Connect with us

Business

Petroleum Industry Governance Bill 2017 (As Passed By The Senate)

Published

on

The Nigeria Petroleum Industry Legislation Explanatory Memorandum for Governance & Institutional Reforms

Background and Introduction
This executive summary note narrates the principles and intent of the 2015 Petroleum Industry Legislation being prepared by the Technical Committee for submission to the National Assembly.
The Technical Committee mandates include:
a. Review the Oil and Gas Policy approved in 2007, for appropriateness;
b. Review all available materials and information of the past reforms the Petroleum Industry Bill (PIB) 2008, 2012 and in addition to the PIB version passed by the House of Representatives in May 2015;
c. Consult and engage as necessary;
d. Debrief relevant authorities as frequently as needed to ensure alignment and adequate guidance; and
e. Redraft, present and commence submission of the PIB 2015, ensuring alignment with the Policy.
It was expedient to go back and review the circumstances that led to the inability to establish an acceptable document and to enact the intended Petroleum Industry Bill in the past, which suffered a multiplicity of assaults from various players/stakeholders
To arrive at the present proposition for the Petroleum Industry legislation-2015, this committee has employed thorough review of past documents, made comparative review of similar and competitive jurisdictions, and ensured international best practices in content and in style.
1.1 Role of Petroleum to National Growth and Development
Oil and gas have been, and will remain for years to come, Nigeria’s most important non-renewable energy source, currently contributing over 90% of country’s foreign exchange earnings and about 80% of recurrent and capital expenditure. The industry is therefore critical to the economic and social development of Nigeria.
While the government’s vision and aspiration continue to target diversification of the economy, the petroleum sector remains the primary source of revenues to make that happen as well as sustain the country for the foreseeable future.
Nigeria currently produces about 2 million barrels of light, sweet quality crude oil per day, still the largest in Sub-Saharan Africa. It has proven oil plus condensate reserves of about 37 billion barrels. Both current oil production and reserves are far short of growth levels envisaged in the Vision 20:2020.
Similarly, Nigeria produces approximately 8 bcf of gas daily of which some 50% goes for export while 13% (mainly associated gas) is flared. Natural gas reserves are substantial at about 183 trillion cubic feet (TCF), representing 3 percent of the world’s total. Incidentally, gas is also not sufficiently addressed in the existing petroleum industry legislation.
History of Petroleum Sector Regulation
The history of petroleum legislations may be classified into three periods:-
a) Pre- colonial, under the British Colony, giving authority to the “Crown” for issuance of licences and taxation under the Minerals Ordinance Act of 1914;
b) Post Independence Nigeria, (1960-1971), whereby only taxes were paid by companies involved in petroleum operations; and,
c) Since joining the Organisation of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) in 1971, that created the enabling environment for greater involvement by the Government, taking equity in petroleum assets and in operations, and as a prelude, ushered authority from 1969 of the Minister to create an Inspectorate Unit in the then Ministry of Mines & Power, as well as promulgate rules and regulations for the sector.
This authority was upped by the 1977 legislation creating a commercial entity, the Nigerian National Corporation (NNPC), alongside with the Department of Inspectorate, renamed, the Department of Petroleum Resources (DPR), under the office of the Minister in 1991.
Since then, petroleum sector realised several ad-hoc legislations mostly on need basis without necessarily checking alignment with existing ones.
As at today, our nation is in energy crisis. There has been a sustained imbalance between domestic Supply and Demand, not arising from lack of endowed energy resources but from inability to manage our resources efficiently. We still import today over 90% of needed petroleum products (petrol and chemicals), flare substantial gas produced, have damaged our eco-systems and polluted our communities and cannot supply adequate electricity to homes and industry. This situation has undermined our citizens’ standard of living, life expectancy, our national energy security and has resulted to other unforeseen fall-outs like: labour unrest; fuel queues; high cost of delivery of products; high cost of delivery of overall services in the total economy; and a share waste of unquantifiable productivity.
