Politics
Group Causions On Technology Application In Elections

Youth Initiatives for Advocacy, Growth and Advancement (YIAGA), a civil society organisation has urged the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) to tread slowly on technology application in electoral process.
The Executive Director of the group, Mr Samson Itodo, in a document released in Abuja, said because of its “limitations and vulnerability” technology could not guarantee credible elections.
According to Itodo, by all standards, elections are complex and capital-intensive because electoral operations, procurement, staff training and remuneration and public outreach gulp huge amounts of the election budget.
He said that the poor state of public infrastructure, including roads, institutions, energy, environment and ICT penetration, contributed to high electoral costs.
Itodo said though a plausible argument, high cost of elections in Africa was the consequence for undemocratic and flawed elections recorded on the continent.
“Simply put, countries are spending more on elections due to low level of electoral integrity hence the reliance on technology to eliminate all forms of electoral heist and irregularity.
“It is common practice for election management bodies in Africa to leverage on technology for voter registration, voter identification or accreditation, electronic tallying and transmission of results.”
He said that different election stakeholders such as companies, civil society groups, politicians and development partners, subject electoral commissions in Africa to intense pressure to deploy new technologies for elections.
The director said that most of the commissions yielded to these pressures without undertaking a cost-benefit analysis on the deployment of electoral technologies or its potency to guarantee credible elections.
According to him, in this era of automation, machine learning and artificial intelligence, it is foolhardy to ignore adaptation of relevant technologies and digitized electoral processes.
He said that unarguably, technology deployed for elections could eliminate human errors associated with calculating and computing of results, improve voter identification, facilitate faster and easier voting, but could lack integrity.
“Although electoral technology can enhance and undermine electoral integrity, electoral commissions must be conscious of its limitations and vulnerabilities that can also undermine it.
“The debate on whether electoral technology can guarantee electoral integrity is premised on the limitations of technology deployment in Africa.
“Experience shows that electoral technology is vulnerable to failure, interference, and security breaches.
“Recent reports of cyber propaganda, warfare and election interference strengthen the argument that electoral technology can potentially de-legitimise elections.”
Itodo pointed out that without checks and oversight, heads of ICT departments in electoral commissions could become kingmakers by subverting the will of the people through a ‘click’ resulting to computer-generated leaders.
He said that there were growing apprehension and suspicion with the deployment of technology in electoral processes in Africa, adding that most people did not trust electoral technology due to its limitations.
He said that in Kenya, Raila Odinga alleged system logs on the Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission (IEBC), suggesting possible infiltration of the commission’s electronic system of tallying of results.
Itodo added that the then opposition Sierra Leone Peoples Party (SLPP) was similarly accused of hacking into the system of the National Electoral Commission (NEC) to alter election results.
He, however, advised electoral commissions to secure public consent and approval in their quest to deploy technology for elections, saying that it would boost citizens’ trust in the process thereby deepening electoral integrity.
Politics
Reps Constitution Review Committee Holds Zonal Hearing For Rivers, C’River, Akwa Ibom In Calabar

A press statement issued by the Chief Press Secretary to the Cross River State Governor, Mr Linus Obogo, disclosed that the Calabar Centre — designated as Centre B — will host representatives and stakeholders from Cross River, Rivers, and Akwa Ibom States.
The public hearing is scheduled to take place on Saturday, July 19, 2025, at 10:00 a.m. at the Transcorp (Metropolitan) Hotel, Calabar.
The initiative, according to the statement, is designed to promote inclusive dialogue and capture the aspirations of Nigerians from all regions.
It aims to serve as a platform for citizens to contribute meaningfully to the ongoing national efforts to refine and strengthen the country’s legal and institutional frameworks.
“Citizens, civil society groups, professional bodies, traditional rulers, and other interest blocs are invited to participate in this landmark engagement aimed at advancing a more just, equitable, and responsive Nigerian Constitution,” the statement read.
The hearing forms part of the broader review process of the 1999 Constitution (as amended), and is seen as a strategic move toward fostering national unity and addressing structural legal issues within the federation.
Politics
Tinubu’s Contribution To Buhari’s Presidency Marginal – Ex-SGF

