Editorial
Tinubu’s Broadcast: The Missing Link

President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s nationwide speech on July 31, 2023, recognised the inauspicious impact of his fiscal and monetary policies on Nigerians. The Tide appreciates his efforts in engaging with citizens’ concerns and comprehending their predicament. We encourage him to sustain a firm commitment to interactive engagement as an inherent feature of his government.
In his nationwide broadcast, the President addressed Nigerians’ concerns regarding the challenging economic situation directly resulting from his government’s recent policies. He empathised with the citizens and justified the necessity of the tough decisions made for the benefit of the country.
However, the speech concentrated on populist grandiosity but disregarded pragmatic measures to forestall subsidy removal and exchange rate flop. Interventions embodied N75billion for 75 enterprises, N125billion for MSMEs, the freeing of 200,000 metric tons of grains, N200 billion for cultivation, and N100billion for gas-powered buses. But Nigerians require more concrete measures to effectively palliate the impact.
For many Nigerians, the broadcast is uninspiring as it failed to tackle essential issues dissembling their standard of living and businesses. For instance, the President failed to cite primal solutions such as local refining of petroleum products, concrete plans for mass transit systems, lifting the employment embargo, or affording a well-defined timeline for raising remunerations and salaries, among others.
Undoubtedly, Tinubu’s policies have caused inflation, particularly impacting small-scale businesses and industries dependent on petrol. This has a disconfirming impact on commercial-grade motorcyclists and local barbers. Major enterprises reliant on the dollar face high exchange rates, ensuing in significantly increased prices for crucial goods, and placing a strain on the average Nigerian’s finances.
The President accused some people of embezzling subsidy funds, but surprisingly no action has been taken to recover the stolen money or penalise the corrupt. The Nigeria Customs Service, the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, and the Nigeria Security and Civil Defence Corps were established to combat petroleum smuggling and protect the subsidy scheme, but their inactivity has contributed to its collapse. Accountability for officials and those accepting funds without fulfilling obligations is needed.
The palliative measures announced by Mr. President are unrealistic and cannot furnish temporary relief or a lasting solution to Nigeria’s rising living expenses. The authorities must re-evaluate the monetary and fiscal policies, which have caused the disorderly economic environment. A sustainable approach to reforms must be enforced by the Tinubu administration to harness the economic issues.
Despite the President’s promise that the Port Harcourt refinery would operate in December in a meeting with the NLC and TUC leadership to forfend the last protest against subsidy removal, we insist that the refinery solely cannot satisfy the fuel demands of Nigerians. Moreover, Tinubu failed to mention when the other refineries would be operative.
The operational date of the Port Harcourt refinery has been uncertain consequent upon multiple timelines presented in the past. Former Minister of State for Petroleum, Timipre Sylva, pledged that it would be running by December last year, but another date of September 2022 was afterwards given. It is mandatory for all the refineries to be operable by the end of the year.
Also in the broadcast, the President mentioned billions of naira budgeted for dissimilar palliatives, loans for students, and gratuitous buses, and how they had preserved over N1 trillion from subsidy removal within a month. We opine that Tinubu and his team should invest the proceeds in the refurbishment of all the refineries in the country to deal with the subsidy question.
Regrettably, little interest has been demonstrated by the Federal Government in revamping the nation’s refineries. The President’s proposed solutions to the country’s economic challenges are ill-conceived. His address lacks the necessary panacea for Nigeria’s current economic conditions. Hence, the problems, inflictions, and adversities will persevere until the refineries are operational.
Even with the removal of subsidy on petroleum products, we reiterate that with a dexterous, transparent and innovative management of resources, economic potentials, national comparative advantage, and expanded value chain in refining capacity, petrol should not sell for more than N150 per litre in the country.
We also observe the absence of provisions in the speech regarding riverine and coastal transportation, as well as haulage, which embody important components driving Nigeria’s trade, commerce, agriculture, and industrial sectors. In the light of these novel challenges presented by the speech, Nigerians should refrain from despair and uphold composure, supporting one another during this precarious period.
Efforts should focus on reducing governance costs and re-allocating savings towards infrastructure provision. If petroleum products cannot be subsidised, other sectors like health, transportation, and education should be considered. Tinubu’s administration must address the insufficient palliatives announced on May 29, 2023, as they cannot inhibit the sufferings of Nigerians.
Editorial
Benue Killings: Beyond Tinubu’s Visit

The recent massacre in Yelewata, Benue State, ranks among Nigeria’s deadliest attacks of
2025. While official figures put the death toll at 59, media reports and Amnesty International estimate between 100 and 200 fatalities. This atrocity extends a decade-long pattern of violence in Nigeria’s Middle Belt, where Beacon Security data records 1,043 deaths in Benue alone between May 2023 and May 2025.
President Tinubu’s visit on 18 June—four days after the 14 June attack—has drawn sharp criticism for its lateness. This delay echoes a history of inadequate responses, with Human Rights Watch documenting similar inaction in Plateau and Kaduna states since 2013, fuelling a culture of impunity. The attack lasted over two hours without meaningful security intervention, despite claims of swift action.
