Connect with us

Column

Expenditure: That Mark’s Humble U-turn

Published

on

Sanusi Lamido Sanusi, Governor, Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN), literally dropped a bombshell recently in the country. Not mincing words, he announced to the chagrin of many, that members of the National Assembly were consuming 1/4 of the nation’s annual expenditure.

Specifically, the CBN boss lamented that the worrisome expenditure was tied to the senators and House of Representative members’ salaries and frivolous allowances. As it were, Sanusi’s outburst threw up dust across the country with condemnations from economists and other well-meaning Nigerians.

Expectedly, the CBN governor was summoned to the National Assembly to explain how he came to the conclusion that NASS members were consuming up to a quarter of the nation’s annual expenditure.

Fearlessly, Sanusi stoutly defended his public statement, which attracted accolade from economic analysts and other Nigerians across the country. Well, our NASS members were not pleased with the Sanusi’s defence. All that is now history.

But the senators and members of the House of Representatives seem to have had closed door meetings to review the matter so as to douse  the palpable tension generated in the country. Perhaps, against the backdrop of public outrage of jumbo salaries and allowances of NASS members, Senate President, David Mark recently announced that the National Assembly was now ready to ensure that its budgetary process did not go beyond “the formalities of annual rituals”.

His words: “We must give meaning and soul to our budgets to truly be the succour to the people’s economic stress and depression, to give hope and to be a soothing source of their faith in government. We owe this to the people we all represent”.

Senate President, however, said that a related issue was the “unacceptable disproportionate ratio of recurrent and overhead expenditure to capital expenditure”, as presented by the financial authorities Nigerians are indeed, glad that the National Assembly is coming to terms with the CBN boss.

Be that as it may, it is sad that all about the anti-graft gospel being preached by the present administration now appears to be a farce, given the avarice with which our legislators and some political appointees want to rise to power through overt and covert graft at the federal level.

Or, how would one explain another story that the Federal Government is reportedly spending at least N 1.3trillion annually on political aides and their cronies, thus undermining the nation’s resources. This is rather unfortunate, to say the least.

In a lecture he delivered at the 25th Annual General Meeting of the Manufacturers Association of Nigeria (MAN), Mr. Bolaji Ogunseye, the Former Executive Director of the Rivers State Sustainable Development Agency (RSSDA), lamented that such expenditure include those as aides to top government functionaries and their cronies.

Such frivolous spending by the Federal Government, he said, “do not contribute to any form of economic advance”, and noted that the situation also extends to government at all levels, hence Nigeria is now operating a “collect and spend economy”, with little or no consideration for the manufacturing industry, which is the mainstay of any development-minded country.

Not done with what he identified as ‘frivolous spending’ by the federal government, the ex-RSSDA boss explained that because of the seeming innate tendency to only collect from government, giving little in terms of being productive in manufacturing of products, most Nigerians are poor.

Listing the solution to the situation in order to achieve the vision 2020, he said the solution is “doing the right thing, and doing it at the right time”, regretting that Nigeria now has what he christened, “economy of affection in which those in authority spend money based on affection instead of on viable economic development ventures such as education, health, among others.

Sadly, the current frivolous spending at the federal level, may force one to recall a seminal and controversial work on “natural tendencies” of organisations, published almost a century ago. Indeed, in 1911, a young German sociologist, Robert Michels, produced a scholarly work on political organisations with the subtitle – A sociological study of the Oligachical Tendencies of Modern Democracy.

Michels, at the end of his research intoned: “It is organisation which gives birth to the domination of the elected over the electors, of the mandataries over the mandators, of the delegates over the delegators.

He also points out that the government of any organisation is always constituted by the leadership, which of course is always an oligarchy. Therefore, what exists in any organisation-including the federal government may not be democratic values, but an oligarchy, defined as a “form of government in which power is vested in few persons or in dominant class or clique”,

Having made these caveat and allowances, it is necessary to allow a confrontation between the’ NASS members, political appointees and Robert Michels, who contends that the elected or government in any form must be rendering services to the people (the electors, mandators, delegators, etc). Therefore, the question now is why would our NASS members want to treat the electorate as underdogs, while aggrandising the scarce resources of the country.

The reported frivolous spending by lawmerkers and other federal authorities is being condemned by civil society organisations, industrialists and some renowned economists. The condemnation borders principally on the fact that the nation’s money should be spent on infrastructural facilities and not on politicians,  political aides and their cronies.

It is instructive to remind our distinguished legislators that they were elected to serve the masses. They should therefore not see themselves as an oligarchy or a clique, thus shirking their constitutional schedules, under selfish motives.

