Connect with us

Oil & Energy

Gas Flaring: Can Oil Firms Meet 2012 Deadline?

Published

on

It  is no longer news that gas is becoming much more important to Nigeria’s economy since its production began years ago. Since its discovery, many companies have set up operations in the country but the flaring of the product has posed a very high challenge as it is not properly utilised for the benefits of the economy.

It is against this backdrop that the Nigerian government deems it necessary to develop gas resources to supply it for the provision of sufficient electricity for domestic and industrial use as well as for exportation. The nation’s power plants are not functioning adequately to generate required electricity and cannot meet domestic demand to end blackouts which now become a political priority.

The government is currently planning to produce enough gas to export as soon as gas flaring is ended in the country and also bring the President’s gas-to-power scheme to fruition.

The last House of Representatives before exist perfected the legislative framework pegging the deadline for gas flaring in Nigeria’s petroleum sector at December 31, 2012 in realisation of the government’s plan to develop and capture gas that is being flared or burned off in parts of the country, especially the oil producing areas. Some million cubic feet of gas resources are being flared daily and the quality is sufficient to generate about 4, 500 megawatts of power. The House also imposed stiff penalties on oil firms that may flout new  regulation s on gas flaring.

The action of the House of Representatives followed the adoption of the report of its committee on gas resources on a bill for an Act to Amend the Associated Gas Reinjection Act No. 99 of 1999 Cap. A25 Laws  of the Federation of  Nigeria Further Amendment of the gas flare deadline is not among the many legislative responsibilities before the present House of Representatives.

Oil companies operating in the country had failed to meet the Federal Government’s umpteenth time shifted deadline for the anti-safety and environment Act, under which violators are meant to be penalised. The end of this year is the battle line for gas flaring to end in this country but the question now is, can the oil companies meet the deadline? It is gathered that the President Goodluck Jonathan-led administration which will be empowered by the Petroleum Industry Bill (PIB) may not allow the continuation of the flaring beyond this year, so it is in the best interest of oil companies to race towards meeting the deadline.

Nigeria is currently making progress towards optimising its gas and power industries and that has been the focus of the government. The Group Managing Director of the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC), Austin Oniwon is quoted as assuring that the Gas Revolution programme for the country would not be abandoned and that to this end, two Memoranda of Understanding (MoU) had been signed. One between Xenel and NNPC and the other among India’s Nagarjuna Fertilisers, NNPC and Chevron as well as the award of the Akwa Ibom/Calabar area gas Control  Progressing Facility (CPF) to Agip and Oando in Abuja, to show how serious and committed NNPC and government are to the Gas Revolution Programme.

In pursuance of the programme, the Brass Liquefied Natural Gas plant is put in place for the production of gas in greater quantity and transmission.

The president is very passionate about the project and the journey has started. We do know that we have large deposit of natural gas resources. Before now, most of the product was being wasted through flaring because of the system we adopted, but with what is happening now, that will change.

Just like the crude oil, natural gas is money, so there should be a concerted effort to commit this natural resources into money for the benefit of Nigerians. The status report of the Nigerian Gas Masterplan, if sincerely and optimally implemented in line with the gas-to-power framework, will support the president’s power agenda and make power available for many ‘dead’ industries to come back to life. Not only that, it will also provide gas as fuel for industries such as the textile mills in Kano and Kaduna that went down because of lack of fuel and they will be able to have clean, cheap and affordable fuel to run their business.

In its commitment to ending routine gas flaring and consolidating leadership position in the domestic gas market, the Shell Petroleum Development Company (SPDC) has said it will continue to make good progress in bringing projects that will reduce flares and boost gas supply to the domestic market as well as sustain economic growth and kick-start new industries that will provide jobs for Nigerians.

Ending gas flaring in the country should be a long-term programme and there must be continuing commitment on the part of the oil companies because the project will help the economy and generate billions of naira or dollars to enhance development funding.  Nigeria holds about 8 per cent of global proven natural gas reserves and about 10 per cent of proven oil reserves but for Nigeria to continue to attract international investments, it needs to sustain confidence and stability and respect the sanctity of contracts.

