Politics
2015: Is Opposition Merger Feasible?
That a serious opposition to the People’s Democratic Party
(PDP) leadership at the Federal level is brewing is no more news. So the three
leading opposition political parties – Action Congress of Nigeria (ACN),
Congress for Progressive Change (CPC) and All Nigeria People’s Party (ANPP) are
in the heart of the plans to dethrone the ruling party.
What might, perhaps, make news is that as much as the
opposition makes plans to overthrow the PDP, developments emerge to remind observers
that such plans may fail like previous ones which dates as far back as the
First Republic.
This is in the face of preparations and strategic plans,
capped by a proposed merger by the ACN, CPC and ANPP. In order to enhance the
achievement of their goal, the parties were said to have decided to commence
talks early enough, three months after the 2011 general elections, precisely.
Their reason was to first address problems that had stalled such moves in the
past.
It was also learnt in their determination, the parties took
into cognizance the fact that they must beat the deadline of the Independent
National Electoral Commission (INEC), which gives 90 days before a general
election for merger.
Section 84 (6) of the 2011 Electoral Act states thus:
“Notwithstanding the provisions of sub-section (2) of this section, no merger
of political parties received by the commission less than 90 days before any
general election in the country shall be considered by the commission”.
In the words of the National Publicity Secretary of the ACN,
Alhaji Lai Mohammed, “The merger of our party, ACN, with the CPC, the All
Nigeria Peoples Party (ANPP) and a splinter group of disenchanted members of
the PDP will come into being very soon.
“I can assure you, the leaders of the parties have been
meeting to consider the proposal, as the only way we can rescue this country
from the PDP,” he said.
In spite of these precautionary measures, however, the
opposition parties acknowledged that one major factor that had stalled previous
pre-2011 election merger plans had been moles planted by the PDP among them.
The National Publicity Secretary of the ANPP, Mr Emma
Eneukwu, admitted this much when he said “We in the ANPP are very serious with
our merger talks. You know that the PDP would not want us to have successful
mergers, they would not want it to succeed and that is why they have repeatedly
planted people among us to scuttle the process, and that is also the reason we
are starting early”.
So, if the PDP can successfully and repeatedly plant moles
in the opposition, what are the chances that it will not happen again? If until
now all they can imply about how their meetings are infiltrated is based on
suspicion, is it not indicative that they are not really prepared for the kind
of merger that could give the PDP a good fight come the 2015 election?
Another factor the opposition parties have to contend with
is the issue of haggling and how to share political positions after they might
have defeated the PDP. This was one of the key factors that also scuttled the
merger attempt before the 2011 elections.
Although they are indications of the coalition parties
having learnt their lessons from the past failures, as clearly stated by a key
member of the opposition who spoke anonymously, there is still the innate fear
among them that who occupies what position will always be a problem, if not
immediately, then later.
Closely related to this is the feeling that beyond merely
opposing the ruling party, the opposition parties are yet to prove that they
would be different if given an opportunity to lead.
As the immediate past National Publicity Secretary of the
PDP, Prof Rufai Ahmed Alkali, put it, “PDP has been in the centre in this
country since 1999 and despite the imperfections of popular democracy, it has
made its own contributions. Sometimes it is difficult to appreciate things,
particularly when we have them.
“I know the leadership of this country under PDP has made
giant strides in so many levels, but that does not mean that the other
political parties will not try to upstage PDP. They have been trying to do
that.
“The blessing is that they think merely being anti-PDP or
fighting PDP is enough for Nigerians to accept them. It is not enough. They
have failed to come up with something that is different, something that is
fresh, something to show Nigerians that they can do better if they are given
the chance.
“So far what we have seen because of court rulings, is the
dogged commitment of the government both under the late Alhaji Umaru Yar’Adua
and under our current President Dr Goodluck Jonathan is the belief in the rule
of law, the judiciary has been given window of opportunities to political
parties, especially opposition, to take over power in so many states of our
country.
“But in those states that the opposition was able to get
judgment like Ondo, Ekiti, Ogun, Edo and the rest, you find that, so far apart
from the populism that they bandy around, they have not done anything close to
what PDP has done. So, in that case they cannot pretend to be better than PDP.
In fact, what they are doing in some of the states, like Ogun, where they held
local government election, was terrible.
“In Lagos, the last local government election held about one
and half years ago was a fiasco, it was one of the most scandalous elections
ever had in this country but because they can make a lot of noise from the
Lagos side the rest of the country kept quiet. So, in that case people are not
fooled”.
