The Federal Government has proposed an adjustment to the nation’s revenue sharing formula, allocating 23.73 percent to local governments as against the previous 20:60 percent.
Other adjustments include Federal Government, 50.65 percent as against 52.68 percent; state governments 25.62 percent as against 26.72 percent; while it retained 13 per cent derivative for the oil-producing states.
The Secretary to the Government of the Federation (SGF), Boss Mustapha, who made the Federal Government’s position known to Nigerians during a public hearing in Abuja, said that the government considered a number of things before arriving at its conclusion.
According to Mustapha, the Federal Government considered its increasing visibility in sub-national responsibilities due to weaknesses at the level, citing primary health care, basic primary education, increasing level of insecurity and increased remittances to state and local governments through Value Added Tax (VAT) sharing formula, where the Federal Government has only 15 percent and the states and local governments share 50 percent and 35 percent, respectively.
Mustapha, who was represented by the Permanent Secretary, Political and Economic Affairs, Mr. Andrew Adejoh, said that the current administration would implement whatever formula was passed by the National Assembly.
He said, “On behalf of the President, Muhammadu Buhari, I wish to re-assure all Nigerians that the Federal Government will implement the final outcome of the conclusion of this exercise as soon as the National Assembly enacts the relevant legislation to complete the process.”
The SGF said, however, that the responsibilities shouldered by each tier of government should guide the Revenue Mobilisation Allocation and Fiscal Commission in the new formula.
Mustapha said that a lot of the resources allocated to the Federal Government were spent on providing services that were the responsibilities of state governments.
According to him, “We are all agreed, as Nigerians, that the present Revenue Allocation formula, both vertical and horizontal, is long over-due for a review not only because the last one was done in 1992 but most importantly, contemporary issues since then, such as heightened insecurity, decaying infrastructure, need for appropriately matching statutory functions and tax powers, need to be taken into consideration.
“The Federal Government has keenly followed all the geo-political consultative process and it is important that we remind ourselves that review of revenue cannot and should not be an emotional or sentimental discussion and it cannot be done arbitrarily.
“All over the world, revenue and resource allocation has always being a function of the level of responsibilities attached to the different components or tiers of government. It is therefore important that this current exercise rests squarely on the 1999 Constitution (as Amended).
“The Second Schedule of the Nigerian constitution contains 68 Items on the Exclusive Legislative List, and these are areas in which the Federal Government is supposed to use resources accruing to the federation to provide services and related development needs. On the other hand, the 30 items on the Concurrent requires both the Federal and State Government to address.
“It is, thus, very clear that for us to have an endearing vertical review of the present revenue allocation formula, we must first agree on the responsibilities to be carried out by all the tiers of Government.
“In order to appreciate the position of the Federal Government, it is also necessary I share with us the vertical disbursement of the Federal Government’s share of 52.68%, which is as follows: Disbursement of the FGN Share of 52.68%; Consolidated Revenue Fund (CRF)48.50%; Federal Capital Territory (like a state)1.00%; Natural Resources Development Fund (states are the beneficiaries)1.68%; Ecological Funds 1.00% (45% to NEMA, NEDC, NALDA and NAGGW, 55% addressing ecological challenges at Sun-National levels); Stabilisation Account 0.50% (25 % – 0.125 to NSIA and 75% 0.375 managed by OAGF and mostly utilized for emergency requests by states).
“Similarly, within the Consolidated Revenue Fund, disbursements are made for Debt Servicing, Statutory Transfers, Salaries, Pension and Gratuities, capital supplementation amongst others.
“It is, therefore, clear from the above that the Federal Government spends most of its resources on and for the state and local government levels. When you juxtapose this with the equally greater number or responsibilities on the Exclusive Legislative List, you would even want to make a case for greater allocation to the Federal Government.
“However, the Federal Government has taken cognizance of the growing clamour for a review of the present vertical revenue allocation formula, President Muhammadu Buhari’s commitment to ensuring resources for development get to the poorest of the poor in our rural communities, imperative to incorporate local communities in our security architecture as well enhancing equitable and inclusive national development.
“Alongside the above, other considerations that informed the Federation Government’s position on the review of the present vertical revenue allocation formula included Federal Government’s increasing visibility in Sub-national level responsibilities due to weaknesses at that level e.g Primary health care, basic primary education; Increasing level of insecurity and increased remittances to State and Local Governments through the Value Added Tax sharing formula, where the Federal Government has only 15 % and the States and Local Government share 50% and 35% respectively.
“As an interim and immediate measure, the Federal Government, is therefore, proposing the following: Federal Government 50.65%; State Government 25.62 %; Local Government 23.73% and Derivation Allocation 13 %.
“It is important to restate that revenue allocation should be done constructively in the face of a dwindling national revenue base and the imperative for states to generate their IGR. Equally important is the fact that this review should culminate in improved national development.”
In his remarks, the Minister of the federal Capital Territory, Mr. Bello Mohammed, asked for more funding of the Federal Capital Territory, in view of its massive developmental needs.
He said, “Because of the massive expansion, for us to be able to develop the city to match the population expansion, we need to have a special funding status and that is our appeal to the commission and I am sure by the grace of God they will work towards it.”
Earlier, the Chairman of Revenue Mobilisation Allocation and Fiscal Commission (RMAFC), Engr. Elias Mbam, had said that the review of the revenue allocation formula became necessary because the last review was in 1992.
He added that there have been obvious changes in the nation’s socio-cultural, political and economic environments since that time.
“As you are aware, the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (as amended) empowers the commission to periodically review the revenue sharing formula and principles in operation to reflect changing realities,” he said.