With all sense of humility, one would like to advise the federal functionaries not to rubbish the good work they have printed on the sands of time, since the inception of the present administration.

Well, the last is yet to be heard about the exact amount being spent yearly by the federal authorities on legislators, political aides and their cronies.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Column

Democracy: Revolution Cannot Help Us

Published

on

Indeed, Nigeria is passing through a perilous time in her 60 years of existence. Nobody, not even the ‘seers’ that flood the space with prophecies, ever imagined the nation will deteriorate to this stage where animals are valued more than humans, as animals are nowadays killed with good reasons unlike humans. Only Chinua Achebe foresaw it a bit in his book, Things Fall Apart. The novelist bewailed when the country was a heaven compared to the present agonising predicaments.
It began with Boko-Haram insurgency to abduction, banditry and presently the ceaseless killings and destruction of public facilities. Nobody is safe, not even the poor or school children. Everybody is trapped; civilians and security personnel are gunned down daily in the style of Nollywood and Hollywood movies. This is the outcome of prolonged abysmal system failure. By the ugly events virtually on daily basis, it points to the number of firearms in private hands particularly the youth. How did firearms get to them?
Government failed to deal with the crisis timely. Initially, terrorists ambushed citizens while asleep, raped women, killed the men and abducted children; nothing happened. From there, they graduated to kidnapping for ransoms and then banditry; nothing happened. None arrested and prosecuted, instead, sustained pleadings and warnings. Meanwhile, many that committed minor offences were regularly arraigned and moved into custody. Government’s negligence particularly long silence on the herdsmen onslaught, banditry and kidnappings across regions contributed to the rise in criminal activities. With huge inflows, crimes became relished livelihoods.
Recently, the Office of the Attorney-General of the Federation disclosed that government was about to prosecute 400 Boko Haram’s sponsors arrested from raids in April at Lagos and some northern states. The question is; from the period the insurgents began terrorising the nation, could this sensibly be the first arrest? Again, when precisely, will the prosecution begin? We must tell ourselves the truth, and not call a spade — a long spoon. The country as presently constituted runs on double-standard. It began with running different legal systems; Criminal Code in the south while Penal Code and Sharia Laws in the north. What a country!
The fake national unity paved way for nepotism that tears the nation to pieces. Presently, all service chiefs hail from one region. Key appointments are lopsided favouring the same region, leading to turmoil. Beyond these, it results to high criminal activities, including liberal proliferation of firearms, now spreading to other regions. Perceptively, some criminals have confidence to escape justice over their crimes knowing that their people occupy most sensitive positions. What a blooper on Nigeria’s hurried self-rule when unprepared!
Nonetheless, some groups of people were drumming songs of war against ‘June 12 – the nation’s Democracy Day’ to takeover government forcefully. This is a colossal blunder. Instructively, revolution is anti-democracy and a popular feature of military regimes. Democracy has its procedures, and doesn’t entertain a revolution except nonviolent protests. Those calling for a revolution to unseat an elected president are gullibly misled. If a president can be removed by street mass actions, it means no president can survive it because every ruling party will also have oppositions.
The acceptable tools for changing a democratic government are election and impeachment. Any violent attempt before its time elapsed is treasonable felony. Emphatically, only the Parliament, exercising sovereignty for the people, is the statutory body empowered to remove an elected president, vice president, governors and their deputies from office, and strictly through stipulated procedures, and exclusively at plenary, not in the streets. The procedures are detailed in Sections 143 and 144 of the 1999 Constitution, Federal Republic of Nigeria, as amended. Any person or group plotting to pull down a government by self-help is a novice, and deficient as far as democracy is concerned.
The golden truth must be told. Destruction of public assets, endless killings, kidnapping and other social disorders can only worsen the dented-image of the nation and scare foreign investors from the country. It cannot change a government save the Parliament thinks otherwise and institutes impeachment processes. Recently, many lament that key multinationals bypassed Nigeria to site their Africa’s headquarters in neighbouring countries which will open up those nations’ economies and create employment opportunities to their citizens. Who gains and who loses? All Nigerians, of course! Nigeria that yearly produces about 100,000 fresh graduates is the loser. No foreign investors will push its funds to a society with instability and criminal activities. This must be noted.
The tragedy is also a lesson for the northern region. They aggressively motivated their youths into criminalities for amnesty programme, as granted Niger Delta with justified demands. Then, with firearms, the youths abduct, while these leaders pose as negotiators for ransoms. Sensibly, the negotiators benefit too. Recently, Southeast youths misleadingly joined and rapidly destroying their enviable, cherished economic space through mayhems like northern youths. Only the Southwest and South-south zones cautiously pursue their agendas with wisdom and decorum.
Thus, the sensible revolution to strategise about is to elect a good successor in 2023. Anarchy will worsen the existing predicaments. This is the reason 2023 election calls for sober reflections. It is not a time to naively boycott election or for bigoted nomination of ‘I-can-lead’ politicians. Nigeria’s economy can only advance through proficient leadership with ideas and innovations.
Umegboro is a public affairs analyst.