Prof. Alkali continued that “they can continue making
alliances and counter alliances but because they are not united to provide any
alternative to this country, to PDP, they are not likely to make any
substantial progress”,
He was, however, quick to add that this should not make
members of PDP to be complacent or to take things for granted because “one of
the greatest mistakes anybody can make is to overestimate his own ability or
underestimate the capability of his enemy or his opponent”.
What is, perhaps, widely believed to be the trump card of
the opposition parties that would expectedly see them win the presidency in
2015, is the perceived disunity among some key members of the ruling party for
various reasons.
One of such reasons is the Northern and South-Eastern
interests. More than any other region of the country, the North has shown
strong interests in reclaiming the presidency in 2015.
Since last year, different northern groups have been holding
meetings to discuss the interests of the region and prominent on their agenda
has been the 2015 general election and the possibility of presenting a
consensus candidate from the region. They are banking on the possibility that
this might generate rancor among the PDP, making it difficult for them to speak
in one voice.
However, speaking in a recent crucial meeting he convened of
the Concerned Northern Politicians, Academicians, Professionals and
Businessmen, Dr Junaid Mohammed, expressed doubt about the possibility of a
consensus northern candidate, saying the proponents of the idea were motivated
by the selfish desire for power, and not the common good of the North or the
nation.
For the South-East, the desire to produce a president has
been protracted. While the zone supported Jonathan in 2011, it is divided on
the possibility of supporting him in 2015.
An indication of this schism manifested when some Igbo
leaders distanced themselves from the call on Jonathan to contest in the 2015
election, shortly after his visit to Anambra.
In a statement signed by top Igbo leaders representing
Oganiru Ndigbo Foundation, including Emeka Maduewesi, Uche Onug Lucas, Maxi
Okwu, Okey Igbokwe, Onyema Uche and Obichi Ikechi, the South-East leaders noted
that “whereas Ndigbo overwhelmingly supported the election of president
Goodluck Jonathan in 2011 elections, we remain of the view that the president
should not be distracted by relevance-seeking political jobbers with such
calls, even when he is yet to deliver on his major promises to Ndigbo”.
But if President Goodluck Jonathan’s Special Adviser on
Inter-Party Relations, Senator Ben Obi, attracts a considerable level of
respect among his kinsmen, he may have resolved the South-East problem when he
recently asked the Igbos to wait for Jonathan’s decision on whether to run or
not before taking action on the 2015 presidential race.
Obi said, “Ohaneze Ndigbo, of which I am a caucus member,
has said it loud and clear that it is the turn of Ndigbo to produce the
president in 2015. Indeed, we are highly interested in the 2015 presidency, but
that is if President Jonathan decides not to run”.
The implication of all these is obvious: unless the
opposition political parties still have their aces face down, waiting for the
opportuned time to turn its face up, all these activities may merely constitute
unnecessary distractions from governance.
As Chairman of the Ijaw National Congress, Joshua
Benamaisia, said “It is too early for Nigerians to start the race for 2015. If
the PDP presents Jonathan, then he is good to run. I think people should cease
from heating up the polity and let’s focus on development and restructuring of
this country.”
Politics
2027: Attack Electoral Officials, Face Full Weight Of Law, INEC Warns
Prof. Amupitan gave the warning on Saturday, in Port Harcourt, Rivers State, during the South-South Zonal Readiness Assessment and Interactive Staff Engagement organised ahead of the 2027 general elections.
He said insecurity remained a potential challenge to the electoral process but stressed that the Commission would not allow threats against its personnel to undermine its constitutional responsibilities.
“Insecurity may pose a challenge, but our collective constitutional resolve is far stronger. Let me again send a clear message from Port Harcourt: anyone who attempts to threaten, intimidate, or harm our ad-hoc staff, NYSC members, or permanent personnel will be brought to justice under the full weight of the law,” he said.
The INEC Chairman, who was accompanied by National Commissioners, directors and technical aides, disclosed that the South-South engagement was the fifth in a series of zonal assessments, following similar exercises in the South-West, North-West, South-East and North-East.
He explained that his physical presence across the geopolitical zones reflected the Commission’s field-first approach, emphasising that electoral integrity must be established through effective operations at the grassroots.
According to him, the assessment would cover operational preparedness across the 123 Local Government Areas in the six South-South states.
