Connect with us

Oil & Energy

Gas Flaring: Can Oil Firms Meet 2012 Deadline?

Published

on

It  is no longer news that gas is becoming much more important to Nigeria’s economy since its production began years ago. Since its discovery, many companies have set up operations in the country but the flaring of the product has posed a very high challenge as it is not properly utilised for the benefits of the economy.

It is against this backdrop that the Nigerian government deems it necessary to develop gas resources to supply it for the provision of sufficient electricity for domestic and industrial use as well as for exportation. The nation’s power plants are not functioning adequately to generate required electricity and cannot meet domestic demand to end blackouts which now become a political priority.

The government is currently planning to produce enough gas to export as soon as gas flaring is ended in the country and also bring the President’s gas-to-power scheme to fruition.

The last House of Representatives before exist perfected the legislative framework pegging the deadline for gas flaring in Nigeria’s petroleum sector at December 31, 2012 in realisation of the government’s plan to develop and capture gas that is being flared or burned off in parts of the country, especially the oil producing areas. Some million cubic feet of gas resources are being flared daily and the quality is sufficient to generate about 4, 500 megawatts of power. The House also imposed stiff penalties on oil firms that may flout new  regulation s on gas flaring.

The action of the House of Representatives followed the adoption of the report of its committee on gas resources on a bill for an Act to Amend the Associated Gas Reinjection Act No. 99 of 1999 Cap. A25 Laws  of the Federation of  Nigeria Further Amendment of the gas flare deadline is not among the many legislative responsibilities before the present House of Representatives.

Oil companies operating in the country had failed to meet the Federal Government’s umpteenth time shifted deadline for the anti-safety and environment Act, under which violators are meant to be penalised. The end of this year is the battle line for gas flaring to end in this country but the question now is, can the oil companies meet the deadline? It is gathered that the President Goodluck Jonathan-led administration which will be empowered by the Petroleum Industry Bill (PIB) may not allow the continuation of the flaring beyond this year, so it is in the best interest of oil companies to race towards meeting the deadline.

Nigeria is currently making progress towards optimising its gas and power industries and that has been the focus of the government. The Group Managing Director of the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC), Austin Oniwon is quoted as assuring that the Gas Revolution programme for the country would not be abandoned and that to this end, two Memoranda of Understanding (MoU) had been signed. One between Xenel and NNPC and the other among India’s Nagarjuna Fertilisers, NNPC and Chevron as well as the award of the Akwa Ibom/Calabar area gas Control  Progressing Facility (CPF) to Agip and Oando in Abuja, to show how serious and committed NNPC and government are to the Gas Revolution Programme.

In pursuance of the programme, the Brass Liquefied Natural Gas plant is put in place for the production of gas in greater quantity and transmission.

The president is very passionate about the project and the journey has started. We do know that we have large deposit of natural gas resources. Before now, most of the product was being wasted through flaring because of the system we adopted, but with what is happening now, that will change.

Just like the crude oil, natural gas is money, so there should be a concerted effort to commit this natural resources into money for the benefit of Nigerians. The status report of the Nigerian Gas Masterplan, if sincerely and optimally implemented in line with the gas-to-power framework, will support the president’s power agenda and make power available for many ‘dead’ industries to come back to life. Not only that, it will also provide gas as fuel for industries such as the textile mills in Kano and Kaduna that went down because of lack of fuel and they will be able to have clean, cheap and affordable fuel to run their business.

In its commitment to ending routine gas flaring and consolidating leadership position in the domestic gas market, the Shell Petroleum Development Company (SPDC) has said it will continue to make good progress in bringing projects that will reduce flares and boost gas supply to the domestic market as well as sustain economic growth and kick-start new industries that will provide jobs for Nigerians.

Ending gas flaring in the country should be a long-term programme and there must be continuing commitment on the part of the oil companies because the project will help the economy and generate billions of naira or dollars to enhance development funding.  Nigeria holds about 8 per cent of global proven natural gas reserves and about 10 per cent of proven oil reserves but for Nigeria to continue to attract international investments, it needs to sustain confidence and stability and respect the sanctity of contracts.

There is ambition and expectation in the gas sector, but there is also uncertainty about who is going to gain and who is going to lose now that the federal Government is gearing efforts towards optimal utility of our gas resources. Nigerians are scared at the rate things are going in the country and people are no longer interested in the way funds are managed as they want to see practical things on ground.

Our social set-up has been shaken and we are yet to come to terms with it. Other countries use their funds to develop the people by providing infrastructure and social amenities but Nigeria’s case is different and not sure to understand. President Goodluck Jonathan has launched the “Roadmap for the power sector reform, so great majority of Nigerians are waiting for dramatic improvements to their quality of life. More gas and more power will raise living standards and support the economy, so lessons should be drawn from countries that have successfully executed gas-to-power and gas industry optimisation reforms with a view to enabling Nigeria learn from and possibly replicate the best practices of these countries.

