Connect with us

Editorial

In Defence Of Oct 25, Gov Amaechi

Published

on

When the framers of the 1999 Nigerian Constitution, as amended, opted for a  multi-party system, the intention was to expand the minefield of political ideologies, alternative views and indeed foster healthy competition among Nigerian political platforms, upon which the country can depend for the  electable representatives. To achieve that feat, the same constitution provided political parties with the necessary powers and quasi-sovereignty to conduct their internal affairs with little or no interference by the National Electoral  Commission (INEC), the lawful body empowered to superintend election and elections matters in the land, and oversee activities of the parties.
So powerful, political parties even succeeded in preventing the judiciary from interfering in their internal crises, no matter the magnitude of threat such unlimited freedom posed to the fragile democracy, the Nigerian state was experimenting.
Undoubtedly, that seeming limitless power to decide on candidates for general elections brewed dangerous signals of undemocratic culture, as the choice of candidates at various times, depended on everything except merit and intra party democracy.

Their internal affairs with little or no interference by the National Electoral  Commission (INEC), the lawful body empowered to superintend election and elections matters in the land, and oversee activities of the parties.
So powerful, political parties even succeeded in preventing the judiciary from interfering in their internal crises, no matter the magnitude of threat such unlimited freedom posed to the fragile democracy, the Nigerian state was experimenting.
Undoubtedly, that seeming limitless power to decide on candidates for general elections brewed dangerous signals of undemocratic culture, as the choice of candidates at various times, depended on everything except merit and intra party democracy.
It took what is now commonly referred to as the Amaechi re-instatement ruling of October 25, 2007 by the Supreme Court of Nigeria for parties to realise that the liberty to run their internal affairs were also limited by the religious adherence to intra-party democracy and indeed obedience to rules contained in their various party constitutions. Another is the fact that anytime such constitutions were observed in the breach, or when their provisions conflict with those of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, the latter reigns supreme.
The Tide believes that the epochal Supreme Court judgement which restored Rt. Hon. Chibuikre Rotimi Amaechi’s mandate about five months after another had been sworn-in went beyond a personal victory. That ruling indeed, redefined Nigeria’s judicial courage and gallantry, defended fairness, equity and the rule of law, promoted intra-party democracy and most importantly, institutionalised enduring structures for punishment and reward in electoral matters.
To appreciate the value, import and indeed propriety of October 25, the history of how then Speaker of the Rivers State House of Assembly, Rt. Hon. Amaechi contested and won the ruling Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) governorship primaries as required by law; how he was denied the mandate to contest the April 14, 2007 election on account of the K-leg theory; how, despite his subsisting protest through the lower court to Appeal Court and to the Supreme Court, he was suspended from the party for seeking justice outside the party; how he was substituted with another candidate, even along the run of litigation, without cogent and verifiable reasons and finally, how Barr . Celestine Omehia was eventually declared winner of the general elections even if he did not contest the party’s primaries as prescribed by law, must be put in context and perspective.
