Connect with us

Politics

RSHA And Task Of Debt Management

Published

on

The Rivers State Government recently obtained a revolving loan of N200bn from banks for project execution in the State, with a plan of repayment through Internally Generated Revenue on an agreed interest rate.

The decision of the State Government  is in apparent conformity with the desire of the Rivers State Governor, Rt Hon. Chibuike  Amaechi to complete all projects initiated by his administration. In seeking the loan through a request of  approval  by the State House of Assembly, the Governor explained that it does not imply that Rivers State was broke, rather it became  necessary to meet up targets by ensuring that money is not a constraint to speedy delivery  of ongoing projects.

In the course of its deliberation and subsequent approvals of the two loan  requests, the Rivers State House of Assembly, certified that the internally Generated Revenue, (IGR) profile of the state was buoyant enough to service  the loans on agreeable terms. The State lawmakers also consented to the necessity of the loan in view of the “many people oriented project embarked upon by the Governor”. The Assembly therefore gave the governor smooth ride to stave off all distractions through its legislative backing.

Pundits and virulent  critics of the Government has however expressed reservation over its decision to obtain the loans, referring to it as “a booby trap for fiscal impropriety and profligacy in the State”.

In the general estimation of analysts, the  propensity for loan is a predisposition to mortgaging the economic future of the state to serving of accruing interest of accumulated loans.

Analysts believes that Rivers State by all standard is disposed financially to carry out projects without recourse to borrowing, and as such accuse the State Assembly of a tacit connivance to squander the state resources.

But the Rivers State House of Assembly Stand by its decision and as a follow up is exploiting its legislative will to augment governments decision and to get it appropriately channeled  towards accountable  governance. Recently the State Assembly initiated a bold move to forestall the looming prospect of a debt burden for the State.

The initiative came at the instance of the leader of the  Assembly Hon Chidi Iloyd  through a privately sponsored  bill, calling  for the establishment of a debt management office in the state. The bill referred  to as “Rivers State Debt  management  office (Establishment)  bill 2011”, is an initiative of the Emohua  born lawmaker to strengthen the Rivers State Government on borrowing and debt  management  to forestall a crippling debt burden in the  State.

Introducing the bill on the floor of the House, Hon Chidi Iloyd, said “the law is to provide for the raising of loans through the issuance of bonds, notes and  other debt securities and for connected purposes”.

He said the bill when passed as law; “will serve as a legal framework to guide the government in the raising of bond and loan for pursuance of projects, building of infrastructure for the economic development of the State”.

Reacting to public criticism of the bill, Hon Chidi Iloyd denied allegations that the bill stands to institutionalized profligacy in the spending of public fund, by giving limitless powers to the Governor to Squander the state. Hon Ilyod said the bill was part of the process of consolidating the state revenue based.

The bill had undergone its first and second readings on the floor of the house and it is presently been debated upon by members of the state Assembly.

The bill which has 27 clauses and 28 citations, came under debate on the  floor of the House after members gave it  proper perusal and digesting it details for proper deliberation.

While the lawmakers appreciated the fact that Government’s decision to borrow, presupposes the fact that there must be proper management of the loan obtained for fiscal propriety in the state, some of them expressed reservation on the workability of the bill.

In his contribution on the floor of the House, Hon Victor Ihunwo representing Port Harcourt constituency III called for the withdrawal of the bill on the grounds that it demerits out-weights it merits. Hon Ihunwo reasoned that beyond creating employment opportunities for Rivers people, “the  bill did not  include how the debt management will brief the House periodically to avert  the temptation of borrowing  by subsequent governments. He also argued  that the state do not require more borrowing.

Debating on the issue, Hon Golden Chioma kicked against  the recommendation that the Rivers State Commissioner for finance should be the head of the debt management office.

He called for an independent chairman for the office arguing that the state commissioner for finance was already saddled with executive  functions. He called for  fresh  nominees to appear before the House for screening for appointment as directors of the debt management office, while the Hon Commissioner for finance, the secretary to the State Government, (SSG) and the Accountant  General of the state should  serve as members.

Hon Chioma who supported the bill, said it was in line with ‘the federal government act which made provision for the establishment of debt  management office” while calling for  the domestication of the bill in Rivers State, he  said the five years duration of tenure  recommended for the directorate  should be  reduced to four years.

Hon Ikunyi Ibani of Andoni Constituency, supported the bill and stated that “if the government is committed to borrowing  it should also have a modified  means of repayment.

He thanked the leader for sponsoring the bill and tasked the Assembly on the need  for proper  monitoring of the loan facilities.

