Editorial
No To Ban On Doctors’ Strike
The House of Representatives may, on resumption from its Christmas and New Year recess, examine a bill prohibiting strike for medical professionals in the enrolment of the three tiers of government. The bill, if passed, will facilitate administrative and judicial processes for resolving trade disputes involving medical practitioners in government employment.
It is entitled: “An Act to Amend the Trade Disputes Act Cap T8, Laws of the Federation of Nigeria 2004 to Prohibit Medical Practitioners in the Employment of Federal, State, and Local Governments (as employees in the essential service sector) from Embarking on Strike and to Accelerate Administrative and Judicial Proceedings in the Determination of Trade Disputes Involving Them and Related Matters.”
Sponsored by Rep Simon Chukwuemeka Atigwe (PDP, Enugu), the bill, which is entered on the House Journal as House Bill (HB) 1618, had earlier scaled first reading in the House and is thought to be scheduled for second reading which is the debate on the general principles of the bill before it goes for public hearing.
Reacting to the proposed law, the Nigerian Association of Resident Doctors (NARD) and the Joint Health Sector Union (JOHESU) knocked members of the House of Representatives over plans to proscribe strikes in the health sector. The bodies described a bill to that effect as draconian and an onslaught on the democratic rights of employees.
Recall that doctors and other health workers frequently get involved in industrial actions, which have paralysed the health system in the country. In 2021, for example, the NARD were on strike for 63 days because the government was unable to meet its demands. The National Association of Nigerian Nurses and Midwives, Lagos State chapter, is also proposing to go on a strike by January 10 over the failure of the state government to meet its demands.
There is no doubt that this move by the legislators will amount to a gross violation of the rights of the medical workers to declare their grievances with amicable negotiation and, as a last resort, launching industrial action. The right to strike is a universal democratic right of all employees, regardless of their workplace – whether private or public.
Our legislators must recognise that industrial actions or strikes are not undertaken for nothing; some issues contribute to them. If there must be a law to ban strikes in the medical sector, then, the House of Representatives should first promulgate a law that will inhibit the government from reneging on several agreements it enters into with health employees.
Furthermore, there should be laws to prevent the government from delays in payment of salaries, pensions and gratuities, promotion and disbursement of entitlements of workers. They should pass legislation that requires us to improve the infrastructure in our hospitals and ensure that consumables are available at all times.
Anything short of that as preconditions to the law to prohibit strikes by health workers means the government wants to arm-twist, gag and turn health providers in Nigeria into captives and lame ducks. The result of this will particularly be a spike in the already colossal migration of the workers to other countries with better service conditions, where their efforts, abilities, and expertise are better recognised.
Indeed, the bill is tumultuous and runs counter to the freedom of expression of health workers. Instead of creating a system in which medical workers do not have to go on strike, the Federal Government seeks to infringe on their rights to declare their resentment. Unfortunately, these legislators fail to understand the privileges that democracy confers. Why would legislators, who are supposed to sympathise with Nigerians as representatives of the people, come forward with such a bill? Shame!
Medical and health workers’ strikes are a global phenomenon, reported in both remarkably developed and progressive countries. Strikes by health workers are of increasing concern for international and local health authorities. They are an obstacle to achieving the universal health coverage contemplated by the World Health Organisation.
However, while the right to strike is regarded a fundamental one, medical workers in Nigeria, notably doctors, must realise that they have a moral duty to adhere to the Hippocratic tenets of the medical profession and fiduciary obligation to their patients. Under Hippocrates oath, doctors are deemed to be in a social contract and obliged to treat a patient’s health and life as a preference over everything else and going on strike may be seen as a contravention of such contract.
As essential workers, Nigerian doctors and health care providers should invariably strike a balance between improved health care services for patients and the need to press for justifiable wages for themselves to fulfill their primary human needs like everyone. So, we advise health workers in this country to act in the best interests of patients and make their health and their lives a priority above all else.