The Existing joint ventures (JVs) and PSCs fiscal policies, require review with respect to “windfall profits” to private companies based on incentives that have distorted normal market economics as well as need harmonisation because they are dispersed along the nature or type of product, company or project specific. In doing so, the indigenous “Sole Risk”/ independent players, should command attention under the nations priority policy that ensures indigenous capacity expansion in the petroleum value chain in Nigeria.
The subsisting primary legislation that governed Oil & Gas in Nigeria are:
A. The Petroleum Act, which came into force on 27th November 1969 and has been amended severally. From it , there exist subsidiary legislations (Regulations), as well as other related international Treaties. Accordingly, there are approximately 70 principal Legislations and 30 Regulations that govern the petroleum sector of Nigeria.
The following regulations, amongst others are subsidiary to the Petroleum Act:
• Mineral Oils (Safety) Regulations, Statutory Instrument 1963 No. 45;
• Petroleum (Drilling and Production) Regulations, Statutory Instrument 1969 No. 69;
• Crude Oil(Transportation and Shipment) Regulations, Statutory Instrument 1984 No. 1984;
• The Oil Pipelines Act 1956;
• The Oil Terminal Dues Act 1969;
• The Associated Gas Re-injection Act 1979
• the Associated Gas Re-injection (and Flaring of Gas) Regulations 1979(as amended)
B. The Petroleum Profits Tax (PPT) Act, which came into force on 1st January 1958, and has been amended many times. Its main purpose was to provide for the assessment and imposition of a tax upon the profits of enterprises engaged in the development and production of petroleum in Nigeria.
Some of the amendments include;
• The Deep Offshore and Inland Basin Production Sharing Contracts Act 1999 No. 9 (as amended);
• Various incentives under the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) of 1986, 1991 and 2000, that were NOT enacted but put in place and implemented by the Tax authorities;
C. The separation or distinction of crude oil and natural gas fiscal structure can be said to have begun with the introduction of incentives terms under the Associated Gas Framework Agreement (AGFA) of 1991. The terms promulgated under AGFA, as a policy and in context, attempted to further differentiate between Associated Gas (AG) and Non-Associated Gas (NAG). The existing legislations and fiscal incentives pertaining to gas are those of:
• The Nigerian Liquefied Natural Gas Act No 39, 1990;
• The Finance (Miscellaneous Taxation Provisions) Act No. 18, 1998 (Amendment to Petroleum Profits Tax Act);
• The Finance (Miscellaneous Taxation Provisions) Act No. 19, 1998 (Amendment to the Petroleum Profits Tax Act)
3. The Nigeria Petroleum Industry Reforms
Recognizing the positive contribution of the oil and gas industry to the Nigerian economy, the real and potential losses due to successive mismanagement of the sector, the Federal Government of Nigeria (FGN) launched a process of broad sector reform which commenced in the year 2000.
The reform was meant to put in place an updated Nigeria Oil and Gas Policy as well as a legislative framework (Petroleum Industry Act) to enhance delivery of the sector objectives with emphasis on complete overhaul of the Nigeria petroleum industry, reforming the operational mechanisms for the upstream, downstream and natural gas sectors, redefinition of the roles and responsibilities of key institutions, enhancement of performance, accountability and transparency, (Governance), licensing and acreage management, bringing operations in line with international standards and, not least, improve on tax codes for both oil and gas.
Although the issues involved are complex, their resolution can be expected to have significant implications for investment flows, industry activity, and government revenues.
