Connect with us

Oil & Energy

Another Look At The Nigerian Content Act

Published

on

The Nigerian Content Development Act was signed into law in
2010 to achieve the domestication of significant portion of derivatives of the
oil and gas industry by ensuring the development and deliberate use of
indigenous human and material resources in the industry in Nigeria. It is
targeted at the adding value to the nation’s economy through the systematic
development capacity and  capabilities by
using Nigerian human and material resources, and services in the industry.

The Act says Nigerian Independent Operators shall be given
first consideration in the award of oil blocks, oil licenses, oil lifting
licenses and all projects that have to do with oil blocks and oil licenses
particularly.

The intention of the Act therefore, is to build the Nigerian
Content by making it mandatory that some jobs in the industry are done in
country by Nigerians using Nigerian materials.

No doubt, the enactment of this Act ushered in a new era in
the oil and gas as prior to the Act, equipment used in the industry were
usually designed, fabricated and assembled abroad thus leading to capital
flight and export of jobs. There was a preponderance of expatriate workers
resulting to scarcity of jobs, paucity of skills  and capacity building and utilization of
Nigerian workforce, culminating to economic under-development in the country.

Agreed, the law gave local entrepreneurs like Niger Dock,
Ladol, Daewoo, Saipem, LoneStar, Adamac among others the confidence to venture
into areas that hitherto were the exclusive preserve of multinational
companies.

According to the Executive Secretary of the Nigerian Content
Development and Monitoring Board (NCDMB), Engr. Ernest Nwapa represented by
Wole Akinyosoye the Act has to say the least opened a floodgate of acativities
in the industry which has resulted to a surge in indigenous capacity in the
industry.

Be that as it may, there still exist some gray areas that
need to be given some consideration. In terms of giving priority to indigenous
operators which the Act talked about, it is not explicit on the process which
the preferential treatment should be done.

For instance, on the list of 2012 to 2013 Crude Oil Contract
Holders, most of the companies have links with foreign owners while in some
cases an holder will be replicated but with different names.

There is also institutional problem as Nigerian National
Petroleum Corporation (NNPC) dominates contract allotment. So how and where
does the NCDMB come in, in terms of giving contracts.

Another gray area in the Act is the downstream Sector which
is the major concern of his piece. The downstream sector is not covered. Dr.
Eddie Wikina, while presenting a paper on “Promoting the Nigerian Content
through Deregulation of the Downstream Sector” at the just concluded Port
Harcourt International Oil and Gas Conference in Port Harcourt, noted that the
Act was restrictive as it does not cover the downstream sector of the
industry   Dr. Wikina who is the managing
director of Treasure Energy Resource limited, a Rivers State Government oil and
gas firm, argued that in terms of Upstream business in the industry as touching
expatriate quota and using Nigerian materials, the Act has faired well but
nothing in the downstream.

The scope of the Act which is restricted to the upstream
sector, according to the oil and gas guru include services from within Nigeria,
goods manufactured in Nigeria, training and employment of Nigerians, location
of project office in catchment area or community, tax incentives for local
manufacturing, all fabrication and welding activities, insurance, legal and
financial activities.

He explained that
anybody who wants to build a downstream plant that is capable of employing up
to 5000 people in the country can do it with 100 per cent foreign labour,
foreign materials, foreign services and nobody will raise an eyebrow because
there is no law that says they must use Nigerian materials and services.

He pointed out that the downstream which has to do with
among others processing that convert oil nad gas into useful products including
distillation, cracking, reforming, blending,
storage, mixing and shipping has some regulatory control issues.

Some of the regulatory control issues, the TERL boss pointed
out were monopoly, closed market, price manipulation, lack of innovation,
investment block, value erosion, inefficient operations, foreign import
dependent, smuggling inter alia.

He therefore, recommended the review of the Act to
explicitly cover the downstream sector as this will open more opportunities for
participation of local indigenous operators and service providers thus leading
to growth of the Nigerian Content Development.

For instance, the coordinator of the 6th Nigerian Dredging
Summit, Exhibition and Award, Mr. Edmund Chilaka quoted NCDMB as saying that
$20billion oil and gas projects in the country were owned by foreigners and
noted that out of this whooping sum, only a paltry sum of less than $4 billion
was retained in Nigeria.

His words: “An estimate of over 150 times more jobs are
created in other countries than in Nigeria when Nigerian projects are being
executed.

“Ownership profile of marine assets supporting industry
activities has a current ratio of about 230 foreign owned vessels to a pitiable
20 Nigerian owned.”

Scenarios like the one painted above could be changed by
making the Act to cover the downstream as advocated by Dr. Wikina.