Resolving persistent strikes in the health sector calls for fiscal and ethical solutions and a moral commitment to promoting the health and welfare of Nigerians. All stakeholders involved in the management of the medical profession in this country are required to come to the negotiating table. A conference between health workers’ unions and associations and the Nigerian government is long overdue. Instead of banning strikes in the sector, a work system must be established where medical staff see no reason to declare a collective action.
Editorial
That Kyari’s Promise On PH Refinery
The Nigerian government has announced that the Port Harcourt Refining Company (PHRC) would soon start operations after missing several previously set deadlines. In a recent meeting with the Senate, the Group Chief Executive Officer of the Nigeria National Petroleum Company Limited (NNPCL), Mele Kyari, assured Nigerians that the refinery would begin operations in two weeks. He emphasised a commitment to meeting the set deadlines for the PHRC and other refineries.
A statement by the NNPCL spokesperson, Olufemi Soneye, quoted Kyari as saying: “We will make sure that promises that we made about the rehabilitation of these refineries are kept. We completed the mechanical completion of PHRC in December. Now, we have crude oil already stocked in it. It is currently undergoing regulatory compliance test before we restream it. I assure you that this refinery will start in the next two weeks”.
Speaking further, Kyari declares: “For Warri, we have also done mechanical work on it. It is undergoing regulatory compliance processes that we are doing with our regulators. Kaduna will be ready by December this year, but we have not reached that stage. We believe that it will also be ready on schedule.” He explained that the PHRC had received 450,000 barrels of crude for processing since the mechanical completion of the plant in December last year.
In 2021, the Federal Government gave approval to allocate $1.5 billion for the purpose of repairing the refinery. Subsequently, an Italian company, named Maire Tecnimont, was selected to undertake the repair work, which would be carried out in three separate phases. The main goal of the first phase is to restore the refinery’s operation to 90 per cent capacity within 18 months.
Although the project faces numerous delays and obstacles, it is a critical measure to increase Nigeria’s ability to refine its petroleum products and decrease its reliance on imports. The original deadline of 2022 was not met. During this year’s budget defence session, Kyari informed lawmakers that the PHRC would start operations by the end of December. However, that deadline was also missed. Another target of January 1, 2024, also failed.
There were two previous instances of deadlines set by Ibe Kachikwu, who was the Minister of State (Petroleum Resources). There was another timeline under Timipre Sylva, and now we are faced with the current one. This would be the fifth or possibly even the sixth one. In the past, several government officials had made similar statements, but no tangible outcomes were achieved.
The four state-owned refineries, which are old and in bad condition, have a total capacity of 450,000 barrels per day. One of them, the Kaduna plant located in the North, has a capacity of 110,000 barrels per day, while the other three units are situated in the oil-rich Niger Delta region. One of these is the Warri refinery, with a capacity of 125,000 barrels per day. All four refineries have been closed for several years.
In 2019, the four local refineries completely ceased operations, leading to fuel supply issues in the country. The Port Harcourt refinery has the ability to produce 60,000 barrels per day at full capacity. If fully utilised, this could result in the production of approximately 10.1 million litres of petrol, which is roughly equivalent to one-third of Nigeria’s estimated daily consumption.
The Dangote refinery was expected to begin producing products by the end of July last year, while the commissioning date for the PHRC continues to be delayed. This impediment is worrisome as it means that Nigeria’s dependence on imported fuel will persist, potentially adding N33.3 billion to consumers’ pump prices due to freight costs. The completion of these refineries is essential for reducing importation and ensuring a more stable and affordable fuel supply for the country.
In general, we should be feeling joyful about Kyari’s promise. However, that is not the situation. If anything, we are extremely angry about the news. What should have been happy news has instead provoked the frustration in us, clearly because similar promises had been made in the past without any palpable outcome. It has become predictable to hear about the functioning of the refineries, whether in Port Harcourt, Warri or Kaduna. We hope that the GMD will fulfil his promise this time.
Since 2015, when the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC) took power from the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), which had been in government for 16 years, there have been promises to maintain and eventually operate the PHRC and others, but none of these promises have been fulfilled. So, when the NNPC released a statement declaring that the government was determined to stop importing fuel and that the PHRC would start operations in two weeks, indicating the government’s readiness to end fuel importation, we are sceptical of this claim.
