Connect with us

Politics

25 Female Guber Candidates Unveil Agenda For 2023 Poll

Published

on

Ahead of the 2023 general elections, about 25 fe-male governorship candidates contesting on the platform of various political parties in the states, on Monday, unveiled their agenda for the poll.
They spoke at a media engagement organised by Women Radio 91.7FM in Abuja.
The Tide source reports that the programme was supported by the UN Women and Canadian government.
The governorship candidate of Action People’s Party (APP) in Delta, Annabel Cosmos, said since the inception of democracy in 1999, the men had not done enough to give the state a facelift, hence, the need for women to take up the challenge.
“They say what a man can do, a woman can do it better.
“Women should not be left at the kitchen. The kitchen is not our place; we can govern a state if given the opportunity to serve,” she said.
She said if elected the governor, she would look into the educational, agricultural and health sectors, among others, with a view to transforming them.
The governorship candidate of Action Democratic Party (ADP) in Benue State, Madam Roseline Chenge, said if elected the governor, her plan was to industrialise the state and tackle the insecurity problem besetting it
“If you are familiar with Benue State, Benue needs industrialisation with local governments in focus.
“Benue needs security and as a mother, I have come out so that as an engineer, I can engage the most modern and sophisticated technology to provide security because my people are dying,” she said.
Chenge said she was ready to also ensure food security for the state by engaging in the modern system of agriculture.
She promised to manage the state’s account in a way that would give dividends of democracy to the people.
“The men have done well but women can do a better job,” she said.
The governorship candidate of the Action Alliance (AA) in Jigawa State, Hajia Binta Umar, said she was vying for the position to enable her to tackle the problems facing the women and youth in the state.
“The women are always at the receiving end anytime there is one challenge or the other, likewise our young people,” she said.
She said her government would ensure that the women and youth are empowered in the state. “We have a lot of resources and we are farmers too.
“We want to use all these resources to make life better than what it is now,” she said.
Social Democratic Party (SDP)’s governorship candidate for Abia State, Dr Ngozika Johnson-Ogbuneke, said though the state is 31 years old, there had been little or nothing to show for it.
“There are no infrastructure in Abia, nothing to give the people good life and when the youth of Nigeria protested back then in 2020, my heart was broken.
“When you look at what they said about the EndSARS, it applies to Abia State too. “I felt it is time to make a difference in my fatherland,” she said. According to her, “I urge the people of the state to vote for me.
“Don’t vote for me because I am a woman, vote for me because I am a capable woman. “I am an orthopaedic surgeon and also a human rights lawyer.
“I am coming to defend the rights of Abia people for quality education, good road; for the children to be well trained, for school teachers to have their salaries paid; pensioners have their gratuities and grants given to them and for Abia State to have an airport,” she said.
Johnson-Ogbuneke, who said she would make Abia to be an enviable state, said her plan was also to revamp agriculture and give a better healthcare system.
The Executive Director, Women Radio, Mrs Toun Sonaiya, said if 25 women can govern 25 states in the country, “peace will come back to Nigeria.”
According to her, if not for this programme, many do not know that we have about 25 candidates contesting for governorship elections.
She urged the media to always report the female candidates positively and give them more visibility.
“Please continue to report them until something happens. “Our women are ready and we should give them the support and encouragement,” Sonaiya urged
According to our source, the governorship candidates of the Allied People’s Movement (APM) in Kwara, Doborah Jaiyeola; APM candidate for Lagos State, Funmilayo Kupoluyi, were among others at the event.

