Connect with us

Oil & Energy

PIB: Eight Years In Limbo

Published

on

President Muhammadu Buhari and Senate President Bukola Saraki

President Muhammadu Buhari and Senate President Bukola Saraki

When President
Umaru Yar’adua, of blessed memory, assumed office in 2007, the unending crisis rocking the nation’s oil sector, could be said to be at its peak.
He was welcome into office by a turmoil occasioned by mass protest over an overnight and unwarranted increase in the pump prices of petroleum products, inherited from his predecessor, ex-president Olusegun Obasanjo.
As expected of a leader who has the feelings of the people at heart, Yar’Adua, reverted the new pump price to normal, rendering the land mine on his administration impotent, and the masses, ended the protest.
But, he also had the problem of the then Niger Delta militancy (the freedom fighters as they chose to be called), confronting him. There is no gain saying the fact that the colossal destruction caused by the activities of the Niger Delta militants on the nation’s oil and gas infrastructure in the region, brought Nigeria’s economy on its knees.
Again, as expected of a peaceful and caring leader, Yar’Adua intrdocued his famous Amnesty Initiative.  Consequent upon this, the staccato sounds of the militants’ guns and the booms of their bombs stopped thereby giving way for peace.
Apparently, after giving a deep thought on the oil sector, considering the fact that it is the lifewire of the nation’s economy, Yar’Adua initiated the Petroleum Industry Bill (PIB) as a master plan towards bringing sanity in the sector.
The PIB which Yar’Adua presented to the National Assembly as Executive Bill in 2008 stirred up wide jubilation amongst natives of oil-bearing communities because it promised them 20 per cent of equity in oil production.  The bill equally promised other goodies to other stakeholders.
However, like a pregnant woman happily welcome into the labour room, eight years after, neither the voice of the child nor that of the mother has been heard as the National Assembly members are yet to agree on issues concerning the PIB. The euphoria that greeted the idea of PIB has given way to anxiety, suspicion and fear.
Is it that the PIB idea is bad and contradicts all expectations of the National Assembly?  Such that the lawmakers cannot find any useful thing in the bill? Is it that the alleged cartel that determines what happens in the Nigerian oil sector is not happy and has decided to frustrate and kill the people’s bill? What exactly is the matter with this bill which in many analysists’ views holds a lot of promises to the people?
When Nigerians waited till the end of the sixth National Assembly (2007-2011) and did not see the bill transform into an Act of the Parliament, the impression then was that, because of the high level of importance attached to the bill and the need for the law makers to do thorough work on the bill, it could not be concluded.
But when the then Senate President, David Mark was concluding activities of the 7th National Assembly in 2015 and hurriedly ‘passed through’ his basket full of bills, concerned Nigerians were disappointed that the PIB was not one of the many bills that graduated to Acts of Parliament.
A group, the Environmental Rights Action/Friends of the Earth Nigeria (ERA/FoEN) expressed dismay over the failure of the National Assembly to pass the bill, attributing it to politics.
Executive Director of the group, Godwin Ojo, had during a press conference in Lagos accused some of the lawmakers of falling prey to the influence of the oil multinationals  who fear that the PIB would rob them of so much unabridged fortune they have been having as far as the nation’s oil industry is concerned.
To Ojo, “some of them became the mouth piece of Shell and other oil companies that threatened to pull out of Nigeria’s oil and gas operations if the PIB was passed.
“They not only betrayed the wishes of the people but succumbed to cheap blackmail of the oil companies that the PIB would render the oil and gas industry unviable”.
It would be recalled that apart from the one submitted by President Yar’Adua, which did not attract the attention of the lawmakers, ex-President Goodluck Jonathan re-introduced the bill to the National Assembly in 2012, which could also not attract the attention of the parliament.
The National Co-ordinator, Niger Delta Youth Coalition (NDYC). Prince Emmanuel Ogba, regretted the attitude of members of the National Assembly to the bill, saying their standing on the way of such a bill shows that the interest of the people was not the main business of those up there, and urged the present  senate, led by Bukola Saraki, to make a difference.
Ogba expressed the view that giving 10 per cent of the equity to the host communities would go a long way in bringing peace both for the community and the oil multinationals.  This according to him, would provide the conducive atmosphere for better oil operation that would benefit the host, the oil companies and the government.
The youth leader blamed the Federal Government for shortchanging the oil-bearing communities by not providing social amenities as road, water, schools, health infrastructure etc.
“You see, because the oil companies are the ones the community people always see physically, they transfer  their grievances to the companies for not providing the infrastructure while  in the actual sense of it these should not be the responsibilities of the companies.
In his own reaction, the publisher of News Africa Magazine, Mr Moffat Ekoriko, described the PIB as a National disgrace in that the sixth and seventh National Assemblies could not give Nigerians any explanation as to why they were not able to pass the bill.
“If we are to believe what we got from the grapevine, two factors were responsible for trauncating the bill.  Inducement by the multinational oil companies and ethnic interest. Ethic, in the sense that most provisions of the bill were seen as being more favourable to host communities”, he said.
Ekoriko, in an interview with The Tide, said the oil multinationals were uncomfortable with the aspect of the bill which gives 10 per cent equlity to the host communities and the incentive for deep offshore.
“If we are to believe those rumours, it then calls to question the sense of patriotism of the Sixth and Seventh Assemblies”, he said.
The News Africa publisher advised President Muhammadu Buhari to invest his political capital in getting the bill passed, noting that since APC controls both Houses of the National Assembly, there is no reason why a president who is so fair as Buhari cannot wield his party into line.
Another alternative, he said, is to break up the bill so that the non-contentious aspects can pass.  He suggested that Buhari should consider leaving the 10 per cent equity to host communities and the incentives for the deep offshore operations and pass the other less contentious aspects of the bill.
“Over the years, the government has been failing the oil communities. They collect tax and always fail to provide amenities.  What the oil firms should do is to provide ‘jara’, but ‘jara’  can’t substitute the real thing”, he said stressing  that oil companies cannot translate into government of the Niger Delta such that you expect them to provide water, road, healthcare and wondered what should be the responsibilities of the government.
Ekoriko also blamed the interventionist agencies as the Niger Delta Development Commission (NDDC) for lack of clear focus on what to provide.
“While NDDC goes into skills acquisition agriculture, primary healthcare what should go to LGAs and state government, it becomes Jack-of-all-trade and master of none”, he explained.
He said what the region needs is infrastructure as rail line connecting Niger Delta, good road network to make the economy of the region to take off and challenged the Niger Delta Ministry and other relevant agencies to be focused on their statutory responsibilities.
The PIB which should serve the interest of well-meaning Nigerians and stakeholders in the oil sector is one that would fairly address their peculiar needs and fears since it is by so doing that all stakeholders would work as partners in progress.
This spirit will bring to an end the so much acrimony where communities see the oil firms as those short changing them.
The Federal Government which defined and enjoys 60 per cent equity in the joint venture, should be alive to its expected responsibilities to the host communities.
Nigeria desires a PIB that would take definite stand on the issues of gas flaring , oil spill clean-up, local or Nigerian content particularly on expatriate quota, contract awards and also bring an end to the enigma of casualisation in the  oil industry.
Those who are so worried about the ubiqiutous influence of the oil multinationals should also know that as stakeholders, the multinational oil companies would not fold their arms on an issue that affects their business interest in Nigeria.
But what one expects is that members of the National Assembly, particularly those from the Niger Delta region should stand up in the interest of Nigeria and not allow themselves to be bought over by other forces protecting their own interest since they are voted to serve their people.
If a thorough job aimed at providing an effective PIB, fair to stakeholders, is done the fear is that there might be a PIB that would be watered down such that it would lose its essence.
The initiator of PIB, Yar’Adua, was a Niger Delta friendly President, same way Goodluck Jonathan was a Northern friendly President and did more for the north.  Buhari should declare his position on PIB.