More importantly, the Supreme Court ruling ended the familiar culture of impunity often demonstrated by dogmatic political party leaders and god –fathers who often imposed candidates, ‘win’ elections by hook or crook, get such rogue candidates endorsed by INEC and sworn-in, in belief that once such sponsored stooge takes oath of office, the resources of the state would be employed to defend the wrong, and make it look right at all cost.
In such instances, the best the judiciary was often left to do after identifying obvious flaws was to order fresh elections, which was the worst case scenario manipulators of Governor Amaechi’s mandate anticipated.
But in what has become a landmark judgement designed, among other things, to erect stronger reward structures in electoral matters, the Supreme Court ruled that by Amaechi’s unchallenged victory at the party’s primaries, and his eventual illegal substitution without cogent and verifiable reasons by INEC as required by law, whosoever contested the election on the PDP platform was an impostor or did so for and on behalf of Governor Amaechi. It then gave the order that he be sworn-in as elected governor of Rivers State.
The Tide would have considered this elaborate recall totally unnecessary if not for questions recently raised against the propriety of reliving events of October 25, 2007 as an important date in the state’s democratic calendar.
In fact, some politicians have argued that such annual observance had been over taken by events, for the singular reason that Governor Amaechi had since sought, earned and won re-election in 2011, which  in their view, diminishes the 2007 redemption of his first mandate.
The Tide  disagrees.  Without the Supreme Court’s verdict, and considering the antecedent  of political parties in punishing members who seek justice beyond the confines of existing intra-party disciplinary structures, Governor Amaechi’s second-term bid would have been more tortuous than the first. Infact, analysts insist without October 25, 2007 serving as check, Amaechi’s  re-election as the PDP candidate would have been a mirage.
More importantly, going by the content of congratulatory messages sent to Governor Amaechi in the press by appreciative stakeholders of the Rivers project, what was celebrated was the conviction that without the October 25, 2007 Supreme Court ruling, the impressive developmental strides recorded by the Rivers  government would have been unthinkable.
Such stakeholders variously pointed to landmark achievements in the areas of education, with the erection of more than 150 model primary schools, and more than10 state of the art secondary schools and still counting; health centres with countless modern health centres and world class referral centres, infrasturctural development, with roads, inter-changes fly-overs and bridges, and huge investment in agriculture, among many others. Without Amaechi, these many others and the recent recruitment and posting of more than 13,000 teachers would have been a pipe dream.
These are why The Tide joins other well-meaning Nigerians, especially lovers of enduring intra-party and inter-party democracy, to celebrate the gallantry of the nation’s apex court, for that historic judegment with Governor Amaechi merely the vessel for such justice delivery.
That in short was what the Chief Justice of Nigeria, Justice Aloysius Kastina-Alu, meant in his lead ruling of October 25, 2007, when he said, ‘ “the justice of the case demands that this court do substantial justice. The only way to redress his right, which was violated by the illegal substitution, is to declare him the winner of the April 14 governorship election in Rivers State”.
This without a doubt is the right way to appreciate the import and potency of October 25, in the annals of our democratic experience, and not to diminish it simply in exercise of personal vendetta against the Rivers Governor.

