FG’s $406.7m Suit Against Shell Adjourned To Oct 9

A Federal High Court in Lagos, yesterday, adjourned until October 9, the alleged crude oil shipment brought by the Federal Government against Shell Western Supply and Trading Ltd.
The adjournment followed the absence of the trial Judge, Justice Mojisola Olatoregun, during proceedings, yesterday.
The suit was filed by the Federal Government’s Counsel, Prof Fabian Ajogwu (SAN), and Shell Petroleum Development Company of Nig Ltd and its subsidiary, Shell Western Supply and Trading Ltd were joined as co-defendants.
The Federal Government is claiming $406.7million from the defendants as the shortfall of money paid for crude oil lifted between 2013 and 2014.
The plaintiff, in its supporting affidavit, accused the Anglo-Dutch oil major of not declaring or under-declaring crude oil shipments during the period.
It said the discovery followed a forensic analysis of bills of laden and shipping documents, adding that Shell had cheated Nigeria of the revenue.
It added that the consortium of experts tracked the global movements of the country’s hydro-carbons, including crude oil and gas.
The experts, it said, identified the companies engaged in the practices that led to missing revenues from crude oil and gas export sales to different parts of the world.
They also revealed discrepancies in the export records from Nigeria with the import records at U.S ports.
The plaintiff averred that the undeclared shipments between January 2013 and December 2014 brought the total value of the entire shortfall to $406.75 million.
The defendants were said to have failed to respond to a Federal Government’s letter through its legal representative, seeking clarification to the discrepancies.
The Federal Government is, therefore, seeking a court order to compel the two companies to pay $406.75 million, being the total value of the missing revenue and interest payment at 21 per cent per annum.
In addition, the government is also asking Shell to pay general exemplary damages of $406.75 million as well as the cost of the legal action.