His words: “If  the Assembly  has power  to grant the executive  request to borrow it also has the power to regulate  the mode of  repayment”. Hon  Ibani also suggested  that the debt management  office should be established as a department in the Rivers State Ministry of Finance.

Hon Augustine Ngo of Abua Odual constituency who also supported the bill said it was timely and also provided  the opportunity for “the Assembly to  put the records straight and wade off criticism and media hypes over alleged endorsement of profligacy in public spending”. Hon Ngo also shared the same view with Hon Chioma that the  directors should be fresh nominees to be screened by the Assembly.

Hon (Dr) Innocent Barikor of  Gokana Constituency also supported the bill on the ground that  it will check the tendency  of abuse of public fund. He said people with proven integrity and the right technical expertise  should be appointed in the directorate.

Also contributing, Hon Belema Okpokiri, of Okrika constituency said  the establishment of the debt management office was necessary but suggested  that “overriding powers should be vested in the Assembly on the activities of the office”.

Hon Michael Chinda representing Obio/Akpor Constituency I, described the establishment of the debt management office as “part of Government planning strategy on debt  management.”

Hon Chinda  called for the inclusion of a clause in the bill stipulating that  “all debts incurred by a particular government should be zeroed to bearest  minimum, by ensuring that all such debts are liquidated within the last lapse of the  administration.” He also suggested that the Attorney  General of the State should be a member of the board of directorate of the debt management office.

Hon Gift Nwokocha of Ogba Egbema Ndoni Constituency I, supported the bill and pointed out that, “issues of debt management is necessary but it is important to know when it is necessary for the state to borrow and when not to borrow”.

The deputy speaker of the State House of Assembly, Hon Leyii Kwane who presided over the session, said  the bill debated on the floor of the house was critical to the development  of the  state, and added that members  will be given  due opportunities to contribute on the issue.

The Rivers State debt management office (establishment) bill 2011, is the first privately sponsored  bill since the resumption, of the  7th  House of Assembly in Rivers State. Subsequent deliberation of the House will determine if the bill will scale through as law.

Taneh Beemene

Continue Reading

Politics

Reps Constitution Review Committee Holds Zonal Hearing For Rivers, C’River, Akwa Ibom In Calabar

Published

on

In a renewed effort to deepen Nigeria’s constitutional democracy, the House of Representatives Committee on the Review of the 1999 Constitution has announced the commencement of its Zonal and National Public Hearings across the country.

A press statement issued by the Chief Press Secretary to the Cross River State Governor, Mr Linus Obogo, disclosed that the Calabar Centre — designated as Centre B — will host representatives and stakeholders from Cross River, Rivers, and Akwa Ibom States.

The public hearing is scheduled to take place on Saturday, July 19, 2025, at 10:00 a.m. at the Transcorp (Metropolitan) Hotel, Calabar.

The initiative, according to the statement, is designed to promote inclusive dialogue and capture the aspirations of Nigerians from all regions.

It aims to serve as a platform for citizens to contribute meaningfully to the ongoing national efforts to refine and strengthen the country’s legal and institutional frameworks.

“Citizens, civil society groups, professional bodies, traditional rulers, and other interest blocs are invited to participate in this landmark engagement aimed at advancing a more just, equitable, and responsive Nigerian Constitution,” the statement read.

The hearing forms part of the broader review process of the 1999 Constitution (as amended), and is seen as a strategic move toward fostering national unity and addressing structural legal issues within the federation.

 

Continue Reading

Politics

Tinubu’s Contribution To Buhari’s Presidency Marginal – Ex-SGF

Published

on

Former Secretary to the Government of the Federation (SGF), Mr Boss Mustapha, has stirred fresh political controversy by dismissing claims that President Bola Tinubu was highly instrumental to former President Muhammadu Buhari’s emergence in 2015 after the merger of political parties that formed the All Progressives Congress (APC).

For the first time since 2022, when then-presidential aspirant Alhaji Bola Tinubu declared he made former President Buhari Nigeria’s President in 2015, Mr Mustapha dismissed the claims, stressing that the merger only contributed about three million votes in addition to Buhari’s existing 12 million votes in the North.

He insisted that former President Buhari’s integrity, national stature, and disciplined messaging were central to the breakthrough, not the three million votes from the merging parties, which he described as insignificant.

Speaking on the role of the merging parties, particularly President Tinubu, the leader of the Action Congress of Nigeria (ACN), Mr Mustapha, who was the keynote speaker at the launch of the book ‘According to the President: Lessons from a Presidential Spokesman’s Experience’ authored by Mallam Garba Shehu, described the impact of the votes from other merging parties as very insignificant.

