Environment
Rivers Guber Tussle: ‘Supreme Court ’ll Come To The Rescue’
We now have a ba
bel of voices concerning judgments on electoral matters before the courts. The Tribunals and Court of Appeal are singing discordant tunes, allowing political considerations to be the centrepiece of their decisions.
The situation has so degenerated that a relationship with the centre gives one a clear advantage in any electoral matter before the lower courts. Without doubt, the oil-rich States of the Niger Delta are worse hit by this sad development in the nation’s judiciary.
Rivers State has suffered the most in the current wave of judicial indiscretion at the lower bench. Once the matters involve Rivers State, the Electoral Act and the Constitution are thrown out of the windows. Cases decided elsewhere based on the law are disregarded when it comes to Rivers State.
The Court of Appeal has decided on all the National Assembly elections in Rivers State and judgements have been entered for the Governorship and State Assembly Elections.
In its judgment on the governorship election, the Court of Appeal claimed that there was no election anywhere in Rivers State. The court claimed that it arrived at its decision on the strength of the use of the card readers and the testimonies of just 56 witnesses.
The judgments of the Court of Appeal on all the elections in Rivers State are flawed in all respects. However, nothing can be done for the victims of the judicial error as regards the National Assembly and State Assembly elections. They will have to make the sacrifice of approaching their constituents again for the revalidation of their earlier mandate.
However, with the unfolding scenario, it is necessary to use the the disposition of the Court of Appeal to actually analyse the situation in the state.
First, the judgments churned out by the Court of Appeal have proved for the very first time, that the elections in Rivers State were held in compliance with the Electoral Act and the Constitution. The fact that the Court of Appeal has upheld State Assembly elections from constituencies in all the three senatorial districts of the state show that the APC lost fairly and Governor Wike was duly elected by lawful votes cast. Out of the 32 State Constituencies , the Appeal Court upheld elections in 11 State Constituencies. That represents roughly 35 percent of the State. Yet, the same Court said that the governorship election did not hold. This error is regrettable.
In one of the state Constituencies upheld by the Appeal Court, that is the Port Harcourt Constituency 1, the Court held that Victoria Nyeche of the APC defeated Jones Ogbonda of the PDP in a legally conducted election. Recall that both the Governorship and State Assembly elections held on same day.
The same Appeal Court held that elections held successfully in Okrika State Constituency, Etche 1 State Constituency, Ahoada West State Constituency, Ogu/Bolo State Constituency , ONELGA 2 State Constituency, Oyigbo, Khana,Phalga 1 ,Abua/Odual and Okrika Constituencies.
These were Constituencies where the APC claimed violence caused elections not to the hold. Two of these Constituencies, ONELGA and Ahoada West were celebrated by the APC as hotbeds of electoral violence and irregularities.
If the Appeal Court has finally admitted that elections held in these constituencies, it goes to prove that no diligent judicial review was done before the decision to annul the Rivers State Governorship Election was taken.
The controversial decisions of the Appeal Court panel on Rivers election have been premised on faulty lines already disregarded by other panels of the Appeal Court and the Supreme Court. First, the Court of Appeal panel for Rivers elections shifted the burden from the petitioners (APC ) to the respondents (PDP ).
An Appeal Court Panel sitting in Makurdi on the appeal filed by Prince Terhemen Tarzoor against the decision upholding the election of Benue State Governor, Samuel Ortom held thus:
“The complaint of the Appellant under this issue is that the Tribunal had misplaced the burden of proof on him when it said that he must win his case on the strength of his own case and not on the weakness of the Respondents’ cases or defence, was on the assertion made that the 2nd Respondent did not conduct a primary election at all for the nomination of the 1st Respondent as a candidate to contest the election in question. The Appellant calls and labels the said assertion or allegation, as a negative assertion which he has no duty to prove under the law. However, as demonstrated earlier, an assertion or allegation, can be either negative or positive, but once made by a party in a case, he owes and bears the legal burden of proof, which is fixed and static, to prove same if he expects a court or tribunal to, on its basis, make a declaration of right he claims in the case in his favour. It is a clear misconception, with due respect to counsel, to argue that the Respondents who had denied the assertion made by the petitioner as the vital and crucial point and fulcrum of his case, had the legal burden of proof of such an allegation against them merely on the basis of their denial of the assertion or allegation”.
