work demand. It is not always easy to find a balance between work and personal time, especially when you have a demanding job or tight deadline. Maintaining a good work-life balance can be difficult and it is common to feel like you are not doing enough in either area.
In fact, employees who are struggling to balance work and personal life are more likely to experience stress and burnout. When you are trying to balance work and personal life, you may find yourself feeling pulled in different directions. It can be hard to focus on when you are thinking about personal obligation and it can be hard to enjoy your personal life when you are thinking about work. Furthermore, when you are trying to find the perfect balance between work and personal life, you may feel like you are not able to give your full attention to either area. This can lead to feelings like guilt or dissatisfaction with your job or personal life. It is important to remember that finding a balance between work and personal life is a work in progress, and it will require constant adjustments and flexibility. It is also important to be realistic and set boundaries for yourself to communicate them with your personal life.
When you are focused on maintaining a good work-life balance, you may end up sacrificing financial opportunities. For instance, you may turn down a promotion or a rise because it will require more time away from your personal life. Or you may take a leave of absence from your job, which can lead to a loss of income. Employees who take time off for personal or family reasons often experience a loss of income. They also may have difficulty getting back into the work force, which can lead to long term financial consequences. Furthermore, employees who are constantly working overtime or taking on additional responsibilities may be eligible for extra pay or bonuses, but if you are trying to maintain a good balance, you may end up missing out on those opportunities. It is important to remember that balancing work and personal life is not just about time but also about financial opportunities and stability.
Finding a balance will require careful consideration of both your personal and financial goals and communicating with your employer about expectations and limitations to ensure that you are able to meet your financial needs without sacrificing your life. Prioritisation is very important. Considering which one is more important than the other. When trying to balance your work and personal life, you may find it difficult to prioritise what is important. According to a survey conducted by the American Psychological Association, 60per cent of adults said that work is a significant source of stress in their lives. This stress can be compounded when you are trying a balance competing demands on your time and attention. Remember, that finding a balance does not mean that you have to divide your time equally between work and personal life. Instead, it is about determining what is most important to you and making sure that you are allocating your time and resources accordingly.
Robinson is a student of Pan African Institute of Management and Technology, Port Harcourt.
By: Happiness Nkiruka Robinson
-
Maritime2 days ago
Farinto Identifies Barriers To Intra-African Trade
-
News2 days ago
Minimum Wage: FCT Workers Begin Indefinite Strike
-
Rivers12 hours ago
RSG Partners Building Institute To Check Quackery
-
News3 days ago
Nigeria, Two Others Lead Countries With Health, Care Visa
-
Oil & Energy2 days ago
PETAN Urges Privatisation Of Oil, Gas Pipelines
-
Business14 hours ago
Firm Empowers 2000 Youths On Solar Onergy
-
News9 hours ago
Let Your Deeds, Impact Speak For You -Chancellor …As Amanyanabo Bags Degree
-
News3 days ago
Tinubu, Buhari, Others Accidental Leaders – Kukah