The violence bore hallmarks of genocide, with survivors recounting systematic house burnings and executions. More than 2.2 million people have been displaced in the region since 2019 due to comparable attacks. Data show Benue’s agricultural output falls by 0.21 per cent in crops and 0.31 per cent in livestock for every 1 per cent rise in violence.
Security forces continue to underperform. No arrests were made following the Easter attacks in April (56 killed) or May’s Gwer West massacre (42 killed). During his visit, Tinubu questioned publicly why no suspects had been detained four days after Yelewata, highlighting entrenched accountability failures.
The roots of the conflict are complex, with climate change pushing northern herders south and 77 per cent of Benue’s population reliant on agriculture. A Tiv community leader described the violence as “calculated land-grabbing” rather than mere clashes, with over 500 deaths recorded since 2019.
Government interventions have largely fallen short. The 2018 federal task force and 2025 Forest Guards initiative failed to curb violence. Tinubu’s newly announced committee of ex-governors and traditional rulers has been met with scepticism given the litany of past unkept promises.
The economic fallout is severe. Benue’s status as Nigeria’s “food basket” is crumbling as farms are destroyed and farmers displaced. This worsens the nation’s food crisis, with hunger surges in 2023-2024 directly linked to farming disruptions caused by insecurity.
Citizens demanding justice have been met with force; protesters faced police tear gas, and the State Assembly conceded total failure in safeguarding lives, admitting that the governor, deputy, and 32 lawmakers had all neglected their constitutional responsibilities.
The massacre has drawn international condemnation. Pope Leo XIV decried the “terrible massacre,” while the UN called for an investigation. The hashtag “200 Nigerians” trended worldwide on X, with many contrasting Nigeria’s slow response to India’s swift action following a plane crash with similar fatalities.
Nigeria’s centralised security system is clearly overwhelmed. A single police force is tasked with covering 36 states and 774 local government areas for a population exceeding 200 million. Between 2021 and 2023 alone, 29,828 killings and 15,404 kidnappings were recorded nationally. Proposals for state police, floated since January 2025, remain stalled.
Other populous nations offer alternative models. Canada’s provincial police, India’s state forces, and Indonesia’s municipal units demonstrate the effectiveness of decentralised policing. Nigeria’s centralised structure creates intelligence and response gaps, worsened by the distance—both physical and bureaucratic—from Abuja to affected communities.
The immediate aftermath is dire: 21 IDP camps in Benue are overwhelmed, and a humanitarian crisis is deepening. The State Assembly declared three days of mourning (18-20 June), but survivors lack sufficient medical aid. Tragically, many of those killed were already displaced by earlier violence.
A lasting solution requires a multi-pronged approach, including targeted security deployment, regulated grazing land, and full enforcement of Benue’s 2017 Anti-Open Grazing Law. The National Economic Council’s failure to prioritise state police in May 2025 represents a missed chance for reform.
Without decisive intervention, trends suggest conditions will worsen. More than 20,000 Nigerians have been killed and 13,000 kidnapped nationwide in 2025 alone. As Governor Hyacinth Alia stressed during Tinubu’s visit, state police may be the only viable path forward. All 36 states have submitted proposals supporting decentralisation—a crucial step towards breaking Nigeria’s vicious cycle of violence.
Editorial
Responding To Herders’ Threat In Rivers

Editorial
Democracy Day: So Far…

Nigeria’s return to democratic rule in 1999 marked a watershed moment in the nation’s political history. After enduring nearly 16 years of successive military dictatorships, Nigerians embraced a new era of civil governance with the inauguration of President Olusegun Obasanjo on May 29, 1999. Since then, the country has sustained a democratic system for 26 years. But, this democratic journey has been a complex mix of progress and persistent challenges.
The formal recognition of June 12 as Democracy Day in 2018 by former President Muhammadu Buhari acknowledged a long-standing injustice. The annulment of the 1993 presidential election, Nigeria’s freest, betrayed the democratic aspirations of millions. That it took decades to honour this date reflects the nation’s complex relationship with its democratic memory.
One of the most momentous successes of Nigeria’s democracy has been the uninterrupted civilian rule over the last two and a half decades. The country has witnessed seven general elections, with power transferring peacefully among different political parties. This is particularly notable considering that prior to 1999, no civilian government had completed a full term without military intervention. The peaceful transitions in 2007, 2015, and 2023 are testaments to Nigeria’s evolving democratic maturity.
Electoral participation, while uneven, has also reflected a level of democratic engagement. In 2003, voter turnout stood at about 69 per cent, but this figure dropped to approximately 34.75 per cent in 2023, according to the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC). Although the declining turnout raises concerns, it also highlights the increasing expectations of the electorate, who demand credible and transparent elections.