There is ambition and expectation in the gas sector, but there is also uncertainty about who is going to gain and who is going to lose now that the federal Government is gearing efforts towards optimal utility of our gas resources. Nigerians are scared at the rate things are going in the country and people are no longer interested in the way funds are managed as they want to see practical things on ground.

Our social set-up has been shaken and we are yet to come to terms with it. Other countries use their funds to develop the people by providing infrastructure and social amenities but Nigeria’s case is different and not sure to understand. President Goodluck Jonathan has launched the “Roadmap for the power sector reform, so great majority of Nigerians are waiting for dramatic improvements to their quality of life. More gas and more power will raise living standards and support the economy, so lessons should be drawn from countries that have successfully executed gas-to-power and gas industry optimisation reforms with a view to enabling Nigeria learn from and possibly replicate the best practices of these countries.

Because the expectations of government and the societies they represent evolve over time, it is inappropriate to expect that what was obtaining when the oil  and gas industry was at its infancy, 50 years ago would still be obtainable today. This follows that with both the socio-political climate and the oil and gas industry changing, the International Oil Companies/National Oil Companies relationship must also evolve. A lot of things are expected when changes occur. This is why the Federal Government should ensure that all recommendations made to it are fully implemented to engender growth and change in the oil/gas industry.

To make the whole dream come true, the partnership between international oil companies and national oil companies needs to be strengthened to enhance the full exploitation of natural resources and develop capability that will bring more value to the industry. The basis of mutual benefit should exist between the two or more parties.

Nigeria has been finding it difficult to maximize its gas-to power potential because of certain factors which create imbalances in the value chain, which include gas pricing. That is why the new price regime put in place by the federal government is commendable as it will give investors reasonable returns on their investments and allow those who build gas transmission infrastructure to achieve certain returns that would justify their investments. In Nigeria, the gas price before 2010 was put at less than $1 per million scf, but with the recent review of the price, which is about $2 per million scf for the domestic gas-to-power, the gap between the international and our local price has been narrowed and with that, people can now invest in gas development.

When there are opportunities  for people to invest in gas development and power distribution and generation then the private sector would be able to take control of gas and power, and that will be the right way to guarantee power supply in the country.

The government should try to address the issue of regulation for the downstream gas sector which has become the bane of the sector’s development. The regulation must take into consideration the non  and partial deregulation and closed access of gas infrastructure, while other issues bordering on security in operational communities should also be visited as well. There is the need to do this because it has been discovered that the problem of insecurity is causing extra expenditure for most oil and gas companies as most engineering, procurement and construction (EPC) contractors also use this as reason for their premium and prohibitive charges.

As soon as government’s increased focus on appropriate pricing is welcomed, it should further extend the focus to the full value chain rather than restricting it to the upstream argument alone. If there is gas in the country, which we know,we, the indigenes should benefit more than everybody else. The rate of economy growth is expected to double from what it has been over the years when gas flaring ends at the end of this year. Not just foreign or intentional oil companies should participate in the gas project but indigenous firms should be given priority consideration. The gas-to-power distribution is a boost the country badly needs, so there must be a corrupt-free national strategy for managing the gas revenues because the worry about monies generated from the oil and gas sector in the country is the ‘curse’ of embezzlement and misappropriation or mismanagement, ie, the judicious utilisation of funds accruing from the sector for the benefit of the ordinary citizens rather than using it to fuel conflict and corruption.

We hope we will avoid the mistakes.

Nigeria is a democracy and everybody is watching. So it is expected that there is going to be improvement when gas flaring will become a thing of the past by December 31, 2012.

With a proven reserves of 182 tonnes per cubic feet, Nigeria is adjudged the world’s seventh largest producers of  high grade gas with zero per cent sulphur and rich in natural gas liquids. Though the huge reserve has not translated to abundant domestic supply, investment in gas distribution is capable of helping to achieve the gas-to-power aspiration of the federal government and make gas readily available to industrial consumers and guarantee accelerated growth of manufacturing and power sectors.