Continue Reading

Editorial

That Odili’s Health Centre Gesture 

Published

on

Ndoni, a small, but peaceful community in Ogba/Egbema/Ndoni Local Government Area of Rivers State
was recently filled with excitement when eminent dignitaries, including Governor Siminalayi Fubara, attended the inauguration of the new Comprehensive Primary Healthcare Centre. This generous donation came from the PAMO Educational Foundation, established by former Rivers State Governor, Dr Peter Odili, who hails from the Ndoni community where he is deeply revered. The Foundation holds a special place in the hearts of the local people.
The inauguration ceremony was a source of great joy and celebration for the community, as the new healthcare facility promises to provide much-needed medical services to the people of Ndoni. The facility is built to provide a wide range of healthcare services, including maternal and child health, immunisation, family planning, and treatment for common illnesses. It is expected to significantly improve the health outcomes of the community, especially for women and children.
PAMO Educational Foundation’s unwavering dedication to enhancing the well-being of the Ndoni community and its environs is exemplified by the establishment of this health facility. The Foundation has consistently invested in initiatives that foster education and healthcare, and this new amenity is a testament to its ongoing commitment. PAMO’s rich history of supporting educational endeavours and healthcare programmes in the community has laid the groundwork for the Foundation’s continued contributions. The health resource stands as a beacon of hope, providing much-needed medical services and improving the quality of life for countless individuals.
Undoubtedly, the presence of dignitaries underscored the necessity of the event and the value placed on the health centre by the community and the state government. The Ndoni people expressed their profound gratitude to PAMO Educational Foundation and former Governor Odili for their generosity and commitment to the well-being of the community. They pledged to make good use of the health appliance and ensure that it served its intended purpose for many years to come.
The former health centre, a vital lifeline for the town and its neighbouring communities, fell victim to the relentless floods of the River Niger in 2020 and 2022. The torrential waters ravaged buildings, destroyed crops, killed livestock, and tragically claimed lives. In the wake of this devastation, residents were left without access to essential medical services, a cruel blow that compelled them to undertake arduous journeys to distant communities like Omoku for over two years. The old primary health amenity was erected during the administration of Odili and inaugurated  in 2008.
The unveiling of the new health institution brought a surge of palpable relief and gratitude to the beneficiaries. The modern facility, equipped with state-of-the-art apparatus and dedicated medical professionals, stood as a symbol of hope and resilience. It marked a new chapter in healthcare for the community, providing them with the means to access quality medical services in the comfort of their own surroundings. The trauma of the floods was slowly fading into memory, replaced by a sense of renewed optimism and a profound appreciation for the gift of healthcare.
Governor Fubara inaugurated the event, which provided a platform for reconciliation as numerous politicians who had previously distanced themselves from the current government were seen at the gathering, showing their support for Fubara’s administration. In his address, the governor thanked Dr Odili, the founder of the PAMO Educational Foundation, and a key political figure in the state, for standing by his administration in the wake of the political turmoil in the state.
He pledged his government’s support to the Ndoni people by enhancing the healthcare accommodation and highlighting Odili’s legacy as a valuable gift. The administration aims to provide quality education, healthcare services, and empowerment, including agriculture and human capital development. Fubara has already approved the recruitment of 1,000 medical doctors for primary health, Hospital Management Board, and Rivers State University Teaching Hospital to improve healthcare delivery and ensure the use of zonal hospitals in the state.
Odili praised Fubara for his humility and commitment to protecting Rivers people in line with the constitution, and encouraged him to focus on providing good governance. He said: “Politics is over, it is now time for governance and you have to hit the ground running, you have touched the critical sectors. In less than one year in office, you have touched education, you have touched health, but the key to what you have done so far is the focus on human beings, on the people, especially the poor amongst you. Human beings are the soul of society. So touching the lives of human beings is more important, you have started showing signs of that.”
We express our sincere gratitude to the former governor for his incredible determination in establishing the health facility. This admirable deed will always be remembered in history as a symbol of his unwavering dedication to the health of the people in our state. By generously donating his personal resources, he has shown true patriotism and a deep love for his community. His selfless actions have not only provided essential healthcare services but have also inspired others to do the same.
For the Ndonis, the inauguration of the health facility marks a critical milestone in the provision of accessible and affordable healthcare. It is an attestation to Odili’s visionary leadership and his unwavering belief in the importance of investing in the health and well-being of his people. We celebrate this Rivers son for his exceptional foresight and humanity. His legacy will be forever linked to this exceptional facility, which will continue to serve as a beacon of hope and healing for generations to come.
All the elites in our state should emulate Odili by embracing a spirit of collaboration with the government to foster the development of the state rather than disparage aimlessly. Needless criticisms, on the other hand, can hinder progress and create an atmosphere of distrust. While constructive animadversion is essential for holding leaders accountable, excessive or unfounded negativity can undermine morale and discourage alliance. If we focus on solutions rather than problems, we can create a positive and productive environment that attracts investment, promotes innovation, and ultimately leads to a better future for all.
Peter Odili’s exploit underscores the critical role private sector infrastructural initiative plays in enhancing the economic landscape of a state. He has not only bridged the gap between the government and private entities, but has also set a precedent for cooperation that fosters innovation, attracts investments, and creates job opportunities. These partnerships are vital for unlocking the untapped potential of the state, laying the foundation for sustainable development. The government’s recognition and support of the private sector as a driver of economic progress are essential. Rivers State can progress towards a future characterised by robust economic transformation and an improved quality of life for its people, if it emulates Odili’s example of promoting synergy.

