Connect with us

Column

Vision 20:2020 Mirage Or Reality?

Published

on

Nigerians are not comfortable that we are talking about competing with leading economies in the Western and Eastern blocs, when the necessary institutional framework is virtually non-existent, when our socio-political system is still characterised with mediocrity and sycophancy, when corruption still stir us in the face, (in high and low places) and indeed when the ideals of the Rule of Law and democratic process are still fragile.

 

Barely eight years to go, Nigeria’s ambition to categorise the country among the world’s 20 strongest economies by 2020 and place her as one of the fastest developing nations is fast becoming a pipe dream.  Vision 20: 2020 is packaged to launch Nigeria, not only as an African giant, but a global economic giant in the comity of nations.

However, the project appears to be heading to the rocks as a number of factors stir the project on the face, thus hindering the successful execution of the scheme. Among the obstacles include: dearth of non accessibility to long-term credit facilities, high cost of living, influx of substandard finished products, especially from Asia axis (China, Taiwan, Korea, Malaysia, India etc).

Other indices are unstable power/energy, poor infrastructures like road network, absence of railway transport, poor research, weak link between small and large-scale enterprises, poor tax administration, policy somersaults, among other hindernesses.

Infact, the obstacles are legion and except deliberate and conscious efforts are made to revert the trend, our hopes to be among the best 20 in the world will continue to be a mirage.

Just recently, a friend of mine, simply called Joe (an economist) while addressing participants during an economic forum held in Port Harcourt recently observed that Nigerian leaders were merely day-dreaming with the Vision 20:2020 project, noting that Nigeria cannot break even with the present crop of leaders.  For him, our leaders are just re-circled from one dispensation to another, and except there is a redical departure from the status-quo, we will continue to slide further.

For Joe, our leaders lack the political will and commitment for a change as most of them are products of the “old brigade” who have run out of ideas and only bent on milking Nigeria dry, rather than strategising on how to move the country forward economically.  According to him, this generation of Nigerians may not see the Messiah that will salvage our economy.

Rightly or wrongly, my friend made his views clear to the conveners of the forum.  He may not be completely right in his assertion but there are salient points that must and should be addressed, if Nigeria must attain the philosophy behind the Vision 20:2020 project.

Currently, the Nigeria business community, from all indications, appears not fully mobilised for the execution of the project.  The development of the business sector is critical, and indeed, crucial to the realisation of the economic dream.

Sadly enough, the manufacturing sub-sector which, of course, is an intergral part of the business community is virtually in limbo, operating in less than 50 per cent capacity due to multiple factors militating against its full operational capacity.

The sector, due to obvious hip-cups, contributes only three per cent yearly as against 25 per cent which the sector should ordinarily contribute to the Gross Domestic Product (GDP).

The sector’s minimal contribution to the GDP is largely attributable to the nation’s epileptic power situation Manufacturers lament that they spend over N3.5 trillion annually on diesel and petrol due to unstable electricity which had remained a nightmare and unaddressed to by successive administrations for decades.

Except drastic and decisive steps are taken urgently by the authorities, the phenomenon may remain the same and this, no doubt, had forced many manufacturing firms to re-locate to neighbouring countries where power is relatively stable.

The question now is what should government do to address this?  Some say, the authorities should declare a state emergency in the power sector while other opine that Nigeria must withdraw supplying some West African countries with light to add to the nation’s power capacity, if it is serious about the Vision 20:2020 ambition.

As much as I subscribe to these views, I also believe that the problem with the power sector is much more than that because there seems to be unpatriotic Nigerians with foreign collaborators who are bent on sabotaging government’s efforts in addressing the endemic power situation in Nigeria.  Government should therefore not hesitate to identify such blacklegs with a view to apprehending and possibly prosecuting them as a deterant to others with such evil intentions.

Similarly, our leaders need to focus on job creation, agriculture, mass transportation, land reforms, qualitative education, functional healthcare system, infrastructural development and security to turn around the economy and make the 20:2020 economic scheme realisable within the target date.

A school of thought believes that the deadline is achievable if only the government can muster enough political will and genuine commitment to make things happen.

When the Yar’Adua’s administration assembled a cream of Nigerian egg-heads in Abuja in October, 2008 to fashion out the road-map to the nation’s desire to join the league of 20 of world’s strongest economies, little did he realise that apart from the political will power needed to push ambition to a desired end, other variables need to be addressed squarely.

Perhaps, it may be right to assert that the zeal and spirit which the then administration attached to the project may have died down judging from the fact that four years after, not much had been achieved towards realising the dream of belonging to “Club 20 in the next eight years.