The overriding objective of the National Oil and Gas policy was “to maximise the net economic benefit to the nation from oil and gas resources and to enhance the social and economic development of the people while meeting the nation’s needs for fuels at a competitive cost, accomplishing all in an environmentally acceptable manner”.
Maximisation of the net economic benefit would include additions through appropriate fiscal regimes, sustained profitability of the sector, delivery of growth commercial activities, active local content policy and the development of improved direct linkages between the oil sector and the other sectors of the Nigerian economy.
4. The Nigeria Petroleum Industry Bill (PIB)
The Nigeria Petroleum Industry Bill (PIB), has been around in one form or the other since 2008 when it was first introduced. During the 7th National Assembly, additional efforts were made to pass the 2012 version of the PIB but it unfortunately was unsuccessful, similar to attempts at prior parliamentary sessions.
Continuous stalling and delay in passage to law has hampered investments, keeping the country’s future in limbo and denying Nigeria the unique opportunity as oil and gas leader in Sub Sahara Africa.
Specifically, the main objectives remain relatively the same, spanning the spectrum of the industry to:-
1. Enhance exploration and exploitation of petroleum resources;
2. Significantly increase domestic gas supplies especially for power generation and industrial development;
3. Create a peaceful business environment that enables petroleum operations;
4. Establish a fiscal framework that is flexible, stable, progressive and competitively attractive;
5. Create a commercially viable National Oil Company;
6. Deregulate downstream petroleum business;
7. Create efficient regulatory entity;
8. Engender transparency and accountability;
9. Promote active Nigerian Content and make Nigeria the hub of the western African petroleum province, and
10. Promote and protect Health Safety and Environment.
Apart from content issues with prior versions, one of the major drawbacks to passage was the bogus packaging of the PIB as a single legal instrument.
Consequently, although this 2015 attempt contains enhanced quality work on content, the bill has been split into logical smaller pieces for submission to the 8th National Assembly, a complete departure from all prior efforts.
This way, the pieces can be expeditiously considered and passed one after the other. And where amendments are required in the future, the relevant piece can be separately considered rather than opening up the whole Act for review.
Accordingly, the following pieces of legislation will be considered for the Nigeria Petroleum Industry Bill – 2015.
1. Petroleum Industry (Governance & Institutional Reforms) Bill
2. Petroleum Industry (Upstream Petroleum Administration Reforms) Bill
3. Petroleum Industry (Downstream Petroleum Administration Reforms) Bill
4. Petroleum Industry (Fiscal Framework & Reforms) Bill
5. Petroleum Industry (Revenue Management Reforms) Bill.
A. Petroleum Industry (Governance & Institutional Reforms) Bill
A1.0 Principles & Structure
It is widely acknowledged that major reforms in the governance and institutional structure for the sector are necessary and urgent.
A major drawback of the existing framework is the lack of clarity of roles, self- regulation, conflicts and unnecessary overlaps.
For example, while the Minister is in charge of the Ministry of Petroleum Resources, and indirectly supervises the Department of Petroleum Resources (supposed to be an independent regulator), he is also the Chairman of the Board of the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC) by law.
The minister therefore operates in a quasi- executive capacity across all facets of government involvement in the industry giving ample room for sustained failures in governance and performance.
In addition, and in particular, the country is being robbed of huge revenues as a result of mismanagement of the NNPC, the intrusive control of the government in the affairs of the corporation, the confusion with the regulator as well as funding difficulties. These continue revenues are needed primarily to grow the sector as well as support the much talked about diversification of the economy.
The key objectives of the Petroleum Industry (Governance & Institutional Reforms) Bill are to:-
a) Create efficient and effective governing institutions with clear and separate roles for the petroleum industry;
b) Establish a framework for the creation of commercially oriented and profit driven petroleum entities that ensures value addition and internationalization of the petroleum industry;