Continue Reading

Editorial

For Peace In The M’East

Published

on

Tensions in the Middle East have been a cause for concern for decades now. The region has been plagued by conflicts, violence, and instability, with countries such as Israel, Iran, Iraq, Yemen, and Syria being at the centre of many disputes. The failure to resolve these concerns may have devastating consequences for the people living in the region. It also has what it takes to escalate into much larger encounters.
If the international community fails to act swiftly to end the hostilities, there is a real risk that a Third World War might ensue. The clashes in the region are perplexing and passionately rooted in historical, religious, and political distinctions. The inability to address these underlying matters and uncover peaceful solutions has only fueled the fire of discord and contentions among the nations involved.
The Middle East is a crucial geopolitical region, with significant reserves of oil and natural resources, as well as being a hotbed of religious and cultural diversity. The fracas in the region has far-reaching socioeconomic aftereffects. Any intensification in the brunt could have widespread upshot for global security, trade, and stability.
No one should take the probability of a Third World War arising from the region lightly. The use of nuclear weapons, the involvement of major world powers, and the potential for an expansive regional conflagration could have catastrophic backlash. The international community must unite to address the root causes of the apprehensions in the region and work towards sustainable solutions.
The ongoing feud between Iran and Israel suggests that there may be challenging days ahead for international peace. It is troubling that what started with Israel’s offensive on Iran’s consular building in Syria on 1st April may not end with Tehran’s Operation True Promise. The bombing in Damascus, which killed at least two top Iranian generals, resulted in the first-ever direct strikes launched against Israel from Iranian territory. The Jewish State’s recent reprisal for the Iranian onslaught may open a new vista in the conflict.
During the intrusion, Iran reportedly launched more than 300 missiles and drones. Almost all were annihilated by Israel’s air defences, augmented by forces from the United States, United Kingdom and Jordan. The Iranians had made their intentions clear, giving Israel and its allies time to prepare themselves, and quickly issued a statement at the United Nations in New York that their retaliation was over.
With the current war in Gaza between Israel and Palestinians, there are fears that the region is on the brink of an all-out war, with conceivably fatal aftermath. This is a defining moment in the Middle East. That is why it is right for world leaders to pressure Israeli Prime Minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, to exhibit restraint. Then both Israel and Hamas could engage in talks to free Israeli hostages and end hostilities.
In addition to the Israel-Palestine strife, the civil wars in Syria and Yemen have further exacerbated the crisis in the region. The fray has resulted in massive deracination of people, extirpation of infrastructure, and loss of lives. The international community must seek a political solution to these inessential wars and provide humanitarian abetment to those affected by the violence.
Moreover, the rise of extremist groups such as ISIS has also destabilised the region, posing a threat to global security. Nations in the locale and beyond should interface and combat terrorism and extremism. A coordinated effort is required to address the very causes of the commination, such as poverty, lack of education, and political marginalisation. Clearly, the status quo in the bailiwick is unsustainable. A new approach is vital to end the dire straits in the region.
Intense diplomatic endeavours, dialogue, and cooperation are cardinal in resolving the impasse in that portion of the world. The use of military force or unilateral actions will only further escalate the situation and increase the risk of a larger conflict. It is time for all parties involved to set aside their disparities, and build a stable future for the Middle East.
Global amity is indispensable for the well-being of all individuals and nations. It is the foundation upon which sustainable development, economic prosperity, and human rights can thrive. The United Nations was established with the primary goal of advancing peace and security among countries, and it is obligatory that the organisation achieves this objective.
Super powers should animate collaboration and diplomacy to attain harmony. These nations have the wherewithal to make necessitous strides in promoting stability and security on a global scale if they set aside political dissimilarities and focus on common goals. Through open communication and mutual respect, super power countries can lead by example and inspire other nations to follow suit in creating a more nonbelligerent world for present and future generations.
Efforts must be made to avert a Third World War. Its idea is deeply disturbing and contentious. It is one that evokes fear, uncertainty, and global disquietude. The possibility of such a cataclysmic event occurring is something that many would rather not think about, yet the signs and anxieties among countries are becoming increasingly apparent. States must be vigilant, proactive, and committed to building a better future for the world.