One is not, however, saying that Nigeria does not have the potentials to make the dream realisable but the fact is that we need more than rhetories and more of action, action, action.

The action must manifest in setting out clear-cut targets by creating institutional and micro-macro economic framework from growth –inducing environment.

Cases abound of policy thrusts by previous administrations which did not see the light of the day just because successive regimes did not see such projects or programmes as their babies and therefore attached no priority to them.

Targets were set on education, agriculture, health, power generation and distribution, industrial capacity, among others, yet noting came out of them eventually.

Remember Operation Feed the Nation (OFN), Green Revolution, Vision 2010, eradication of polio, illiteracy and poverty, guinea worn, Structural Adjustment Programme (SAP) among other policies which hit the rocks after their initiators  left the saddle.

One cannot easily forget our economic policy thrust aimed at reducing inflation to single digit, revaluation of the Naira, and other economic jargons which could not lead Nigeria anywhere close to Club 50 strongest economies in the world.

My worry on the Vision 20:2020 is hinged on these economic considerations which appear not to be favourable to the successful execution of the target date.

Nigerians are not comfortable that we are talking about competing with leading economies in the Western and Eastern blocs, when the necessary institutional framework is virtually non-existent, when our socio-political system is still characterised with mediocrity and sycophancy, when corruption still stir us in the face, (in high and low places) and indeed when the ideals of the Rule of Law and democratic process are still fragile.

Continue Reading

Column

Renewable Energy Faces Looming Workforce Crisis

Published

on

Despite a discouraging political climate and unprecedented uncertainty in the United States clean energy sector, low costs of wind and solar energy continue to drive growth of the domestic clean energy sector.
However, while market forces continue to support the expansion of renewable energy capacity, the sector faces critical challenges extending beyond the antagonism of the Trump administration.
The continued growth of solar and wind power risks being hampered by several mitigating factors, including (but not limited to) intensifying competition over increasingly scarce suitable land plots, stressed and volatile global supply chains, lengthy and unpredictable development processes, Complex and overlapping permitting processes, and a critical talent gap.
The renewable energy labor shortage has been years in the making, but is no less closer to resolution. The issue spans both white collar and blue collar positions, and threatens to kneecap progress in the booming sector.
Between the years of 2011 and 2030, it is expected that global levels of installed wind and solar capacity will quadruple. Analysis from McKinsey & Company concludes that “this huge surge in new wind and solar installations will be almost impossible to staff with qualified development and construction employees as well as operations and maintenance workers.
“It’s unclear where these employees will come from in the future,” the McKinsey report goes on to say.
He continued that “There are too few people with specialized and relevant expertise and experience, and too many of them are departing for other companies or other industries.”
The solar and wind industries are suffering from a lack of awareness of career paths and opportunities, despite their well-established presence in domestic markets.
Emergent clean energies face an even steeper uphill battle. Geothermal energy, for example, is poised for explosive growth as one of vanishingly few carbon-free energy solutions with broad bipartisan support, but faces a severe talent gap and punishingly low levels of awareness in potential talent pools.
But while the outlook is discouraging, industry insiders argue that it’s too soon to sound the alarms. In fact, a recent report from Utility Drive contends that “solutions to the energy talent gap are hiding in plain sight.”
The article breaks down those solutions into four concrete approaches: building partnerships with educators, formulating Registered Apprenticeship pathways, updating credential requirements to reflect real-world needs, and rethinking stale recruitment strategies.
Targeting strategic alliances with educational institutions is a crucial strategy for creating a skilled workforce, particularly in emerging sectors like geothermal energy.
Businesses can, for example, partner with and sponsor programs at community colleges, creating a pipeline for the next generation of skilled workers. Apprenticeships serve a similar purpose, encouraging hands-on learning outside of the classroom. Such apprenticeships can apply to white collar positions as well as blue collar roles.
“If we can figure out a way to educate the younger generation that you can actually have a career that you can be proud of and help solve a problem the world is facing, but also work in the extractive industry, I think that could go a long way,” said Jeanine Vany, executive vice president of corporate affairs for Canadian geothermal firm Eavor, speaking about the geothermal energy talent gap.
These approaches won’t solve the talent gap overnight – especially as political developments may discourage would-be jobseekers from placing their bets on a career in the renewables sector. But they will go a long way toward mitigating the issue.
“The clean energy transition depends on a workforce that can sustain it,” reports Utility Drive. “To meet the hiring challenges, employers will benefit from looking beyond the next position to fill and working toward a strategic, industry-wide vision for attracting talent.”
By: Haley Zaremba
Continue Reading

