Ajaero’s Unending Persecutions 

The intricate relationship between governance, law enforcement, and civil society is often marked by both collaboration and tension. Recent events in Nigeria have put this relationship into sharp focus as the President of the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC), Joe Ajaero, was summoned by the Nigerian police. This elicited a wave of reactions from various quarters, highlighting concerns surrounding democracy, civil rights, and the role of law enforcement in a democratic society.
The allegations against Ajaero, which include criminal conspiracy, terrorism financing, treasonable felony, subversion, and cybercrime, have raised questions about the intent behind these actions and the implications for the labour movement in Nigeria. Each of these accusations carries weight and consequences. The charge of treasonable felony, for instance, can lead to severe legal repercussions in Nigeria, a country that has experienced its fair share of political instability and conflicts.
Meanwhile, accusations of funding terrorism are particularly damaging, not only to an individual’s reputation but also to their ability to mobilise support. The seriousness of the avowals raises concerns about whether they are based on credible evidence or if they are merely a political manoeuvre designed to stifle dissent and weaken the NLC.
In response to the police summons, the NLC has vehemently defended Ajaero, labelling the allegations as baseless. The Congress contends that this action is a calculated attempt to intimidate and harass both Ajaero and the NLC. They argue that the police’s actions are emblematic of a broader trend of victimisation of organisations and individuals that speak out against governmental policies, particularly those relating to labour rights and social justice.
Earlier, on August 8, 2024, the Nigerian police had stormed Labour House, headquarters of the NLC. The police claimed they were looking for an international terrorist who used the NLC building as his office. Nigerians were shocked when the police issued the NLC President an invitation to answer to charges of criminal conspiracy, terrorism financing, treasonable felony, subversion and cyber crime.
Recently, the Department of State Services (DSS) apprehended the prominent labour leader as he was en route to participate in a conference taking place in the United Kingdom. At this conference, he was scheduled to present a paper. The unexpected arrest sparked widespread reactions and pressure from concerned Nigerians, who expressed their support for the labour leader and condemned the actions of the DSS. In response, the agency interrogated Ajaero and released him.
From every indication, the government may not cease its actions with just Ajaero; there is a possibility that they will target additional leaders within the labour movement who possess independent viewpoints. This could result in the arrest of other prominent figures who challenge the status quo. Furthermore, it is plausible that the umbrella unions, which represent a collective of workers and their interests, could face prohibition from operating. In such a scenario, the authorities might appoint their agents to oversee the management of these unions’ secretariats.
These strategies are reminiscent of tactics that were meticulously refined during periods of military rule, a time characterised by oppression and the silencing of dissent, which Nigerians actively resisted in their pursuit of democratic governance. The fight against such authoritarian practices is not just a memory; it serves as a reminder of the need to safeguard the democratic principles and freedoms that Nigerians have struggled to obtain.
While we call upon Ajaero and his legal representatives to actively engage with the relevant security authorities to facilitate a transparent investigation process, we implore Nigerians to advocate for fairness and justice by urging the law enforcement agencies to substantiate their claims against him with concrete evidence. The principle of innocent until proven guilty must be upheld, and any suspicions of politically-driven bias or victimisation are vehemently opposed.
In a democratic society, adherence to the rule of law and respect for fundamental human rights must be unwavering. Resorting to coercive tactics typically employed by the military has no place in a civil and just system. Therefore, we stand firm against any form of undue pressure or harassment aimed at individuals based on their political affiliations or beliefs. We must unite in safeguarding the integrity of our democratic institutions and ensuring that due process is followed in all legal proceedings.
Given that both the DSS and the conventional police have the authority to carry out legal arrests, it is necessary that such power be wielded with impartiality. It is of utmost importance that Ajaero, as well as any other individual, is accorded respect and courtesy in any engagement with the legal system. Citizens are equally expected to fulfil their responsibilities by facilitating and supporting thorough investigations.
Adhering to the law is mandatory, not discretionary.  Let Ajaero inform the police or the DSS about what he knows.  It is important for the police to comply with the rules too.  If they fail, Ajaero’s lawyers will not fail to claim his rights under the law. Democracy depends on checks and balances that represent the heart of due process.