For the first time since 2022, when then-presidential aspirant Alhaji Bola Tinubu declared he made former President Buhari Nigeria’s President in 2015, Mr Mustapha dismissed the claims, stressing that the merger only contributed about three million votes in addition to Buhari’s existing 12 million votes in the North.
He insisted that former President Buhari’s integrity, national stature, and disciplined messaging were central to the breakthrough, not the three million votes from the merging parties, which he described as insignificant.
Speaking on the role of the merging parties, particularly President Tinubu, the leader of the Action Congress of Nigeria (ACN), Mr Mustapha, who was the keynote speaker at the launch of the book ‘According to the President: Lessons from a Presidential Spokesman’s Experience’ authored by Mallam Garba Shehu, described the impact of the votes from other merging parties as very insignificant.
In attendance were former Head of State Yakubu Gowon, chair of the event; immediate past Vice President Yemi Osinbajo; SGF George Akume, who represented President Tinubu; PDP’s 2023 presidential candidate Atiku Abubakar; former Chief of Staff to Buhari Ibrahim Gambari; elder statesman Babagana Kingibe; former governors Nasir El-Rufai (Kaduna), Kayode Fayemi (Ekiti), Chris Ngige (Anambra), Rauf Aregbesola (Osun), Raji Babatunde Fashola (Lagos); former ministers Solomon Dalung and Sunday Dare; former Army Chief Tukur Buratai, and Bayo Onanuga, President Tinubu’s spokesman, among others.
According to Mr Mustapha, “I do not intend to stir up any controversy. The merger in 2013 was midwifed to create a Buhari presidency. Let us look at the statistics. In the 2003 election, it was the Obasanjo-Buhari presidential contest where Buhari recorded 12.7 million votes. In 2007, it came to 6.6 million, and it went back to 12.2 million in 2011.
“When we were conceptualising the merger, what would give us a headstart? Obviously, it was at the back of our consciousness that the merger with the Congress for Progressive Change (CPC), though it had only one state, the ACN had six states, ANPP three states, and when you sum up the total votes that we had as the presidency in 2015, the aggregate of the total votes was 15.4 million.
“So, basically, what we brought to the table after the merger outside the Buhari 12.5 million votes was three million. Before turning to that presidency, it is important to recognise the former President’s role in reshaping Nigeria’s political trajectory.
“In early 2013, as the leader of the CPC, Buhari formally requested and supported the creation of a CPC merger committee, part of a broader coalition-building process that brought together the ACN, ANPP, APGA faction, and elements of the ruling party through the breakaway ‘new PDP’ group. His endorsement and participation, along with other party leaders such as President Tinubu and Senator Ali Modu Sheriff, lent credibility and direction to the merger, helping to unify disparate party factions under the banner of the APC. That coalition-building paved the way for the first democratic defeat of an incumbent ruling party in Nigeria’s history.
“President Buhari’s integrity, national stature, and disciplined messaging were central to that breakthrough. No account of President Buhari’s tenure would be complete without acknowledging the extended periods he spent on medical leave. These moments, while politically delicate, were also telling of his leadership philosophy and personality,” he said.
In his remarks, President Tinubu promised to build on the legacies of former President Buhari, stressing that “nation-building is a relay. The efforts of one administration lay the foundation for the next.
“In this regard, I acknowledge the efforts of my predecessor, President Buhari, and assure all Nigerians that the reform-oriented path he initiated will be consolidated and strengthened under this administration. Our Renewed Hope Agenda is inspired by the desire to build a resilient, just, and inclusive Nigeria—a nation that delivers dividends of democracy to all its citizens”.
Politics
Your Lies Chasing Investors From Nigeria, Omokri Slams Obi
Speaking during an appearance on live television on Wednesday, Mr Omokri alleged that Mr Obi’s statements were misleading and damaging to the country’s economic prospects.
Mr Omokri said some investors currently operating in Nigeria were considering exiting the market due to Mr Obi’s remarks.
“That is not true. He doesn’t rile me up. I rile him up. The reason why I came here is because I’m a patriot. Peter Obi lied. You know, foreign direct investors are watching your programme, who are making investment decisions not to come to Nigeria. There are foreign investors in Nigeria that are making investment decisions to leave Nigeria because of the lie he told.
“One of the lies he told is that President Tinubu has borrowed more than the administrations of Yar’Adua, Jonathan, Buhari. That is a blatant lie”, Mr Omokri said.
To buttress his claims, Mr Omokri referenced figures from the Debt Management Office (DMO), maintaining that President Tinubu had actually reduced Nigeria’s external debt burden since assuming office.
“I have here with me data from the Debt Management Office, and Nigerians who are watching can go to DMO.com and search Debt Management Office, Nigeria State of Indebtedness 2015.
“As of 2015, Nigeria was owing a total of $63 billion. When Buhari was leaving office, Nigeria was owing $113 billion. Today, from the DMO, our debt has gone from $113 billion to $97 billion, meaning that Tinubu has reduced our debt by over $14 billion.
“We should be appreciating this man. Yet Peter Obi came here and lied to the Nigerian people. He took the debts and translated them into naira to make it look like the debts have increased”, he said.
-
Business1 day ago
NCDMB Promises Oil Industry Synergy With Safety Boots Firm
-
News1 day ago
KENPOLY Appoints Abalubu As Ag. Registrar
-
Politics1 day ago
Your Lies Chasing Investors From Nigeria, Omokri Slams Obi
-
Opinion1 day ago
Get Rid Of Wastes In PH
-
Business1 day ago
NCDMB, Dangote Refinery Unveil JTC On Deepening Local Content
-
Business1 day ago
Replace Nipa Palms With Mangroove In Ogoni, Group Urges FG, HYPREP
-
News1 day ago
Police Rescue Kidnapped Victim As Suspects Escape With Gunshots in Rivers
-
Politics1 day ago
Tinubu’s Contribution To Buhari’s Presidency Marginal – Ex-SGF