Politics
National Confab: Nigeria At It Again
In the next three months,
beginning from today, 492 ‘wise men’ who are believed to be the true representatives of over 160 million Nigerians will be putting the soul of Nigeria on the slab, courtesy of the national conference. The national dialogue which kicks off today in the nation’s capital, Abuja with the inauguration of 492 delegates is a platform that affords Nigerians yet another opportunity to agree on the basis of their togetherness.
The state of the nation which has been held captive by the nation’s main fault lines – politics, religion and ethnicity, has made the conference compellingly appealing to many Nigerians, even though some others have questioned the timing of the conference and the motive behind the Federal Government’s sudden romance with a national dialogue it had consistently rejected as unnecessary.
This year’s talkshop will be one in a series of discussions that would take place since the amalgamation of the Southern and Northern protectorates by the British colonialists in 1914 to form a single entity known as Nigeria. The first discussion which took place in 1922 gave birth to Clifford Constitution which introduced the principle of election in Nigerian politics. This was followed by another talkshop which produced the 1946 Richard Constitution that recognised regionalism in Nigeria, and then the 1951 Macpherson Constitution which was a bye-product of a conference that recognised federalism and expanded the frontiers of regional autonomy.
In 1953, there was yet another constitutional conference in London that produced a federal constitution known as the 1954 Lyttleton Constitution. That constitution allocated limited but specific powers to the federal government while allowing the three regions that made up Nigeria at that time – North, West and East, to develop at their own pace.
The 1957 constitutional conference also in London, prepared Nigeria for independence and gave birth to the 1960 Constitution; while the conference that produced the 1963 Republican Constitution formally freed Nigeria from the apron strings of the British colonialists. The year 1978 saw Nigeria organising a constituent Assembly which produced the 1979 Constitution and the presidential system of government, while 20 years later, Nigeria achieved another constitution – 1999 Constitution which is now in place, and currently undergoing amendment.
With the exemption of the 1995 and 2005 national confabs held under General Sani Abacha and former President Olusegun Obasanjo, respectively, and whose outcome were not effected, other national dialogues produced results and made clear impacts in moving Nigeria forward. This year’s talk shop is expected to produce similar results, depending however on how the 492 delegates canvass and aggregate their views at the confab.
Most of the discussions that will feature in the conference are already in the public domain, as have been canvassed by several ethnic groups in the country. But the most central and perhaps most thorny ones are issues of true federalism and resource control. Given the cacophony of voices trailing these two issues over the years, with the South-West and South-South leading the campaign in favour of true federalism and resource control as against the North’s retention of the status quo, it will require a political savvy on the part of the delegates to resolve the impasse these contentious issues might create.
Rising from a Pan-Niger Delta conference organised by the Social Development Integrated Centre in collaboration with other civil society and community groups in Port Harcourt on January 28, the South South demanded a structuring of the country into a truly federal state where the component ethnic nationalities own and control their natural resources with residual powers residing in the constituent units.
Also on February 24, the various ethnic nationalities in Southern Nigeria met in Calabar to articulate their positions in the national conference. The Southern leaders summit which was attended by delegates from the three southern geopolitical zones – South-West, South-East and South-South deliberated extensively on the issue of resource control as the only way to make the federating units look inward by exploring and exploiting their natural resources under the economic principle of comparative advantage. It also recommended an increase in the percentage of revenue allocation from oil and gas production under the derivation principle.
In a separate position, the Committee of Benin Elders, just like their counterparts in the South-West, proposed regional governments. The Benin Elders Committee particularly proposed the structuring of the country into eight regions with four regions each for Northern Nigeria and Southern Nigeria. The committee also proposed that the regions should be allowed to control their resources and pay a royalty tax of 25 per cent to the Federal Government.
For the Northern Nigeria, however, there was the need for a review of the revenue sharing formular. Although the North held no mini or pre-national conference to articulate a common position to be presented at the national conference, its leaders have consistently opposed the idea of resource control, just as they have always argued that the huge allocations to the South South, where the bulk of the nation’s revenue comes from through oil exploration, amount to an injustice. The Arewa Consultative Forum which is regarded as the mouthpiece of the North, at a public hearing in Sokoto, called for the abolition of onshore/offshore dichotomy in the calculation of revenue accruing to the littoral states.