 

Chris Oluoh

Continue Reading

Oil & Energy

FG Inaugurates National Energy Master Plan Implementation Committee

Published

on

The Federal Government has inaugurated the National Energy Master Plan Implementation Committee (NEMiC), in a major step towards repositioning Nigeria’s energy sector.
Minister of Innovation, Science and Technology, Uche Nnaji, disclosed this in a Statement issued by the minister’s Senior Special Adviser, Robert Ngwu, in Abuja, at the Weekend.
According to the statement, the inauguration which marked the beginning of the full implementation phase of the National Energy Master Plan (NEMP), tasked the committee with the responsibility of spearheading the country’s transition to a cleaner, more inclusive and sustainable energy future.
Nnaji urged the committee to deliver real impact to households, industries, and communities nationwide.
“The National Energy Master plan is not just a document; it is a blueprint for transforming our energy landscape. NEMiC must fast-track the deployment of energy solutions that are reliable, affordable, and climate-friendly.
“The work you do will directly influence Nigeria’s economic growth, social progress, and environmental sustainability,” the minister said.
Nnaji expressed optimism that the committee would deliver on the assignment.
“The decisions and actions taken by this Committee will define Nigeria’s energy trajectory for decades to come.
“This is a responsibility of the highest order, and I am confident NEMiC has the capacity, the vision, and the commitment to rise to the occasion,” he said.
It would be noted that NEMP is a comprehensive framework designed to guide Nigeria’s energy diversification, strengthen energy security and align national development with global climate action goals.
Constituted on Oct. 17, 2024, by the Energy Commission of Nigeria (ECN), NEMiC is tasked with mobilising funding and investing in renewable energy infrastructure.
It also has the responsibility of accelerating the deployment of technologies that expand access to reliable and affordable power.
The committee would oversee projects across solar, wind, hydro, biomass, and other emerging technologies while also advancing the operationalisation of the National Energy Fund, meant to channel resources into domestic energy efficiency and infrastructure projects.
Continue Reading