 

Shedie Okpara

Continue Reading

Oil & Energy

Global Energy Crisis Is Reviving Green Hydrogen

Published

on

The global energy crisis has reshaped global energy priorities seemingly overnight. The Strait of Hormuz has been closed to virtually all commercial traffic for well over a month now, severely restricting global flows of oil and gas. As a result, global energy prices have skyrocketed, and supplies have tightened, pushing many countries to explore alternative energy pathways in a big hurry. This has led to an unfortunate resurgence of coal-fired power, especially in Asia – but it is also set to supercharge the clean energy industry on a global scale. And one of the unlikely benefactors of this groundswell of new investment may be the green hydrogen industry.
China, the world’s top hydrogen producer, is planning to ramp up production of hydrogen, and especially green hydrogen, more quickly than previously planned in order to shore up its energy security as import-dependent Asian markets are rocked by skyrocketing oil and gas prices. China’s National Energy Administration (NEA) has referred to hydrogen as a “strategic lever” for national energy autonomy and resilience, and has pledged to accelerate the development of the domestic sector accordingly.
China’s 15th five-year plan, released last month, flagged hydrogen as a “future industry.” But, apparently, the future is now. According to a recent report from the South China Morning Post, the rhetoric around hydrogen coming out of China signals a shift away from research and toward rapid practical development of the sector.
Last year, the NEA earmarked 41 projects in nine regions across the country to lead hydrogen pilot projects all along the value chain “from production and transport to storage and application.” Now, leadership is pushing to bring those projects out of demo phases and into industrial applications as quickly as possible.
European leaders, too, are pivoting to embrace green hydrogen production with renewed enthusiasm. Earlier this month, ministers from Austria, Germany, the Netherlands, Poland, and Spain petitioned the European Union to loosen production regulations to encourage investment into the sector. And Italy successfully approved a €6 billion state aid plan to support renewable hydrogen.
Even the United States is getting on board. This week, the Trump administration instructed the Department of Energy to save $5 billion worth of hydrogen hubs that were slated for closure. The hydrogen projects – though not green hydrogen ventures – were funded under the Biden administration in order to promote cleaner-burning fuel sources.
Hydrogen could potentially be a critical pathway for decarbonization, as it combusts at high heat like fossil fuels. But, unlike fossil fuels, when it burns, it leaves behind nothing but water vapor. This could make it indispensable for the decarbonization of hard-to-abate sectors like steelmaking and shipping. However, the vast majority of commercial hydrogen is made with fossil fuels. Green hydrogen, by comparison, is made using renewable energies.
But while hydrogen, and especially green hydrogen, could be a key part of the global clean energy transition, research and development in the sector had been cooling for years, as commercial and cost-effective green hydrogen production methods largely failed to materialize. “Even if production costs decrease in line with predictions, storage and distribution costs will prevent hydrogen from being cost-competitive in many sectors,” Roxana Shafiee, a postdoctoral fellow at the Harvard University Center for the Environment, told The Harvard Gazette in 2024. Shafiee led a study that found cause to believe “that the opportunities for hydrogen may be narrower than previously thought.”
But the economics of energy are changing as we speak, and the global hydrogen market is likely about to see a windfall as the world rushes to replace geopolitically risky fossil fuels, which have become prohibitively expensive overnight. Clearly, global leaders are already reembracing the fledgling sector as part of an all-of-the-above approach to energy security and independence. While hydrogen may not be a silver bullet solution, it could be a critical part of a more diverse and therefore more resilient global energy landscape going forward.
By Haley Zaremba
Continue Reading

Oil & Energy

PETAN Tasks Indigenous Oil Firms On Investments Attraction    … Global Engagement Sustenance

