Stop Privatisation Of TCN, Others

The Trade Union Congress (TUC) of Nigeria is strongly opposing the Federal Government’s plans to privatise the Transmission Company of Nigeria (TCN), Nigeria Post and Telecommunications Services (NIPOST), and Federal Medical Centres (FMCs) across the country.
The labour union said it was antithetical to the last-minute rush to privatise the assets, despite the current administration having only a few weeks left to depart. At the union’s National Executive Meeting held in Abuja recently, TUC President, Festus Osifoh, asked the Federal Government to halt the distribution of N8 billion which had been reportedly released for the asset unbundling of NIPOST until the incoming government took over.
TUC recalled that the previous privatisation of public resources during former President Olusegun Obasanjo’s administration lacked transparency and favoured regime officials and their cronies. Additionally, many of the privatised entities were unstable as the State continued to provide monetary assistance, particularly for the DisCos and GenCos.
We support the TUC’s stance on the privatisation of public assets. The decision to privatise should be left for the incoming government to handle. Privatisation, if executed properly, can bring in capital, expertise, and best practices for the administration of state-owned enterprises.
However, the privatisation of the energy sector in Nigeria, which took place 10 years ago, has not yielded the desired results. In fact, the power supply condition in the country has regressed. Despite a report by the Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission (NERC) that the Federal Government has subsidised electricity supply in the country with N35.27 billion, the position remains dire.
Nigeria’s electricity supply is currently oscillating between 5,000 and 7,000 megawatts, which is inadequate for a country with a population of over 200 million. The 11 DisCos and three GenCos are facing various challenges such as under-capitalisation, debts, and technical difficulties, which are affecting their ability to deliver expected services to Nigerians. Unfortunately, five of these companies have been taken over by banks because of their financial distress.
This current state of the power sector demands a complete review of the energy privatisation programme. It is evident that the intended objectives of the privatisation exercise have not been met. To resolve the issues plaguing the sector, it is crucial to acknowledge that a hasty privatisation of the transmission company may not provide a permanent solution. A repositioning of the sector is necessary to ensure better performance and meet the expectations of Nigerians.
The TCN’s technical and commercial inefficiency can be traced back to the public sector management that dominated the electricity sector before privatisation. The transmission system, or national grid, is inadequate to handle the total generation capacity, and the authorities have been slow to expand it.
The privatisation of the transmission arm of the power sector by the Federal Government should be approached with caution. The Tide has always advocated the sale of national assets with prudence. Developing economies require significant State intervention in infrastructure development because of their fragility. However, private-public partnerships can still play a role.
The DisCos have been frequently requesting bailouts, despite receiving enormous sums of government intervention. This shows that Nigeria is not yet prepared for full-scale capitalism. If the TCN is sold quickly, it will cause perpetual economic enslavement for the country. Therefore, any government asset privatisation must adhere to processes that encourage competition, enhance efficiency, and decrease direct government participation in their operations.
Since its inception in 2004, the Bureau for Public Enterprises (BPE) has privatised 142 enterprises, but regrettably, 37 per cent of them (52) are not performing well. The BPE has attributed this poor performance to the hostile business environment in the country, which has caused many private or privatised national enterprises to either close or move to neighbouring countries.
The Nigerian government has been attempting to privatise Nigeria Telecommunications Limited (NITEL) for almost a decade because of the poor state of its fixed-line infrastructure and high levels of debt. Despite Nigeria being one of the world’s fastest-growing telecoms markets, NITEL’s established lines have decreased to fewer than 100,000 from five times that amount in 2001. The total number of subscribers to its Nigeria Mobile Telecommunication (MTEL) mobile unit has dropped to a few thousand from over 1 million. The latest attempt to sell the firm is just one in a string of efforts by the government.
Unfortunately, the greed of past Nigerian leaders has raised questions about the efficiency of our privatisation programme. Clarity and accountability are crucial in privatisation, but Nigeria’s history of corruption has created distrust and suspicion. To address this issue, separate auditing and legislature oversight committees should be established to monitor privatisation deals and prevent fraud.
Transparency in privatisation can create a perception of honesty and accountability, reducing mistrust from citizens. If carried out with sincerity, divestment can benefit various groups. Workers become shareholders, consumers receive better services, fresh graduates and the unemployed can secure jobs following expansion, and the government is relieved of subsidies or subventions.