c) promote transparency in the administration of the petroleum resources of Nigeria;
d) create a conducive business environment for petroleum industry operations.
In defining the new petroleum industry institutional landscape, the following principles were used to guide the overall framework:-
a) Clear delineation of government roles and responsibilities across the industry (Policy formulation, Regulatory oversight and Commercial operations);
b) Simple and lean structure, devoid of unnecessary overlaps;
c) Streamline the coordination role of the Minister;
d) Creation of a single strong industry regulator;
e) Unbundling of the existing NNPC to two Commercial entities limited by shares – the NOC, and the National Assets Management Company;
f) Ensuring strong governance, transparency and accountability in all institutions.
Based on these principles, the institutions proposed in the Petroleum Industry (Governance & Institutional Reforms) Bill are as follows:-
1) The minister, who shall be responsible for policy formulation and coordinating the affairs of the petroleum industry on behalf of the Federal Government.
2) The Petroleum Regulatory Commission, who shall be the industry regulator and watchdog, responsible for licensing, monitoring, supervision of petroleum operations, enforcing laws, regulations and standards across the value chain.
3) The National Petroleum Company, who will operate as a commercial entity, fully integrated across the value chain.
4) The National Assets Management Company, who shall ensure maximum value for the federation through prudent management of the federation’s oil and gas investments in assets where government is relieved of upfront funding obligations; eg. PSC assets.
These institutions constitute the key structures necessary to assure effective governance and efficiency of the petroleum industry. It is recognised however that the following agencies do exist and contribute in one way or the other to the running of the industry.
1. The Nigerian Content Development &Monitoring Board (NCDMB) whose Act came into effect in April 2011 and already undergoing some amendment, hence remain as is.
2. The Petroleum Technology Development Fund (PTDF) has responsibility for providing funds for human capacity development in the industry. A separate bill has been developed for this to institute appropriate legislative framework which was never in place.
A2.0 Institutions, Roles, Governance and Controls
In line with the proposed structure of the industry, mandates, deliverables and control mechanisms, in particular for the effective governance of the various institutions are clarified in greater detail in the Bill.
This narrative simply provides high level characteristics of each of the new institutions proposed in the Petroleum Industry (Governance & Institutional Reforms) Bill.
A2.1 The Minister
The Minister of Petroleum Resources will exercise general coordination powers and provide full diplomatic cover on all petroleum-related matters on behalf of the country.
A2.1.1 Mandates
Specifically, the Minister shall:-
a) Be responsible for the determination, formulation and monitoring of government policy for the petroleum industry in Nigeria;
b) Exercise general coordination over the affairs and operations of the petroleum industry subject to the provisions of this Act;
c) Report developments in the petroleum industry to the Federal Executive Council;
d) Advise the Government on all matters pertaining to the petroleum industry;
e) Represent Nigeria at meetings of international organisations that are primarily concerned with the petroleum industry;
f) Negotiate and execute international petroleum treaties and agreements with other sovereign countries, international organizations and other similar bodies on behalf of the government
g) Promote the strategic interest of Nigeria in the global oil and gas industry.
The Minister will be empowered to source professional support on fixed term basis as needed without drawing resources from the regulatory authority (e.g the DPR) or the National Oil Company (e.g. the NNPC) as currently is the case.
Consideration was given to creating a new institution within the ministry to cater for this but was subsequently discarded as it does not fit with the civil service framework.
A2.1.2 Funding
Funding of the office of the Minister shall be by appropriation by the National Assembly.