Continue Reading

Politics

INEC Trains Political Parties Officials On ICNP Use Ahead By-Elections

Published

on

To enhance the capacity of political parties and minimise procedural errors in candidate nominations, the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) organised a two-day refresher training workshop on using its Candidate Nomination Portal (CNP) for party officials on Wednesday.
Held at the INEC Headquarters in Abuja, the training brought together key representatives from registered political parties, some of whom had previously been trained ahead of the 2023 general elections.
The workshop aimed to consolidate achievements from previous cycles and ensure a more efficient, transparent, and technologically seamless nomination process in preparation for upcoming by-elections and the Federal Capital Territory Area Council elections.
In her welcome address, the National Commissioner and Chairperson of the Legal Services, Clearance and Complaints Committee (LSC&CC), Mrs May Agbamuche-Mbu, emphasised the importance of accurate and timely nominations in the electoral process.
“Nomination of candidates is not only a statutory obligation as provided in Section 29 of the Electoral Act, 2022, but it is the very foundation upon which elections are conducted,” she stated, adding that “An error in the submission of personal particulars of candidates by political parties can be potentially detrimental to both the party and its candidate.”
She acknowledged that despite progress with the CNP in reducing paperwork and improving compliance, political parties still faced challenges such as incomplete form submissions, improper document attachments, and frequent turnover of personnel managing the nomination process.
“This refresher training is designed to bridge those gaps and ensure that both returning and newly appointed party officials have the knowledge and skills necessary for a smooth nomination process,” she said.
The Assistant Director in the Legal Drafting and Clearance Department, Mr Samuel Omale, outlined the purpose and strategic focus of the refresher training. According to him, the workshop was designed not just as a routine exercise, but as a timely intervention to deepen the capacity of political party officials ahead of upcoming FCT and by-elections.
“The objective,” he explained, “is to refresh political parties on the approved Guidelines for the Nomination of Candidates as outlined in the Electoral Act, 2022, while equipping them with practical knowledge of the nomination process.”
He further elaborated that the training sought to enhance parties’ familiarity with the Commission’s internal procedures, particularly through live demonstrations on how to make timely and correct submissions via the INEC Candidate Nomination Portal (ICNP).
In addition to addressing common areas of confusion and past mistakes, the sessions also provided space for open dialogue between the Commission and party representatives an opportunity to ask questions, seek clarifications, and find common ground.
Mr Omale expressed optimism about the expected outcomes of the exercise, citing better understanding of the portal, improved accuracy in submissions, and the establishment of a more collaborative framework between INEC and political parties as key deliverables.
“Ultimately,” he said, “this is about ensuring that we reduce errors and build confidence in the nomination process going forward.”
The initiative reaffirms INEC’s commitment to using technology to strengthen electoral integrity, improve compliance, and build capacity among political actors to ensure credible and inclusive elections.

 

Continue Reading

Politics

Natasha’s Counsel Writes Senate Over Court Judgment 

Published

on

The legal counsel to the Senator representing Kogi Central, Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan, has faulted the National Assembly’s interpretation of a Federal High Court’s judgment which ordered her reinstatement to the Senate, insisting that the judgment was binding and must be complied with in full.
In a rejoinder dated July 14, and addressed to the Director of Litigation and Counselling, Legal Services Directorate of the National Assembly, Mr Charles Yoila, Sen. Akpoti-Uduaghan’s legal team, led by  Mr Michael Numa (SAN), accused the Senate of misinterpreting the decision of the Federal High Court in Suit No: FHC/ABJ/CS/384/2025 — Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan v. Clerk of National Assembly & 3 Ors.
The lawyers responded to an earlier correspondence from the National Assembly dated the same day, in which the Senate purportedly treated the court’s judgment as advisory. They argued that the enrolled judgment was not suggestive, but declaratory and mandatory in nature.
“The preamble of the enrolled order begins with the words ‘it is hereby ordered’ and proceeds to enumerate 12 distinct and substantive orders,” the letter stated.
“Of particular relevance is Order 12 which directed that the Senate should recall the plaintiff. While the word ‘should’ is used, the context of the full judgment supports a binding construction”, it argued.
The legal team noted that the plaintiff had sought, among other reliefs, an order nullifying the recommendations and findings of the Senate Committee on Ethics, Privileges and Public Petitions, which had led to her suspension. They further referenced that the plaintiff’s application for a mandatory injunction was heard alongside the substantive matter and was incorporated into the composite judgment.
Referencing Order 4 of the enrolled judgment, Mr Numa maintained that the court had adjudged the suspension of Sen. Akpoti-Uduaghan as unconstitutional, excessive, and ultra vires.
He contended that, pursuant to Section 1(3) of the 1999 Constitution (as amended), the Senate’s action was null and void to the extent of its inconsistency with constitutional provisions.
The letter made reference to Section 287(3) of the Constitution, which mandates all authorities and persons to give effect to the decisions of courts. It also invoked Section 318, which defines a court decision to include judgment, decree, order, conviction, sentence, or recommendation.
To reinforce the legal position, the letter cited *Ecobank (Nig.) Ltd v. Tempo Energy (Nig.) Ltd* (2025) 9 NWLR (Pt. 1994) 125 at 144–145, where the Supreme Court held that recommendations arising from adjudicated disputes may constitute binding judicial acts.
“The judgment in this case falls squarely within the definition of enforceable judicial determinations,” Mr Numa argued, urging the Legal Services Directorate to revisit the enrolled order and advise the Senate to comply accordingly.
He emphasised that compliance with the judgment was not optional or discretionary, but a constitutional obligation binding on the Senate under the principle of separation of powers and judicial supremacy.
In a final note, the legal team informed the National Assembly that Sen. Akpoti-Uduaghan intends to resume her legislative duties on July 22, especially in light of the recent passing of former President Muhammadu Buhari, describing the development as a moment of national transition.
The letter concluded with a caution that the embattled senator reserves the right to pursue all legal avenues to enforce her rights should the Senate continue to defy the judgment.
This development sets the tone for a potential legal showdown between the judiciary and the legislature over the enforcement of court orders, especially in politically sensitive matters involving elected representatives.