On election security, Prof. Amupitan said INEC had moved away from reactive security arrangements traditionally activated around election day to a proactive, intelligence-driven framework known as the “ICCES Tentacle”.
He explained that the framework was designed to extend inter-agency security coordination from national and state headquarters to local government areas and Registration Area Centres, including remote communities.
He identified three critical pillars of the framework as mapping and mitigating security threats, protecting electoral personnel and infrastructure, and guaranteeing safe access to polling units.
The INEC boss said the security arrangement would provide comprehensive protection for electoral personnel, technological infrastructure, including Bimodal Voter Accreditation System (BVAS) devices and server infrastructure, as well as voters.
He added that the framework was intended to ensure that every polling unit, irrespective of its geographical location or history of security challenges, remained safe and accessible for the exercise of democratic rights.
Prof. Amupitan disclosed that the South-South security architecture comprised approximately 60 major operational formations, headquarters and state commands operating under the Inter-Agency Consultative Committee on Election Security (ICCES).
The network, he said, brings together military, naval, air, police and other security and intelligence agencies across the six states.
“Together, this integrated multi-agency network represents the operational backbone that guarantees intelligence-led protection across every riverine creek, coastal axis, and land-based polling unit in the Niger Delta,” he stated.
Providing an overview of the region’s electoral significance, the INEC Chairman said the South-South had the fourth-largest voting bloc in the country, with 15,823,550 registered voters, representing 15.30 per cent of the national register.
Rivers State alone, he said, accounts for 3,736,434 registered voters spread across the 23 local government areas.
Politics
2027: RIVERS GUBER CANDIDATES SIGN CHARTER TO PRIORITIZE CITIZENS’ DEMANDS
Politics
Atiku Demands INEC Officials’ Probe Over Alleged Voters’ Register Manipulation
Alhaji Abubakar made the demand following revelations that some INEC registration officers allegedly abused their access to the voter registration system to introduce irregular records into the database.
In a statement issued by his Director of Strategic Communications, Mr Phrank Shaibu, the former vice-president described the development as a serious breach of the Commission’s internal safeguards and raised concerns about the integrity of the electoral process.
He urged INEC to identify the officials implicated in the alleged misconduct and explain what disciplinary or legal measures had been taken against them.
Alhaji Abubakar also called for an independent forensic audit of the preliminary voters’ register to establish the scale of the alleged manipulation, identify affected records and determine how the questionable entries were introduced into the system.
He further insisted that INEC preserve all relevant voter records, image files, system access logs and electronic audit trails to prevent the destruction or alteration of evidence before an independent examination could be conducted.
The former vice-president also demanded that the Commission disclose the identities of companies contracted to produce sensitive election materials ahead of the 2027 polls, arguing that transparency was essential to building public confidence in the electoral process.
INEC’s Director of Information and Communication Technology, Dr Lawrence Bayode, had earlier disclosed during a television interview that some registration officers across the country allegedly used their official login credentials to introduce irregularities into the voters’ database.
Dr Bayode explained that the Commission’s Automated Biometric Identification System helped identify questionable records and establish how some irregularities entered the system.
He, however, clarified that not all suspicious photographs were AI-generated, as some resulted from poor registration procedures.
The development followed public concerns over suspected AI-generated photographs, alleged duplicate entries and other inconsistencies discovered in the preliminary voters’ register published online on October 26, 2026.
INEC has maintained that the published document is a preliminary register and that it is reviewing questionable records ahead of the certification of the final Register of Voters.
The controversy has intensified calls for greater transparency and accountability in the management of the voters’ register as preparations gather momentum for the 2027 general elections.
-
Opinion4 days ago
Ancestorial Worship: My Take (1)
-
Education24 hours agoPAMO MEDICAL UNIVERSITY -Nullifies Arrest warrant on VC
-
Niger Delta1 day ago
PANDEF Seeks 50% Oil Derivation Allocation Increase
-
Rivers23 hours ago
Don Seeks Repositioning Of Tech Education For Dev
-
Education24 hours agoIAUE MOVES TO END GHOST WORKERS SYNDROME AS 400 NEW NON-TEACHING STAFF UNDERGO MANDATORY ETHICS TRAINING
-
News1 day agoFresh Ebola Scare As NCDC Records Two Cases
-
News1 day ago
Customs Partners EFCC, NDLEA, Others To Tackle Money Laundering, Terrorism Financing
-
News4 days agoFG Must Address Nigerians’ Concerns On Reforms -Shettima …Warns Against Misuse of AI, Social Media