A2.2 The Petroleum Regulatory Commission
A single and one stop shop Petroleum Regulatory Commission is hereby proposed for the petroleum industry, consolidating such roles currently largely resident in the Department of Petroleum Resources (DPR), the Petroleum Products Pricing Regulatory Agency (PPPRA), and some environmental regulations driven by the National Oil Spill and Detection Agency (NOSDRA).
A2.2.1 Mandates
The core mandates of the Commission are as follows:-
a. Promote the healthy, safe and efficient conduct of all petroleum operations;
b. Promote the efficient, safe, effective and sustainable infrastructural development of the petroleum industry;
c. Ensure compliance with all applicable laws and regulations governing the petroleum industry;
d. Determine and ensure the implementation and maintenance of technical standards, codes and specifications applicable to the petroleum industry;
e. Subject to the provisions of this Act, execute government policies for the petroleum industry assigned to it by the minister;
f. Promote an enabling environment for investments in the petroleum industry;
g. Ensure that regulations are fair and balanced for all classes of lessees, licensees, permit holders, consumers and other stakeholders; and
h. Implement such other objectives as are consistent with the provisions of this Act.
In addition to the above and other roles detailed out in the bill, it shall:-
i. Undertake and promote the exploration of the frontier basins of Nigeria.
j. Develop exploration strategies and portfolio management for the exploration of unassigned frontier acreages in Nigeria;
k. Identify opportunities and increase information about the petroleum resources base within all frontier acreages in Nigeria;
l. Undertake studies, analyse and evaluate all unassigned frontier acreages in Nigeria.
Detailed tasks, responsibilities and deliverables are listed in the Bill.
A2.2.2 Governance & Controls
The size and powers of the commission requires effective governance and controls to assure delivery as envisaged, in addition to reducing abuse to the absolute minimum.
At the same time, there is need to ensure maximum independence of the new Nigeria Petroleum Regulatory Commission and limit political interference in particular on technical decisions.
To this end, the Commission is proposed to be governed by a 9-man board comprised of politically autonomous individuals with proven integrity, relevant competencies and experience to effectively deliver on core functions.
These are:
a) A non-executive chairman;
b) One non-executive commissioner;
c) The executive vice chairman, who shall also be the accounting officer of the Commission;
d) Three executive commissioners;
e) A representative of the Ministry of Petroleum Resources who shall not be below the rank of Director;
f) A representative of the ministry of finance who shall not be below the rank of director;
g) A representative of the ministry of environment who shall not be below the rank of director;
All appointments shall be made by the president and confirmed by the senate. It is expected that the board will operate outside the 4-year electoral cycle to safeguard continuity.
The Board shall:-
a) Be responsible for the general direction and supervision of the commission;
b) Oversee the operations of the commission;
c) Provide general guidelines for the carrying out of the functions of the commission;
d) Review and approve the business, strategic and operating plans of the commission;
e) Consider and approve the budget of the commission and monitor its performance;
f) Approve the audited and management accounts of the commission and undertake consideration of the management letter from the external auditors;
g) Determine the terms and conditions of service of employees of the commission;
h) Stipulate remuneration, allowances, benefits and pensions of staff and employees of the commission in consultation with the National Salaries, Incomes and Wages Commission;
i) Structure the commission into such number of departments as it deems fit for the effective discharge of the functions of the commission; and
j) Carry out such other functions and undertake such other activities which in the opinion of the board, are necessary to ensure the efficient and effective administration of the commission in accordance with the provisions of this Act or as may be delegated to the commission by the minister.