While it may be difficult to predict the outcome of the confab, there are two issues that are germane to the success or otherwise of the talkshop. The first is the issue of whether or not Nigeria should remain as one indivisible entity. And if the answer is yes, what will be the term of reference of living together peacefully?
Although President Goodluck Jonathan had during the inauguration of the Presidential Advisory Committee on National Dialogue, last year, foreclosed any discussion on the unity of the country, the objection of some delegates to the President’s no-go-area, calls for utmost caution, especially against the backdrop of secession threat by a section of the South East, as represented by the Movement for the Actualisation of the Sovereign State of Biafra (MASSOB).
There is also a groundswell of objections to some recommendations of the Senator Femi Okunrounmu-led Presidential Advisory Committee which designed the modality for the national conference. While the committee recommended that the outcome of the conference be ratified by the National Assembly, many Nigerians, including some of the delegates prefer that the outcome of the confab be subjected to a referendum.
Whatever option the confab chooses to ratify its decisions, it is expected that the outcome will promote unity and peace among all ethnic nationalities, and above all assuage the feelings of ordinary people who have over the past 100 years of existence as Nigerians been held down by socio-economic, political and ethno -religious challenges that were recently exarcerbated by the seemingly intractable Boko Haram insurgency.
L-R: Afenifere Chieftain, Sir Olaniwun Ajayi, Governor Abiola Ajimobi of Oyo State and Chief Ayo Adebanjo, during the preliminary meeting of the Yoruba Committee on National Conference in Ijebu Ode last Monday
Boye Salau
The lawmaker representing Ipokia/Idiroko Constituency in the Ogun State House of Assembly, Bisi Oyedele, says Nigerian legislature, especially at the state level, has not ceased to be an appendage of the executive because the constitution which guarantees its financial autonomy has not been strictly adhered to.
Hon. Oyedele argued that a legislature that goes cap in hand to the executive cannot perform it functions optimally.
He spoke at a symposium organised by the Forum for Governance Leadership and Value (FGLV) in Abeokuta, Ogun State.
The symposium with the theme: “Enhancing The Value Of The Legislature In Nigeria’s Democratic Process”, was put together in honour of the Senator representing Ogun West Senatorial District, Senator Adeola Olamilekan, who was decorated as the legislative icon in Nigeria.
“The constitution is clear about legislative autonomy in section 121 of the constitution. It states clearly how legislature should be autonomous, independent. Until when that is done in Nigeria, the legislature will continue to become an appendage of the executive.
“I must tell you that if there’s strict adherence to the dictate of the constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, you will begin to see changes in the operationalities of the houses of assembly.
“That’s very important because when you are not empowered financially, when everything you want to do, you have to raise a memo to the governor, we want this; you’re more like at the service of the governor, of which the constitution doesn’t put us under the governor”, Hon. Oyedele said.
He described the legislature as the bedrock of democracy, saying lawmakers should be the ones speaking for the people.
Delivering the lecture, a university don, Prof. Moshood Omotosho, lamented that corruption and lobbying by powerful political ‘cabals’ are major obstacles to effective lawmaking in Nigeria.
The professor of International Relations at the Obafemi Awolowo University, said despite the challenges, the crucial role of the legislature in stabilizing democratic governance through law-making, oversight promoting good governance, amongst others must not be undermined.
He said, “The legislature’s ability to make effective laws can be affected by factors like political gridlock, corruption, and the influence of special interest groups, i.e., lobbying by powerful political mafia in the state, major power brokers, and political cabals.
“The relationship between the executive and legislature can be strained, leading to conflicts that hinder effective governance due to differing priorities and power struggles,” Prof. Moshood explained.
A Federal Commissioner, Public Complaints Commission, Ogun State, Morakinyo Akinleye, who represented Senator Adeola, applauded his strides in lawmaking and empowerment of his constituents.
“The legislature is the closest arm of government to the people. Hon. Solomon Adeola should be commended for his understanding of grassroots needs and his effective committee management,” Akinleye stated.
The convener, Bolaji Adeniji, disclosed that the purpose of the symposium was to have a conversation on how the legislature can add value to the society.
