Politics
2015: Is Opposition Merger Feasible?
That a serious opposition to the People’s Democratic Party
(PDP) leadership at the Federal level is brewing is no more news. So the three
leading opposition political parties – Action Congress of Nigeria (ACN),
Congress for Progressive Change (CPC) and All Nigeria People’s Party (ANPP) are
in the heart of the plans to dethrone the ruling party.
What might, perhaps, make news is that as much as the
opposition makes plans to overthrow the PDP, developments emerge to remind observers
that such plans may fail like previous ones which dates as far back as the
First Republic.
This is in the face of preparations and strategic plans,
capped by a proposed merger by the ACN, CPC and ANPP. In order to enhance the
achievement of their goal, the parties were said to have decided to commence
talks early enough, three months after the 2011 general elections, precisely.
Their reason was to first address problems that had stalled such moves in the
past.
It was also learnt in their determination, the parties took
into cognizance the fact that they must beat the deadline of the Independent
National Electoral Commission (INEC), which gives 90 days before a general
election for merger.
Section 84 (6) of the 2011 Electoral Act states thus:
“Notwithstanding the provisions of sub-section (2) of this section, no merger
of political parties received by the commission less than 90 days before any
general election in the country shall be considered by the commission”.
In the words of the National Publicity Secretary of the ACN,
Alhaji Lai Mohammed, “The merger of our party, ACN, with the CPC, the All
Nigeria Peoples Party (ANPP) and a splinter group of disenchanted members of
the PDP will come into being very soon.
“I can assure you, the leaders of the parties have been
meeting to consider the proposal, as the only way we can rescue this country
from the PDP,” he said.
In spite of these precautionary measures, however, the
opposition parties acknowledged that one major factor that had stalled previous
pre-2011 election merger plans had been moles planted by the PDP among them.
The National Publicity Secretary of the ANPP, Mr Emma
Eneukwu, admitted this much when he said “We in the ANPP are very serious with
our merger talks. You know that the PDP would not want us to have successful
mergers, they would not want it to succeed and that is why they have repeatedly
planted people among us to scuttle the process, and that is also the reason we
are starting early”.
So, if the PDP can successfully and repeatedly plant moles
in the opposition, what are the chances that it will not happen again? If until
now all they can imply about how their meetings are infiltrated is based on
suspicion, is it not indicative that they are not really prepared for the kind
of merger that could give the PDP a good fight come the 2015 election?
Another factor the opposition parties have to contend with
is the issue of haggling and how to share political positions after they might
have defeated the PDP. This was one of the key factors that also scuttled the
merger attempt before the 2011 elections.
Although they are indications of the coalition parties
having learnt their lessons from the past failures, as clearly stated by a key
member of the opposition who spoke anonymously, there is still the innate fear
among them that who occupies what position will always be a problem, if not
immediately, then later.
Closely related to this is the feeling that beyond merely
opposing the ruling party, the opposition parties are yet to prove that they
would be different if given an opportunity to lead.
As the immediate past National Publicity Secretary of the
PDP, Prof Rufai Ahmed Alkali, put it, “PDP has been in the centre in this
country since 1999 and despite the imperfections of popular democracy, it has
made its own contributions. Sometimes it is difficult to appreciate things,
particularly when we have them.
“I know the leadership of this country under PDP has made
giant strides in so many levels, but that does not mean that the other
political parties will not try to upstage PDP. They have been trying to do
that.
“The blessing is that they think merely being anti-PDP or
fighting PDP is enough for Nigerians to accept them. It is not enough. They
have failed to come up with something that is different, something that is
fresh, something to show Nigerians that they can do better if they are given
the chance.
“So far what we have seen because of court rulings, is the
dogged commitment of the government both under the late Alhaji Umaru Yar’Adua
and under our current President Dr Goodluck Jonathan is the belief in the rule
of law, the judiciary has been given window of opportunities to political
parties, especially opposition, to take over power in so many states of our
country.