But in the state of all Rivers State elections decided so far, the Appeal Court panel moved the burden from the APC to the PDP.
In the case of the governorship election, the Rivers State APC only called only 56 witnesses. Majority of these witnesses had nothing to do with the governorship election at the polling unit. They were soldiers, mobile policemen and DSS operatives detailed by the Security High Command to lie in court. Even where the exact officers who personally provided security for the elections testified, they were ignored.
Even at that, these few 56 witnesses’ testimonies in line with the Supreme Court position on the required proofs to void an election represent just 56 polling units out of the 4442 polling units for the entire state. It is unheard of that courts would rely on gossips or hearsay to decide electoral matters.
According to the Supreme Court, a petitioner can only prove that elections did not hold by calling a voter per polling unit to prove his case. Therefore, a petitioner cannot rely on blanket frivolous allegations like APC have done to get judgment in an electoral dispute.
Deciding the election petition filed by Senator Ucha against the election of former Governor Elechi of Ebonyi State in 2012, the Supreme Court declared:
“The results declared by INEC are prima facie correct and the onus is on the petitioner to prove the contrary. Where a petitioner complains of non-compliance with provisions of the Electoral Act, 2010 (as amended), he has a duty to prove it polling unit by polling unit, ward by ward and the standard of proof is on the balance of probabilities and not on minimal proof. He must show figures that the adverse party was credited with as a result of the non-compliance, Forms EC8A, election materials not stamped/signed by Presiding Officers. He must establish that non-compliance was substantial, that it affected the election result. “.
Now, there is the issue of the qualification to contest the Rivers State elections in the state first place. Section 85 (1) spells out clearly that a political party must give INEC 21 days notice before holding a valid primary. Failure to do this implies that no primary was held. It was on the premise of the APC’S failure to observe Section 85 (1) that the Appeal Court panel upheld the election of Prince Nnam Obi, representing ONELGA /Ahoada West at the House of Representatives. It was also on the basis of Section 85 (1) that the same Appeal Court dismissed the appeal of Labour Party against the election of Governor Wike.
Only this week, the Court of Appeal nullified the election of Senator Uche Ekwunife of the PDP on the strength that she was not validly nominated.
According to the Appeal Court panel that sat in Enugu :
“Nomination is part and parcel of qualification to stand for an election and since an election can be challenged on the grounds of lack of qualification, it follows that the appropriate forum to challenge it after the election is held is the Election Tribunal”.
However, the Appeal Court panel that considered all the appeals on the Rivers State elections deviated from this norm. Instead, they chose to support the illegality wherein the APC conducted no valid primary in the state. Based on the Electoral Act, APC had no governorship candidate, no National Assembly candidates or State Assembly candidates.
Finally, there is the issue of card reader accreditation. The Appeal Court panel for Rivers elections elevated the card reader accreditation above the Electoral Act and the Constitution. The Electoral Act spells out the process of accreditation during an election.
The electoral dispute between Jimi Agbaje (PDP ) and the Lagos State Governor, Akinwunmi Ambode (APC ) is the most prominent case to cite on the issue of card reader accreditation. The Appeal Court threw out Agbaje’s appeal in a considered opinion.
Justice Ogbuinya, the presiding judge of the Appeal Court panel held that: “The paragraph (13b) displays a vitriolic attack on the irregularities germinating from the improper or non-use of the smart card readers in the polling units.