To be contd

Continue Reading

Business

NCDMB, Dangote Refinery Unveil JTC On Deepening Local Content

Published

on

The Nigerian Content Development and Monitoring Board (NCDMB) and the Dangote Petroleum Refinery and Petrochemical Company have inaugurated a Joint Technical Committee (JTC) aimed at advancing local content implementation during the operational phase of the 650,000 barrels per day  plant.
A statement from the Directorate of Corporate Communications of the Board noted that the inauguration ceremony took place at the Dangote Free Trade Zone, Ibeju-Lekki, Lagos State.
The statement also said the inauguration marks a pivotal moment in fostering strategic collaboration between the both institutions, and was a significant move to reinforce local content development in the oil and gas sector.
Presided over by the Executive Secretary of the NCDMB, Engr. Felix Omatsola Ogbe, and the Group Vice President, Oil and Gas, Dangote Group, Chief Edwin Devakumar, the event featured the formal sign-off of the Committee’s Terms of Reference (ToR), a guided tour of the refinery, other critical facilities, and the official commencement of the JTC’s responsibilities.
According to the Board, the visit also featured the presentation of the certificate of the Nigerian Content Downstream Operator of the Year Award won by the Dangote Petroleum Refinery and Petrochemical Company at the inaugural ‘Champions of Nigerian Content Awards’ held recently in May.
The NCDMB’s boss made the presentation to the President of the Dangote Group, Alhalji Aliko Dangote, who expressed delight at the recognition, noting that he would display the certificate proudly at his office.
Ogbe congratulated the Dangote Group on the successful development and commissioning of the largest single train refinery in the world, as well as petrochemical and fertiliser plants, describing the projects as a historic milestone not for Nigeria alone, but for the entire continent.
He emphasized that the Dangote Refinery stands as a testament to the success of the Nigerian Oil and Gas Industry Content Development (NOGICD) Act of 2010 and the transformative potential of Nigerian-led industrial projects.
“At an optimal daily production capacity of 650,000 barrels, this refinery will significantly enhance Nigeria’s energy security and contribute to the supply of refined petroleum products across West Africa.
“Nigerians, have to own the plant, we have to make sure that the plant works well. We have to secure it, we have to maintain it. The NCDMB would continue to collaborate with Dangote Petroleum Refinery”, Engr  Ogbe said.
Highlighting the need to ensure more value retention in the sector, as mandated by the Nigerian Oil and Gas Industry Content Development Act (NOGICD) 2010, the Board’s helmsman demanded compliance with Sections 32 and 33 of the NOGICD Act, with particular reference to local manpower utilization and requirements for NCDMB’s approval prior to the engagement of expatriates.
“The NOGICD Act stipulates that no expatriate can be employed in any organization in the oil and gas industry without the prior approval of the NCDMB. We will work with you, We’ve to protect jobs for Nigerians. It’s critical to job creation, skills development, and national capacity building in line with the ‘Renewed Hope Agenda’ of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu”, he said.
He commended the firm for training and employing Nigerian engineers, saying the collaboration will ensure that qualified Nigerians were given opportunities across all operational roles, while also urging the Dangote Petroleum Refinery and Petrochemicals to support the Board’s initiative which aims at developing oil and gas industrial parks across the country to foster local content and manufacturing in the sector.
He noted that the Nigerian Oil and Gas Parks Scheme (NOGaPS) seeks to create an enabling environment for Small and Medium Enterprises in the sector.
“NOGaPS was conceived by the Board to develop facilities close to oil fields where manufacturing of oil and gas components, as well as research and development, can be carried out.
“We would like Dangote to support one of our major activities, which is the oil and gas industrial parks scheme. The parks are aimed at creating an enabling environment for SMEs in the industry to do fabrications and create more jobs for Nigerians”, the NCDMB’S boss stated.
In his welcome address, the Dangote Group Vice President, Devakumar, highlighted that the refinery project and NCDMB have been working together, promoting local content development during the construction stages of the project.
“We can’t say we have achieved everything, because there is opportunity to do more. We’re grateful to the NCDMB for all their support and advice.  As entrepreneurs, we’re trying to optimise costs. It’s a Nigerian company, it’s also an entrepreneur-driven company. As a Nigerian company, the focus will be on Nigerian content. As an entrepreneur-driven company, it will be cost-focused”, he noted.
Devakumar underscored the long-standing commitment of the Dangote Group to national development and capacity building, saying that the Group’s vision is to grow Nigeria’s industrial landscape.
High points of the visit, according to the Corporate Communications Directorate of the NCDMB, was the inauguration of the Committee members.
The statement from the NCDMB further added that the committee is to ensure the implementation of local content in the refinery’s operations, while its core objectives include promoting the use of Nigerian skilled manpower, services, and locally sourced materials in compliance with Section 3 of the NOGICD Act.
The Tide learnt that the committee will also support Dangote Refinery in aligning its operational procedures with the Act’s requirements.
In his acceptance remarks, Director of Corporate Services at NCDMB and Chairman of the Committee, Mr. Abdulmalik Halilu, expressed gratitude to the leadership of both organizations, reiterating the Committee’s dedication to upholding the highest standards of local content enforcement and fostering measurable outcomes that will benefit the nation’s economy.
Continue Reading