In attendance were former Head of State Yakubu Gowon, chair of the event; immediate past Vice President Yemi Osinbajo; SGF George Akume, who represented President Tinubu; PDP’s 2023 presidential candidate Atiku Abubakar; former Chief of Staff to Buhari Ibrahim Gambari; elder statesman Babagana Kingibe; former governors Nasir El-Rufai (Kaduna), Kayode Fayemi (Ekiti), Chris Ngige (Anambra), Rauf Aregbesola (Osun), Raji Babatunde Fashola (Lagos); former ministers Solomon Dalung and Sunday Dare; former Army Chief Tukur Buratai, and Bayo Onanuga, President Tinubu’s spokesman, among others.

According to Mr Mustapha, “I do not intend to stir up any controversy. The merger in 2013 was midwifed to create a Buhari presidency. Let us look at the statistics. In the 2003 election, it was the Obasanjo-Buhari presidential contest where Buhari recorded 12.7 million votes. In 2007, it came to 6.6 million, and it went back to 12.2 million in 2011.

“When we were conceptualising the merger, what would give us a headstart? Obviously, it was at the back of our consciousness that the merger with the Congress for Progressive Change (CPC), though it had only one state, the ACN had six states, ANPP three states, and when you sum up the total votes that we had as the presidency in 2015, the aggregate of the total votes was 15.4 million.

“So, basically, what we brought to the table after the merger outside the Buhari 12.5 million votes was three million. Before turning to that presidency, it is important to recognise the former President’s role in reshaping Nigeria’s political trajectory.

“In early 2013, as the leader of the CPC, Buhari formally requested and supported the creation of a CPC merger committee, part of a broader coalition-building process that brought together the ACN, ANPP, APGA faction, and elements of the ruling party through the breakaway ‘new PDP’ group. His endorsement and participation, along with other party leaders such as President Tinubu and Senator Ali Modu Sheriff, lent credibility and direction to the merger, helping to unify disparate party factions under the banner of the APC. That coalition-building paved the way for the first democratic defeat of an incumbent ruling party in Nigeria’s history.

“President Buhari’s integrity, national stature, and disciplined messaging were central to that breakthrough. No account of President Buhari’s tenure would be complete without acknowledging the extended periods he spent on medical leave. These moments, while politically delicate, were also telling of his leadership philosophy and personality,” he said.

In his remarks, President Tinubu promised to build on the legacies of former President Buhari, stressing that “nation-building is a relay. The efforts of one administration lay the foundation for the next.

“In this regard, I acknowledge the efforts of my predecessor, President Buhari, and assure all Nigerians that the reform-oriented path he initiated will be consolidated and strengthened under this administration. Our Renewed Hope Agenda is inspired by the desire to build a resilient, just, and inclusive Nigeria—a nation that delivers dividends of democracy to all its citizens”.

Continue Reading

Politics

Your Lies Chasing Investors From Nigeria, Omokri Slams Obi

Published

on

Former Presidential aide, Mr Reno Omokri, has accused Labour Party’s 2023 presidential candidate, Mr Peter Obi, of spreading false information about Nigeria’s debt profile, claiming it is deterring foreign investors from the country.

Speaking during an appearance on live television on Wednesday, Mr Omokri alleged that Mr Obi’s statements were misleading and damaging to the country’s economic prospects.

Mr Omokri said some investors currently operating in Nigeria were considering exiting the market due to Mr Obi’s remarks.

“That is not true. He doesn’t rile me up. I rile him up. The reason why I came here is because I’m a patriot. Peter Obi lied. You know, foreign direct investors are watching your programme, who are making investment decisions not to come to Nigeria. There are foreign investors in Nigeria that are making investment decisions to leave Nigeria because of the lie he told.

“One of the lies he told is that President Tinubu has borrowed more than the administrations of Yar’Adua, Jonathan, Buhari. That is a blatant lie”, Mr Omokri said.

To buttress his claims, Mr Omokri referenced figures from the Debt Management Office (DMO), maintaining that President Tinubu had actually reduced Nigeria’s external debt burden since assuming office.

“I have here with me data from the Debt Management Office, and Nigerians who are watching can go to DMO.com and search Debt Management Office, Nigeria State of Indebtedness 2015.

“As of 2015, Nigeria was owing a total of $63 billion. When Buhari was leaving office, Nigeria was owing $113 billion. Today, from the DMO, our debt has gone from $113 billion to $97 billion, meaning that Tinubu has reduced our debt by over $14 billion.

“We should be appreciating this man. Yet Peter Obi came here and lied to the Nigerian people. He took the debts and translated them into naira to make it look like the debts have increased”, he said.

 

Continue Reading

Trending