Wike’s Zero Tolerance For Administrative Flops

Beyond his serial admonitions to government officials to step up their game with respect to fostering good governance, the Executive Governor of the Rivers State, Chief Nyesom Wike has demonstrated with action, his commitment to zero tolerance for administrative flops in governance. A key feature of his agenda in that respect is his promptness to respond to public service challenges as and when due. Throughout his first tenure, this trait was clearly manifest in virtually all his engagements, be such in policy articulation, programme implementation as well as project execution. The unmistakable dividends of such a disposition are there for all to see in the quality of service delivery recorded in the harvest of projects and programmes to his credit. Against the determined enterprise of an opposition lobby that was intent to run his administration out of town, Wike prevailed in writing his name in gold as a focused leader that was made of sterner stuff.
In a development that is progressively defining his first term as a learning season, the second term has commenced with tell-tale signs that he intends to run it on a high gear and transform the culture of public service delivery in the Rivers State. This disposition has dawned on some state officials in an uncommon manner, complete with the attendant reverberations. Among the topical instances was the ultimatum given to government operatives were the Andoni Local Government officials and chiefs in June to ensure the release of three kidnapped expatriates working on a development project in the area or face appropriate sanctions. By the same token, he warned other communities in the state that similar response from the government would follow in any instance of administrative incongruences, that put the state in bad light.
Closely following the Andoni case was that of Ogbakiri where a long standing land dispute between the Rumuoro and Okporowo communities was seeding to start another round of inter-communal hostilities between them. Even in this case, Wike read the riot act and left no one in doubt over his disposition towards any flashpoint of crisis across the state. Needless to state that his deft approach to resolution of such avoidable crises in these two cases has rubbed off on many communities that faced similarly incipient tendencies.
However, Wike’s deft and prompt response to public service contingencies manifested in the mainstream public bureaucracy with the recent removal from office of a serving Permanent Secretary in the Rivers State Ministry of Transport, Samuel Eguma, as well as both the Vice Chancellor of the Rivers State University, Professor Blessing Didia and the Deputy Vice Chancellor (Administration), Professor Magnus Oruwari, over developments that put the Rivers State in bad light. The circumstances of the recently disengaged officers draw strong connection with the theme of the ongoing campaign to reposition the state as launched by the Rivers State Ministry of Information and Communications, with the hashtag “#OurStateOurResponsibiity”, ably driven by the Permanent Secretary, Pastor Paulinus Nsirim.
In its essence, Wike’s actions so far point to his inclination to redirect government business along the state to the proper setting of responsible service delivery. Public service delivery should rightly be seen by responsible officials and operatives in line with the prompt discharge of stated actions and relevant procedures that would promote public good. Hence, whichever government official in Rivers State that does not share this perspective, is technically misreading the governor’s agenda, and has himself or herself to blame in the circumstance of any adverse consequence of such indiscretion.
With due respect to the public officers at various levels across the Rivers State and even the entire country, every position in the country’s public office has extant rules covering the discharge of the associated duties. Failure in service delivery occurs when officers abdicate their legitimate responsibilities and allow public business to suffer. This is the message of Wike’s agenda for his administration as demonstrated during his first tenure and is in continuum with the second term.
It has been severally advocated that much of the seemingly intractable challenges – particularly that of insecurity facing the country today, are simply latter-day manifestations of issues that were left untreated in the past, and have mutated into more odious forms with time. Had decisive action been carried out as and when due in the past, some of these present day challenges would not be around.
In the same vein, present day pubic officers need to appreciate the need for discretion in their service delivery actions, as such will affect society tomorrow. Ensuring rectitude in the conduct of public business today remains the central message of Wike’s agenda for governance. And he could not have been more justified.