“As it is, it has no life of its own as a ground. It endeavours to introduce the defects in the use of smart card readers. The evolution of the concept of smart card reader is a familiar one. It came to being during the last general election. On this score, it is a nascent procedure injected into our infant and fledgling electoral system to ensure credible and transparent election.
“The extant Electoral Act (2010) which predates the concept (of card reader) is not its parent or progenitor. Since it is not the progeny of the Electoral Act, fronting it as a ground to challenge any election does not have its (the Electoral Act’s) blessing, nay Section 138 (1) of it.
“Put simply, a petitioner cannot project the non-presence or improper use of smart card reader as a ground for questioning an election. It does not qualify as one.”
The preceding paragraphs on the Lagos State Governorship Dispute between the PDP and the APC rests the issue on card reader accreditation. It brings to the fore the errors that invalidate the Appeal Court judgments on Rivers elections.
In Delta State, the Appeal Court similarly dismissed the card reader as the basis for the nullification of an election in the appeal filed by Great Ogboru of Labour Party who challenged the election of Governor Ifeanyi Okowa.
Justice Abba-Aji in the lead judgment of the Court of Appeal held that Ogboru merely relied on records of the card reader accreditation without demonstrating the documents by credible evidence.
She held that Ogboru never challenged the evidence of the respondents and even his own witnesses that the card readers had challenges in many part of the states and that apart from the use of card reader, there was also manual accreditation.
While the National and State Assembly elections have come and gone, the judiciary still has the opportunity to remedy its dwindling image in relation to the Rivers State Governorship Election.
The onus to address the errors of the Appeal Court panel that sat on Rivers State elections rests squarely with the Supreme Court. These erroneous judgments of the Appeal Court panel should be confined to the dustbin of history. They have damaged the electoral jurisprudence, but the Supreme Court must come to the rescue. Irrespective of whose political ox is gored, the Supreme Court must rise to the occasion.
From all indications, immediate past Rivers State Governor, Rotimi Amaechi has concluded plans to use Rivers State as a collateral to remain relevant in Abuja after squandering over N3trillion in the worst governance tragedy of our time. Amaechi and his political crooks who have been fingered in the worst judicial misrepresentation of all time. The National Judicial Council should act on the petition filed against the Appeal Court panel that failed the Justice system. This is the only way the reforms the Chief Justice of Nigeria promised dissatisfied Nigerians will be effected. Indicted Amaechi is using these illegally acquired funds to compromise the judiciary. The facts are with the EFCC and Nigerians are waiting for the commission to act.
SimeonNwakaudu is Special Assistant to the Rivers State Governor on Electronic Media.
Environment
Group Advocates End To Plastic Wastes
Health of Mother Earth Foundation (HOMEF), an ecology-focused Non-Governmental Organisation (NGO), has called for a drastic reduction in the use of plastics to save planet earth from suffocation.
This was contained in a press release made available to The Tide in Port Harcourt.in reactions to the just concluded World Earth Day celebration.
According to the release signed by Komev Odhomo HOMEF media /communications lead, HOMEF noted that celebrating Earth Day is an annual event designed to shed light on serious environmental problems faced from the climate crisis to air pollution and deforestation.
“World Earth Day reminds us as humans that the Earth is ours to protect and preserve but over time humans have abandoned their roles in protecting the planet because of selfishness and drive for profit.
The International Mother Earth Day’s theme this year ‘Planet vs Plastic’ urges us to build a liveable future for humans, other beings, and natural systems.
We stand united in our fight against non-biodegradable waste pollution.
“Our addiction to single-use plastics suffocates the planet. Plastics can take hundreds of years to decompose, clog our water bodies, and cause harmful impacts as a result of their chemical composition.
“Sadly, the world is literally a plastic civilisation due to a vested interest in hydrocarbons and ease of application, HOMEF said.
It qouted the Executive Director of Health of Mother Earth Foundation, Dr Nnimmo Bassey, as advocating for urgent action to ban the production and usage of single-use plastics.
