Politics
PDP Accuses INEC Of Replacing Servers To Conceal Alleged Rigging
The Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) on Monday accused the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) of replacing all the servers in its headquarters and its state offices to conceal alleged rigging in the just concluded general elections.
The party made the allegation in a statement issued by its National Publicity Secretary, Mr Kola Ologbondiyan, in Abuja, saying that the action was in a desperate bid to change the actual results of the presidential election transmitted from the polling centers across the nation.
Ologbondiyan said that the alleged replacement of the servers was completely reprehensible and had further exposed the culpability of INEC in the alleged manipulation and rigging of the election.
He said that the PDP was briefed on how the INEC leadership and officials of the presidency became jittery and resorted to the desperate measure, after they realised that the servers had information of its presidential candidate, Atiku Abubakar’s victory at the election.
“Our party also has details of how the INEC leadership and the presidency agents procured and detailed computer experts to the commission’s offices to switch the servers, mutilate vital information in the system and attempt to erase all trails of transmitted results to the main server.
“Moreover, our party has been informed about how the INEC leadership, several weeks after the election, used some compromised officials of the commission to manipulate voter registers in some states by ticking names of individuals who did not participate in the Presidential election, as having voted.
“This is with the view to using such to cover the fictitious results it wrote for the All Progressives Congress (APC).”
Ologbondiyan said that forensic investigation of the system would reveal the real votes transmitted from the polling centers.
“The PDP therefore insists on forensic examination of all relevant documents and equipment used for the Presidential election.”
Howerver, the Chief Press Secretary to INEC Chairman, Mr Rotimi Oyekanmi, who reacted to the allegation described it as baseless and uncalled-for.
“The commission has maintained that it will not join issues with the PDP in the media on a petition that the party had already filed in court, in respect of the 2019 Presidential Election.
“Rather than issuing press statements and addressing press conferences on the same petition on a daily basis, PDP should allow the legal process to run its full course, ” Oyekanmi said.
The president made the assertion on Wednesday in Abuja during a news conference organised by the association ahead of the NBA Section on Legal Practice’s (NBA-SLP) annual conference.
According to Mr Osigwe, the problem in Rivers State was caused by the ego of the principal actors in refusing to sit down to find a solution that works for the people of Rivers.
“Blaming the Supreme Court or any other body will not solve the problem. If the actors had placed Rivers above their own personal interests and cared about the security and welfare of the people, we would not be where we are. It became an ego fight and an issue of who wins. So, ego is at the base of the problem in Rivers and not the Supreme Court.
“People get judgements from the court and still decide to go for an amicable solution, so it is not the judgement of the Supreme Court but the principal actors that are to be blamed,’’ Mr Osigwe said.
He added that while the NBA was not in a legal argument with the president, the association was of the view that some of the actions taken might not be supported by the constitution.
“We are of the opinion that Section 305 of the 1999 Constitution cannot be read in isolation from Section 11 of the same constitution. There have been killings in many states in Nigeria and much more breakdown of law and order than we have seen in Rivers but no state of emergency was declared in those states. We are of the view that the problem in Rivers can be solved by the principal actors swallowing their egos and putting the welfare and security of the people of Rivers above their personal interests.
“This declaration may not solve the problem in Rivers and it worries me that an administrator can be appointed and worse still, a retired military officer to administer the state. It is unconstitutional and should not be supported because we may be setting a dangerous precedence,’’ Mr Osigwe said.
Earlier, the Chairman of the Conference Planning Committee, Paul Harris Ogbole, (SAN), said that the theme for the 2025 NBA-SLP Conference was “Uncommon challenges in a rapidly changing legal environment.’’
Mr Ogbole said the conference aimed to explore the contemporary challenges evolving in the legal environment.
He said they would also explore the impact of global interconnectedness on legal systems, the growing demand for specialised legal services and provide insights into navigating the legal frontiers.
The conference will also highlight great opportunities for legal practitioners including the development of legal technological solutions, the expansion of alternative dispute resolution mechanisms and the increasing focus on access to justice and legal empowerment.