Column

Why Oil Prices Could See Significant Upside Shift

Published

on

The 9th OPEC International Seminar was held in Vienna recently, wherein participants discussed energy security, investment, climate change, and energy poverty, with a particular emphasis on balancing these competing priorities.
According to commodity analysts at Standard Chartered, the summit, titled “Charting Pathways Together: The Future of Global Energy”, featured significantly greater engagement from international oil companies and consuming country governments, with discussions converging on a more inclusive shared agenda rather than non-intersecting approaches seen in previous years.
However, StanChart reported there was a clear mismatch between what energy producers vs. market analysts think about spare production capacity.
Unlike Wall Street analysts, who frequently talk about spare capacity of 5-6 million barrels per day (mb/d), speakers from several sectors of the industry noted that spare capacity is both limited and very geographically concentrated.
StanChart believes this erroneous assumption about spare capacity has been a big drag on oil prices, and the implications for the whole forward curve of oil prices could be potentially profound once traders realize that roughly two-thirds of the capacity they thought was available on demand does not actually exist.
This makes the analysts bullish about the general shape of their forecast 2026 price trajectory (Figure 32), i.e., a set of significant upward shifts as opposed to the flat trajectory seen in the market curve and in analyst consensus.
In other words, oil prices could have as much as $15/barrel upside from current levels.
StanChart is not the only oil bull here. Goldman Sachs recently hiked its oil price forecast for H2 2025, saying the market is increasingly shifting its focus from recession fears to potential supply disruptions, low spare capacity, lower oil inventories, especially among OECD countries and production constraints by Russia.
GS has increased its Brent forecast by $5/bbl to $66/bbl, and by $6 for WTI crude to $63/bbl, slightly lower than current levels of $68.34/bbl and 66.24/bbl for Brent and WTI crude, respectively.
However, the Wall Street bank has maintained its 2026 price forecast at $56/bbl for Brent and $52 for WTI, due to “an offset between a boost from higher long-dated prices and a hit from a wider 1.7M bbl/day surplus.’’ Previously, GS had forecast a 1.5M bbl/day surplus for the coming year.
Further, Goldman sees a stronger oil price rebound beyond 2026 due to reduced spare capacity.
EU natural gas inventories have climbed at faster-than-average clip in recent times. According to Gas Infrastructure Europe (GIE) data, Europe’s gas inventories stood at 73.10 billion cubic metres (bcm) on 13 July, good for a 2.31 bcm w/w increase.
Still, the injection rate is not enough to completely fill the continent’s gas stores, with the current clip on track to take inventories to about 97.9 bcm, or 84.3% of storage capacity, at the end of the injection season.
Europe’s gas demand remains fairly lacklustre despite extremely high temperatures across much of the continent in recent weeks.
According to estimates by StanChart, EU gas demand for the first 14 days of July averaged 583 million cubic meters/day, nearly 3% lower from a year ago but a 10% improvement from the June lows.
However, StanChart is bullish on natural gas prices, saying the market is likely underestimating the likelihood of more Russian gas being taken off the markets.
Back in April, U.S. senators Lindsey Graham (Republican) and Richard Blumenthal (Democrat), introduced “Sanctioning Russia Act of 2025”, with the legislation enjoying broad bipartisan support (85 co-sponsors in the Senate out of 100 senators).
In a joint statement on 14 July, the two senators noted that President Trump’s decision to implement 100% secondary tariffs on countries that buy Russian oil and gas if a peace agreement is not reached within 50 days but pledged that they will continue to work on “bipartisan Russia sanctions legislation that would implement up to 500 percent tariffs on countries that buy Russian oil and gas”.
StanChart has predicted that the Trump administration is unlikely to take actions that risk driving oil prices higher. However, Russian gas remains in the crosshairs, with U.S. LNG likely to see a surge in demand if Russian gas exports are curtailed.
StanChart estimates that the EU’s net imports of Russian pipeline gas averaged 79.8 million cubic metres per day (mcm/d) in the first 14 days of July, with all non-transit flows into the EU coming into Bulgaria through the Turkstream pipeline, with Hungary and Slovakia also receiving Turkstream gas.
There was also a flow of about 65 mcm/d of Russian LNG in the first half of July, with Russia providing 18.6% of the EU’s net imports. StanChart has predicted that we could see a strong rally in natural gas prices if Washington slaps Moscow with fresh gas sanctions.
By: Alex Kimani
Continue Reading