Business

Industry Leaders Defend Local Content,  … Rally Behind NCDMB 

Published

on

Nigeria’s Oil and Gas industry leaders have defended the Nigerian local content policy, rejecting claims that it inflates business costs in the oil and gas sector.
The leaders, who made the defence during the recent Nigerian Oil and Gas (NOG) Energy week held in Abuja, the nation’s capital, cautioned that such criticisms jeopardizes the nation’s industrial progress.
They lauded the Nigerian Content Development and Monitoring Board (NCDMB), for what they described as its pivotal role in building indigenous capacity and fostering innovation.
In a panel session titled “Technology as a Business Strategy”, panellists championed NCDMB’s contributions, emphasizing its success in driving local expertise and technological advancement.
In his remarks, Group Chief Executive Officer of Pana Holdings, Dr. Daere Akobo, dismissed critics of local content, arguing that its benefits to Nigeria’s economy far outweighs any perceived cost increases.
“Claims that local content drives up costs are misguided. How can you prioritize cost over GDP growth? Where will our youth find jobs?  Undermining local content for short-term gains is a mistake. Nigeria must stay the course”, he said.
He highlighted his company’s work on Africa’s first digital refinery, a pioneering project showcasing the synergy between technology and local content, and also identified fragmented data in Nigeria’s oil and gas sector as a key barrier to cost efficiency.
Akono said, “Technology drives accountability and curbs cost inflation. But our data remains siloed. Consolidation is critical for industry efficiency.”
Also speaking, Managing-Director of Coleman Cables and Wires, Mr. George Onafowokan, praised NCDMB’s data-driven approach, crediting it for significant strides in local content development.
“Data is the backbone of growth. Effective data collection and accessibility are vital. Thanks to NCDMB, we’ve achieved 52% local content—a remarkable milestone”, he said.
The panellists unanimously agreed that integrating technology, consolidating data, and strengthening institutions like NCDMB are critical to building a resilient and competitive oil and gas sector.
He urged policymakers, operators, and international stakeholders to reject narratives blaming local content for rising costs and rather advocate for robust frameworks and investments to drive inclusive growth and long-term industry stability.
Similarly, speaking at the NOG week, representatives from Ghana, and other African nations have underscored the growing influence of Nigeria’s local content framework and urged stronger cross-border policy alignment.
In his remark, NCDMB’S pioneer Executive Secretary, Ernest Nwapa, highlighted the Nigerian oil and gas sector’s resurgence, saying it is driven by increased production, deregulation, and improved governance, while also emphasizing the need for long-term sustainability to sustain the momentum.
“Africa is a cornerstone of Nigeria’s foreign policy. Initiatives like the West African and African Gas Pipelines, the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA), and President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s ‘Nigeria First, Africa Next’ strategy are evidences of Nigeria’s continental commitment.
“When Nigeria enacted its local content law, it faced Western criticism from bodies like the WTO and EU, who labelled it anti-trade. Today, over 16 African nations and even the United States have adopted similar laws. Nigeria must lead again, driving investments that benefit the entire continent”, he said.
In similar vein, Deputy Chief Executive of the Petroleum Commission of Ghana, Nasir Alfa Mohamed, noted that African nations have long looked to Nigeria for energy sector leadership, calling for the dismantling of barriers to regional integration and advocated for standardized regulations.
“A Ghanaian company should be able to compete for contracts in Nigeria based solely on merit. We need joint regulatory bodies, mutual recognition of standards, and robust support for platforms like the African Oil Forum”, he noted.
Mohamed also highlighted Ghana’s growing partnerships with Nigeria and others, including a memorandum of understanding with Uganda, noting that Ghana is currently the only African nation participating in the International Upstream Forum.
In his speech, Authority Chief Executive of the Nigerian Midstream and Downstream Petroleum Regulatory Authority (NMDPRA), Engr. Farouk Ahmed, represented by Prof. Zainab Gobir, stressed the importance of joint infrastructure, uniform tariffs, and coordinated regulations for true economic integration.
“We must uphold our sustainability commitments and support each other in meeting them.
“The Petroleum Industry Act (PIA) is a model, particularly its Midstream and Downstream Gas Infrastructure Fund, designed to de-risk investments in gas and infrastructure projects. We collaborate closely with NCDMB to strengthen local content, ensuring regulations support fair participation”, he said.
Meanwhile, Chief Executive of the Nigerian Upstream Petroleum Regulatory Commission (NUPRC), Engr. Gbenga Komolafe, has reaffirmed the nation’s strategic role in regional energy cooperation, noting that the country accounts for nearly 30% of Africa’s oil reserves and 33% of its gas.
“Our host community development model is a success, fostering stability in oil-producing regions and serving as a blueprint for others”, Komolafe said.
He highlighted the NUPRC’s 17 forward-looking regulations and new frameworks for deepwater development, alongside a production optimization programme built on inter-agency and operator collaboration.
The NUPRC boss also praised President Tinubu’s recent Executive Order, which he said enhances local content laws by prioritizing human capacity development and boosting investor confidence.
“International oil companies now recognize Nigeria’s robust local expertise, making it a key investment draw. We’re exporting our local content model to other African nations”, he said.
Ariwera Ibibo-Howells, Yenagoa
Continue Reading