He further urged action by everyone to be involved in efforts to kick out plastics.
Now is a critical time to choose between planet and plastic. Good sense tells us to choose the planet, our Mother Earth that sustains all lives.
Poor sense driven by profit urges humans to choose plastics because of the ease they bring, despite the harmful impacts on our health, climate, and overall health of the planet.
As we mark World Earth Day 2024, the alarm must be sounded that it is time to uproot plastics from their fossil base or be ready to be turned into plastic humans living plastic lives and heading to an infernal plastic future. At HOMEF, we are all for the planet, people, and all life forms,” Bassey said.
HOMEF noted that research has shown that 380 million tonnes of plastic are now produced every year, while only nine percent of plastic ever produced has been recycled. Campaigns around the world calling for a 60 percent reduction in plastic by 2040 are commendable and worthy of support.
At Health of Mother Earth Foundation (HOMEF), we believe in the intrinsic Rights of Mother Earth and the rights of humans and other beings to be respected and to live in dignity.
It is time to build up courage and to preserve and protect our health, and our livelihoods by embracing alternatives that are sustainable, healthy, and safe for the planet. We must stop all forms of destructive extractive activities in Nigeria, Africa, and the World.
The Planet vs Plastics campaign is a call to arms, a demand that we act now to end the scourge of plastics and safeguard the health of every living being on our planet,” We are submerged in a sea of plastic wastes, from our creeks to the ocean. It’s time we did better!”
Environment
WED:Activists Task Govt On Plastic Pollution, Synophom Ban
Civil societies and environmental rights activists have tasked governments across the country to find solutions to the issue of plastic pollution.
They also called on Rivers state and other state governments in the country to ban syrophom as was done in Lagos.
The activists said this while reacting to the theme of the just concluded World Earth Day celebration which held across the world last Monday 22 April,2024.
The theme for this year’s celebration was”Planet vs Plastic”. According to information on the website of the United Nations Environment Programm( UNEP), 380 million tonnes of plastic are now produced every year,while only 9 percent of plastic ever produced has been recycled.
It was also found that over 5.25 trillion macro and micro process of plastic are lying on the ocean bed
It noted that “The Planet v Plastics campaign is a call to arms, a demand that we act now to end the scourge of plastic pollution
Environmental Right Activists said time has come for the government to either ensure an outright ban on plastic productions or seek for ways of recycling them.
It would be noted that the effects of plastic pollution is being felt by communities across the country
Recently, the Amadi-Ama Community in the Port Harcourt City Local Government Area of Rivers State raised alarm over the scourge of plastic pollution in its waterways.
According to the community, plastic pollution in its water ways has not only affected aquactic lives but has hampered communication including movement of vessels within its water ways.
Amadi -Ama Community is not alone in this, other communities have also raised concern.
In Port Harcourt and Obio-Akpor local government areas, dumping of plastic into drainages were largely blamed for the flooding withnessed annually in the city.
According to respondents ,plastics dumped into drainages by unscrupulous elements always block the free flow of water to the river, thereby causing flooding.
Meanwhile, some Environmental Right Activists have been speaking on the celebration.
According to some of them, solution to plastic pollution must be sought urgently by the Authorities
They urged governments at all levels to embark on a programmes of plastic recycling while also sensitising the public on the dangers associated with indiscriminate dumping of plastics into the environment including water ways.
She also decried the indiscriminate dumping of plastics by residents of Port Harcourt City and Obio Akpor, adding that it contributes to flooding being experienced in the city.
Meju said the best way to dispose off plastics must be sought out.
Olatunji Olawapo of Sustainability and Climate Literacy particularly urged the Rivers State Government to ban syrophom,a plastic used by food vendors to wrap food for their customers.
He said syrophom does not decay adding it constitute a big environmental nuisance
Olawapo argued that if Lagos State can banned it, there is no reason why Rivers state cannot do same.