Column

Nuclear Stocks Soar on Stargate AI Infrastructure Announcement

Published

on

Over the past couple of years, the nuclear energy sector has enjoyed a renaissance in the U.S. and many western countries, thanks to the global energy crisis triggered by Russia’s war in Ukraine, high power demand and nuclear’s status as a low-carbon energy source.
Uranium demand has soared, thanks to a series of policy “U-turns” with governments from Japan to Germany revising plans to phase out nuclear power.
Uranium spot prices hit an all-time high of $81.32 per pound in February, double the level 12 months prior.
According to the World Nuclear Association, demand from reactors is expected to climb 28% by 2030, and nearly double by 2040. Not surprisingly, the sector’s popular benchmark, VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NYSEARCA:NLR), recently hit an all-time high.
However, last month, nuclear energy stocks started pulling back sharply, mostly because the sector was seriously overheating. One of the biggest losers was NuScale Power Corp. (NYSE:SMR), with the stock crashing nearly 30% in a matter of weeks.
The selloff kicked off after the company disclosed an agreement with several brokerage firms in which the company may offer and sell from time to time as much as $200M in common stock.
NuScale says proceeds from the sale will be used for general corporate purposes, including operating expenses, capital expenditures, R&D costs and working capital. NuScale is a developer of modular light water reactor nuclear power plants.
Small modular nuclear reactors (SMRs) are advanced nuclear reactors with power capacities that range from 50-300 MW(e) per unit, compared to 700+ MW(e) per unit for traditional nuclear power reactors.
Thankfully, nuclear stocks are on fire again after President Donald Trump on Tuesday announced a $500 billion joint venture with Oracle Corp. (NYSE:ORCL), OpenAI, and SoftBank (OTCPK:SFTBY) to build AI infrastructure in the U.S.
The companies have pledged to commit $100 billion to start, and as much as $500 billion over the next four years toward the initiative, with Trump calling it “largest AI infrastructure project in history”.
OpenAI, ChatGPT maker, said it expects the project, called Stargate, to help support American leadership in AI, and that it could create “hundreds of thousands” of jobs in the U.S. Other tech giants including Nvidia Corp. (NASDAQ:NVDA) Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT)) and Arm Holdings (NASDAQ:ARM) are also expected to be technology partners in the project.
NuScale stock has rocketed 1,175% over the past 12 months; Oklo Inc. (NYSE:OKLO), which is backed by OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, has surged 299%, Vistra Corp. (NYSE:VST) has soared 386% while Centrus Energy (NYSE:LEU) has jumped 73% over the timeframe.
Meanwhile, shares of Nano Nuclear Energy (NASDAQ:NNE) have jumped 1,017% since its May 2024 IPO. The shares made further gains on Thursday after the company was awarded patents related to its designs for a modular transportable nuclear generator.
Nano Nuclear is developing ZEUS, a solid core battery reactor, and ODIN, a low-pressure salt coolant reactor.
Yet another big mover is Baltimore, Maryland-based Constellation Energy Corporation (NASDAQ:CEG), a power utility that sells natural gas, energy-related products, and sustainable solutions.
CEG shares have soared 200% over the past 52 weeks. The company owns approximately 33,094 megawatts of generating capacity consisting of nuclear, wind, solar, natural gas, and hydroelectric assets.
The big nuclear rally kicked off last year after NuScale signed an agreement with Standard Power to supply the data center provider with SMRs. Standard Power–a developer of modular data centers–will use NuScale Power’s power solutions at two separate sites, where up to 12 SMRs (at each site) would be used to provide power for new data centers.
Suddenly, the market took note of SMRs as a viable solution for data centers struggling to keep up with surging power demands by artificial intelligence (AI) computing.
The International Energy Agency has projected that global data center electricity consumption will jump from 460 terawatt-hours in 2022 to 1,000 terawatt-hours in 2026.
The long-term outlook for the nuclear sector remains bullish, with nuclear power expected to meet surging AI demand and lower greenhouse gas emissions.
According to Goldman Sachs, escalating electricity needs from running AI data centers will generate downstream investment opportunities that will benefit utilities, renewable energy generation, and industrial sectors.
The investment bank has forecast that data center power demand will grow at 15% compound annual growth rate from 2023-2030, with data centers consuming 8% of total U.S. electricity output at the end of the forecast period compared to ~3% currently.
Analysts estimate that ~47 GW of additional power generation capacity will be required to meet the growth in U.S. data center power demand by 2030.
Last year, a total of 34  countries, including the U.S., pledged to increasingly deploy nuclear power to reduce reliance on fossil fuels.
According to the International Energy Agency’s (IEA) report Electricity 2024, nuclear power generation is forecast to reach an all-time high globally in 2025, exceeding the previous record set in 2021 as new reactors begin commercial operations in multiple markets, including China, India, South Korea, and Europe; output from France climbs and several plants in Japan are restarted.
Kimani writes for Oilprice.com
Continue Reading

Trending