Continue Reading

Editorial

Governor’s Pension Law Repeal, Otti’s Example 

Published

on

Abia State’s decision to repeal the governor’s pension law is a momentous move towards cutting down on
the expenses of governance and focusing on the welfare of pensioners in the State, who were last paid in 2014. Governor Alex Otti’s bold action in overturning this law demonstrates a dedication to financial prudence and transparency. This resolve will help in reducing the financial burden on the State.
Pension for governors and their deputies has been a contentious topic in Nigeria, with concerns raised about the ethics and morality of providing lifetime benefits to public officials who may only serve a limited term in office. Abia State has taken a bold step by repealing this law, setting a positive example for other States to follow. This move has sparked a much-needed conversation about the need for accountability and responsible governance in the country.
Governor Otti’s argument for repealing the governor’s pension law to alleviate the financial burden on the State and address the issue of unpaid pensions for Abia’s retirees is compelling. By prioritising the needs of the people over political considerations, Governor Otti is demonstrating strong leadership and a commitment to serving the best interests of the citizens.
The Abia State Governors and Deputy Governors Pension (Repeal) Law of 2024 has been widely reproached for its excessive provisions for former office holders. Not only does the law guarantee former governors and former deputy governors 100 per cent of the operative salary of their successors, but it also includes the provision of three police officers and two Department of State Services officers for life. Additionally, the State is responsible for paying for their domestic staff and building mansions for them in both their home State and in Abuja.
Proponents of these benefits assert that they are necessary to ensure that former governors are appropriately provided for after their tenure in office. They maintain that these benefits are in line with the sacrifices and responsibilities that come with holding a public office. Furthermore, supporters of the entitlements contend that these provisions are intended to attract qualified individuals to compete for gubernatorial positions, with the assurance that their welfare will be looked after once they leave office.
Despite efforts to eliminate these schemes in some States, about 18 States still retain pension for their former leaders, which many Nigerians view as a form of political hedonism. Zamfara set a precedent in 2019 by eliminating its pension law, signaling a shift away from the traditional practice of providing lucrative benefits to former governors and their deputies. Many other States continue to operate this practice, allowing former leaders to receive substantial pension and other perks even after leaving office.
In 2020, both Lagos and Kwara States announced their intentions to scrap their pension laws, acknowledging the increasing public outcry over the issue. Kwara went a step further by officially abrogating the law in January, 2021, demonstrating a commitment to reforming the system and promoting accountability. Meanwhile, Lagos took a more gradual approach by reducing the benefits for former leaders by 50 per cent in August , 2021. This move was perceived as a compromise between completely abolishing the scheme and maintaining the status quo.
According to the World Poverty Clock and the National Bureau of Statistics (NBS), Nigeria has been listed as the poverty capital of the world, with millions of people living in extreme poverty. The fact that States would continue to record more ex-office holders after every tenure only adds to the financial strain of these pension schemes. With the number of former office holders increasing each year, the costs associated with their pension become unsustainable for many States.
The funds that could be allocated towards alleviating poverty and improving infrastructure are instead being spent on providing lavish retirement benefits for a select few. The current pension schemes for ex-governors in Nigeria are not sustainable in the long term, especially in the face of the present economic realities. Reforms are needed to ensure that public funds are used more efficiently and effectively, and that the needs of the most vulnerable in society are given preference over the comfort of former government officials.
Pension for former governors often result in the enrichment of the wealthy elite at the expense of the struggling masses. These politicians typically only served in office for a maximum of eight years, yet, they are able to secure generous pension that allow them to maintain a life of luxury. Some even go on to hold positions as Ministers or Senators, further perpetuating their unjustified wealth.
Curiously, the 10th National Assembly is home to more than 12 former governors who continue to benefit from these lavish retirement benefits. In stark contrast, many public workers dedicate 35 years of their lives to serving the public and the government, only to receive meagre pension or sometimes none at all. Tragically, some pensioners pass away before ever receiving the benefits they are owed.
Other States should look to Abia State as a model for promoting democratic values and accountability. The active participation of civil society organisations, pressure groups, taxpayers, and activists is critical in upholding the principles of democracy and ensuring that the government is accountable to the people. The scandalous pension laws that have been passed in many States are not only unjust but also a detriment to the democratic process.
Nigerians should engage with their legislators and demand the immediate annulment of these obnoxious laws that serve to enrich a select few at the expense of the public. Citizens can help ensure that their voices are heard and that their rights are protected by actively participating in the legislative process and holding their representatives accountable. Abia is a constant reminder that democracy is a continuous process that requires the active involvement of all.

Continue Reading

Trending