Olawapo also urged for more sensitisation on the effects of plastic pollution the on the environment he said his organisation based in Eagle Island Port Harcourt has been doing a lot in the area of environmental sustainability.
Environment
South East Businessmen Charge Governors On Rail, Security, Others
Business community in Se South East has asked governors in the zone to eschew individualism and forge cooperation for the development of the region.
They identified development of the rail system, security, power and roads as areas the states should cooperate, citing what was going on in the South West states.
Some businessmen, who spoke, said only regional cooperation could enable the people of the area to fully benefit from the present enhanced attention some of the states were placing on repositioning and upgrading of infrastructures.
They also said governments and the organised private sector groups in the five states needed to work in synergy.
This comes on the heels of huge investments organisations, like Geometric Power, have thrown into the system in Aba, Abia State, to ensure uninterrupted electricity power supply, the rehabilitation of the Enugu/Port Harcourt expressway, eastern rail lines currently being restored, as well as promises from the Federal Government, to reignite the industrialisation of the zone.
Immediate past president of Aba Chamber of Commerce, Industry, Mines and Agriculture (ACCIMA), Jerry Kalu, said there was need to link the major cities in the zone with a rail line, good roads and other infrastructures that will bring them together industrially and provide avenues of assisting one another, in development.
In achieving this, Kalu said private sector organs should always be taken in by governments of Abia, Anambra, Ebonyi, Enugu and Imo states, in planning their annual, medium and long-term development programmes and budgeting, to accommodate all sectors of the society.
He commended Governor Alex Otti’s administration in Abia, for being the first to ever invite ACCIMA to participate and present the needs and aspirations of the organised private sector for input into the 2024 budget, during the preparations last year.
Former president of Onitsha Chamber of Commerce, Industry, Mines and Agriculture (ONICIMA), Kevin Obieri, said individualism was the bane of development in the region.
Obieri said such attitude affects everything happening in the South East, noting that even the altruistic ones among the people talk about their community, town or friends instead of collective development of the region.
According to him, the individualistic approach to life also made the South East Governors’ Forum a very weak institution not strong enough to help articulate and pursue an integrated approach to development in the zone in the areas of power, railway and security, industrial concerns and transportation.
“Any railway or road that does not take into consideration its outlet to the sea and the need for our people to evacuate their imports easily into the hinterlands, will always have problems. To get the private sector to support it will be difficult too because the private sector is also looking for its own benefits, what affects it directly.
“It is a very complex situation that needs good leadership, a leadership that plays beyond party and personal levels. A leadership that can look at things in the overall benefit of the region,” he said.
In addition, Obieri called for the decentralisation of the security architecture in Nigeria.
“Let there be clear cut constitutional changes in theory and practice and our people can do more in this regard. People come from Imo State and do kidnapping in Anambra and go back. Without proper cooperation between the South East governors, there will always be problems. Today, you hardly hear Imo State Governor, Hope Uzodimma and Anambra State Governor, Charles Soludo talking because they belong to different parties. Otti is on his own too and this situation is not the best for us,” he said.
-
News4 days ago
Bonny-Bodo Road: FG Offers Additional N20bn, Targets December Deadline
-
Business4 days ago
Nigeria Set To Get $2.25bn World Bank Loan … Plans Diaspora Bond
-
Rivers15 hours ago
Cleric Attributes Nigeria’s Unity To God’s Grace
-
Oil & Energy12 hours ago
Reps Committee Summons Kyari, Others Over Environmental Degradation
-
Niger Delta4 days ago
Mile One Market: Committee Commences Verification Exercise …Denies Allocations Of Shops
-
Sports4 days ago
Chairman Lauds NPFL Referees Improvement
-
News13 hours ago
NDLEA Intercepts Cakes Laced With Drugs
-
Environment11 hours ago
FG Unveils Framework For Washcom Formation, Management