Jega And The Challenges Of Credible Polls

Last Tuesday, Nigerian President Goodluck Ebele Jonathan nominated and submitted to the Senate for approval, Prof Attahiru Jega as the chairman of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), thus ending weeks of speculations, anxiety, lobbying and name-dropping over the replacement of Prof Maurice Iwu, the former INEC boss.

Before the much awaited screening, by the National Assembly on June 28, the Council of States had in its meeting in Abuja last week, overwhelmingly endorsed the president’s nominee.

Since then, Jega’s nomination, has continued to attract applause from all strata of society, apparently, because of his integrity, academic track record and human rights activist pedigree, being a former chairman of Academic Staff Union of Universities (ASUU) and incumbent vice chancellor, Bayero University, Kano (BUK). Indeed, we join all other well-meaning Nigerians to salute Jega’s nomination which if endorsed by the National Assembly will make him first person from the North to be Nigeria’s Chief electoral umpire.

We also commend President Jonathan for keeping to his promise of giving Nigerians a creditable person to superintend over affairs of the INEC at this momentous time of Nigeria’s march to a true democracy, through an electoral process where all voters must count. We see the nomination of Attahiru Jega, variously described as a man of letters, integrity and vanguard of human rights as the nation’s chief electoral umpire as a signpost of good things to come and a determination pm Jonathan’s part to deliver to Nigerians and the international community an electoral process and outcome to be proud of.

No doubt, the antecedents and credentials of Attahiru Jega are very intimidating and speak volumes of his accounability. But we believe, without any fear of contradictions, that the former BUK Vice Chancellor and human rights activist needs more than an impressive academic and human rights record and pedigree to make the much expected difference in the national assignment.

We say so because all Jega’s predecessors in the office with similar shinning credentials were known to have conducted questionable elections and ended their tenures without national honours. Right from the tenure of Chief Eyo Esua as the first indigenous chief electoral umpire in 1964 to his succssors (in a descending order), Chief Michael Ani, Justice Victor Ovie Whisky, Prof Eme Awa, Prof Humphrey Nwosu, Prof Okon Uya, Chief Sumner Dagogo-Jack, Justice Fayuyitan Oluyemi, Justice Ephraim Akpata, Dr Abel Guobadia and the last, Prof Maurice Iwu, Nigeria has had disputed elections of disgraceful dimensions, some of which are yet to be resolved, more than three years after their conduct.

Actually, this is not a healthy environment and Nigerians are hopeful that this time around, Jega and his team prevent, another painful walk down that road again. With less than nine months to the 2011 general elections, the task before Jega is by no means a challenging and Herculean one. Luckily enough, Jega’s new job is a familiar terrain, having been consultant to Prof Iwu-led INEC and a member of Hon Justice Uwais panel on electoral reforms, and should bring his wealth of experience to bear on his new assignment.

The first step towards succedding where others failed is for Jega to work towards the institutionalization of the electoral reforms as recommended by Uwais Electoral Reform report. This will put the electoral commission and its operators in a stable position to effectively check electoral flaws and system failure. Jega’s predecessors failed not because they had no good pedigree, but largely due to what could be dubbed “system errors” especially among the operators of the electoral system. Therefore, it will not be out of place to insist that the federal government gives Jega free hand to assemble transparent people to work with if for nothing else, to help checkmate dubious politicians who might not like to play by the rules. For, we believe that if those going to work with Jega’s INEC, like National Commissioners and the Resident Electoral Commissioners (RECs) are not men and women of integrity, then every effort by the new INEC boss at making a difference will be a wasted one.

The Tide is aware that one of the problems of INEC is poor funding. This time around, the Federal Government, should as a matter of urgency, ensure adequate funding of the commission as and when due to enable it deliver the much-needed free, fair and credible elections. The issues of revalidation of voters register, delineation of wards, etc, should be of immediate concern to INEC this time around. A situation, for instance, in which registered voters cannot find their names on the register displayed in their areas of primary residency, as was common place in the past, cannot only discourage participatory democracy but also give wrong signals that the electoral process lacks the necessary credibility, hence the loss of hope for better Nigeria. Therefore, INEC must address the problem now as such will go a long way in rekindling the hope of the ordinary Nigerian on the electoral process.

Above all, INEC in conjunction with the National Orientation Agency (NOA), should urgently, commence sensitization of Nigerians in order to inculcate in them good electoral values. It must also include INEC staff who are often gullible and some times tempted to compromise their integrity.

Even with the seemingly shot time at his disposal, Jega, a consensus builder should learn from the mistakes of the past and bring to bear courage, independence and integrity necessary to lead INEC. The right leadership and strong political will to make the electoral system work must be brought to bear. We expect fundamental improvements on the conduct of future elections. That way, the confidence of Nigerians on the system can be restored and this will nurture the democratic project.