Because the expectations of government and the societies they represent evolve over time, it is inappropriate to expect that what was obtaining when the oil  and gas industry was at its infancy, 50 years ago would still be obtainable today. This follows that with both the socio-political climate and the oil and gas industry changing, the International Oil Companies/National Oil Companies relationship must also evolve. A lot of things are expected when changes occur. This is why the Federal Government should ensure that all recommendations made to it are fully implemented to engender growth and change in the oil/gas industry.

To make the whole dream come true, the partnership between international oil companies and national oil companies needs to be strengthened to enhance the full exploitation of natural resources and develop capability that will bring more value to the industry. The basis of mutual benefit should exist between the two or more parties.

Nigeria has been finding it difficult to maximize its gas-to power potential because of certain factors which create imbalances in the value chain, which include gas pricing. That is why the new price regime put in place by the federal government is commendable as it will give investors reasonable returns on their investments and allow those who build gas transmission infrastructure to achieve certain returns that would justify their investments. In Nigeria, the gas price before 2010 was put at less than $1 per million scf, but with the recent review of the price, which is about $2 per million scf for the domestic gas-to-power, the gap between the international and our local price has been narrowed and with that, people can now invest in gas development.

When there are opportunities  for people to invest in gas development and power distribution and generation then the private sector would be able to take control of gas and power, and that will be the right way to guarantee power supply in the country.

The government should try to address the issue of regulation for the downstream gas sector which has become the bane of the sector’s development. The regulation must take into consideration the non  and partial deregulation and closed access of gas infrastructure, while other issues bordering on security in operational communities should also be visited as well. There is the need to do this because it has been discovered that the problem of insecurity is causing extra expenditure for most oil and gas companies as most engineering, procurement and construction (EPC) contractors also use this as reason for their premium and prohibitive charges.

As soon as government’s increased focus on appropriate pricing is welcomed, it should further extend the focus to the full value chain rather than restricting it to the upstream argument alone. If there is gas in the country, which we know,we, the indigenes should benefit more than everybody else. The rate of economy growth is expected to double from what it has been over the years when gas flaring ends at the end of this year. Not just foreign or intentional oil companies should participate in the gas project but indigenous firms should be given priority consideration. The gas-to-power distribution is a boost the country badly needs, so there must be a corrupt-free national strategy for managing the gas revenues because the worry about monies generated from the oil and gas sector in the country is the ‘curse’ of embezzlement and misappropriation or mismanagement, ie, the judicious utilisation of funds accruing from the sector for the benefit of the ordinary citizens rather than using it to fuel conflict and corruption.

We hope we will avoid the mistakes.

Nigeria is a democracy and everybody is watching. So it is expected that there is going to be improvement when gas flaring will become a thing of the past by December 31, 2012.

With a proven reserves of 182 tonnes per cubic feet, Nigeria is adjudged the world’s seventh largest producers of  high grade gas with zero per cent sulphur and rich in natural gas liquids. Though the huge reserve has not translated to abundant domestic supply, investment in gas distribution is capable of helping to achieve the gas-to-power aspiration of the federal government and make gas readily available to industrial consumers and guarantee accelerated growth of manufacturing and power sectors.

 

Shedie Okpara

Continue Reading

Oil & Energy

TotalEnergies, Conoil Sign Deal To Boost Oil Production

Published

on

TotalEnergies has signed agreements with Conoil Producing Limited under which to acquire from Conoil a 50 per cent interest in Oil Processing Licence (OPL) 257, a deep-water offshore oil block in Nigeria.
The deal entails Conoil also acquiring a 40 per cent participating interest held by TotalEnergies in Oil Minining Lease (OML) 136, both located offshore Nigeria.
Upon completion of this transaction, TotalEnergies’ interest in OPL257 would be increased from 40 per cent to 90 per cent, while Conoil will retain a 10% interest in this block.
Covering an area of around 370 square kilometres, OPL 257 is located 150 kilometers offshore from the coast of Nigeria. “This block is adjacent to PPL 261, where TotalEnergies (24%) and its partners discovered in 2005 the Egina South field, which extends into OPL257.
Senior Vice-President Africa, Exploration & Production at TotalEnergies, Mike Sangster, said “An appraisal well of Egina South is planned to be drilled in 2026 on OPL257 side, and the field is expected to be developed as a tie-back to the Egina FPSO, located approximately 30 km away.
“This transaction, built on our longstanding partnership with Conoil, will enable TotalEnergies to proceed with the appraisal of the Egina South discovery, an attractive tie-back opportunity for Egina FPSO.
“This fits perfectly with our strategy to leverage existing production facilities to profitably develop additional resources and to focus on our operated gas and offshore oil assets in Nigeria”.
Continue Reading