Published

on

The Petroleum Technology Association of Nigeria (PETAN) has urged indigenous oil and gas companies to deepen global engagement and attract investment.
The Association urged intending participants to leverage the forthcoming 2026 Offshore Technology Conference (OTC) in the U.S. to expand their access to new technologies and partnerships.
PETAN said its participation at the global event would be driven by a deliberate strategy to position Nigerian firms as competitive players within the international energy value chain.
In a statement issued  by the Association’s Publicity Secretary, Dr Joan Faluyi, In Lagos, at the weekend,  PETAN would anchor its activities at the Nigerian Pavilion, with the theme: “Africa’s Energy Transformation: Scaling Investment, Technology, and Local Capacity for Sustainable Growth”.
Faluyi noted that the conference, scheduled for May 4 to May 7 in Houston, Texas, remained a leading platform for offshore energy dialogue, partnerships and innovation.
According to her, PETAN’s participation goes beyond routine attendance and reflects a focused effort to strengthen Nigeria’s visibility and influence in global energy discussions.
“At OTC 2026, PETAN is returning with stronger alignment and a clearer objective, to ensure Nigerian companies are not just present, but actively engaged and recognised as credible global partners,” she said.
Faluyi explained that the association had consistently showcased the capabilities of indigenous oil and gas service providers at previous editions of the conference, reinforcing their capacity to compete internationally.
She added that the Nigerian Pavilion would serve as a strategic hub for investment discussions, technical exhibitions and direct engagement with global stakeholders.
The association is also scheduled to participate in key engagements, including the African Energy Forum, the NCDMB–OEM Investment Forum and the PETAN Golf Tournament slated for May 7 at Quail Valley Golf Course, Texas.
Faluyi described OTC as a critical gateway for Nigerian companies seeking international opportunities, noting that visibility and engagement at the event often translate into commercial partnerships.
“In an increasingly competitive energy landscape, securing a seat at the global table is essential. Through sustained participation, PETAN continues to assert Nigeria’s place in that conversation,” she said.
Also speaking, PETAN Chairman, Mr Wole Ogunsanya, said the Association’s focus was to ensure that indigenous capacity is fully integrated into global energy decision-making processes.
“We have seen firsthand how global energy decisions are shaped at OTC. This year, we are returning to ensure indigenous Nigerian capacity is not just present but recognised, engaged and heard.
“We are taking our businesses to the table where real partnerships are formed,” he said.
Faluyi added that under Ogunsanya’s leadership, PETAN was prioritising strategic positioning to ensure Nigerian companies are not only visible but considered credible partners in major international energy projects.
Continue Reading

Oil & Energy

Solar Panels Imports Ban: Experts Recommend Phase -out Approach 

Published

on

Stakeholders in Nigeria’s energy sector have warned that an abrupt restriction on solar panels imports would undermine electricity access.
The experts called for a gradual phase-out of imports over several years rather than an outright ban.
Recall that the federal government had announced plans to halt solar panel imports after investing more than N200 billion to encourage domestic production.
Speaking at the Solar Power Media Training, in Abuja, last week, the Campaign Director, Secure Energy Project (SEP), Joseph Ibrahim, said stakeholders support the goal of building local manufacturing capacity but cautioned against sudden policy shifts.
“Let me be clear, we wholeheartedly support local manufacturing of solar panels”.
“We want to see factories in our states, jobs for our youth, and a supply chain that begins and ends on our soil”, he stated.
Ibrahim insisted that the most effective path forward is a carefully managed roadmap implemented over three to five years to give investors and workers time to adjust.
“If we rush this, we risk making solar power too expensive for the millions who currently rely on it for survival.
“By taking a phased approach, we allow time for investors to build their plants, for our workers to learn specialised skills, and for our economy to adjust without losing power”, he said.
The SEP director said policy stability, access to financing, and strict quality standards are essential to building a sustainable local solar manufacturing industry.
“To make local manufacturing a reality, we don’t just need new laws; we need an enabling environment. This means stability — policies that don’t change with the wind,” he said.
Also speaking, Tosin Asonibare,  said renewable energy has become a critical solution to Nigeria’s persistent electricity supply challenges.
He cited findings by the Global Initiative for Food Security and Ecosystem Preservation, indicating that many Nigerians remain unaware of the proposed import restrictions and their potential implications.
According to him, respondents in the report largely favoured a phased ban supported by incentives for importing raw materials needed for local production.
“The report also shows that infrastructure for locally manufactured panels is not fully available, so there is need for foreign direct investment improvement in government policy.
“So that the local manufacturers and assembling companies can have higher capacity to meet demand. If that is not done, the price of solar panels will go up”, he said.
He warned that affordability could become a major concern for consumers if restrictions are implemented without adequate preparation.
Continue Reading

Trending