S’Court Restrains FG From Ceding Rivers’ 17 Oil Wells To Imo

The Supreme Court has restrained the Federal Government and its agencies from ceding 17 disputed oil wells located at Akri and Mbede to Imo State.
The injunctive order was granted, last Wednesday, to stop an alleged implementation of the ceding of the 17 oil wells to Imo State pending the determination of a suit brought before the apex court by the Rivers State Government.
The apex court made the order in a ruling, in an ex-parte application argued by Emmanuel Ukala, SAN, seeking to restrain the Attorney General of the Federation (AGF) and the Attorney General of Imo State from taking any further action on the ownership of the disputed 17 oil wells till the ownership disputes surrounding them are resolved.
The apex court also barred the Revenue Mobilisation Allocation and the Fiscal Commission (RMAFC) and the Office of the Accountant General of the Federation from approving, implementing, or giving effect in any manner to a letter from the RMAFC office, with reference number RMC/O&G/47/1/264 of July 1, 2021, which cancelled the equal sharing of proceeds from the 17 oil wells by Rivers and Imo states.
The apex court subsequently fixed September 21 for hearing of the substantive matter.
It would be recalled that the Rivers State Government, through its Attorney General, had dragged the AGF and the Attorney General of Imo State before the Supreme Court, praying for a declaration that the boundary between Rivers State and Imo State, as delineated on Nigeria Administrative Map, 10, 11 and 12 editions and other maps bearing similar delineations, are inaccurate, incorrect and do not represent the legitimate and lawful boundaries between Rivers and Imo states.
The Plaintiff also sought a declaration that as far as Nigeria’s Administrative Map 10,11 and 12 editions and other maps bearing similar delineations relate to the boundaries between Rivers and Imo, the said maps are unlawful and void, cannot be relied on to determine the extent of the territorial governmental jurisdiction of Rivers State and to determine the revenue accruing to Rivers State from the Federation Account, including the application of the principle of derivation and other revenue allocation principles as contained in the 1999 Constitution.
It further applied that the Supreme Court declare that the correct instrument maps and documents to be relied on in determining the boundary between Rivers and Imo states, are those used by the plaintiff in delineating the boundary line between Rivers and Imo states.
The Plaintiff also sought a declaration that all the oil wells within Akri and Mbede communities were wrongly attributed to Imo State, and that they were all oil wells within the territory of Rivers State and form part of Rivers State.
The government also insists that it is only Rivers State that is entitled to receive the full allocation of the distributable revenue from the oil wells on the basis of the 13% derivation as contained under Section 162 of the 1999 Constitution.
The Rivers State Government sought an order of mandatory injunction directing the AGF to calculate, to its satisfaction, and refund to it, all revenue that has been wrongly attributed to or paid to Imo State on account of the limit or extent of their territories, including earnings due to it from revenue derived from Akri and Mbede oil wells.
The Plaintiff also sought an order of injunction directing the AGF to withdraw from circulation its Administrative Map 10,11 and 12th editions and to refrain from relying on any of the said maps for the purpose of determining the boundary between Rivers and Imo states.
The Rivers State Government also applied for another order of mandatory injunction directing the AGF to produce an administrative map bearing the correct boundary between Rivers and Imo states.
A sum of N500million was also sought as the cost of prosecuting the case.