We strongly advise the National Assembly (NASS) to increase its efforts in pressuring the NNPCL management to fulfil its pledge of making the PHRC operational at the stipulated time by regularly monitoring its activities. If the NASS had performed its oversight function commendably, the state-owned refineries would not have been a heavy burden on public funds, preventing Nigerians from experiencing the benefits of being an oil-producing nation. If the refinery does not function as promised, Kyari should face severe sanctions.
Considering the Nigerian government’s history of making unfulfilled undertakings, it is understandable that we are hesitant to believe Kyari’s statement. Previous assurances have been broken, so it is hard to trust that this one will be any different. However, there is still some optimism that things will change this time and that the government will actually follow through on their promises. If the Tinubu administration must regain our trust and that of Nigerians, they have to demonstrate their sincerity and commitment to their obligations.
Editorial
Delta Killings: Need For Caution
The Niger Delta region, known for its abundant oil resources, has long been plagued by violence, rebellion and challenges to duly constituted authorities, especially among the youths. This unrest is particularly noticeable in Ughelli South Local Government Area of Delta State, casting a shadow over the region’s wealth of resources. On March 14, a tragic incident occurred where angry youths in Ughelli ambushed and killed 17 soldiers who were on a peacekeeping mission in the Okuama community.
This terrible act of extreme violence highlights the growing divide between the authorities and the frustrated younger generation. The significant loss suffered underscores the seriousness of the situation and shows the urgent need for quick and efficient solutions. The question that remains is: Who can be trusted to bring peace back to this troubled region?
With Nigerians already on edge about the increasing number of kidnappings in several areas of the country, the recent incident in the riverine communities of Ughelli and Bomadi Local Government Areas in Delta State has only added to the anxiety. The conflict between the Okuama and Okoloba communities, which began in January over a land dispute, has escalated and led to heightened tensions in the area. The citizens are understandably concerned about the situation and are hoping for a peaceful resolution of the conflict.
The Okuama people had unfortunately lost some of their own in recent events, leading to tensions between them and the rival community of Okoloba. In retaliation, the Okuama natives allegedly kidnapped a member of the Okoloba locality. This action prompted troops to embark on a peace mission to Okuama to rescue the kidnapped individual. Tragically, the mission turned deadly. The Army then insisted on taking some community leaders with them, a request members of the community declined, resulting in the crisis.
According to reports, a group of Okuama youths ambushed the military team and viciously killed the Commanding Officer, two majors, a captain, and 13 soldiers. There were allegedly intense gun battles between the youths and the troops. Reflecting the horror of the incident, media outlets described the aftermath scene as “barbaric”. The victims’ corpses were mutilated beyond recognition with severed legs and brutally torn bowels. The chilling degree of violence demonstrated was not only shocking but also unacceptable as it showcased the severe lack of regard for human life.
President Bola Tinubu’s denouncement of the attack on the military personnel and his call to fish out the attackers was expected and necessary. However, it is disappointing that he did not explicitly mention the need to avoid extrajudicial acts by the military in the process as they are wont to do. Other Nigerians have also condemned the killings as unprovoked and have called for justice to be served. All parties must ensure that the perpetrators are brought to justice through legal means and that there is no room for further violence or retaliation.
Already, reports have surfaced indicating that the military has encircled the communities, causing the indigenes to flee to neighbouring areas because of apprehension of reprisals. Viral images depicting armoured vehicles and burning structures imply that the soldiers have initiated operations. While we strongly denounce the shocking, barbaric, wicked and unforgiveable killing of the soldiers, we implore the Nigerian military to exhibit maturity and refrain from resorting to vigilantism in response. Instead, they should concentrate on apprehending the culprits, with some of them already identified.
Angry troops from the Nigerian Army recently attacked an Ijaw community called Igbomotoru, located in Bayelsa State in the Southern Ijaw Local Government Area. This community is known to be the birthplace of the purported ringleader, whom the troops were searching for. However, their efforts proved abortive, as the suspect had received a tip-off and fled before their arrival. Unfortunately, the invasion resulted in significant loss of life and destruction of property. Regardless of the soldiers’ anger, it is morally and legally wrong to take innocent lives. Such actions are uncivilised and give the impression that our military operates outside of the law.