By: Carl Umegboro

Continue Reading

Column

Morass Of Decaying Values

Published

on

Every society has cherished values that are hallowed from generation to generation. Such values are rooted in their culture. Culture is the totality of the modus Vivendi of a people or way of life. So when such values begin to decay, it splashes on all aspects of society. That Nigeria is caught up in a morass of decaying values is no longer in doubt.
It is often more convenient for the people in any leadership dispensation to always point at the leadership and subject them to critical scrutiny. Such scrutiny sometimes, are not aligned to what should be the responsibility of the ordinary people who should hold on to values of good citizenship and ethics. Professor Chinua Achebe in his work on “The Trouble with Nigeria”, weighs more on the side of the followership than the leadership.
When you look at the Nigeria state, you will see the justification in that opinion. Yes, we agree that the followership is a reflection of the leadership. We also agree that a people get the leadership they deserve.
The Greek civilization had looked at the polity and came out with the relationship between leadership and followership. The most interesting is their classification of people with respect to roles and disposition in the well being of the polity. The Greek picked out a group they described as citizens. The Citizen according to the Greek is one who is well equipped with knowledge and skills to live in the realm of the public. The citizen should be able to see oneself as a member of the common wealth of the nation. He has an understanding and experience of what is civil and what is not, his rights and obligations. So when Nigerians speak of citizens and they speak of good and bad citizen, there is a contradiction. Those they call bad citizens are the class of people the Greek referred to as IDIOTS. The Greek idiots are not selfless, indeed the Greek identified the idiots as not being mentally deficient but those who are selfish and private in their actions and inactions. This is unlike our common understanding of idiots. The most important trait of the Greek idiot is the lack of public philosophy, knowledge and virtue.
In all, they do not have the common good of the public in mind. They are unethical and reckless. They are found in all strata of society. In Nigeria unfortunately they constitute a large population with dominant negative and decaying values in all aspects of our national life.
This phenomenon has led to the increasing population of the Greek Idiots. They are seen everywhere constituting nuisance in traffic, dumping refuse indiscriminately. These Greek idiots have also increased their negative nuisance value in the area of noise pollution, criminality of all sorts, even in the houses of worship.
Positive values are almost dead and buried. Values have been explained as ideals with which we evaluate actions with different perspectives.
Every ethnic nationality, communities and families have time tested values. The unfortunate situation in Nigeria today is that we have lost the value of decorum, respect for self and others. Our national values of respect for the rights of others have been eroded.
How else can one explain the nuisance of noise pollution in cities in Nigeria. In Port Harcourt the law against noise pollution has been taken for granted. Loud noise beyond the accepted decibel has become the norm rather than the exception.
Those whose offices are located close to Mile one park are in danger of losing their auditory well being as record sellers use loud speakers to unleash all manner of sounds into the confines of their business enclosures or officers.
These mobile record sellers are allowed to push their truck of noise pollution around the city center disturbing the neigbhourhood unhindered. Those who are supposed to enforce the state laws on noise pollution have remained adamant.
It is unfortunate that Nigerians which the Greek Philosophers would like to call idiots have refused to restrain themselves from all manner of unethical practices. People no longer have respect for residential places. Churches are located within residential homes mounted with horn speakers. Loud worship sessions rent the air at all times of the day even all nights. The worst case scenario are those who have cell worship groups that use loud speakers to disturb their neigbours and damming the consequences all day, all night.
They are those that Greek philosophers call idiots because all they think about are themselves, not their neigbours, not the state and the laws that are supposed to protect the rights of other citizens.
Maybe these persons in religious and secular sectors are waiting for the state to set up taskforces to enforce sanity in the state capital. These adults are quick to point at youths who have lost their family values, they are quick to point at some corrupt politicians who are also part of the Greek idiots but not themselves. They are holy and those who complain are demonic and must be consumed by Holy Ghost fire.
It takes a good followership to have the right leadership.
How can we have a sane society when there is a followership that have lost it?
Such followership breed bad leaders and even when good leaders emerge they make governance difficult for them.
The case of worship houses reminds us of the saying which poses a question that “if gold rust what should iron do”? We all are caught up in a morass of decaying values.