Oil & Energy

“COP30: FG, Brazil Partner On Carbon Emissions Reduction

Published

on

The Federal Government and Brazil have deepened collaboration on climate action, focusing on sustainable agriculture, renewable energy, and the reduction of black carbon emissions.
The partnership is anchored in South-South cooperation through the Brazil-Nigeria Strategic Dialogue Mechanism, which facilitates the exchange of ideas, technology, and policy alignment within the global climate framework, particularly the Paris Agreement.
The Executive Secretary, Amazon Interstates Consortium, Marcello Brito, made the disclosure during an interview with newsmen, in Abuja, on the sidelines of the 2025 COP30 United Nations Climate Change Conference, held in Belem, Brazil.
Brito emphasized that both nations are committed to global efforts aimed at curbing black carbon emissions, a critical component of climate mitigation strategies.
“Nigeria and Brazil are collaborating on climate change remedies primarily through the Green Imperative Project (GIP) for sustainable agriculture, and by working together on renewable energy transition and climate finance mobilisation,” Brito said.
“These efforts are part of a broader strategic partnership aimed at fostering sustainable development and inclusive growth between the two Global South nations,” Brito added.
TheTide gathered that President Bola Ahmed Tinubu announced an ambitious plan to mobilize up to $3 billion annually in climate finance, through its National Carbon Market Framework and Climate Change Fund, positioning itself as a leader in nature-positive investment across the Global South.
Represented by the Vice President, Senator Kashim Shettima, Tinubu made the announcement during a high-level thematic session of the conference titled ‘Climate and Nature: Forests and Oceans’
Tinubu stressed that Nigeria’s climate strategy is rooted in restoring balance between nature, development, and economic resilience.
Hosted in the heart of the Amazon, on November 10—21, the 30th COP30 conference brought together the international community to discuss key climate issues, focusing on implementing the Paris Agreement, reviewing nationally determined contributions (NDCs), and advancing goals for energy transition, climate finance, forest conservation, and adaptation.
Continue Reading

Oil & Energy

DisCo Debts, Major Barrier To New Grid Projects In Nigeria ……. Stakeholders 

Published

on

Energy industry leaders and lenders have raised concerns that the high-risk legacy debts of Distribution Companies (DisCos) and unclear regulatory frameworks are significant barriers to the financing and development of new grid-connected power projects in Nigeria.
The consensus among financiers and power sector executives is that addressing legacy DisCo debt, improving contractual transparency, and streamlining regulatory frameworks are critical to unlocking private investment in Nigeria’s power infrastructure.
Speaking in the context of new grid-connected power plants, during panel sessions at the just concluded Lagos Chamber of Commerce and Industry (LCCI) Power Conference, Senior Vice President at Stanbic IBTC Infrastructure Fund, Jumoke Ayo-Famisa, explained the cautious approach lenders take when evaluating embedded or grid-scale power projects.
Ayo-Famisa who emphasized the critical importance of clarity around off-takers and contract structures said “If someone approaches us today with an embedded power project, the first question is always: Who is the off-taker? Who are you signing the contract with?” . “In Lagos State, for example, there is Eko Electricity and Excel Distribution Company Limited. Knowing this is important,” she said.
She highlighted the nuances in contract types, whether the developer is responsible just for generation or for the full chain, including distribution and collection.
“Collection is very important because you would be wondering, ‘is the cash going to be commingled with whatever is happening at the major DISCO level, is it ring-fenced, what is the cash flow waterfall,” she stated.
Ayo-Famisa pointed out that the major stumbling block remains the “high leverage in the books of the legacy DisCos.” Incoming project financiers want to be confident that their cash flows won’t be exposed to the financial risks of these indebted entities. This makes clarity on contractual relationships and cash flow mechanisms a top priority.
Noting that tariff clarity also remains a challenge, Ayo-Famisa said “Some states have come out to clearly say that there is no subsidy; some are saying they are exploring solutions for the lower income segments. So, the clarity would be on who is responsible for the tariff, is this sponsored?, Can they change tariffs?, In terms of if their cost rises, they can pass it on, or they have to wait for the regulator.
“Unlike, what you find in the willing seller-willing buyer, where they negotiate and agree on their prices. Now they are going into grid, there is Band A, Band B, if my power goes into, say, Ikeja Electric, or I have a contract with them, “am I commingled with whatever is happening across their multiple bands?”
Also speaking, Group Managing Director and CEO of West Power & Gas Limited, Wola Joseph Condotti, stressed the dual-edged nature of decentralization in the power sector.
“Of course, decentralization brings us closer to the people as the jurisdiction is now clear. You also know that your tariff would be reflective of the type of people living in that environment. You cannot take the Lagos tariff to Zamfara, and this is what has been happening before now in the power sector. So, decentralization brings about a more customized solution to issues you find on the ground.
“Some of the issues I see are those that bother on capacity. It was a centrally run system that had 11 DISCOs. Of the 11 DISCOs, I think there are 3 or 4 of us today that are surviving or alive, if I may put it that way. If you go to electricity generation companies, they are doing much better,” she said.
Condotti highlighted regulatory overlaps as another complication, especially when power generation or distribution crosses state lines.
She said, “Investors would definitely have a problem. Say if you have a plant in Ogun State supplying power to another state, say Lagos State; you are automatically regulated by NERC. But the truth is that the state regulator of Ogun State and Lagos State wants you to comply with certain regulatory standards.”
With the growing demand for reliable electricity and an urgent need for infrastructure expansion, the ability to navigate these complex financial and regulatory landscapes would determine the pace at which new grid-connected power projects can be developed.
Continue Reading

Trending