It is a common practice in Nigeria for the military to respond to violence against its personnel by taking severe actions against the involved people or communities. Nonetheless, this approach may not necessarily lead to long-term peace and understanding. In fact, it could backfire and provoke more hostilities. That is why we think that the military must tread with caution. The risk is that such retaliatory measures could fuel resentment and defiance among the affected population, causing a cycle of ongoing animosity that could eventually lead to even more rebellion and hostility towards the authorities.
To look into the circumstances surrounding the regrettable incident, the Federal and Delta State governments should work together to form impartial probe panels that include representatives from both parties. The decision to deploy soldiers to settle a land dispute was inappropriate in the first place, as this is a matter that falls under the jurisdiction of the police. The military needs to concur with the police force and possibly the Directorate of State Services (DSS) in similar situations to prevent any further escalation of civil conflicts.
Nigeria’s police system needs to be reviewed in light of the killings of the military officers. Following understaffing, the military has been forced to take on internal policing duties, including tackling organised crime, oil theft, communal crises, kidnappings, and banditry. The police force must be adequately funded and equipped to effectively carry out their constitutional responsibilities. This tragic event emphasises the necessity for seeking justice without first resorting to revenge.
In November 1999, in Odi community, Bayelsa State, a gang killed 12 police officers and soldiers over oil resources and environmental degradation issues. The military’s response was severe, leading to the deaths of hundreds of civilians and the destruction of Odi. In October 2021, the military intervened in Zaki-Biam, Benue State, after 19 soldiers were abducted and killed by locals. The troops were sent to stabilise the area due to clashes between the Tiv and Jukun communities in Benue and Taraba States. Reports by Human Rights Watch indicated that the soldiers killed about 100-200 men and destroyed properties in Zaki-Biam and neighbouring areas.
The Okuama killings have shed light on the harsh reality that there are far too many weapons in the wrong hands in our country. To combat this issue and reduce criminality, President Tinubu must prioritise disarming and preventing non-state actors from obtaining weapons during his administration. The military and police should conduct thorough investigations into the homicides and ensure that only the perpetrators are brought to justice, to prevent further bloodshed and violence.
Editorial
For An Effective Supreme Court
The recent inauguration of 11 additional Justices to the Supreme Court, Nigeria’s highest judicial institution, presents a robust event in the judiciary. This action comes in the wake of a period the court was grappling with high workload pressure because of statutory retirements and unfortunate demise, resulting in the highest court running below its required capacity. However, the induction of the new Justices has brought transformation. The replenishment of the Bench restores the court’s strength to its estimated complement of 21 Justices, in line with the stipulations of the country’s constitution.
During the administration of the Oath of Office to the Justices, the Chief Justice of Nigeria (CJN), Justice Olukayode Ariwoola, reiterated the essence of their role and the responsibility they carry. He emphasised the expectation for them to exhibit utmost integrity and fairness, akin to Caesar’s wife, in delivering justice impartially regardless of whose interests were at stake. According to him, they should see themselves as God’s representatives. Unfortunately, the 11 Justices were assuming their positions on the Supreme Court Bench during a period when the Nigerian judiciary, including the apex court, faces severe criticisms, resulting in widespread skepticism towards judges among the people.
Today, there is a lack of consensus regarding CJN Ariwoola’s assertion that Nigerian judges, across different levels, serve as representatives of God on earth and understand his expectations. While the CJN could have provided his guidance without invoking religious beliefs, he accurately pointed out the heightened scrutiny that the apex court will face, particularly from Nigerian politicians seeking to manipulate judicial outcomes. The legal community will also closely observe the newly appointed Justices, assessing how their promotion and the completion of the judicial panel at the apex court will impact the administration of justice and advance legal principles.