By: Bon Woke

Continue Reading

Column

Nollywood Deserves An Oscar

Published

on

Genevive Nnaji is a popular Nigerian actress and film producer. Her film, Lionheart, which received rave reviews by renowned critics shortly after its release, may also have acquitted itself in local box office takings.
Again, given the multiplicity of film festivals and movie award institutions, it is very likely that Ms Nnaji’s flick had also picked up some local and regional accolades. But about the most thrilling part of its success story thus far came when Netflix, an elite online movie platform, announced the film’s inclusion in its showlist.
Apparently encouraged by these early positives, the Imo State-born screen diva may have felt that her latest tour de force was already qualified to reach for the ultimate prize in the global movie industry – an Oscar. And so, in 2019, Lionheart was reported as the first Nigerian film to be submitted in the Best International Feature Film (BIFF) category of the Oscar Awards organised annually by the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences (AMPAS), USA.
Nollywood stakeholders and, indeed, other native film lovers who had looked forward to the Nigerian movie industry’s emergence at the Oscars were, however, devastated to learn that Lionheart had been disqualified for failing to use a predominantly non-English dialogue track as part of the requirements for films entered in that category. In fact, it was reported that the 95-minute film contains only 11 minutes dialogue in Igbo language, the rest being in English.
Some commentators had questioned why the film was submitted at all given that the terms of eligibility were clearly spelt out for that Oscar category. For the avoidance of doubt, any movie entered for the BIFF category must dwell heavily on culture; have predominantly non-English dialogue track; and present a 100 percent original story.
The Nigerian film industry is popularly referred to as Nollywood, apparently a mimic of America’s Hollywood. Going by what this industry has been able to accomplish in its relatively short period of existence, the above rules need not appear daunting. Ordinarily, that is.
Femi Odugbemi is a film maker of international standing. He is also one of the four Nigerians invited into the voting membership of AMPAS for the BIFF category. In an exclusive interview with a popular Nigerian online publication, and even before Lionheart’s ill-fated Oscar outing, he said of Nollywood: “We have made enough films to, at least, earn a nomination and we really do have excellent people and excellent talents. And yes, some of our films can definitely compete.
“The challenge for us is to systematise our excellence to create a factory line that ensures that every single year there is an Oscar nomination.
“Nigeria is powerful enough in global affairs to constantly have a film in the lineup and that is our challenge.”
One is not unaware of the fact that the BIFF category was recently adjusted to accommodate more entries from outside Europe and America. And so, came the expectation that Nollywood ought to have earned, at least, an Oscar nomination by now, being an industry leader in the entire African continent.
Nevertheless, Odugbemi said that it was now left for Nollywood to create works that were culturally defining. He spoke of the need to tap into the people’s history and heritage to script larger-than-life characters that would create stories for a global audience.
According to him, the local film industry also needed to strive for such technical excellence that would enable its products compete with other films of international quality and get nominated, especially now that the excuse of discrimination or the Oscars being an all-White affair no longer existed.
The movie-industry practitioner found solace in the fact that it took a long time for India’s popular and more experienced Bollywood to win an Oscar. South Africa, he said, also took as much time to have a nominated film; while China’s mammoth film-making industry had not translated to its creations getting on the Oscar nomination list every year.
Even so, my worry for Nollywood is that its practitioners appear to be too conceited to the detriment of the industry. They seem to be content with making clean sweeps of prizes at the annual African Movie Academy Awards (AMAA) and such other continental events. But not so for the Ghanaian film industry (Ghollywood) which, on realising that Nollywood was ahead of it and also had a larger market, permitted its actors to work with their Nigerian counterparts for experience and better exposure. And today, flicks from our West African neighbour are seriously narrowing whatever gap that may have existed.
Likewise in music, Nigerian singers had since gone into collaboration with some foreign megastars to boost their careers, a move which paid off at this year’s Grammys with Wizkid’s award. The story is not any different in professional football where local talents had consistently been recruited to play for some big clubs in Europe and elsewhere across the world.
Additionally, British-born Nigerian thespians like Chiwetel Ejiofor, David Oyelowo and Carmen Ejogo are already household names in the UK and US (the last two starred in Selma with Oprah Winfrey). Imagine a Nigerian actor playing the legendary Martin Luther King Jr. in that film! Unfortunately, even as Nigerians, they cannot be seen as representing our film industry.
Of course, there are Nigerian movies which show some of our Nollywood greats performing in the streets of London, New York and other world cities, but hardly are A-list foreign acts involved in such outings. Our actors need to be seen in Western movies alongside some of the world’s best. That way, they may be lucky to win accolades for individual role performances at the Oscars and British BAFTA awards.

By: Ibelema Jumbo

Continue Reading

Trending