The conference will hold in Jos from April 24 to April 27.
The president also cited the destruction of pipelines by suspected militants as a contributing factor to the declaration.
However, Anabs Sara-Igbe, a chieftain of the Pan Niger Delta Forum, disagreed with the president’s action on the emergency rule.
He stated that all avenues for mediation should have been exhausted before resorting to an emergency rule.
“President Tinubu’s invocation of Section 305 of the Nigerian Constitution at this time is inappropriate. The president claims to have declared a state of emergency to restore peace, but the real question is: why is the FCT minister Nyesom Wike, the key figure in the crisis, not suspended?”, he queried.
Chief Sara-Igbe said the president’s suspension of Rivers’ elected officials from office was unconstitutional.
“Unlike in Sokoto, Borno, and other northern states, there is no war or loss of lives in Rivers that warrants the declaration of emergency rule in a peaceful state,’’ Chief Sara-Igbe explained.
He, however, accused the president of not being sincere with the people of Rivers State and had taken sides in the crisis through his actions and comments.
Ann-Kio Briggs, a prominent environmental and human rights activist, also decried President Tinubu’s justification for the emergency declaration, particularly his claim that Gov Fubara failed to brief him or condemn the pipeline explosions.
She stated that Gov Fubara had, on multiple occasions, informed the president of developments in the state.
“On March 11, PANDEF met with the president to brief him and seek his intervention; the group had also made efforts to mediate peace between Fubara and Wike,” Ms Briggs said, adding, “So, for President Tinubu to give the impression that no efforts were made to resolve the crises is misleading.”
Ms Briggs said the president’s reference to pipeline attacks as a basis for the state emergency was not convincing since pipelines had been vandalised for decades in Niger Delta without such drastic measures being taken.
She acknowledged that while the president had the power to declare a state of emergency, he did not have the constitutional authority to suspend an elected governor.
“This decision is hasty, rash, and premeditated, posing a grave threat to the people of the state; it is a targeted plot against Governor Fubara. It is unacceptable,” Ms Briggs added.
She also referenced Chief Wike’s past remarks on TV, where he allegedly claimed to have the capacity to sabotage pipelines, and questioned why the minister was not suspended.
“Why wasn’t the minister suspended, considering he is a major player in the crises and the one the 27 lawmakers take instructions from?” Ms Briggs noted.
Tonye Cole, the APC governorship candidate in the 2023 Rivers election, blamed all political actors involved.
“Today is a dark day in Rivers politics; the president had no choice but to step in to address the situation. I believe the president made some attempts to resolve the issues, but he did not push hard enough to bring the matter to a peaceful conclusion,” Mr Cole said.
The Tide source reports that two female members shouted at each other over the political crisis in the South-South State.
The two female lawmakers, Marie Ebikake (PDP, Bayelsa) and Blessing Amadi (PDP, Rivers), engaged in a shouting match on the constitutionality of the President’s decision to declare a state of emergency in Rivers State.
This happened before the commencement of the plenary.
It took the intervention of other lawmakers in the chamber to prevent the issue from snowballing into an uncontrollable situation.
Recall that President Bola Tinubu on Tuesday declared a state of emergency in Rivers State following the prolonged political crisis in the state.
The president also suspended Governor Siminalayi Fubara, his deputy, Ngozi Odu, and members of the state assembly for six months.
President Tinubu also nominated a former Chief Of Naval Staff, Vice-Admiral Ibok-Ete Ibas (retd), to administer the state.
Reacting, the spokesperson of the House of Representatives, Akin Rotimi, said President Tinubu informed the national assembly through a letter before the emergency proclamation.
Hon. Rotimi added that President Tinubu’s letter informing the House of his decision and seeking approval on the state of emergency in Rivers in line with section 305 of the Constitution had been transmitted to the green chamber and would be read during plenary on Wednesday for further legislative action.
He said President Tinubu met with the leadership of both chambers, and the National Security Adviser and Service Chiefs before the broadcast.