The TERL MD also recommended a full deregulation of the
downstream which would see government releasing the control on product prices.
He said it will open the market for more investors to come into the sector and
the emergence of more production facilities. Countries like Peru, Argentina,
Pakistan, Chile, Philippines, Thailand, Mexico, Canada, Venezuela, Japan,
United States of America (USA) among others have undergone complete
deregulation leading to a turn around of their economies. Government’s roles in
these countries have been drastically reduced thus giving greater freedom for
operators in the industry to operate and thrive which create room for healthy
competition and naturally drive down costs.

He enjoined government to completely end control on the
sector to allow independent operators to come in and money saved from subsidy
could be reinvested in local industries or used to support those ready to build
independent processing plants. And to a great extent add the much desired value
to the nation’s economy.

Federal Governments, he suggested should make funds
affordable by making investors in the industry have access to low interest rate
loans as this would serve as encouragement for them to venture into the
industry.

Commenting on the
difficulty of accessing funds by indigenous players in the industry, the
managing director of Harrybeath International Services Limited, Engr Agha Abani
said “You see the Nigerian government has good intentions to build capacity but
the problem most Nigerian companies have is in funding; we still have problems
of getting the required funding from the Banks. In the Western world, it is
much easier for them to finance this kind of projects but here in Nigeria it is
very difficult to get funding from the banks. So this is an area that has to be
looked at.”

 

Vivian-Peace Nwinaene

Continue Reading

Oil & Energy

Global Energy Crisis Is Reviving Green Hydrogen

Published

on

The global energy crisis has reshaped global energy priorities seemingly overnight. The Strait of Hormuz has been closed to virtually all commercial traffic for well over a month now, severely restricting global flows of oil and gas. As a result, global energy prices have skyrocketed, and supplies have tightened, pushing many countries to explore alternative energy pathways in a big hurry. This has led to an unfortunate resurgence of coal-fired power, especially in Asia – but it is also set to supercharge the clean energy industry on a global scale. And one of the unlikely benefactors of this groundswell of new investment may be the green hydrogen industry.
China, the world’s top hydrogen producer, is planning to ramp up production of hydrogen, and especially green hydrogen, more quickly than previously planned in order to shore up its energy security as import-dependent Asian markets are rocked by skyrocketing oil and gas prices. China’s National Energy Administration (NEA) has referred to hydrogen as a “strategic lever” for national energy autonomy and resilience, and has pledged to accelerate the development of the domestic sector accordingly.
China’s 15th five-year plan, released last month, flagged hydrogen as a “future industry.” But, apparently, the future is now. According to a recent report from the South China Morning Post, the rhetoric around hydrogen coming out of China signals a shift away from research and toward rapid practical development of the sector.
Last year, the NEA earmarked 41 projects in nine regions across the country to lead hydrogen pilot projects all along the value chain “from production and transport to storage and application.” Now, leadership is pushing to bring those projects out of demo phases and into industrial applications as quickly as possible.
European leaders, too, are pivoting to embrace green hydrogen production with renewed enthusiasm. Earlier this month, ministers from Austria, Germany, the Netherlands, Poland, and Spain petitioned the European Union to loosen production regulations to encourage investment into the sector. And Italy successfully approved a €6 billion state aid plan to support renewable hydrogen.
Even the United States is getting on board. This week, the Trump administration instructed the Department of Energy to save $5 billion worth of hydrogen hubs that were slated for closure. The hydrogen projects – though not green hydrogen ventures – were funded under the Biden administration in order to promote cleaner-burning fuel sources.
Hydrogen could potentially be a critical pathway for decarbonization, as it combusts at high heat like fossil fuels. But, unlike fossil fuels, when it burns, it leaves behind nothing but water vapor. This could make it indispensable for the decarbonization of hard-to-abate sectors like steelmaking and shipping. However, the vast majority of commercial hydrogen is made with fossil fuels. Green hydrogen, by comparison, is made using renewable energies.
But while hydrogen, and especially green hydrogen, could be a key part of the global clean energy transition, research and development in the sector had been cooling for years, as commercial and cost-effective green hydrogen production methods largely failed to materialize. “Even if production costs decrease in line with predictions, storage and distribution costs will prevent hydrogen from being cost-competitive in many sectors,” Roxana Shafiee, a postdoctoral fellow at the Harvard University Center for the Environment, told The Harvard Gazette in 2024. Shafiee led a study that found cause to believe “that the opportunities for hydrogen may be narrower than previously thought.”
But the economics of energy are changing as we speak, and the global hydrogen market is likely about to see a windfall as the world rushes to replace geopolitically risky fossil fuels, which have become prohibitively expensive overnight. Clearly, global leaders are already reembracing the fledgling sector as part of an all-of-the-above approach to energy security and independence. While hydrogen may not be a silver bullet solution, it could be a critical part of a more diverse and therefore more resilient global energy landscape going forward.
By Haley Zaremba
Continue Reading

Oil & Energy

PETAN Tasks Indigenous Oil Firms On Investments Attraction    … Global Engagement Sustenance