 

Continue Reading

Politics

Alleged Money Laundering: Fayose Has No Case To Answer, Court Tells EFCC

Published

on

Justice Chukwujekwu Aneke of the Federal High Court, Ikoyi, Lagos, on Wednesday, discharged and acquitted former Ekiti State Governor, Mr Ayodele Fayose, of all charges bordering on alleged money laundering and theft amounting to N6.9 billion.
The court’s decision followed the judge’s ruling in favour of Mr Fayose’s no case submission, bringing to an end a long running legal battle.
It would be recalled that on May 20, 2025, Justice Aneke had reserved ruling on the no case submission after hearing arguments from Chief Kanu Agabi (SAN), counsel to Mr Fayose (the 1st defendant); Olalekan Ojo (SAN), counsel to the 2nd defendant, Spotless Investment Limited; and Rotimi Jacobs (SAN), representing the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC).
Mr Fayose and his company had been re-arraigned on an 11 count charge of money laundering and theft, offences the EFCC alleged took place during his tenure as governor and involved funds linked to the office of the former National Security Adviser (NSA), Col. Sambo Dasuki.
Adopting the no case submission dated July 16, 2025, Chief Agabi argued that the prosecution “failed to establish a prima facie case.”
He told the court, “With due respect, the predicate offences on which these charges are based do not hold water. Criminal breach of trust and conspiracy are distinct, and no co-conspirator was charged alongside the defendant.”
He further noted that Abiodun Agbele, allegedly involved in the offences, was not jointly tried, which he said weakened the prosecution’s case and urged the court to hold that Mr Fayose had no case to answer.
Counsel for the 2nd defendant, Olalekan Ojo (SAN), also adopted a no case submission dated March 21, 2025, pointing out that key evidence by prosecution witnesses had been discredited. He highlighted the testimony of the 13th prosecution witness, former Minister of State for Defence, Senator Musiliu Obanikoro, who admitted there was no communication between Mr Fayose and the then NSA.
However, the EFCC counsel, Mr Rotimi Jacobs (SAN), urged the court to dismiss the no case submissions. Adopting the commission’s counter affidavit and written address dated May 8, 2025, Jacobs argued that the defence failed to explain several suspicious transactions.
Mr Jacobs recalled evidence from EFCC investigator, Mr Abubakar Madaki, who told the court that Mr Fayose used associates to acquire multiple properties in Abuja, Lagos, and abroad—properties those associates later denied owning, but which Mr Fayose claimed in his statements.
“If the money was clean, why not buy the properties in his name?” Mr Jacobs asked.
Mr Jacobs also cited Sen. Obanikoro’s testimony that Mr Fayose requested funds in cash and introduced Mr Agbele to facilitate the handover, stressing that “the defendant has questions to answer.”
Delivering his verdict, Justice Aneke ruled that the EFCC failed to establish any prima facie case against Mr Fayose and could not provide concrete evidence linking him to the alleged crimes.

 

Continue Reading

Trending