Business

Replace Nipa Palms With Mangroove In Ogoni, Group Urges FG, HYPREP

Published

on

A concerned group of stakeholders under the auspices of Khana Coastal Communities has made a passionate appeal to the Federal Ministry of Environment and the Hydrocarbon Remediation Restoration Project (HYPREP) to include the removal of Nipa palms which has taken over the positions of mangroves in the area as part of the ongoing Ogoni Clean Up Exercise.
The group, which decried the invasive and destructive effects of Nypa fructicans, commonly known as Nipa palms, on the ecosystem of the affected communities, made their appeal in a Press Statement issued shortly after the  inspection and survey of the creeks and coastlines of  affected communities.
The communities are Kwiri, Kereken, Kaa, Gwara, Sii, Kpean, Tehnnama, Bane, Kalaoku, and Opuoku, all in Khana Local Government Area of Ogoni, Rivers State.
Signed on behalf of the affected communities by comrades Emmanuel Goteh Bie, Raymond Nwibani, and Chief Barineka Tonwe, the statement emphasized the need for urgent intervention to clear the Nypa fructicans and replace them with mangroves which provided sustainable habitat for aquatic species in the affected communities.
The group commended the Federal Ministry of Environment and HYPREP for their commitment to the Ogoni cleanup process and urged all stakeholders involved in the process not to renege on their complementary roles.
The statement read in part: “As you have seen, the Nypa fructicans has taken over our creeks, displacing native mangroves and aquatic life. The impact on our communities has been severe, with many of our people struggling to make a living due to the depletion of fish and other aquatic resources.
“We commend the Hydrocarbon Pollution Remediation Project (HYPREP) for its efforts in restoring native mangroves in Ogoni, particularly in the Bomu Community. However, we are alarmed by the unintended consequences of removing invasive Nypa fructicans, which has led to the disappearance of fish and aquatic life, threatening the livelihoods of our coastal communities.
“We believe that the removal of Nypa fructicans and replanting of native mangroves will help revive our aquatic life and sustain the livelihoods of our people.”
The group passed a vote of confidence on the Minister of Environment, Balarabe Abbas, and HYPREP Coordinator, Prof. Nenibarini Zabbey, for what it described as their unwavering efforts in ensuring the success of the Ogoni cleanup exercise.
They  called on the Federal Government to release their counterpart funding to HYPREP without delay to sustain the pace of progress recorded in the clean up process.
“The cleanup exercise is commendable, and any delay in funding could stall the progress and undermine the efforts of all stakeholders. We urge the government to prioritize the Ogoni cleanup exercise and provide the necessary support to ensure its success”, they stated.
They also used the opportunity to caution against the antics of self-inflicted activists or bodies that might attempt to hijack the cleanup agenda and create unnecessary agitation, and assured the total support of the affected  communities to HYPREP’s activities to enhance the holistic success of the Ogoni clean up exercise.
Bemene Taneh
Continue Reading

Trending