Published

on

The Petroleum Technology Association of Nigeria (PETAN) has urged indigenous oil and gas companies to deepen global engagement and attract investment.
The Association urged intending participants to leverage the forthcoming 2026 Offshore Technology Conference (OTC) in the U.S. to expand their access to new technologies and partnerships.
PETAN said its participation at the global event would be driven by a deliberate strategy to position Nigerian firms as competitive players within the international energy value chain.
In a statement issued  by the Association’s Publicity Secretary, Dr Joan Faluyi, In Lagos, at the weekend,  PETAN would anchor its activities at the Nigerian Pavilion, with the theme: “Africa’s Energy Transformation: Scaling Investment, Technology, and Local Capacity for Sustainable Growth”.
Faluyi noted that the conference, scheduled for May 4 to May 7 in Houston, Texas, remained a leading platform for offshore energy dialogue, partnerships and innovation.
According to her, PETAN’s participation goes beyond routine attendance and reflects a focused effort to strengthen Nigeria’s visibility and influence in global energy discussions.
“At OTC 2026, PETAN is returning with stronger alignment and a clearer objective, to ensure Nigerian companies are not just present, but actively engaged and recognised as credible global partners,” she said.
Faluyi explained that the association had consistently showcased the capabilities of indigenous oil and gas service providers at previous editions of the conference, reinforcing their capacity to compete internationally.
She added that the Nigerian Pavilion would serve as a strategic hub for investment discussions, technical exhibitions and direct engagement with global stakeholders.
The association is also scheduled to participate in key engagements, including the African Energy Forum, the NCDMB–OEM Investment Forum and the PETAN Golf Tournament slated for May 7 at Quail Valley Golf Course, Texas.
Faluyi described OTC as a critical gateway for Nigerian companies seeking international opportunities, noting that visibility and engagement at the event often translate into commercial partnerships.
“In an increasingly competitive energy landscape, securing a seat at the global table is essential. Through sustained participation, PETAN continues to assert Nigeria’s place in that conversation,” she said.
Also speaking, PETAN Chairman, Mr Wole Ogunsanya, said the Association’s focus was to ensure that indigenous capacity is fully integrated into global energy decision-making processes.
“We have seen firsthand how global energy decisions are shaped at OTC. This year, we are returning to ensure indigenous Nigerian capacity is not just present but recognised, engaged and heard.
“We are taking our businesses to the table where real partnerships are formed,” he said.
Faluyi added that under Ogunsanya’s leadership, PETAN was prioritising strategic positioning to ensure Nigerian companies are not only visible but considered credible partners in major international energy projects.
Continue Reading

Oil & Energy

Solar Panels Imports Ban: Experts Recommend Phase -out Approach 

Published

on

Stakeholders in Nigeria’s energy sector have warned that an abrupt restriction on solar panels imports would undermine electricity access.
The experts called for a gradual phase-out of imports over several years rather than an outright ban.
Recall that the federal government had announced plans to halt solar panel imports after investing more than N200 billion to encourage domestic production.
Speaking at the Solar Power Media Training, in Abuja, last week, the Campaign Director, Secure Energy Project (SEP), Joseph Ibrahim, said stakeholders support the goal of building local manufacturing capacity but cautioned against sudden policy shifts.
“Let me be clear, we wholeheartedly support local manufacturing of solar panels”.
“We want to see factories in our states, jobs for our youth, and a supply chain that begins and ends on our soil”, he stated.
Ibrahim insisted that the most effective path forward is a carefully managed roadmap implemented over three to five years to give investors and workers time to adjust.
“If we rush this, we risk making solar power too expensive for the millions who currently rely on it for survival.
“By taking a phased approach, we allow time for investors to build their plants, for our workers to learn specialised skills, and for our economy to adjust without losing power”, he said.
The SEP director said policy stability, access to financing, and strict quality standards are essential to building a sustainable local solar manufacturing industry.
“To make local manufacturing a reality, we don’t just need new laws; we need an enabling environment. This means stability — policies that don’t change with the wind,” he said.
Also speaking, Tosin Asonibare,  said renewable energy has become a critical solution to Nigeria’s persistent electricity supply challenges.
He cited findings by the Global Initiative for Food Security and Ecosystem Preservation, indicating that many Nigerians remain unaware of the proposed import restrictions and their potential implications.
According to him, respondents in the report largely favoured a phased ban supported by incentives for importing raw materials needed for local production.
“The report also shows that infrastructure for locally manufactured panels is not fully available, so there is need for foreign direct investment improvement in government policy.
“So that the local manufacturers and assembling companies can have higher capacity to meet demand. If that is not done, the price of solar panels will go up”, he said.
He warned that affordability could become a major concern for consumers if restrictions are implemented without adequate preparation.
Continue Reading

Trending