“But in those states that the opposition was able to get
judgment like Ondo, Ekiti, Ogun, Edo and the rest, you find that, so far apart
from the populism that they bandy around, they have not done anything close to
what PDP has done. So, in that case they cannot pretend to be better than PDP.
In fact, what they are doing in some of the states, like Ogun, where they held
local government election, was terrible.
“In Lagos, the last local government election held about one
and half years ago was a fiasco, it was one of the most scandalous elections
ever had in this country but because they can make a lot of noise from the
Lagos side the rest of the country kept quiet. So, in that case people are not
fooled”.
Prof. Alkali continued that “they can continue making
alliances and counter alliances but because they are not united to provide any
alternative to this country, to PDP, they are not likely to make any
substantial progress”,
He was, however, quick to add that this should not make
members of PDP to be complacent or to take things for granted because “one of
the greatest mistakes anybody can make is to overestimate his own ability or
underestimate the capability of his enemy or his opponent”.
What is, perhaps, widely believed to be the trump card of
the opposition parties that would expectedly see them win the presidency in
2015, is the perceived disunity among some key members of the ruling party for
various reasons.
One of such reasons is the Northern and South-Eastern
interests. More than any other region of the country, the North has shown
strong interests in reclaiming the presidency in 2015.
Since last year, different northern groups have been holding
meetings to discuss the interests of the region and prominent on their agenda
has been the 2015 general election and the possibility of presenting a
consensus candidate from the region. They are banking on the possibility that
this might generate rancor among the PDP, making it difficult for them to speak
in one voice.
However, speaking in a recent crucial meeting he convened of
the Concerned Northern Politicians, Academicians, Professionals and
Businessmen, Dr Junaid Mohammed, expressed doubt about the possibility of a
consensus northern candidate, saying the proponents of the idea were motivated
by the selfish desire for power, and not the common good of the North or the
nation.
For the South-East, the desire to produce a president has
been protracted. While the zone supported Jonathan in 2011, it is divided on
the possibility of supporting him in 2015.
An indication of this schism manifested when some Igbo
leaders distanced themselves from the call on Jonathan to contest in the 2015
election, shortly after his visit to Anambra.
In a statement signed by top Igbo leaders representing
Oganiru Ndigbo Foundation, including Emeka Maduewesi, Uche Onug Lucas, Maxi
Okwu, Okey Igbokwe, Onyema Uche and Obichi Ikechi, the South-East leaders noted
that “whereas Ndigbo overwhelmingly supported the election of president
Goodluck Jonathan in 2011 elections, we remain of the view that the president
should not be distracted by relevance-seeking political jobbers with such
calls, even when he is yet to deliver on his major promises to Ndigbo”.
But if President Goodluck Jonathan’s Special Adviser on
Inter-Party Relations, Senator Ben Obi, attracts a considerable level of
respect among his kinsmen, he may have resolved the South-East problem when he
recently asked the Igbos to wait for Jonathan’s decision on whether to run or
not before taking action on the 2015 presidential race.
Obi said, “Ohaneze Ndigbo, of which I am a caucus member,
has said it loud and clear that it is the turn of Ndigbo to produce the
president in 2015. Indeed, we are highly interested in the 2015 presidency, but
that is if President Jonathan decides not to run”.
The implication of all these is obvious: unless the
opposition political parties still have their aces face down, waiting for the
opportuned time to turn its face up, all these activities may merely constitute
unnecessary distractions from governance.
As Chairman of the Ijaw National Congress, Joshua
Benamaisia, said “It is too early for Nigerians to start the race for 2015. If
the PDP presents Jonathan, then he is good to run. I think people should cease
from heating up the polity and let’s focus on development and restructuring of
this country.”
Politics
Rivers Assembly Resumes Sitting After Six-Month Suspension

The Rivers State House of Assembly yesterday resumed plenary session after a six-month state of emergency imposed on the state by President Bola Tinubu elapsed on Wednesday midnight.