The Leader of the New Nigeria Peoples Party (NNPP), Senator Rabi’u Kwankwaso has accused the members of the party that recently defected to the All Progrssives Congress (APC) of betraying the party and the masses that brought them to power.
He spoke at his Bompai residence in Kano State, when he received supporters of Senator Abdulraham Sumaila (Kano South) who recently declined to defect with him (Kawu Sumaila) to the APC.
“Kano South is a lesson. Voters rejected spaghetti, N200 and Atamfa (wrappers) and were patient to vote for the NNPP. But those who won the election on the party’s ticket decided to abandon the masses to join those who do not have the masses at heart but are only after what they will get for themselves and their families” he stated.
“There is no worse political sin than leaving the party that gave you the opportunity and support but later you abandoned the party. This is the highest level of betrayal,” Senator Kwankwaso added.
Senator Kwankwaso, a former governor of Kano State, appreciated the loyal members for “taking the courage to return to their base,” while predicting that all those who betrayed the Kwankwasiyya Movement would regret their political actions sooner or later.
“Fighting Kwankwasiyya is not an easy task, they will not know until when they engage in the fight,” he said.
Speaking on behalf of the supporters, Muntari Fararawa, said that they came to his home to inform him of their refusal to join the APC with their senator.
“We thought it wise to return home so as to continue to propagate the ideals of the Kwankwasiyya Movement and the NNPP as well as to contribute our quota to the development of our dear state.
“We hope that we will be accepted back and reintegrated into the Kwankwasiyya Movement and the NNPP to enable us to enjoy the same rights and privileges as other members,” he said.
Business mogul and elder statesman, Prince Arthur Eze, has hailed President Bola Tinubu for his historic visit to Anambra State and the Southeast zone, describing it as a clear message of healing and reconciliation to the Igbo.
The business magnate stated this in a letter he sent to the president, a copy of which was made available to newsmen, upon his return to Nigeria from Venezuela, where he had gone for a business endeavour.
“I have seen the joy and excitement elicited amongst our people by your visit to Anambra State.
“To this end I write to thank you specially for the visit to Anambra and by extension to the Southeast,” Prince Eze wrote.
He noted that the visit has gone a long way in healing the civil war wounds of South Easterners and assured the people that there is hope for proper reconciliation and reintegration.
“Today, it has entered the annals of Nigeria’s chequered history that you are the first President of the country, from the Southwest who has taken this historic initiative to visit the Southeast after the bitter civil war with a clear message of reconciling the Igbo with other parts of the nation.
“Nigerians have not forgotten the bitter civil war and its painful relics with its tribal cleavages and dimensions. This visit by you is therefore a giant leap forward and a clear signal that the wounds of that unfortunate era is healable.
“Your pronouncements during the visit are vivid indications that you are indeed a nationalist and a bridge builder who has risen above tribal dogmatism.
“Your actions by this singular visit has sent a message of hope of complete reintegration and reconciliation to the Igbo race.
“This is monumental and a generational landmark that we would continue to cherish and value,” he said.
Prince Eze also expressed appreciation to the president for appointing Igbo sons and daughters into key positions in his government.
“We are appreciative to the genuine concern you have always shown as the President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, for the cause of the Igbos. You have appointed Igbo sons and daughters to key positions as a mark of recognition for the entire Igbo people of this country.
“You also gave us important ministerial positions which no President before you had done, signaling your appreciation of the people of Southeast extraction.
“I also commend your robust appreciation of the laudable economic and infrastructural development projects accomplished by the Anambra State government under the able leadership of the amiable Professor Charles Chukwuma Soludo. Soludo is a genuine and sincere personality, and every Igboman will support him. Be rest assured that he will ensure massive support for you from the Southeast in the 2027 elections”.
While describing President Tinubu as a true nationalist, Prince Eze pledged his support and those of other Igbo for the re-election of the president in 2027.
“I therefore make bold to say that Igbos, wherever they may reside in this country now have very concrete and genuine reasons to support you and work actively for your re-election in 2027 so that you can do more for the Igbos.
“Once again, I thank you immensely, my dear President, Dike Si’mba!” Prince Eze said.