Oil & Energy

How Solar Canals Could Revolutionize the Water-Energy-Food Nexus

Published

on

Globally, demand for food, water, and energy is sharply on the rise. The World Economic Forum says that by 2050, food demand could increase by over 50%, energy by up to 19% and water by up to 30%. The increasing scarcity of these resources – and potential solutions to their sustainable management – are deeply interconnected, calling for integrated solutions.
“Disruption in one amplifies vulnerabilities and trade-offs in others,” wrote the World Economic Forum in a July report. “Such disruptions also create opportunities for sustainable growth, enhanced resilience and more equity.” The idea of synergistic nexus solutions is starting to pick up steam in both public and private sectors.
A new project in California, aptly named Project Nexus, aims to do just that. The novel project seeks to find synergies for water management and renewable energy production in some of the nation’s sunniest and most water-stressed agricultural lands by covering miles and miles of irrigation canals with solar panels, yielding multiple benefits for the water-energy-food nexus.
While the panels generate clean energy, they also shade the canals from the harsh desert sun, mitigating water loss to evaporation and discouraging the growth of aquatic weeds that can choke the waterways. Plus, the presence of the water acts as a built-in cooling system for the solar panels. The $20 million state-funded initiative could produce up to 1.6 megawatts of renewable energy “while producing a host of other benefits,” according to a report from SFGATE.
In addition to these benefits, placing solar panels on top of existing agricultural infrastructure could offer key benefits compared to standard solar farms. They are more easily and quickly greenlit, as they don’t face the same land-use conflicts that utility-scale solar farms are facing across the nation. Plus, “placing solar panels atop existing infrastructure doesn’t require altering the landscape, and the relatively small installations can be plugged into nearby distribution lines, avoiding the cumbersome process of connecting to the higher-voltage wires required for bigger undertakings,” reports Canary Media.
The result of Project Nexus and similar models appears to be a win-win for water, energy, and food, all while using less land. “The challenges of climate change are going to really force us to do more with a lot less … so this is just an example of the type of infrastructure that can make us more resilient,” says project scientist Brandi McKuin. While Project Nexus isn’t releasing figures on the project’s performance until they have a full year’s worth of data, McKuin says current analysis shows that the project is on track to meet its projected outputs.
Project Nexus is not the first project to place solar panels over canals, but it’s still among just a handful of such projects in the world. The United States’ first and only other solar canal project came online late last year in Arizona, where the project produces energy for the Pima and Maricopa tribes, collectively known as the Gila River Indian Community. While many large-scale renewable energy projects have run up against land-use issues with tribal lands, the Arizona project shows that the canal model can be an excellent alternative solution.
“Why disturb land that has sacred value when we could just put the solar panels over a canal and generate more efficient power?” David DeJong, director of the Pima-Maricopa Irrigation Project, was quoted by Grist. In keeping with the spirit of water-energy nexus solutions, the Project is currently developing a water delivery system for the water-stressed Gila River Indian Community.
Of course, these pilot projects produce a whole lot less energy than utility-scale solar farms. But research suggests that if the solar canal idea is scaled across the United States’ 8,000 miles of federally owned canals and aqueducts, it could have a significant impact. In 2023, a coalition of environmental groups calculated that installing panels on all that existing federal infrastructure could generate over 25 gigawatts of energy and potentially avoid tens of billions of gallons of water evaporation at the same time.
By Haley Zaremba
Continue Reading

Oil & Energy

Dangote Refinery Resumes Gantry Self-Collection Sales, Tuesday

Published

on

Dangote Petroleum Refinery and Petrochemicals Limited has announced that it will resume self-collection gantry sales of petroleum products at its facility beginning tomorrow, Tuesday, September 23, 2025.

This is revealed in an email communication from the Group Commercial Operations Department of the company, and obtained by Newsmen, at the Weekend.

The decision marks a reversal of a directive issued earlier, which had suspended self-collection and compelled marketers to rely exclusively on the refinery’s Free Delivery Scheme.

The company explained that while gantry access is being reinstated, the free delivery service remains operational, with marketers encouraged to continue registering their outlets for direct supply at no additional cost.

The statement said “in reference to the earlier email communication on the suspension of the PMS self-collection gantry sales, please note that we will be resuming the self-collection gantry sales on the 23rd of September, 2025”.

Dangote Petroleum Refinery also apologised to its partners for any inconvenience the suspension may have caused, while assuring stakeholders of its commitment to improving efficiency and ensuring seamless supply.

“Meanwhile, please be informed that we are aggressively delivering on the free delivery scheme, and it is still open for registration. We encourage you to register your stations and pay for the product to be delivered directly to you for free. We sincerely apologise for any inconvenience this may cause and appreciate your understanding,” it added.

It would be recalled that in September 18, 2025, Dangote refinery had suspended gantry-based self-collection of petroleum products at its depot. The move was designed to accelerate the adoption of its Free Delivery Scheme, which guarantees direct shipments of petroleum products to registered retail outlets across Nigeria.

 The company had also explained that the suspension would help curb transactions with unregistered marketers, either directly at its depot or indirectly through other licensed dealers.

The refinery stressed that the earlier decision was an operational adjustment aimed at streamlining efficiency in the downstream supply chain.

It further warned that any payments made after the effective suspension date would be rejected.
Continue Reading

Trending