Another area of progress is the growth of a vibrant and free press. Nigerian media has played a crucial role in holding governments accountable and fostering public discourse. Investigative journalism and civil society activism have exposed corruption and human rights abuses. The rise of social media has further expanded the democratic space, enabling young Nigerians to mobilise and advocate for change, as evidenced by the 2020 #EndSARS protests.
Judicial independence has seen mixed results. On one hand, the judiciary has occasionally demonstrated resilience, such as in landmark rulings that overturned fraudulent elections or curtailed executive excesses. On the other hand, allegations of political interference and corruption within the judiciary persist, undermining public confidence in the legal system’s impartiality.
Nigeria’s democracy has also facilitated the decentralisation of power through the federal system. State governments now wield some autonomy, allowing for experimentation in governance and service delivery. While this has led to innovative policies in some states, it has also entrenched patronage networks and uneven development across the federation.
Despite these successes, Nigeria’s democratic journey faces formidable problems. Electoral integrity remains a critical concern. Reports from election observers, including those from the European Union and ECOWAS, frequently highlight issues such as vote-buying, ballot box snatching, and violence. The introduction of the Bimodal Voter Accreditation System (BVAS) and electronic transmission of results in 2023 elections showed promise, but technical glitches and alleged manipulations dampened public trust.
Corruption continues to be a pervasive issue. Nigeria ranks 145th out of 180 countries on Transparency International’s 2023 Corruption Perceptions Index, with a score of 25/100. Democratic institutions meant to check graft—such as anti-corruption agencies and the legislature—often struggle due to political interference and weak enforcement mechanisms.
Security challenges have also strained Nigeria’s democracy. Insurgency in the North East, banditry in the North West, separatist agitations in the South East, and herder-farmer conflicts across the Middle Belt have collectively resulted in thousands of deaths and displacements. According to the Global Terrorism Index 2024, Nigeria ranks as the eighth most impacted country by terrorism. The government’s difficulty in ensuring safety erodes public confidence in the state’s capacity and legitimacy.
The economy poses another critical remonstrance. Nigeria’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP) per capita stands at approximately $2,400 as of 2024, with over 40 per cent of the population living below the national poverty line. High unemployment and inflation have fueled discontent and disillusionment with democratic governance, especially among youth. Without addressing economic grievances, the democratic dividend will remain elusive for many Nigerians.
Ethnic and religious divisions further complicate Nigeria’s democratic consolidation. Politicians often exploit identity politics for electoral gains, exacerbating social tensions. Although federal character principles aim to promote inclusiveness, they have also sometimes fostered a quota mentality rather than merit-based appointments.
Gender representation remains inadequate in Nigeria’s democratic institutions. Women occupy less than 10 per cent of seats in the National Assembly, one of the lowest rates globally. Efforts to pass gender parity bills have faced stiff resistance, highlighting deep-seated cultural and institutional barriers to female political participation.
Civil liberties, while constitutionally guaranteed, are under threat. Crackdowns on protesters, restrictions on press freedom, and surveillance of activists reveal an authoritarian streak within the democratic framework. The controversial Twitter ban in 2021 exemplified the country’s willingness to curb digital freedoms, prompting domestic and international criticism.
The political crisis in Rivers State embodies broader democratic struggles. Attempts to control the state through undemocratic means expose weaknesses in federal institutions and the rule of law. Immediate restoration of democratic governance in Rivers State is vital to preserving Nigeria’s democratic integrity and institutional credibility.
Local governments remain under the control of state governors, depriving citizens of grassroots democracy. Last year’s Supreme Court judgment on local government autonomy is promising, but state-level resistance threatens its implementation. Genuine autonomy would bring governance closer to the people and foster democratic innovation.
As we mark Democracy Day, we must honour the sacrifices of Chief M.K.O. Abiola, Kudirat Abiola, Femi Falana, Chief Gani Fawehinmi, Pa Alfred Rewane, President Bola Tinubu, and countless others, who fought for Nigeria’s freedom. As democracy in Nigeria continues to evolve after 26 years, this day should inspire action toward its renewal. With despotism and state failure as real threats, both citizens and leaders must take responsibility—citizens by demanding more, and leaders by delivering. Excuses are no longer acceptable.
-
News1 day ago
Police Rescue Kidnapped Victim As Suspects Escape With Gunshots in Rivers
-
Politics1 day ago
Tinubu’s Contribution To Buhari’s Presidency Marginal – Ex-SGF
-
Opinion1 day ago
How Reliable Is AI
-
News24 hours ago
RSG Tasks Rural Dwellers On RAAMP …As Sensitization Team Visits Akulga, Degema, Three Others
-
Politics1 day ago
Keyamo Inaugurates Ganduje As FAAN Board Chair
-
News1 day ago
Demonstrate Commitment In Improving Host Communities, Ibas Tells Corps Members
-
Politics1 day ago
Reps Constitution Review Committee Holds Zonal Hearing For Rivers, C’River, Akwa Ibom In Calabar
-
Opinion1 day ago
Is Nigeria Democratic Nation?