The main concern regarding the depletion of the apex court was the high number of cases on the docket, leading to over-congestion in the court and causing the Justices, who were already few in number, to be overworked. Justice Musa Dattijo Muhammad highlighted in his emotional farewell speech in October 2023 that the Justices were also underpaid and lacked resources. With the recent addition of 11 judges to the apex court, more cases can now be heard, leading to improved performance and efficiency. However, for this to be successful, the administrative processes at the Supreme Court must also be revamped and modernised.
We congratulate the new Justices on their appointment to a position that carries a sense of authority in their decisions while presiding over cases brought before them for adjudication. However, they must remember that their new role comes with great challenges, responsibilities, and heightened expectations, as the judiciary is often seen as the last resort for the common man.
This has become pertinent in light of the demand for justice by Nigerians, both ordinary citizens and those in positions of power, who feel let down by the decisions coming from the courts on various issues, especially those related to politics. Whether rightly or wrongly, there is a widespread belief that the respected institution of justice has been influenced by corruption; that greed and dishonesty have tarnished what was once a highly esteemed establishment that was respected by all.
Many well-meaning Nigerians have been vocal in their calls for the purification of the corrupt judiciary, especially the Supreme Court. It is widely believed that by ensuring a full complement of judges, a new era of swift justice can be ushered in, ultimately leading to the much-needed purification of the system. The hope is that with a reformed and efficient judiciary, the rule of law will be upheld, and justice will be served timely.
The judiciary in Nigeria is a reflection of the larger society, encompassing both the good and the bad. It must be recognised that Justices are human, with all the inherent flaws that come with being human. However, it is believed that through their training, sense of duty, and the discipline required for their roles, they should be able to rise above any shortcomings and fulfil their responsibilities to the public. It is expected that they will meet the presumptions of the people they serve.
From that perspective, and in view of the burden of duty they must discharge, we feel obligated to further contend that for the Justices to be able to, like the blind-folded lady, dispense justice without fear, favour or ill-will, there is the compelling urgency to make the judiciary a member of the tripod, truly independent, especially from the standpoint of funding. It deserves to get its allocation directly from the federation account devoid of the manipulative influence of any other arm of government. This is required if the nation must do away with the negative perceptions of who pays the piper dictates the tune.
Furthermore, the selection of the Chief Justice of the Federation or Chief Judge of a state should not be at the discretion of a single elected official, whether it be a governor or the President of the country. This tendency for one individual to have complete control over who holds these critical positions, often through manipulation and questionable deals, undermines the idea of a judiciary that is truly independent and able to withstand political pressure. Appointments to these offices should be made based on merit, integrity, and public scrutiny rather than political favouritism.
If judicial officers are diligent in carrying out their duties, they deserve to have comfortable working conditions. This means that they should not have to settle for the meager salaries they currently receive. The nation must ensure that we did not repeat the past where Supreme Court Justices had to protest against the poor working conditions they were subjected to. Corruption can be tempting, but with the right incentives and working environment, we can prevent it from taking hold. Justices need to be provided with better working conditions that do not compromise their rectitude.
Given that the Supreme Court has now been completely constituted, there should be no room for cases to drag on in their dockets. It is anticipated that a fully constituted Supreme Court will have all its courtrooms operational and the newly appointed Justices will enhance our legal system and assist the apex court in realising its maximum potential. Despite these recent appointments, more Justices of the apex court are approaching retirement and any resulting vacancies should be promptly filled without delays. With the court now at full capacity, we are optimistic about the future productivity and efficiency of the Supreme Court.
-
Oil & Energy3 days ago
NNPCL Lists Transparency, Accountability, Others, As Transformation Drivers
-
News3 days ago
Trafficking: Beware Of Fake $900 Jobs, NAPTIP Warns Nigerians
-
Focus3 days ago
Reminisces On Tributes To Mrs Adeline Ndalu Jaja
-
Nation1 day ago
Ododo Applauds Security Agencies Over Rescue Of 43 Bus Passengers
-
Education3 days ago
Bill To Increase UBEC Funding Passes Second Reading
-
News3 days ago
Food Prices Rise In February 2024 -NBS
-
Niger Delta1 day ago
Bayelsa Community Set For Youth Election, Inaugurates Eleco
-
News1 day ago
Deputy Gov Urges Rivers Youths To Read Impactful Books