President Bola Tinubu had lifted the emergency rule on September 17, with the Governor of the state, Siminalayi Fubara, his deputy, Ngozi Odu, and members of the state assembly asked to resume duties on September 18.
The plenary was presided over by the Speaker of the House, Martins Amaewhule, at the conference hall located within the legislative quarters in Port Harcourt, the state capital.
The conference hall has served as the lawmakers’ temporary chamber since their official chamber at the assembly complex on Moscow Road was torched and later pulled down by the state government.
The outgone sole administrator of the state, Ibok-Ete Ibas, could not complete the reconstruction of the assembly complex as promised.
Recall that on March 18, President Bola Tinubu declared a state of emergency in Rivers following the prolonged political standoff between Fubara and members of the House of Assembly loyal to the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory, Nyesom Wike.
He subsequently suspended the governor, his deputy, Ngozi Odu, and lawmakers for six months and installed a sole administrator, Vice Admiral Ibok-Ete Ibas (rtd.), to manage the state’s affairs.
The decision sparked widespread controversy, with critics accusing the president of breaching the Constitution.
However, others hailed the move as a necessary and pragmatic step.
Politics
2027: Bayelsa APC Adopts Tinubu As Sole Candidate … As Lokpobiri, Lyon Shun Meeting
Politics
Alleged Smear Campaign Against Yakubu, CSOs Demand Apology From Uzodimma

During a press conference held in Owerri, the coalition called the campaign a “dangerous and shameful display” designed to distract the public from the governor’s performance in office.
The CSOs directly linked the Greater Imo Initiative (GII) —the group that made the allegations on September 4, 2025—to Governor Uzodimma, describing the group as his “mouthpiece and attack dog.”
“Every word spoken against INEC was spoken on his behalf.
“By falsely alleging that Professor Yakubu has an alliance with Dr. Amadi to compromise the 2027 elections, Uzodimma has not only maligned a man of proven integrity but also assaulted the very foundation of our democracy”, said Dr Agbo Frederick, speaking for the coalition.
The coalition described Professor Yakubu as a “beacon of electoral professionalism” and called the attempt to soil his reputation “defamatory and a national security risk.”
They also defended Dr. Amadi, a “respected development scholar,” stating that the governor’s accusations were “laughable, desperate, and dangerous.”
The CSOs see the motive behind the campaign as an attempt to “silence the dissent, intimidate the opposition, and divert attention from the governor’s abysmal record in office.”
The coalition issued four key demands to Governor Uzodimma: An immediate retraction of the false and defamatory allegations against Professor Mahmood Yakubu and Dr. Chima Amadi.
- A public apology to both men within seven days, to be published in at least three national newspapers and broadcast on major television networks.
- An end to diversionary tactics and proxy propaganda.
- A renewed focus on governance, including addressing insecurity, unemployment, and poverty in Imo State.
The CSOs warned that failure to comply would force them to “review our position with a view to seeking legal redress from Governor Uzodimma for defamation, false accusation, and reckless endangerment of lives.”
“Governor Uzodimma must be reminded that he did not find himself in the seat of power to chase shadows.
“We call on all Nigerians to reject Uzodimma’s diversionary antics as they are nothing short of desperate plots by a government terrified of accountability”, the statement concluded.
-
Sports1 day ago
FIFA rankings: S’Eagles drop Position, remain sixth in Africa
-
Sports1 day ago
NNL abolishes playoffs for NPFL promotion
-
Sports1 day ago
CAFCL : Rivers United Arrives DR Congo
-
Sports1 day ago
NPFL club name Iorfa new GM
-
Sports1 day ago
Kwara Hopeful To Host Confed Cup in Ilorin
-
Sports1 day ago
NSF: Early preparations begin for 2026 National Sports Festival
-
Sports1 day ago
RSG Award Renovation Work At Yakubu Gowon Stadium
-
Sports1 day ago
RSG Pledges To Develop Baseball